Identification of clinically actionable variants from genome sequencing of families with congenital heart disease.

PURPOSE: Congenital heart disease (CHD) affects up to 1% of live births. However, a genetic diagnosis is not made in most cases. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of genome sequencing (GS) of a heterogeneous cohort of CHD patients. METHODS: Ninety-seven families with probands born with CHD requiring surgical correction were recruited for genome sequencing. At minimum, a proband-parents trio was sequenced per family. GS data were analyzed via a two-tiered method: application of a high-confidence gene screen (hcCHD), and comprehensive analysis. Identified variants were assessed for pathogenicity using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines. RESULTS: Clinically relevant genetic variants in known and emerging CHD genes were identified. The hcCHD screen identified a clinically actionable variant in 22% of families. Subsequent comprehensive analysis identified a clinically actionable variant in an additional 9% of families in genes with recent disease associations. Overall, this two-tiered approach provided a clinically relevant variant for 31% of families. CONCLUSIONS: Interrogating GS data using our two-tiered method allowed identification of variants with high clinical utility in a third of our heterogeneous cohort. However, association of emerging genes with CHD etiology, and development of novel technologies for variant assessment and interpretation, will increase diagnostic yield during future reassessment of our GS data.

A Screening Approach to Identify Clinically Actionable Variants Causing Congenital Heart Disease in Exome Data.

BACKGROUND: Congenital heart disease (CHD)-structural abnormalities of the heart that arise during embryonic development-is the most common inborn malformation, affecting ≤1% of the population. However, currently, only a minority of cases can be explained by genetic abnormalities. The goal of this study was to identify disease-causal genetic variants in 30 families affected by CHD. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing was performed with the DNA of multiple family members. We utilized a 2-tiered whole-exome variant screening and interpretation procedure. First, we manually curated a high-confidence list of 90 genes known to cause CHD in humans, identified predicted damaging variants in genes on this list, and rated their pathogenicity using American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines. RESULTS: In 3 families (10%), we found pathogenic variants in known CHD genes TBX5, TFAP2B, and PTPN11, explaining the cardiac lesions. Second, exomes were comprehensively analyzed to identify additional predicted damaging variants that segregate with disease in CHD candidate genes. In 10 additional families (33%), likely disease-causal variants were uncovered in PBX1, CNOT1, ZFP36L2, TEK, USP34, UPF2, KDM5A, KMT2C, TIE1, TEAD2, and FLT4. CONCLUSIONS: The pathogenesis of CHD could be explained using our high-confidence CHD gene list for variant filtering in a subset of cases. Furthermore, our unbiased screening procedure of family exomes implicates additional genes and variants in the pathogenesis of CHD, which suggest themselves for functional validation. This 2-tiered approach provides a means of (1) identifying clinically actionable variants and (2) identifying additional disease-causal genes, both of which are essential for improving the molecular diagnosis of CHD.

Clinical significance of circulating microRNAs as markers in detecting and predicting congenital heart defects in children.

BACKGROUND: Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are emerging as novel biomarkers for detecting cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we aimed to investigate the usefulness of miRNAs as biomarkers in diagnosing and predicting children with congenital heart defects (CHD), particularly in the context of multiple subtypes of CHD. METHODS: We recruited 26 families, each having a child with CHD and parents who do not have any cardiovascular disorder. 27 families unaffected by cardiovascular disease were also included as controls. Firstly, we screened 84 circulating miRNAs relating to cardiovascular development in 6 children with atrial septal defects (ASD) and 5 healthy children. We validated the selected miRNAs with differential expression in a larger sample size (n = 27 for controls, n = 26 for cases), and evaluated their signal in different types of septal defects. Finally, we examined the identified miRNAs signatures in the parent population and assessed their diagnostic values for predicting CHD. RESULTS: The three miRNAs hsa-let-7a, hsa-let-7b and hsa-miR-486 were significantly upregulated in children with ASD. A further validation study showed that overexpression of hsa-let-7a and hsa-let-7b was specifically present in ASD children, but not in children with other subtypes of septal defects. A similar expression profile of hsa-let-7a and hsa-let-7b was discovered in mothers of ASD children. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses indicated that hsa-let-7a and hsa-let-7b had significant diagnostic values for detecting ASD and in maternal samples predicting the occurrence of ASD in offspring. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating miRNAs are important markers not only for diagnosing CHD, but also for predicting CHD risk in offspring. The distinct miRNA signatures are likely to present in various subtypes of CHD, and the phenotypic heterogeneity of CHD should be considered to develop such miRNA-based assays.

Compliance with professional guidelines with reference to familial cancer services.

OBJECTIVE: Professional guidelines define the risk categorisation of patients for a genetic predisposition to cancer based on family history. These guidelines inform the appropriate referral of patients to specialist familial cancer services. Our study aimed to determine the quality of referral letters from general practitioners and specialists to genetic services for breast, ovarian and colorectal cancers, and their compliance with relevant professional guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective review of the referral letters and patient files of 241 consecutive patients referred between June and October 2008. RESULTS: Sufficient information to make a risk assessment was provided in 71% of referrals. Of these, 89% were compliant with guidelines. Genetic counsellors collected further information on 167 of the 241 referred patients and of these 83% were appropriate for referral according to guidelines. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Overall, referrals to familial cancer genetic services complied with professional referral guidelines. The majority of referrals were high quality, and with additional information, most patients were shown to be appropriate for review in a familial cancer clinic. Despite this, a better understanding of the reasons for non compliant referrals, and appropriate targeted education and resources is recommended to improve referral quality and compliance.