Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 14(2): e0211119, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30730906

ABSTRACT

Identifying the presence of animals based on faecal deposits in modern and ancient environments is of primary importance to archaeologists, ecologists, forensic scientists, and watershed managers, but it has proven difficult to distinguish faecal material to the species level. Until now, four 5ß-stanols have been deployed as faecal biomarkers to distinguish between omnivores and herbivores, but they cannot distinguish between species. Here we present a database of faecal signatures from ten omnivore and herbivore species based on eleven 5ß-stanol compounds, which enables us to distinguish for the first time the faecal signatures of a wide range of animals. We validated this fingerprinting method by testing it on modern and ancient soil samples containing known faecal inputs and successfully distinguished the signatures of different omnivores and herbivores.


Subject(s)
Feces/chemistry , Mammals/classification , Mammals/metabolism , Sterols/analysis , Animals , Archaeology , Biomarkers/analysis , Carnivory , Databases, Chemical , Herbivory , History, 21st Century , History, Ancient , Humans , Russia , Siberia , Soil/chemistry , Species Specificity
2.
Sci Total Environ ; 610-611: 55-63, 2018 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28802110

ABSTRACT

This study identified sources of fecal contamination in three different French headwater and coastal catchments (the Justiçou, Pen an Traon, and La Fresnaye) using a combination of microbial source tracking tools. The tools included bacterial markers (three host-associated Bacteroidales) and chemical markers (six fecal stanols), which were monitored monthly over one or two years in addition to fecal indicator bacteria. 168 of the 240 freshwater and marine water samples had Escherichia coli (E. coli) or enterococci concentrations higher than "excellent" European water quality threshold. In the three catchments, the results suggested that the fecal contamination appeared to be primarily from an animal origin and particularly from a bovine origin in 52% (Rum2Bac) and 46% (Bstanol) of the samples and to a lesser extent from a porcine origin in 19% (Pig2Bac) and 21% (Pstanol) of the samples. Our results suggested a human fecal contamination in 56% (HF183) and 32% (Hstanol) of the samples. Rainfall also impacted the source identification of microbial contamination. In general, these findings could inform effective implementation of microbial source tracking strategies, specifically that the location of sampling points must include variability at the landscape scale.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring/methods , Water Microbiology , Water Pollution/analysis , Animals , Bacteroidetes , Cattle , Escherichia coli , Feces/microbiology , Humans , Swine , Water Quality
3.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 89(1-2): 40-48, 2014 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25455370

ABSTRACT

In this study, the capacity of oysters to bioaccumulate fecal stanols and to record a source-specific fingerprint was investigated by the short-term contamination of seawater microcosms containing oysters with a human effluent. Contaminated oysters bioaccumulated the typical fecal stanols coprostanol and 24-ethylcoprostanol and their bioaccumulation kinetics were similar to that of the Fecal Indicator Bacteria Escherichia coli used in European legislation. Although stanol fingerprints of contaminated water allowed the identification of the human specific fingerprint, this was not the case for oysters. This discrepancy is attributed to (i) high concentrations of endogenous cholestanol and sitostanol, responsible for "unbalanced" stanol fingerprints, (ii) different accumulation/depuration kinetics of fecal coprostanol and 24-ethylcoprostanol and (iii) the limits of the analytical pathway used. These results show that fecal stanols bioaccumulated by oysters are useful to record fecal contamination but the usefulness of stanol fingerprints to identify specific sources of contamination in shellfish currently seems limited.


Subject(s)
Cholestanol/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Feces/chemistry , Food Contamination/analysis , Ostreidae/chemistry , Shellfish , Sitosterols/analysis , Water Pollution/analysis , Animals , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Feces/microbiology , Humans , Ostreidae/microbiology , Seawater/chemistry , Seawater/microbiology
4.
Lipids ; 49(6): 597-607, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24771549

ABSTRACT

The objective of this work was to study the effects of washing and purification steps on qualitative and quantitative analysis of fecal stanols in the oyster Crassostrea gigas using either single or a combination of lipid purification steps on silica gel or aminopropyl bonded silica gel (NH2) or a washing step. Among the three analytical pathways compared, the two including water extraction or NH2 purification did not lead to higher recoveries and decreased repeatabilities of extractions compared to the single purification on silica gel. This latter led to similar recoveries (ca. 80%) and repeatabilities (ca. 10%) for both spiked standards (coprostanol and sitostanol). This analytical pathway has been applied to oysters collected in a harvesting area in Brittany (France) where fecal contaminations are important and allowed to quantify eight stanols in oysters. The relative proportions of fecal stanols of these oysters were combined with principal component analysis in order to investigate the usefulness of their stanol fingerprints to record a fecal contamination and to distinguish its source between human, porcine and bovine contaminations. Oysters non-fecally contaminated by Escherichia coli did not present specific stanol fingerprints while oysters fecally contaminated had a bovine fingerprint, suggesting a contamination of these samples by bovine sources. As a consequence, the method developed here allows the use of stanol fingerprints of oysters as a microbial source tracking tool that can be applied to shellfish harvesting areas subjected to fecal contaminations in order to identify the different sources of contamination and improve watershed management.


Subject(s)
Cholestanols/chemistry , Crassostrea/metabolism , Feces/chemistry , Sitosterols/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical/chemistry , Animals , Cholestanols/isolation & purification , Cholestanols/metabolism , Crassostrea/microbiology , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Feces/microbiology , France , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/standards , Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points , Humans , Liquid-Liquid Extraction/standards , Principal Component Analysis , Reference Standards , Sewage/chemistry , Sewage/microbiology , Sitosterols/isolation & purification , Sitosterols/metabolism , Water Microbiology , Water Pollutants, Chemical/isolation & purification , Water Pollutants, Chemical/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...