Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 26
Filter
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(4)2024 Feb 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38398388

ABSTRACT

We have previously shown that the use of hypnotic drugs increased among young Scandinavians during 2012-2018. This study aimed to explore psychiatric and somatic morbidity among adolescent hypnotic drug users in a cohort study of 13-17-year-old individuals during 2008-2018 in Norway. Data sources were (i) prescription data from the Norwegian Prescription Database linked to specialist health care diagnoses from the Norwegian Patient Registry and (ii) sleep disorder diagnoses from the Primary Health Care Database. Hypnotic drugs were defined as the sedative antihistamine alimemazine and the ATC group "Hypnotics and Sedatives" (N05C), excluding midazolam. In 2017, 2519 girls (16.5/1000) and 1718 boys (10.7/1000) were incident (new) users of hypnotic drugs. Most of these new users (82% of girls, 77% of boys) were referred to secondary health care, where the most frequent diagnoses were mental and behavioral disorders (51.8% of girls, 46.2% of boys), while only 3.2% received a specific sleep disorder diagnosis. The most common mental and behavioral disorders were "Neurotic stress-related disorders" among girls (27.4%) and "Behavioral and emotional disorders" among boys (23.6%). In conclusion, the trend of increasing hypnotic drug use among adolescents reflects the initiation of hypnotic drugs in a subgroup of the population with a higher disease burden, mainly due to psychiatric disorders, than the general population.

2.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act ; 20(1): 6, 2023 Jan 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36691059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is increasing need for prospective investigations in the preventing role of health-related behaviours on mental health problems. The aim of this study is to identify patterns of health-related behaviours in adolescence, and the association between the behavioural patterns and the subsequent diagnoses and/or drug treatment for anxiety and/or depression in adulthood. METHODS: This prospective study consisted of 13-19-year-old participants in the Trøndelag Health Study (Young-HUNT3) in 2006-2008 (n = 2061, 1205 females and 856 males) in Norway, who also participated in HUNT4 (2017-2019). Survey data on health-related behaviours in adolescence, including low level of physical activity, low consumption of wholegrain bread, fish, fruit, vegetables and high consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and insomnia were linked on an individual level to prospective information on drug use and diagnosis in national health registries. The different patterns of health-related behaviours were identified through latent class analysis. Subsequent anxiety or depression was defined as at least one recording in either of three registries covering recorded diagnosis in primary and specialist healthcare, or dispensed prescription drugs during 2008-2019. Additionally, self-reported psychological distress measured in young adulthood was applied as a supplemental outcome measure. RESULTS: Four patterns of health-related behaviours were identified: high risk behaviours (class 1), moderate to high risk behaviours (class 2), low to moderate risk behaviours (class 3) and low risk behaviours (class 4). Adolescents in class 3 showed higher odds of subsequent diagnoses for anxiety and/or depression in primary and specialist healthcare compared to class 4 participants. In addition, both class 1 and class 4 participants had higher odds for self-reported psychological distress than those class 4 (OR = 1.56 and OR = 1.86, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that health-related behaviours are clustered among Norwegian adolescents. The patterns of unhealthy behaviours during adolescence only partly increased the risk of anxiety and depression in adulthood. Promoting healthy behaviours during adolescence may potentially reduce the burden of mental illness in adulthood, but further research is needed to clarify the nature of the relationships.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Depression , Male , Female , Humans , Prospective Studies , Depression/psychology , Anxiety/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Registries
3.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 32(10): 2049-2056, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35831669

ABSTRACT

The objective of the study was to compare the use of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication among children and adolescents in Scandinavia 2010-2020. Using aggregated prescription data for individuals aged 5-19 years, we calculated annual prevalence proportions of ADHD medication (users/1000 inhabitants) for each country, overall and stratified by age and sex. Overall, use of ADHD medication increased during 2010-2020 in all countries. The increase was pronounced in Sweden reaching 35 users/1000 inhabitants in 2020 (119% increase), whereas it reached 22/1000 in Denmark and Norway (equivalent to a 38% and 16% increase, respectively). Methylphenidate was the most frequently used drug and Sweden had the highest use reaching 25/1000 in 2020 compared to 16/1000 and 18/1000 in Denmark and Norway, respectively. Lisdexamfetamine use increased steadily and was also highest in Sweden (13/1000 in 2020). In 2020, atomoxetine use was higher in Sweden (4.6/1000) and Denmark (4.5/1000) compared to Norway (2.2/1000). From 2015, use of guanfacine increased in Sweden reaching 4.4/1000 in 2020 but remained low in Denmark (0.4/1000) and Norway (0.7/1000). Use of dexamphetamine was low (ranging from 0.47 to 0.75/1000 in 2020) in the three countries. ADHD medication use was highest in Sweden across all age groups. In all countries, the prevalence was higher in males compared to females. In conclusion, use of ADHD medication among children and adolescents in Scandinavia is increasing. The prevalence of use is higher in Sweden for all drug groups compared to Norway and Denmark.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Central Nervous System Stimulants , Methylphenidate , Male , Female , Child , Humans , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Atomoxetine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Scandinavian and Nordic Countries/epidemiology
5.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 144(2): 100-112, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021908

