Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hear Res ; 315: 34-9, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24973579

ABSTRACT

The dynamics of cochlear excitotoxicity can be monitored from effects on the contralateral ear. After unilateral mechanical ablation of the cochlea (in a mouse model) we observed immediate elevations in auditory brainstem evoked response (ABR) thresholds in the contralateral ear. Threshold elevations peaked at 2-3 h post ablation, and returned to baseline levels after 5-6 h. These contralateral effects are initiated by cochlear afferent injury discharges most likely activating the olivocochlear efferent system. Six hours after cochlear injury, ABR thresholds were fully returned to pre-lesion baseline levels and remained normal for up to 10 days of monitoring. We have confirmed that our cochlear ablation procedure increases short-term activity levels in the auditory brainstem and midbrain using c-fos labelling. The study provides insight into the dynamics of glutamate excitotoxicity, a pathological process directly related to acute tinnitus after acoustic trauma, and more generally implicated in many types of brain injury and neuro-degenerative disease.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold/physiology , Cochlea/injuries , Cochlea/metabolism , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Neurotoxins/metabolism , Animals , Glutamates/metabolism , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred CBA , Models, Animal , Neurons, Efferent/physiology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos/metabolism , Time Factors
2.
Int J Otolaryngol ; 2014: 248187, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24672553

ABSTRACT

Newborn hearing screening is an established healthcare standard in many countries and testing is feasible using otoacoustic emission (OAE) recording. It is well documented that OAEs can be suppressed by acoustic stimulation of the ear contralateral to the test ear. In clinical otoacoustic emission testing carried out in a sound attenuating booth, ambient noise levels are low such that the efferent system is not activated. However in newborn hearing screening, OAEs are often recorded in hospital or clinic environments, where ambient noise levels can be 60-70 dB SPL. Thus, results in the test ear can be influenced by ambient noise stimulating the opposite ear. Surprisingly, in hearing screening protocols there are no recommendations for avoiding contralateral suppression, that is, protecting the opposite ear from noise by blocking the ear canal. In the present study we have compared transient evoked and distortion product OAEs measured with and without contralateral ear plugging, in environmental settings with ambient noise levels <25 dB SPL, 45 dB SPL, and 55 dB SPL. We found out that without contralateral ear occlusion, ambient noise levels above 55 dB SPL can significantly attenuate OAE signals. We strongly suggest contralateral ear occlusion in OAE based hearing screening in noisy environments.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL