Triple Combination Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Adapalene 0.15%/Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1% for Acne: Efficacy and Safety from a Pooled Phase 3 Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: A three-pronged approach to acne treatment combining an antibiotic, antimicrobial, and retinoid may be more efficacious than single/double treatments while potentially reducing antibiotic resistance. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the first fixed-dose, triple-combination topical acne product, clindamycin 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 3.1% gel (CAB) using pooled phase 3 data. METHODS: In two identical phase 3 (N = 183; N = 180), double-blind, 12-week studies, participants aged ≥ 9 years with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized 2:1 to receive once-daily CAB or vehicle gel. Endpoints included ≥ 2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator's Global Severity Score and clear/almost clear skin (treatment success) and least-squares mean percent change from baseline in acne lesion counts. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and cutaneous safety/tolerability were evaluated. RESULTS: At week 12, 50.0% of participants achieved treatment success with CAB versus 22.6% with vehicle gel (P < 0.001). CAB resulted in > 70% reductions in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions at week 12 (77.9% and 73.0%, respectively), which were significantly greater than vehicle (57.9% and 48.2%; P < 0.001, both). Most TEAEs were of mild-moderate severity, and < 3% of CAB-treated participants discontinued study/treatment because of AEs. Transient increases from baseline in scaling, erythema, itching, burning, and stinging were observed with CAB, but resolved back to or near baseline values by week 12. CONCLUSIONS: The innovative fixed-dose, triple-combination clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/BPO 3.1% gel was efficacious and well tolerated in children, adolescents, and adults with moderate-to-severe acne. Half of participants achieved clear/almost clear skin by 12 weeks, rates not previously seen in clinical studies of other topical acne products. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04214639 and NCT04214652.

Treatments for Moderate-to-Severe Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple treatment options exist for the management of moderate-to-severe acne. However, the comparative effectiveness (efficacy/safety) of moderate-to-severe acne treatments has not been systematically examined. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials of ≥4 weeks of treatment (topical, oral, physical, or combinations) for moderate-to-severe facial acne in patients aged ≥9 years. Efficacy outcomes included: percentage of patients achieving ≥2-grade reduction from baseline and “clear” or “almost clear” for global severity score (treatment success); absolute change in inflammatory (ILs reduction); and noninflammatory lesion counts (NILs reduction). A random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted for the efficacy outcomes. Treatments were ranked with posterior rank plots and surface under cumulative ranking values.  Results: Eighty-five studies were included in the SLR/NMA. Topical triple-agent fixed-dose combination (FDC) gel (clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1%) and combinations of double-agent fixed-dose topical treatments with oral antibiotics (TOA3) consistently ranked in the top 3 treatments. Topical triple-agent FDC gel was numerically superior to TOA3 for treatment success (log-odds ratios: 1.84 [95% credible interval (CrI) 1.36 to 2.29]) and 1.69 (95% CrI: 1.01 to 2.32) vs placebo/vehicle). TOA3 was numerically superior to topical triple-agent FDC gel for reduction of ILs (mean difference: -8.21 [-10.33 to -6.13]) and -10.40 [-13.44 to -7.14] vs placebo/vehicle) and NILs (mean difference: -13.41 [-16.69 to -10.32] and -17.74 [-22.56 to -12.85] vs placebo/vehicle). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this SLR/NMA, topical triple-agent FDC gel was the most efficacious and safe treatment for moderate-to-severe acne. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(4):     doi:10.36849/JDD.8148.

Rosacea Core Domain Set for Clinical Trials and Practice: A Consensus Statement.

Importance: Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of rosacea is impeding and likely preventing accurate data pooling and meta-analyses. There is a need for standardization of outcomes assessed during intervention trials of rosacea. Objective: To develop a rosacea core outcome set (COS) based on key domains that are globally relevant and applicable to all demographic groups to be used as a minimum list of outcomes for reporting by rosacea clinical trials, and when appropriate, in clinical practice. Evidence Review: A systematic literature review of rosacea clinical trials was conducted. Discrete outcomes were extracted and augmented through discussions and focus groups with key stakeholders. The initial list of 192 outcomes was refined to identify 50 unique outcomes that were rated through the Delphi process Round 1 by 88 panelists (63 physicians from 17 countries and 25 patients with rosacea in the US) on 9-point Likert scale. Based on feedback, an additional 11 outcomes were added in Round 2. Outcomes deemed to be critical for inclusion (rated 7-9 by ≥70% of both groups) were discussed in consensus meetings. The outcomes deemed to be most important for inclusion by at least 85% of the participants were incorporated into the final core domain set. Findings: The Delphi process and consensus-building meetings identified a final core set of 8 domains for rosacea clinical trials: ocular signs and symptoms; skin signs of disease; skin symptoms; overall severity; patient satisfaction; quality of life; degree of improvement; and presence and severity of treatment-related adverse events. Recommendations were also made for application in the clinical setting. Conclusions and Relevance: This core domain set for rosacea research is now available; its adoption by researchers may improve the usefulness of future trials of rosacea therapies by enabling meta-analyses and other comparisons across studies. This core domain set may also be useful in clinical practice.

Early and Sustained Acne Lesion Reductions With Fixed-Dose Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Adapalene 0.15%/Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1% Gel.

BACKGROUND: A once-daily, three-pronged approach using an antibiotic, antibacterial, and retinoid may provide faster acne improvement versus monotherapy or dual-combination products. This post hoc analysis compared threshold acne lesion reductions with clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1% (CAB) gel—the first FDA-approved triple-combination topical acne product—to its dyads and vehicle. METHODS: Phase 2 (N=741; NCT03170388) and phase 3 (N=183; N=180; NCT04214639; NCT04214652), double-blind, 12-week studies randomized participants aged ≥9 years with moderate-to-severe acne to once-daily CAB or vehicle gel; the phase 2 study included three additional dyad gel arms. The pooled percentage of participants achieving ≥33%, ≥50%, and ≥75% reduction in inflammatory and noninflammatory acne lesions was evaluated. RESULTS: As early as week 4 in the phase 2 study, ≥33% reduction in inflammatory lesions occurred in a significantly greater percentage of CAB gel-treated participants (82.7%) than with the 3 dyads and vehicle (61.1-69.8%; P<0.05, all). These early reductions were sustained throughout the study, with significantly (P<0.05) more CAB-treated participants achieving ≥50% reduction in inflammatory lesions versus dyads and vehicle from weeks 4-12. By week 12, CAB led to substantial reductions of ≥75% in significantly more participants than dyads and vehicle (65.8% vs 49.9-51.2% and 21.6%; P<0.05, all). Similar trends were observed for noninflammatory lesions in the phase 2 study and for inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions in the phase 3 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion count reductions were significantly greater with CAB versus its dyads and vehicle gel as early as week 4, with substantial reductions observed after 12 weeks of treatment. This faster-acting and sustained efficacy of CAB gel—coupled with its optimized formulation, once-daily dosing, and tolerability—may positively impact treatment adherence. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(3):     doi:10.36849/JDD.7907.

Microencapsulated Benzoyl Peroxide for Rosacea in Context: A Review of the Current Treatment Landscape.

Rosacea, a chronic skin condition affecting millions of people in the USA, leads to significant social and professional stigmatization. Effective management strategies are crucial to alleviate symptoms and improve patients' quality of life. Encapsulated benzoyl peroxide 5% (E-BPO 5%) is a newly FDA-approved topical treatment for rosacea that shows promise in enhancing therapeutic response and minimizing skin irritation. This review aims to assess the role of recently FDA approved E-BPO 5% in the current treatment landscape for rosacea management, as it is not yet included in clinical guidelines that predominantly rely on older approved therapies. The review focuses on randomized controlled trials conducted in English-speaking adults. It evaluates the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of various US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agents used for rosacea treatment, including E-BPO cream, metronidazole gel, azelaic acid gel and foam, ivermectin cream, minocycline foam, oral doxycycline, brimonidine gel, and oxymetazoline HCl cream. Existing therapies have been effective in reducing papulopustular lesions and erythema associated with rosacea for many years. E-BPO 5% offers a promising addition to the treatment options due to its microencapsulation technology, which prolongs drug delivery time and aims to improve therapeutic response while minimizing skin irritation. Further research is necessary to determine the exact role of E-BPO 5% in the therapeutic landscape for rosacea. However, based on available evidence, E-BPO 5% shows potential as a valuable treatment option for managing inflammatory lesions of rosacea, and it may offer benefits to patients including: rapid onset of action, demonstrated efficacy by Week 2, excellent tolerability, and sustained long-term results for up to 52 weeks of treatment.