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypnotic use in children and adolescents is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of hypnotic drugs (melatonin, z-drugs, and sedating antihistamines) among 5- to 24-year-old Scandinavians during 2012 to 2018. METHODS: Aggregate-level data were obtained from public data sources in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. We calculated annual prevalence (users/1000 inhabitants) stratified by age group, sex, and country. Quantity of use (Defined Daily Dose (DDD)/user/day) was estimated for Norway and Denmark. RESULTS: Melatonin was the most commonly used hypnotic, and its use increased markedly from 2012 to 2018, particularly among females and 15- to 24-year-old individuals. Sweden had the highest increase in use (6.5 to 25/1000) compared with Norway (10-20/1000) and Denmark (5.7-12/1000). The annual prevalence of sedating antihistamine use was also highest in Sweden, reaching 13/1000 in 2018 in comparison to 7.5/1000 in Norway and 2.5/1000 in Denmark. Z-drug use decreased in all countries toward 2018, dropping to 3.5/1000 in Sweden, 4.4/1000 in Norway, and 1.7/1000 in Denmark. The quantity of hypnotic use in Norway and Denmark was 0.8-1.0 DDD/user/day for melatonin in 2018, as compared to 0.1-0.3 for z-drugs and antihistamines. CONCLUSION: The use of melatonin and sedating antihistamines increased among young Scandinavians during 2012-2018, and the increase was twice as high in Sweden compared with Norway and Denmark. In addition, Sweden had the highest use of sedating antihistamines. The Scandinavian variation of hypnotic use could reflect differences in frequency of sleep problems between populations or variation of healthcare access or clinical practice between countries.


Subject(s)
Hypnotics and Sedatives , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Norway/epidemiology , Scandinavian and Nordic Countries/epidemiology , Sweden/epidemiology , Young Adult
6.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 28(2): 177-188, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29721753

ABSTRACT

In this prospective study, the association between physical activity and subsequent use of antidepressant and hypnotic drug use in adolescents aged 15-16 years was examined. This study is based on information retrieved from the Norwegian Youth Health Surveys (2000-2003) and linked to prescription data from the Norwegian Prescription Database (2004-2013). In total, the study included 10711 participants with a participation rate of 87%. Adolescents were asked how many hours per week they spent on physical activity that made them sweat and/or be out of breath outside of school. Incident psychotropic drug use (outcome measure) was defined as ≥ 1 prescription of one of the following psychotropic drugs: hypnotics and antidepressants registered in the Norwegian Prescription Database. In the crude model for the time period 2004-2007, the odds of incident hypnotic use were lower for those who were physically active 1-2 h per week (OR 0.48-0.64), compared to those who were physically inactive (< 1 h per week). However, the association become non-significant 4-year post-baseline (2008-2010 and 2011-2013). In the crude model for the time periods 2004-2007, 2008-2010 and 2011-2013, the odds of incident antidepressant use were lower for physically active adolescents (2004-2007: OR 0.46-0.71, 2008-2010: OR 0.40-0.67 and 2011-2013: OR 0.37-0.58, compared to those who were physically inactive < 1 h. However, after adjustment for confounders, the association became non-significant in all time periods except in physical activity 5-7 and 8-10 h in the period 2008-2010. Physical activity does not indicate any association with later use of antidepressants, and the significant association with incident hypnotic drug use was for short-term follow-up only and disappeared on longer term follow-up periods. Given the scarcity of longitudinal studies examining the association between physical activity and mental health as well as psychotropic drug use among young people, the current study adds to previous research.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Exercise/psychology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Leisure Activities/psychology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Health , Motor Activity/physiology , Norway/epidemiology , Prospective Studies
7.
Scand J Public Health ; 47(2): 166-173, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28669312

