Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg ; 19(5): 841-849, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704793

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Deep learning-based analysis of micro-ultrasound images to detect cancerous lesions is a promising tool for improving prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. An ideal model should confidently identify cancer while responding with appropriate uncertainty when presented with out-of-distribution inputs that arise during deployment due to imaging artifacts and the biological heterogeneity of patients and prostatic tissue. METHODS: Using micro-ultrasound data from 693 patients across 5 clinical centers who underwent micro-ultrasound guided prostate biopsy, we train and evaluate convolutional neural network models for PCa detection. To improve robustness to out-of-distribution inputs, we employ and comprehensively benchmark several state-of-the-art uncertainty estimation methods. RESULTS: PCa detection models achieve performance scores up to 76 % average AUROC with a 10-fold cross validation setup. Models with uncertainty estimation obtain expected calibration error scores as low as 2 % , indicating that confident predictions are very likely to be correct. Visualizations of the model output demonstrate that the model correctly identifies healthy versus malignant tissue. CONCLUSION: Deep learning models have been developed to confidently detect PCa lesions from micro-ultrasound. The performance of these models, determined from a large and diverse dataset, is competitive with visual analysis of magnetic resonance imaging, the clinical benchmark to identify PCa lesions for targeted biopsy. Deep learning with micro-ultrasound should be further studied as an avenue for targeted prostate biopsy.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Ultrasonography/methods , Neural Networks, Computer , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods
2.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg ; 19(6): 1121-1128, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598142

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The standard of care for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis is the histopathological analysis of tissue samples obtained via transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy. Models built with deep neural networks (DNNs) hold the potential for direct PCa detection from TRUS, which allows targeted biopsy and subsequently enhances outcomes. Yet, there are ongoing challenges with training robust models, stemming from issues such as noisy labels, out-of-distribution (OOD) data, and limited labeled data. METHODS: This study presents LensePro, a unified method that not only excels in label efficiency but also demonstrates robustness against label noise and OOD data. LensePro comprises two key stages: first, self-supervised learning to extract high-quality feature representations from abundant unlabeled TRUS data and, second, label noise-tolerant prototype-based learning to classify the extracted features. RESULTS: Using data from 124 patients who underwent systematic prostate biopsy, LensePro achieves an AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity of 77.9%, 85.9%, and 57.5%, respectively, for detecting PCa in ultrasound. Our model shows it is effective for detecting OOD data in test time, critical for clinical deployment. Ablation studies demonstrate that each component of our method improves PCa detection by addressing one of the three challenges, reinforcing the benefits of a unified approach. CONCLUSION: Through comprehensive experiments, LensePro demonstrates its state-of-the-art performance for TRUS-based PCa detection. Although further research is necessary to confirm its clinical applicability, LensePro marks a notable advancement in enhancing automated computer-aided systems for detecting prostate cancer in ultrasound.


Subject(s)
Neural Networks, Computer , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography/methods , Deep Learning , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL