Relevance of Protein Intake for Weaning in the Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill: Analysis of a Large International Database.

OBJECTIVES: The association between protein intake and the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) is controversial. We aimed to investigate the associations between protein intake and outcomes in ventilated critically ill patients. DESIGN: Analysis of a subset of a large international point prevalence survey of nutritional practice in ICUs. SETTING: A total of 785 international ICUs. PATIENTS: A total of 12,930 patients had been in the ICU for at least 96 hours and required MV by the fourth day after ICU admission at the latest. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We modeled associations between the adjusted hazard rate (aHR) of death in patients requiring MV and successful weaning (competing risks), and three categories of protein intake (low: < 0.8 g/kg/d, standard: 0.8-1.2 g/kg/d, high: > 1.2 g/kg/d). We compared five different hypothetical protein diets (an exclusively low protein intake, a standard protein intake given early (days 1-4) or late (days 5-11) after ICU admission, and an early or late high protein intake). There was no evidence that the level of protein intake was associated with time to weaning. However, compared with an exclusively low protein intake, a standard protein intake was associated with a lower hazard of death in MV: minimum aHR 0.60 (95% CI, 0.45-0.80). With an early high intake, there was a trend to a higher risk of death in patients requiring MV: maximum aHR 1.35 (95% CI, 0.99-1.85) compared with a standard diet. CONCLUSIONS: The duration of MV does not appear to depend on protein intake, whereas mortality in patients requiring MV may be improved by a standard protein intake. Adverse effects of a high protein intake cannot be excluded.

[Laboratory and calorimetric monitoring of medical nutrition therapy in intensive and intermediate care units : Second position paper of the Section Metabolism and Nutrition of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI)]. / Laborchemisches und kalorimetrisches Monitoring der medizinischen Ernährungstherapie auf der Intensiv- und Intermediate Care Station : Zweites Positionspapier der Sektion Metabolismus und Ernährung der Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI).

This second position paper of the Section Metabolism and Nutrition of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI) provides recommendations on the laboratory monitoring of macro- and micronutrient intake as well as the use of indirect calorimetry in the context of medical nutrition therapy of critically ill adult patients. In addition, recommendations are given for disease-related or individual (level determination) substitution and (high-dose) pharmacotherapy of vitamins and trace elements.

Medical nutrition therapy and clinical outcomes in critically ill adults: a European multinational, prospective observational cohort study (EuroPN).

BACKGROUND: Medical nutrition therapy may be associated with clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay. We wanted to assess nutrition practices in European intensive care units (ICU) and their importance for clinical outcomes. METHODS: Prospective multinational cohort study in patients staying in ICU ≥ 5 days with outcome recorded until day 90. Macronutrient intake from enteral and parenteral nutrition and non-nutritional sources during the first 15 days after ICU admission was compared with targets recommended by ESPEN guidelines. We modeled associations between three categories of daily calorie and protein intake (low: < 10 kcal/kg, < 0.8 g/kg; moderate: 10-20 kcal/kg, 0.8-1.2 g/kg, high: > 20 kcal/kg; > 1.2 g/kg) and the time-varying hazard rates of 90-day mortality or successful weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). RESULTS: A total of 1172 patients with median [Q1;Q3] APACHE II score of 18.5 [13.0;26.0] were included, and 24% died within 90 days. Median length of ICU stay was 10.0 [7.0;16.0] days, and 74% of patients could be weaned from invasive mechanical ventilation. Patients reached on average 83% [59;107] and 65% [41;91] of ESPEN calorie and protein recommended targets, respectively. Whereas specific reasons for ICU admission (especially respiratory diseases requiring IMV) were associated with higher intakes (estimate 2.43 [95% CI: 1.60;3.25] for calorie intake, 0.14 [0.09;0.20] for protein intake), a lack of nutrition on the preceding day was associated with lower calorie and protein intakes (- 2.74 [- 3.28; - 2.21] and - 0.12 [- 0.15; - 0.09], respectively). Compared to a lower intake, a daily moderate intake was associated with higher probability of successful weaning (for calories: maximum HR 4.59 [95% CI: 1.5;14.09] on day 12; for protein: maximum HR 2.60 [1.09;6.23] on day 12), and with a lower hazard of death (for calories only: minimum HR 0.15, [0.05;0.39] on day 19). There was no evidence that a high calorie or protein intake was associated with further outcome improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Calorie intake was mainly provided according to the targets recommended by the active ESPEN guideline, but protein intake was lower. In patients staying in ICU ≥ 5 days, early moderate daily calorie and protein intakes were associated with improved clinical outcomes. Trial registration NCT04143503 , registered on October 25, 2019.