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aim of this work was to examine psychological distress among Norwegian adolescents in relation to changes over time and the associations with leisure time physical activity and screen-based sedentary behaviour. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was based on data retrieved from the Norwegian Youth Health Surveys in 2001 and 2009 in Hedmark County. Adolescents aged 15-16 years old completed a questionnaire regarding physical activity, sedentary behaviour, psychological distress and other health and lifestyle variables. The self-report Hopkins Symptom Checklist-10 was used to assess psychological distress. Multinomial logistic regression was used to analyse the associations between psychological distress, physical activity and sedentary behaviour. RESULTS: Self-reported psychological distress increased significantly from 2001 to 2009 (from 19.4 to 28.2%), with the proportion of girls reporting psychological distress being twice as large as the proportion of boys. The proportion of adolescents who were physically active for ⩾11 hours per week increased significantly over the same period (from 6.0 to 10.4%). Sedentary behaviour ⩾6 hours per school day increased significantly among both sexes between 2001 and 2009. Physical activity (⩾11 hours) and sedentary behaviour (⩾6 hours) were both significantly associated with psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: The association between physical activity, sedentary behaviour and psychological distress was weak; only high amounts of physical activity and high amounts of screen-based sedentary behaviour were associated with psychological distress. Longitudinal studies are needed to provide further insights into these associations and to understand the extent to which these variables might be causally related.


Subject(s)
Exercise/psychology , Leisure Activities/psychology , Screen Time , Sedentary Behavior , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Norway/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
8.
BMC Public Health ; 18(1): 1368, 2018 Dec 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30541522

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to analyse the association between physical activity taking place in different contexts (sports club, gym, exercise independently and other organized physical activities) and symptoms of depression. METHODS: The study was based on self-reported cross-sectional data from the Ungdata survey, conducted in 2017 by the Norwegian Social Research (NOVA) institute in cooperation with regional centres for drug rehabilitation. The target group comprised 5531 15-16 years old adolescents (Grade 10 students) and 11,655 students in grades 8 and 9 in Norway. Based on Rasch analysis, six items on depressions symptoms were used to create a composite measure of depression. Binomial logistic regression was used to analyse the association between physical activities in different contexts and symptoms of depression. RESULTS: In the crude model, the odds for symptoms of depression were lower for those who were physically active in a sports club (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.30-0.53), in a sports club and gym (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28-0.56), in a sports club and exercise or keep fit independently (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.38-0.72) and in a sports club, gym and exercise or keep fit independently (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.81). After adjustment for potential confounders, the association became significant only for those who were physically active in a sports club (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.40-0.81) and other organized physical activities, e.g. dance, martial arts (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31-0.86). Analysis for grade 8 and 9 showed the same patterns for the associations between sports club and symptoms of depression (grade 8: crude model, OR: 0.47, adjusted model, OR: 0.63, grade 9: crude model, OR: 0.44, adjusted model, OR: 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity in a sports club was associated with significantly lower odds for symptoms of depression, suggesting a possible role for social interaction in addition to physical activity per se. It is important, therefore, to consider in which types of contexts physical activities take place, not only focusing on physical activity frequency and volume when investigating the association between adolescents' physical activity and mental health. Additional research is needed to further explore these associations as well as measures of physical activity and mental health.


Subject(s)
Depression/epidemiology , Exercise/psychology , Sports/psychology , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Norway/epidemiology , Students/psychology , Students/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Eur Psychiatry ; 49: 16-22, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29366845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic drug use among children and adolescents is increasing, and there is growing concern about off-label use and adverse effects. The present study aims to investigate the incidence, psychiatric co-morbidity and pharmacological treatment of severe mental disorder in Norwegian children and adolescents. METHODS: We obtained data on mental disorders from the Norwegian Patient Registry on 0-18 year olds who during 2009-2011 were diagnosed for the first time with schizophrenia-like disorder (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes F20-F29), bipolar disorder (F30-F31), or severe depressive episode with psychotic symptoms (F32.3 or F33.3). Data on filled prescriptions for psychotropic drugs were obtained from the Norwegian Prescription Database. RESULTS: A total of 884 children and adolescents (25.1 per 100 000 person years) were first time diagnosed with schizophrenia-like disorder (12.6 per 100 000 person years), bipolar disorder (9.2 per 100 000 person years), or severe depressive episode with psychotic symptoms (3.3 per 100 000 person years) during 2009-2011. The most common co-morbid mental disorders were depressive (38.1%) and anxiety disorders (31.2%). Antipsychotic drugs were prescribed to 62.4% of the patients, 72.0% of the schizophrenia-like disorder patients, 51.7% of the bipolar disorder patients, and 55.4% of the patients with psychotic depression. The most commonly prescribed drugs were quetiapine (29.5%), aripiprazole (19.6%), olanzapine (17.3%), and risperidone (16.6%). CONCLUSIONS: When a severe mental disorder was diagnosed in children and adolescents, the patient was usually also prescribed antipsychotic medication. Clinicians must be aware of the high prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders among early psychosis patients.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Aripiprazole/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Norway/epidemiology , Olanzapine/therapeutic use , Prevalence , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Quetiapine Fumarate/therapeutic use , Risperidone/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/epidemiology
10.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 26(9): 1412-1418, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27452144

ABSTRACT

Antipsychotic drugs are used increasingly by children and adolescents and there is concern about off-label use. We aimed to study which substances, and for which mental disorder diagnoses, antipsychotic drugs were prescribed to 0-18-year-old boys and girls in Norway. Linked data from the national health registry for prescription drugs in 2010 and mental disorder diagnoses in 2008-2012 were used to study the prevalence of antipsychotic drug use, the type of antipsychotic drug substances used, mental disorder diagnoses in users and distribution of drugs per diagnostic category across gender. In total, 0.18% of Norwegian children and adolescents were prescribed antipsychotic drugs during 2010, of which there were more boys (0.23%) than girls (0.13%). Risperidone was the most frequently used substance among boys (57.4%) and girls (32.3%), followed by aripiprazole (19.4%) in boys and quetiapine (27.4%) in girls. The most common mental disorder diagnoses among male users were hyperkinetic (49.9%) and autism spectrum disorder (27.1%), while anxiety disorders (41.5%) and depressive illness (33.6%) were most common among female users. A schizophrenia-like psychosis diagnosis was given to 11.1% of the male and 18.2% of the female users. A hyperkinetic disorder was diagnosed among 56.9% and 52.4% of the male risperidone and aripiprazole users, respectively. Among female quetiapine users, 57.1% were diagnosed with anxiety disorders and 52.4% with depressive illness. These results demonstrate that children and adolescents who use antipsychotic drugs are predominantly diagnosed with non-psychotic mental disorders such as hyperkinetic disorder among boys and anxiety disorder or depressive illness among girls.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Norway , Prevalence , Registries
11.
BMC Psychiatry ; 16: 12, 2016 Jan 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26822371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Time-trend studies on psychotropic drugs among children and adolescents are scarce, and most of them are outdated. The purpose of this study was to study prevalences of psychotropic drug use during 2004-2014 among Norwegians aged <18 years, overall and in psychotropic sub-groups. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Norwegian Prescription Database, which covers all dispensed prescription drugs in Norway from 2004 and onwards. Psychotropic drugs included: antipsychotics (ATC-group N05A), anxiolytics (N05B), hypnotic/sedatives (N05C), antidepressants (N06A), stimulants (N06BA), and alimemazine (R06AD01). Period (1-year) prevalence of use, overall and in subgroups of psychotropic drugs, was estimated by identifying individuals <18 years who had at least one psychotropic drug dispensed during each year. RESULTS: Psychotropic drug use increased in 0-17 year olds over an 11-year period, in which the main contributing drugs were stimulants (boys overall; 15.0 to 20.8/1000, girls overall; 3.8 to 8.5/1000), hypnotic/sedative drugs in adolescents (boys overall; 4.2 to 10.8/1000, girls overall; 2.6 to 8.8/1000) and to some extent antidepressants among adolescent girls (girls overall from 3.1 to 4.0/1000). Psychotropic drug use was, however, reduced by half in the youngest children, attributed to reduction of alimemazine only (1-year olds: boys; from 36.6 to 10.2/1000, girls; 26.9 to 7.2/1000). A higher level of psychotropic drug use was observed among younger boys, but there is a shift towards girls using more psychotropic drugs than boys during adolescence for all psychotropic drugs except for stimulants. CONCLUSION: Different trends in psychotropic drug use exist in age and gender subgroups. Psychotropic drug use has decreased among the youngest children, attributed to alimemazine, and increased in older children and adolescents, attributed mainly to stimulants and hypnotics/sedatives.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Child , Female , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Infant , Male , Norway , Prevalence
12.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol ; 117(4): 267-73, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25892306