New Insights Into Systemic Drivers of Inflammation and Their Contributions to the Pathophysiology of Acne.

Acne Vulgaris (AV) is a prominent skin disease commonly affecting teenagers. It often persists into adulthood and is associated with adverse physical and psychosocial impacts. The pathophysiology of AV is conventionally correlated with 4 factors within and around the pilosebaceous unit: increased sebum production, follicular hyperkeratinization, Cutibacterium acnes proliferation, and localized immune responses. As such, conventional therapeutic approaches for AV have primarily focused on these factors. In addition to this primarily localized pathophysiology, there is a progressively emerging body of evidence indicating that underlying systemic factors contributing to a generalized immuno-inflammatory response can contribute to or exacerbate AV. In this article, we introduce and provide the supporting data, for 6 patient-centric systems that may be implicated in the development of AV: psycho-emotional stress, diet and metabolism, dysbiosis of the gut and skin microbiome, hormonal fluctuations, oxidative stress, and immune response. Identifying these pathways and their contributions in a patient-centric approach may provide expanded therapeutic opportunities for treating patients with AV. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(2):90-96.   doi:10.36849/JDD.8137.

INDIVIDUAL ARTICLE: Impact of Acne Vulgaris and Sarecycline on Social/Emotional Functioning and Daily Activities: PROSES Study.

BACKGROUND: Concise patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments addressing the consequences of facial acne vulgaris (AV) on patients’ functioning and activities of daily living (ADL) are needed. METHODS: A 12-week, single-arm, prospective cohort study was conducted in patients ≥9 years old with moderate/severe non-nodular facial AV prescribed sarecycline as part of usual care. The primary endpoint included AV-specific patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes assessed with the expert panel questionnaire (EPQ, developed by 10 experts using a Delphi method) in patients (>12 years) and caregivers (for patients 9-11 years). Additional assessments included parental/caregiver perspectives on children’s AV. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients completed the study. Following 12-weeks of treatment, there were significant (P ≤.0001) changes from baseline in the proportion of patients responding that they never or rarely: felt angry (31.6%), worried about AV worsening (28.9%), had thoughts about AV (20.9%), had a certain level of worries about AV (38.7%), altered their social media/selfie activity (23.7%), had an impact on real-life plans due to AV (22.9%), made efforts to hide AV (21.3%), felt picked-on/judged due to AV (15.0%), were concerned about their ability to reach future goals due to AV (13.8%), or had sleep impacted due to AV (18.2%). No significant change from baseline was observed for parent/caregiver’s understanding of the child’s AV concerns, from both patient and parent/caregiver perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: Over 12 weeks of AV management with oral sarecycline, patients reported significant reductions in AV-related effects on emotional/social functioning and ADL as measured by the EPQ, a simple PRO with potential for use in clinical practice. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23:1(Suppl 1):s4-11.

INDIVIDUAL ARTICLE: Sarecycline Improves Acne Severity, Symptoms, and Psychosocial Burden in Non-nodular Acne Vulgaris: PROSES Study.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are emerging as a fundamental component of disease impact assessment in acne vulgaris (AV), complementing clinician-reported outcomes. No data is available on PROs for patients with AV using sarecycline in real-world settings. METHODS: A single-arm, prospective cohort study that included patients ≥9 years old diagnosed with moderate or severe non-nodular AV was implemented as part of routine care in clinical practices (N=30). Patients received oral sarecycline (60 mg, 100 mg, or 150 mg) for 12 weeks, as part of usual care. The primary endpoint was Acne Symptom and Impact Scale (ASIS) responses from patients (≥12 years) and caregivers (for patients 9-11 years) at week 12 and change from baseline (CFB). Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) of AV severity and adverse events (AEs) were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients with AV completed the study (adults: 60.1%, females: 77.6%). ASIS mean scores significantly decreased (P <.0001) at week 12 for: signs (mean CFB ± standard deviation [SD]: –0.8 ± 0.7), impact (–1.0 ± 1.0), emotional impact (–1.2 ± 1.1), and social impact (0.6 ± 1.1). Significant reductions in AV severity (P <.0001) were reported by patients and caregivers. The IGA success rate was 58.9% and physician satisfaction with treatment outcomes was 88.1%. A total of 31 (10.3%) patients reported ≥1 AE during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate-to-severe AV receiving acne management with an oral antibiotic for 12 weeks experienced a significant improvement in AV-related symptoms and psychosocial burden. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23:1(Suppl 1):s12-18.