[Assessment and technical monitoring of nutritional status of patients in intensive and intermediate care units : Position paper of the Section Metabolism and Nutrition of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive and Emergency Medicine (DIVI)]. / Erfassung und apparatives Monitoring des Ernährungsstatus von Patient*innen auf der Intensiv- und Intermediate Care Station : Positionspapier der Sektion Metabolismus und Ernährung der Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI).

At the time of admission to an intensive or intermediate care unit, assessment of the patients' nutritional status may have both prognostic and therapeutic relevance with regard to the planning of individualized medical nutrition therapy (MNT). MNT has definitely no priority in the initial treatment of a critically ill patient, but is often also neglected during the course of the disease. Especially with prolonged length of stay, there is an increasing risk of malnutrition with considerable prognostic macro- and/or micronutrient deficit. So far, there are no structured, evidence-based recommendations for assessing nutritional status in intensive or intermediate care patients. This position paper of the Section Metabolism and Nutrition of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive and Emergency Medicine (DIVI) presents consensus-based recommendations for the assessment and technical monitoring of nutritional status of patients in intensive and intermediate care units. These recommendations supplement the current S2k guideline "Clinical Nutrition in Intensive Care Medicine" of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine (DGEM) and the DIVI.

Protein intake and outcome of critically ill patients: analysis of a large international database using piece-wise exponential additive mixed models.

BACKGROUND: Proteins are an essential part of medical nutrition therapy in critically ill patients. Guidelines almost universally recommend a high protein intake without robust evidence supporting its use. METHODS: Using a large international database, we modelled associations between the hazard rate of in-hospital death and live hospital discharge (competing risks) and three categories of protein intake (low: < 0.8 g/kg per day, standard: 0.8-1.2 g/kg per day, high: > 1.2 g/kg per day) during the first 11 days after ICU admission (acute phase). Time-varying cause-specific hazard ratios (HR) were calculated from piece-wise exponential additive mixed models. We used the estimated model to compare five different hypothetical protein diets (an exclusively low protein diet, a standard protein diet administered early (day 1 to 4) or late (day 5 to 11) after ICU admission, and an early or late high protein diet). RESULTS: Of 21,100 critically ill patients in the database, 16,489 fulfilled inclusion criteria for the analysis. By day 60, 11,360 (68.9%) patients had been discharged from hospital, 4,192 patients (25.4%) had died in hospital, and 937 patients (5.7%) were still hospitalized. Median daily low protein intake was 0.49 g/kg [IQR 0.27-0.66], standard intake 0.99 g/kg [IQR 0.89- 1.09], and high intake 1.41 g/kg [IQR 1.29-1.60]. In comparison with an exclusively low protein diet, a late standard protein diet was associated with a lower hazard of in-hospital death: minimum 0.75 (95% CI 0.64, 0.87), and a higher hazard of live hospital discharge: maximum HR 1.98 (95% CI 1.72, 2.28). Results on hospital discharge, however, were qualitatively changed by a sensitivity analysis. There was no evidence that an early standard or a high protein intake during the acute phase was associated with a further improvement of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of a standard protein intake during the late acute phase may improve outcome compared to an exclusively low protein diet. In unselected critically ill patients, clinical outcome may not be improved by a high protein intake during the acute phase. Study registration ID number ISRCTN17829198.

[The New DGEM Guideline - All the Clinician Needs to Know]. / Die neue DGEM-Leitlinie ­ alles, was der Kliniker wissen muss.

