ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare disease severity and mortality differences between female and male patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). STUDY DESIGN: We queried the CDH Study Group (CDHSG) database for CDH neonates managed between 2007 and 2018. Female and males were compared in statistical analyses using t tests, χ² tests, and Cox regression, as appropriate (P ≤ .05). RESULTS: There were 7288 CDH patients, of which 3048 (41.8%) were female. Females weighed less on average at birth than males (2.84 kg vs 2.97 kg, P < .001) despite comparable gestational age. Females had similar rates of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) utilization (27.8% vs 27.3%, P = .65). Although both cohorts had equivalent defect size and rates of patch repair, female patients had increased rates of intrathoracic liver herniation (49.2% vs 45.9%, P = .01) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) (86.6% vs 81.1%, P < .001). Females had lower survival rates at 30-days (77.3% vs 80.1%, P = .003) and overall lower survival to discharge (70.2% vs 74.2%, P < .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that increased mortality was significant among those who underwent repair but were never supported on ECLS (P = .005). On Cox regression analysis, female sex was independently associated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.32, P = .02). CONCLUSION: After controlling for the established prenatal and postnatal predictors of mortality, female sex remains independently associated with a higher risk of mortality in CDH. Further study into the underlying causes for sex-specific disparities in CDH outcomes is warranted.
Subject(s)
Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital , Hypertension, Pulmonary , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Humans , Male , Female , Treatment Outcome , Proportional Hazards Models , Survival Rate , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine in-hospital morbidities for neonates with right-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia (R-CDH) compared with those with left-sided defects (L-CDH) and to examine the differential effect of laterality and defect size on morbidities. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective, multicenter, cohort study from the international Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group registry collected data from neonates with CDH surviving until hospital discharge from 90 neonatal intensive care units between January 1, 2007, and July 31, 2020. Major pulmonary, cardiac, neurologic, and gastrointestinal morbidities were compared between neonates with L-CDH and R-CDH, adjusted for prenatal and postnatal factors using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 4123 survivors with CDH, those with R-CDH (n = 598 [15%]) compared with those with L-CDH (n = 3525 [85%]) had an increased odds of pulmonary (1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-2.2, P < .0001), cardiac (1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P = .01), gastrointestinal (1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; P = .01), and multiple (1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0; P < .001) in-hospital morbidities, with a greater likelihood of morbidity with increasing defect size. There was no difference in neurologic morbidities between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neonates with R-CDH and a larger defect size are at an increased risk for in-hospital morbidities. Counseling and clinical strategies should incorporate knowledge of these risks, and approach to neonatal R-CDH should be distinct from current practices targeted to L-CDH.