A Review of the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Gaps in Rosacea Management: Consensus Opinion.

Rosacea is a common, chronic inflammatory disease characterized by both fluctuating and fixed heterogeneous signs such as facial erythema, papules/pustules, telangiectasia, acute vasodilation (flushing), and phymatous changes, and symptoms such as cutaneous stinging and burning. The shift to a phenotype-based approach to rosacea management has improved the consistency of recommendations across recent published guidelines. Consistent and thorough guidance for the classification, diagnosis, and management of the disease is difficult, as the mechanisms underlying the development of rosacea are still not completely understood nor universally accepted. Here, we provide a critical review of current published guidance, and gaps in the knowledge and management of rosacea. We present the recently approved microencapsulated benzoyl peroxide as an effective topical treatment option for papulopustular rosacea. Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) has been used in acne management for many years; however, many clinicians perceive treatment of rosacea with any BPO formulation to be counterintuitive because of concerns of potential skin irritation, while the lack of an accepted mechanism of action on rosacea pathophysiology means that others may be hesitant to use BPO as a treatment. Minocycline foam 1.5% is also an option for the treatment of inflammatory lesions in rosacea, with a decreased risk of systemic adverse events compared with oral minocycline.

Influence of Season on Efficacy and Tolerability of Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion for the Treatment of Acne.

Objective: The condition of the skin can vary due to weather fluctuations. Therefore, this post-hoc analysis evaluated efficacy and safety of tazarotene 0.045% lotion in warmer versus colder months. Methods: In two Phase III, double-blind, 12-week studies, participants aged nine years or older with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized 1:1 to once-daily tazarotene or vehicle lotion. The pooled population (N=1,614) was stratified by randomization date (warmer=May to September; colder=October to April). Evaluations included inflammatory/noninflammatory lesion counts, treatment success, adverse events, and safety/tolerability. Results: Tazarotene 0.045% lotion was similarly efficacious over colder and warmer months. Compared with vehicle, tazarotene demonstrated significantly greater least-squares mean absolute reductions from baseline to Week 12 in inflammatory (colder/warmer tazarotene vs. vehicle: -16.6/-15.8 vs. -13.2/-12.9) and noninflammatory lesions (-23.2/-22.6 vs. -17.5/-15.1); treatment success rates were also significantly higher (30.1/30.8% vs. 18.2/17.6%) (P<0.001, all). No strong seasonal trends in safety were observed, though tazarotene led to slightly more discontinuations (3.4% vs. 1.9%) and related adverse events (12.0% vs. 10.3%) in colder versus warmer months. Transient increases in scaling, erythema, and itching at Weeks 2 to 8 of tazarotene treatment were slightly higher in colder versus warmer months but returned to baseline/improved by Week 12. Limitations: Geographical variation across study sites can lead to varying temperatures and humidity within the same months. Conclusion: Tazarotene 0.045% lotion was efficacious and well tolerated for acne treatment, regardless of season. Year-round tolerability of tazarotene 0.045% lotion may be due to its lower tazarotene concentration and polymeric emulsion technology, which simultaneously delivers moisturizers/humectants/emollients to skin.

The Personalized Acne Treatment Tool - Recommendations to facilitate a patient-centered approach to acne management from the Personalizing Acne: Consensus of Experts.

Background: Acne, a commonly treated skin disease, requires patient-centered management due to its varying presentations, chronicity, and impact on health-related quality of life. Despite this, evidence-based clinical guidelines focus primarily on clinical severity of facial acne, omitting important patient- and disease-related factors, including ongoing management. Objectives: To generate recommendations to support patient-centered acne management, which incorporate priority and prognostic factors beyond conventional clinical severity, traditionally defined by grading the appearance and extent of visible lesions. Methods: The Personalizing Acne: Consensus of Experts consisted of 17 dermatologists who used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements regarding patient- and treatment-related factors pertaining to patient-centered acne management. Consensus was defined as ≥75% voting "agree" or "strongly agree." Results: Recommendations based on factors such as acne sequelae, location of acne, high burden of disease, and individual patient features were generated and incorporated into the Personalized Acne Treatment Tool. Limitations: Recommendations are based on expert opinion, which may differ from patients' perspectives. Regional variations in healthcare systems may not be represented. Conclusions: The Personalizing Acne: Consensus of Experts panel provided practical recommendations to facilitate individualized management of acne, based on patient features, which can be implemented to improve treatment outcomes, adherence, and patient satisfaction.

Sixty Years of Benzoyl Peroxide Use in Dermatology.

BACKGROUND: Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) has been used extensively in industry and health care for more than a century and has been approved for the treatment of acne for over 60 years. Recently, BPO received a second approved indication by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of rosacea. Topical BPO use has historically been limited by tolerability, photosensitivity, oxidation, and, uncommonly, contact allergy. Research has led to enhanced efficacy and tolerability, as well as the combination of BPO with other topical medications. These advances have allowed extended use of BPO in additional dermatologic conditions that may not have been feasible in the past. Additionally, the role of BPO in preventing antibiotic resistance cannot be underestimated. Here, we discuss the historical limitations of BPO and recent advances developed to overcome these limitations. We also describe newly approved BPO medications and their role in aiding antibiotic stewardship. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(1):54-59. doi:10.36849/JDD.7150.

Reduced blood-brain barrier penetration of acne vulgaris antibiotic sarecycline compared to minocycline corresponds with lower lipophilicity.

Background: Vestibular side effects such as dizziness and vertigo can be a limitation for some antibiotics commonly used to treat acne, rosacea, and other dermatology indications. Objective: Unlike minocycline, which is a second-generation tetracycline, sarecycline, a narrow-spectrum third-generation tetracycline-class agent approved to treat acne vulgaris, has demonstrated low rates of vestibular-related adverse events in clinical trials. In this work, we evaluate the brain-penetrative and lipophilic attributes of sarecycline in 2 non-clinical studies and discuss potential associations with vestibular adverse events. Methods: Rats received either intravenous sarecycline or minocycline (1.0 mg/kg). Blood-brain penetrance was measured at 1, 3, and 6 h postdosing. In another analysis, the lipophilicity of sarecycline, minocycline, and doxycycline was measured via octanol/water and chloroform/water distribution coefficients (logD) at pH 3.5, 5.5, and 7.4. Results: Unlike minocycline, sarecycline was not detected in brain samples postdosing. In the octanol/water solvent system, sarecycline had a numerically lower lipophilicity profile than minocycline and doxycycline at pH 5.5 and 7.4. Conclusion: The reduced blood-brain penetrance and lipophilicity of sarecycline compared with other tetracyclines may explain low rates of vestibular-related adverse events seen in clinical trials.

Supplement Article: The Role of Epidermal Barrier Dysfunction and Cutaneous Microbiome Dysbiosis in the Pathogenesis and Management of Acne Vulgaris and Rosacea.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of either the cutaneous microbiome (CM) or epidermal barrier function (EBF) is thought to play an increasingly important role in acne vulgaris (AV) and rosacea pathogenesis. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature regarding epidermal barrier dysfunction (EBD) and cutaneous dysbiosis in AV and rosacea and provide clinical pearls for dermatologists. METHODS: A Medline literature search was performed for relevant literature regarding EBD and dysbiosis and either AV or rosacea. An expert consensus panel was then convened to discuss article merits and distill findings into clinical pearls. RESULTS: Final review included 138 articles. Puberty may alter natural stratum corneum lipid ratios, instigating and/or exacerbating EBD in AV. Patients with severe AV have an abundance of virulent Cutibacterium acnes phylotype IA1. EBD may manifest as classic signs of rosacea and improve with treatment. While several microbial populations are dysregulated in rosacea, the effect from any singular species is unclear. Current AV and rosacea treatment regimens may mitigate inflammation but may also indiscriminately damage CM and EBF. Physiologic moisturizers and cleansers that harness pre-/pro-/postbiotics may have a role in restoring CM, EBF, and potentially improving dermatosis severity. LIMITATIONS: Limited prospective clinical trial data especially regarding over-the-counter (OTC)/non-prescription skincare products. CONCLUSION: Appropriately developed prescription and OTC preparations may selectively influence the microbiome and potentially maintain/restore EBF. By understanding this relationship, dermatologists will be better able to educate patients on the importance of appropriate skin care.J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21:9(Suppl 2):s5-14.