The German Society for Nutritional Medicine has recently updated its guideline on clinical nutrition in critically ill patients thereby cooperating with seven other national medical societies. This article provides readers with a concise overview on selected key aspects of this guideline relevant for clinical practice. We will discuss some issues in detail such as the determination of energy expenditure and of calorie and protein intake, the choice of the route of administration (enteral or parenteral), and the handling of micronutrients.

Clinical Nutrition in Critical Care Medicine - Guideline of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine (DGEM).

PURPOSE: Enteral and parenteral nutrition of adult critically ill patients varies in terms of the route of nutrient delivery, the amount and composition of macro- and micronutrients, and the choice of specific, immune-modulating substrates. Variations of clinical nutrition may affect clinical outcomes. The present guideline provides clinicians with updated consensus-based recommendations for clinical nutrition in adult critically ill patients who suffer from at least one acute organ dysfunction requiring specific drug therapy and/or a mechanical support device (e.g., mechanical ventilation) to maintain organ function. METHODS: The former guidelines of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine (DGEM) were updated according to the current instructions of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) valid for a S2k-guideline. According to the S2k-guideline classification, no systematic review of the available evidence was required to make recommendations, which, therefore, do not state evidence- or recommendation grades. Nevertheless, we considered and commented the evidence from randomized-controlled trials, meta-analyses and observational studies with adequate sample size and high methodological quality (until May 2018) as well as from currently valid guidelines of other societies. The liability of each recommendation was described linguistically. Each recommendation was finally validated and consented through a Delphi process. RESULTS: In the introduction the guideline describes a) the pathophysiological consequences of critical illness possibly affecting metabolism and nutrition of critically ill patients, b) potential definitions for different disease phases during the course of illness, and c) methodological shortcomings of clinical trials on nutrition. Then, we make 69 consented recommendations for essential, practice-relevant elements of clinical nutrition in critically ill patients. Among others, recommendations include the assessment of nutrition status, the indication for clinical nutrition, the timing and route of nutrient delivery, and the amount and composition of substrates (macro- and micronutrients); furthermore, we discuss distinctive aspects of nutrition therapy in obese critically ill patients and those treated with extracorporeal support devices. CONCLUSION: The current guideline provides clinicians with up-to-date recommendations for enteral and parenteral nutrition of adult critically ill patients who suffer from at least one acute organ dysfunction requiring specific drug therapy and/or a mechanical support device (e.g., mechanical ventilation) to maintain organ function. The period of validity of the guideline is approximately fixed at five years (2018-2023).

Enteral vs. parenteral nutrition in septic shock: are they equivalent?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current review focuses on recent clinical evidence and updated guideline recommendations on the effects of enteral vs. parenteral nutrition in adult critically ill patients with (septic) shock. RECENT FINDIGS: The largest multicenter randomized-controlled trial showed that the route of nutrient supply was unimportant for 28-day and 90-day mortality, infectious morbidity and length of stay in mechanically ventilated patients with shock. The enteral route, however, was associated with lower macronutrient intake and significantly higher frequency of hypoglycemia and moderate-to-severe gastrointestinal complications. Integrating these findings into recent meta-analyses confirmed that the route per se has no effect on mortality and that interactions with (infectious) morbidity are inconsistent or questionable. SUMMARY: The strong paradigm of favoring the enteral over the parenteral route in critically ill patients has been challenged. As a consequence, updated guidelines recommend withholding enteral nutrition in patients with uncontrolled shock. It is still unclear, however, whether parenteral nutrition is advantageous in patients with shock although benefits are conceivable in light of less gastrointestinal complications. Thus far, no guideline has addressed indications for parenteral nutrition in these patients. By considering recent scientific evidence, specific guideline recommendations, and expert opinions, we present a clinical algorithm that may facilitate decision-making when feeding critically ill patients with shock.

[DGEM Guideline "Clinical Nutrition in Critical Care Medicine" - short version]. / DGEM-Leitlinie: Klinische Ernährung in der Intensivmedizin ­ Kurzversion.

PURPOSE: Variations of clinical nutrition may affect outcome of critically ill patients. Here we present the short version of the updated consenus-based guideline (S2k classification) "Clinical nutrition in critical care medicine" of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine (DGEM) in cooperation with 7 other national societies. The target population of the guideline was defined as critically ill adult patients who suffer from at least one acute organ dysfunction requiring specific drug therapy and/or a mechanical support device (e.g. mechanical ventilation) to maintain organ function. METHODS: The former guidelines of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine (DGEM) were updated according to the current instructions of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) valid for a S2k-guideline. We considered and commented the evidence from randomized-controlled trials, meta-analyses and observational studies with adequate sample size and high methodological quality (until May 2018) as well as from currently valid guidelines of international societies. The liability of each recommendation was indicated using linguistic terms. Each recommendation was finally validated and consented by a Delphi process. RESULTS: The short version presents a summary of all 69 consented recommendations for essential, practice-relevant elements of clinical nutrition in the target population. A specific focus is the adjustment of nutrition according to the phases of critical illness, and to the individual tolerance to exogenous substrates. Among others, recommendations include the assessment of nutritional status, the indication for clinical nutrition, the timing, route, magnitude and composition of nutrition (macro- and micronutrients) as well as distinctive aspects of nutrition therapy in obese critically ill patients and those with extracorporeal support devices. CONCLUSION: The current short version of the guideline provides a concise summary of the updated recommendations for enteral and parenteral nutrition of adult critically ill patients who suffer from at least one acute organ dysfunction requiring pharmacological and/or mechanical support. The validity of the guideline is approximately fixed at five years (2018 - 2023).

Calorie intake and short-term survival of critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The association between calorie supply and outcome of critically ill patients is unclear. Results from observational studies contradict findings of randomized studies, and have been questioned because of unrecognized confounding by indication. The present study wanted to re-examine the associations between the daily amount of calorie intake and short-term survival of critically ill patients using several novel statistical approaches. METHODS: 9661 critically ill patients from 451 ICUs were extracted from an international database. We examined associations between survival time and three pragmatic nutritional categories (I: <30% of target, II: 30-70%, III: >70%) reflecting different amounts of total daily calorie intake. We compared hazard ratios for the 30-day risk of dying estimated for different hypothetical nutrition support plans (different categories of daily calorie intake during the first 11 days after ICU admission). To minimize indication bias, we used a lag time between nutrition and outcome, we particularly considered daily amounts of calorie intake, and we adjusted results to the route of calorie supply (enteral, parenteral, oral). RESULTS: 1974 patients (20.4%) died in hospital before day 30. Median of daily artificial calorie intake was 1.0 kcal/kg [IQR 0.0-4.1] in category I, 12.3 kcal/kg [9.4-15.4] in category II, and 23.5 kcal/kg [19.5-27.8] in category III. When compared to a plan providing daily minimal amounts of calories (category I), the adjusted minimal hazard ratios for a delayed (from day 5-11) or an early (from day 1-11) mildly hypocaloric nutrition (category II) were 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.94) and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.82), respectively. No substantial hazard change could be detected, when a delayed or an early, near target calorie intake (category III) was compared to an early, mildly hypocaloric nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a severely hypocaloric nutrition, a mildly hypocaloric nutrition is associated with a decreased risk of death. In unselected critically ill patients, this risk cannot be reduced further by providing amounts of calories close to the calculated target. STUDY REGISTRATION: ID number ISRCTN17829198, website http://www.isrctn.org.

Long-term changes of patient-reported quality of life after major trauma: The importance of the time elapsed after injury.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have identified various risk factors for a poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after severe trauma. The relative importance of the time elapsed after injury, however, is unknown and results of clinical studies have been conflicting. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in two trauma centres using data from the German TraumaRegister DGU®, which contained prospectively collected information on the type and severity of the injury, on critical care, and on outcome. To evaluate HRQOL in patients surviving more than 500days after the injury, we used a self-rating instrument, the EQ-5D which contains a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), and which allows the calculation of a global outcome indicator, the EQ-D5 index value. Complex statistical models were used to evaluate independent associations between the time elapsed after injury and a poor HRQOL. RESULTS: Of 380 contacted patients, follow-up assessments could be obtained in 168 patients (44.2%) 3.6±1.6 (SD) years after the injury. There was a linear association between the time elapsed after the injury and the% of contacted patients not participating in the study (p=0.013). In participating subjects, average EQ-5D index value was 0.599±0.299, and average EQ-VAS rating 67.8±22.0. A very poor quality of life (EQ-5D index value<0.6, EQ-VAS rating≤50) could be found in 43.5% and 28.0% of the patients, respectively. After adjusting for multiple confounders, the number of days elapsed after injury showed a complex non-linear and independent association with a poor HRQOL (low EQ-5D index value: p=0.027; low EQ-VAS rating: p=0.008). Frequencies of a poor HRQOL reached their minimum about four to five years after the injury and increased thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: There is an independent, U-shaped association between the frequency of extreme values of HRQOL and the time elapsed after injury. Time patterns of HRQOL may be sensitive to increasing rates of attrition since patients with a good outcome are less likely to respond to questionnaires. Time from injury should be incorporated into all future cross sectional studies trying to identify predictors of HRQOL.

TEMPORAL LINKS BETWEEN ENDOTOXIN ACTIVITY LEVELS AND INTERLEUKIN 6 CONCENTRATIONS IN ABDOMINAL SEPSIS.

In severe human peritonitis, the precise pathophysiological importance of endotoxin is controversial. Prognostic and therapeutic studies have yielded conflicting results. The current study wanted to investigate qualitative, quantitative, and temporal associations between blood endotoxin activity (EA) levels and acute inflammatory reactions. We conducted a prospective observational study in 30 patients with intra-abdominal infections who had undergone specific focus therapies (surgical/radiological/pharmaceutical interventions) and who required intensive care therapy. We performed sequential postinterventional measurements of blood EA levels and plasma interleukin 6 (IL-6) concentrations until recurrence or cure. There was no association between daily EA levels and IL-6 concentrations, or daily EA levels and changes in IL-6 concentrations on subsequent days. We found, however, a significant association between EA levels and IL-6 concentrations, when newly changing EA levels were referred to subsequent changes in IL-6 concentrations (P < 0.05). Increasing EA levels were followed by a 90% increase of subsequent IL-6 concentrations during the next 24 to 48 h, whereas decreasing/stable EA levels were associated with slightly decreasing IL-6 concentrations (P < 0.05). Our findings suggest an altered response of the innate immune system because postinterventional EA levels did not vary with concomitant or subsequent inflammatory reactions and because inflammatory responses to newly increasing EA levels were delayed and comparatively small. Still, our results support the concept that endotoxin is a trigger of inflammatory reactions in human peritonitis.

Metabolic self-destruction in critically ill patients: origins, mechanisms and therapeutic principles.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the evolution and nature of self-destructive metabolic responses observed in critically ill patients, and to analyze therapeutic principles on how best to avoid or diminish these responses. METHODS: We electronically identified articles through a search of PubMed and Google Scholar. RESULTS: Metabolic reactions associated with surgical injury or infections comprise hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, increased hepatic glucose production, and muscle protein breakdown. From an evolutionary perspective, these responses have been necessary and successful to overcome spontaneously survivable insults (minor surgical trauma). If prolonged and exaggerated, however, these reactions may become self-destructive, causing secondary metabolic damage. There is overwhelming evidence that extreme metabolic responses have not been selected by evolution, but are brought about by modern medicine enabling survival of severe, otherwise lethal insults and giving patients the chance to develop such exaggerated self-destructive metabolic reactions. Poorly adapted metabolic responses to severe insults, however, may have persisted because of unavoidable evolutionary constraints. Self-destructive metabolic responses cannot be prevented by adjuvant therapies such as artificial nutrition, which may only help to ameliorate secondary metabolic damage. CONCLUSIONS: Minor surgical trauma is associated with a beneficial adaptive metabolic response. After a severe insult, however, emergence of self-destructive responses will be unavoidable if the patient survives the acute phase. Effective treatment is only possible by an aggressive therapy of underlying pathologies (such as shock, trauma or infection) thereby interrupting secondary metabolic trigger mechanisms at an early stage.

Use of gastric residual volume to guide enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a brief systematic review of clinical studies.

OBJECTIVE: In critically ill patients, the optimal procedure to monitor upper gastrointestinal function is controversial. Several authors have proposed gastric residual volume (GRV) as a tool to guide enteral nutrition. The aim of this contribution is to briefly discuss corresponding studies. METHODS: We electronically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL for studies relevant to the subject. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six prospective observational studies were identified. Each analyzed different thresholds of GRV to guide enteral nutrition and to avoid complications (e.g., vomiting, aspiration, nosocomial pneumonia) in artificially ventilated patients. Due to heterogeneity in outcome measures, patient populations, type and diameter of feeding tubes, and randomization procedures, combination of the results of the six RCTs into a meta-analysis was not appropriate. High-quality RCTs studying medical patients could not demonstrate an association between complication rate and the magnitude of GRV. The only observational study that adjusted results to potential confounders and that studied surgical patients found, however, that the frequency of aspiration increased significantly if a GRV > 200 mL was registered more than once. CONCLUSION: For mechanically ventilated patients with a medical diagnosis at admission to the intensive care unit, monitoring of GRV appears unnecessary to guide nutrition. Surgical patients might profit, however, from a low GRV threshold (200 mL).

In search of the perfect glucose concentration for hospitalized patients: a brief review of the meta-analyses.

In hospitalized patients, the optimal target blood glucose concentration is controversial. Numerous studies have examined clinical use of glucose control in various patient populations. In the present review, we briefly discuss corresponding meta-analyses. We electronically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL for meta-analyses relevant to the subject. Fifteen meta-analyses were identified that analyzed effects of a targeted glucose control. Twelve meta-analyses examined studies performed in critically ill patients. Included studies in this review varied in terms of the type of nutritional support, the efficacy of glucose control, the kind of glucose measurement, clinical end points (hospital or intensive care unit mortality, or 28-, 90- or 180-d mortality, or mortality 30 d after discharge), and the intensity of glucose control (moderate, tight, very tight). Four meta-analyses also including studies with a less stringent glucose control (glucose target <200 mg/dL) showed a beneficial effect on mortality. This effect disappeared when analyzing studies with a tighter glucose control (glucose target <150 mg/dL or <110/120 mg/dL, n = 5), with a very tight glucose control (glucose target <110/120 mg/dL, n = 2), or with a more precise definition of clinical endpoints (28-d mortality, n = 2). Eight meta-analyses showed that, despite the intensity of glucose control, the frequency of hypoglycemic episodes increased. The residual heterogeneity of individual studies incorporated into the various meta-analyses prevents a valid conclusion regarding potential benefits of a specific glucose target. A glucose concentration <200 mg/dL appears preferable.

Nutritional screening for risk prediction in patients scheduled for extra-abdominal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The Nutritional Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2000) is currently recommended by the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition as a screening tool in hospitalized patients. However, for preoperative risk prediction, the usefulness of this tool is uncertain and may depend on the type of surgical disease. The present study investigated the relative prognostic importance of the NRS-2002 and of established medical and surgical predictors for postoperative complications in patients scheduled for non-abdominal procedures. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we enrolled 581 patients scheduled for elective non-abdominal surgery. Data were collected on nutritional variables (body mass index, weight loss, and food intake), age, gender, type of surgery, extent of surgery, underlying disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and comorbidity. We also evaluated a modification of the NRS-2002 (ordinal graduation according to <2 or ≥2 points) and the importance of individual parameter values. Relative complication rates were calculated with generalized linear models and cumulative proportional odds models. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (7.6%) sustained at least one postoperative complication. The frequency of this event increased significantly with a higher NRS-2002 score. However, the model that performed the best (sensitivity 81.8%, specificity 78.6%) included the modified NRS-2002 graduation (<2 or ≥2 points) and other factors such as American Society of Anesthesiologists class, the duration of the procedure, and the need for red blood cell transfusion. CONCLUSION: In surgical patients with non-abdominal diseases, a modified NRS-2002 classification may be required to preoperatively identify patients at a high nutritional risk. The NRS-2002 alone is insufficient to precisely predict complications.