Supplement Article: Skin Barrier Deficiency in Rosacea: An Algorithm Integrating OTC Skincare Products Into Treatment Regimens.

INTRODUCTION: Rosacea is a chronic condition involving inflammation leading to a diminished skin barrier function in sebaceous gland-rich facial skin. The current algorithm represents part II of a series investigating similar topics associated with preventing, treating, and maintaining rosacea, including ceramides-containing skincare. METHODS: The consensus process consisted of a modified Delphi technique. A previously published review by the US Cutaneous Rosacea Outcomes (USCRO) group on skin barrier deficiency in rosacea and the integration of over-the-counter (OTC) products and skincare recommended for rosacea treatment and maintenance informed the development of the current algorithm. The selected information from the literature searches, coupled with the USCRO group's opinion and experience, was used to develop, discuss, and reach a consensus on an evidence-based clinical treatment and maintenance algorithm focusing on rosacea phenotypes. RESULTS: The algorithm includes foundational measures to be taken by all patients with rosacea and rosacea-prone skin. These measures include education, behavioral modifications, avoidance of triggers and skin irritants, preventative skincare, and sun avoidance and sunscreen use. The algorithm further describes how assessment of skin condition and grading of cutaneous rosacea should take place during treatment and maintenance while the preventative measures continue. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription medications combined with gentle cleansers, moisturizers, and sunscreen support a successful rosacea therapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21:9(Suppl 1):s3-10.

Evaluation of Psychological Wellbeing and Social Impact of Combined Facial and Truncal Acne: a Multi-national, Mixed-Methods Study.

INTRODUCTION: Half of the individuals with facial acne develop truncal acne, but the impact of combined facial and truncal acne (CA) on patients' quality of life is poorly researched. METHODS: A 60-min interview of 30 participants with CA was conducted that formed the basis for a cross-sectional survey of 694 adolescents and adults with CA. RESULTS: The main themes identified from the qualitative interviews among CA subjects included acceptability to self and others, social functioning and emotional wellbeing. Feelings of embarrassment, self-consciousness and low confidence were experienced often or all the time by over 50% of participants, and were more frequent in those who perceived their acne to be out of control (P = 0.003). Half of patients reported feeling stigmatised because of their CA, and 65.4% believed that others associated their truncal acne with unhealthy or unhygienic habits. Perceived stigma was associated with more feelings of embarrassment (P = 0.005), self-consciousness (P = 0.034) and low self-confidence (P = 0.017). Overall, 64% participants reported that CA interfered with daily life, 46.4% often or always avoided social interaction, 48.6% were often concerned about talking to unfamiliar people and 47.4% were uncomfortable showing affection. Further, 32% and 24.4% participants ≥ 16 years old avoided dating or having romantic/intimate relationships because of their facial and truncal acne, respectively. Social and leisure activities were more frequently negatively impacted among those with perceived uncontrolled CA than among those with controlled CA. Avoiding undressing in front of spouse/partner/friends/relatives was more commonly reported by participants with perceived uncontrolled truncal acne than by those with controlled truncal acne (90.5% versus 80.6%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: CA is associated with considerable psychological morbidity, with several exacerbating (e.g. perceived stigma) and attenuating factors (e.g. acne being perceived as being under control) that should be accounted for in CA management.

Evaluation of psychological well-being and social impact of atrophic acne scarring: A multinational, mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Most people with acne are at risk of developing acne scars, but the impact of these scars on patients' quality of life is poorly researched. OBJECTIVE: To assess the perspective of patients with acne scars and the impact of these scars on their emotional well-being and social functioning. METHODS: A 60-minute interview of 30 adults with acne scars informed and contextualized the development of a cross-sectional survey of 723 adults with atrophic acne scars. RESULTS: The main themes identified in the qualitative interviews included acceptability to self and others, social functioning, and emotional well-being. In the cross-sectional survey, 31.6%, 49.6%, and 18.8% of the participants had mild, moderate, and severe/very severe acne scarring. The survey revealed that 25.7% of the participants felt less attractive, 27.5% were embarrassed or self-conscious because of their scars, 8.3% reported being verbally and/or physically abused because of their scars on a regular basis, and 15.9% felt that they were unfairly dismissed from work. In addition, 37.5% of the participants believed that their scars affected people's perceptions about them, and 19.7% of the participants were very bothered about hiding their scars daily. Moreover, 35.5% of the participants avoided public appearances, and 43.2% felt that their scars had negatively impacted their relationships. LIMITATIONS: The temporal evaluation of the impact was not estimated. CONCLUSION: Even mild atrophic acne scarring can evoke substantial emotional, social, and functional concerns.

Impact of Facial Atrophic Acne Scars on Quality of Life: A Multi-country Population-Based Survey.

BACKGROUND: Acne affects more than 80% of adolescents and young adults, who most often develop acne scars. Supporting data on the effect of acne scars on patient's health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine how the severity of acne scars impacts the HRQOL of afflicted individuals. METHODS: In this population-based cross-sectional study, 723 adults with facial acne scars but without active acne lesions self-completed the Self-assessment of Clinical Acne-Related Scars (SCARS) questionnaire formulated to investigate degree of acne scarring. The Facial Acne Scar Quality of Life (FASQoL), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Dysmorphic Concern Questionnaire (DCQ) were completed to assess the attitude of these patients toward their scars and the impact of scarring on their HRQOL. RESULTS: The mean (standard error) DLQI score for facial acne scars was 6.26 (0.22). Acne scars were considered a 'very large' or 'extremely large' concern by 19.3% of participants with mild scars as compared to 20.1% and 34.0% of participants with moderate and severe/very severe scars, respectively (P = 0.003). Higher FASQoL scores were associated with increased severity of scarring (P = 0.001). In total, 16.9% of participants had clinical features of dysmorphia (i.e., DCQ > 13). DCQ scores were significantly higher among participants with more severe scarring (mean DCQ score of 8.04 [0.28], 8.40 [0.18], and 10.13 [0.08] among participants with mild, moderate, and severe/very severe acne scars, respectively; P = 0.001). Most commonly reported signs of emotional distress were self-consciousness (68.0%) and worry about scars not going away (74.8%). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the significant psychosocial impact of atrophic acne scars in the form of embarrassment and self-consciousness. Individuals with mild scars also expressed significant impact on quality of life that increased with aggravation of scar severity. Patient-reported outcomes provide an insight into the physical, functional, and psychological impact of acne scarring from the patient's perspective.

Gaps and recommendations for clinical management of truncal acne from the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel.

BACKGROUND: Truncal acne is common and burdensome for patients; however, there is paucity of evidence and guidance for the management of truncal acne. Currently, clinical practice guidelines provide very little guidance on the assessment or management of truncal acne. OBJECTIVES: To identify unmet needs in truncal acne and make recommendations to address clinical and management gaps using an international consensus. METHODS: The Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel consisted of 13 dermatologists, who used a modified Delphi approach to reach a consensus on statements related to clinically relevant aspects of truncal acne evaluation and management. A consensus was defined as ≥75% of the panelists voting "agree" or "strongly agree." The voting was electronic and blinded. RESULTS: The panel identified gaps and made recommendations related to truncal acne identification, assessment, and grading; the evaluation of the impact on patients; and treatment goals and factors to be considered for its management. LIMITATIONS: The recommendations are based on expert opinion, in the absence of high-quality evidence. CONCLUSIONS: We highlighted addressing not just facial acne but also truncal acne during patient consultations. The recommendations made herein may help facilitate the care of patients who present with truncal acne, with or without facial acne.