ABSTRACT

The aims were, for the entire Norwegian population aged 4-17 years, to study the prevalence of melatonin use during 2004-2012, recurrent use in incident users and psychiatric and neurological morbidity in recurrent users. Data on dispensed melatonin were retrieved from the Norwegian Prescription Database and linked to diagnostic data from the Norwegian Patient Register. Outcome measures were the following: 1-year prevalence of use, proportion of recurrent use (use over three consecutive 365-day periods among incident users in 2009) and annual number of milligrams and number of prescriptions dispensed in recurrent users. The prevalence of registered ICD-10 diagnoses during the period of 2008-2012 was given for the recurrent users. The prevalence of melatonin use increased annually in both genders during 2004-2012 (boys: 3.4-11.0 per 1000; girls: 1.5-7.7 per 1000). Twenty-nine per cent of boys and 23% of girls were recurrent melatonin users, with highest level of recurrent use among the youngest (aged 4-8 years; boys: 47%, girls: 42%). In the third year, the median annual amount of melatonin dispensed was 1080 (IQR 586-1800) milligrams in boys and 900 (IQR 402-1620) milligrams in girls. Among recurrent users, 91% had a diagnosis of either psychiatric (84%) or neurological (32%) disorder. Off-label recurrent use of melatonin seems to have acquired a role mainly in treating secondary sleep problems in children and adolescents with psychiatric and neurological disorders. Once melatonin has been started, a large proportion of patients continue for at least 3 years, in doses corresponding to daily use in the majority.


Subject(s)
Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Medical Record Linkage , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Off-Label Use , Pediatrics/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Databases, Factual , Drug Prescriptions , Drug Utilization Review , Female , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Male , Melatonin/administration & dosage , Norway , Registries , Time Factors
13.
J Clin Nurs ; 24(7-8): 970-9, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25639291

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the paper was to describe the perceptions of public health nurses' roles in relation to psychotropic drug use by adolescents. BACKGROUND: Mental health problems among adolescents are documented with studies indicating an increased use of psychotropic drugs. In Norway, care for such adolescents may fall naturally into the remit of public health nurses. DESIGN: A phenomenographic approach was used to analyse the data. METHOD: A qualitative interview study was made of 20 Norwegian public health nurses, strategically chosen using phenomenographic methodology. RESULTS: The public health nurses described three categories: discovering public health nurses who become aware of psychotropic drug use in the health dialogue with adolescents and choose to either act or not act in relation to psychotropic drug use. Those public health nurses who take action are cooperating public health nurses, who cooperate with adolescents, their families, schools and others. If cooperation has been established, supporting public health nurses teach and support the adolescent in relation to psychotropic drug use. CONCLUSION: The public health nurses who do not act can hinder or delay further treatment. Public health nurses need to acquire knowledge about psychotropic drugs, to fulfil their role in nursing mental health problems among adolescents and the increasing use of psychotropic drugs. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results demonstrated that public health nurses, working in health centres and schools, have the responsibility and the opportunity to identify young people struggling with mental health problems and psychotropic drug use as well as teach and support significant others, e.g. parents and siblings. Intervention studies are needed with regard to health promotion programmes aimed at fortifying young people's mental health.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Nurse's Role , Nurses, Public Health/psychology , Psychiatric Nursing , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway , Qualitative Research , Young Adult
14.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 69(1): 111-8, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22684128

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The repeated use of prescription opioids may lead to serious side effects. It is therefore important to examine factors associated with such repeated use. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the maternal use of prescription opioids and their use by offspring of these mothers. METHODS: Data were extracted from two nationwide registers linked by unique personal identity numbers: the 2001 Norwegian Population and Housing Census and the Norwegian Prescription Database 2004-2009. The study population consisted of 97,574 adolescents aged 15-16 years in 2001 and their mothers. The repeated use of opioids was defined as the issuing of >4 and >15 prescriptions to an adolescent and his/her mother, respectively, during the period 2004-2009. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are not potentially addictive, and individuals issued prescriptions for NSAIDs were used as the reference analgesic drug group. RESULTS: The proportion of repeated prescription opioid users was higher among adolescents whose mother was registered as a repeated user of prescription opioids (8.4 %) than among those whose mother did not repeatedly use prescription opioids (2.4 %). The odds ratio (OR) was 3.1 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.7-3.6] when adjusted for the mother's socioeconomic characteristics and the gender of the offspring. A lower socioeconomic position of the mother increased the risk of repeated opioid use by her offspring. Maternal repeated use of NSAIDs was associated with repeated use of NSAIDs among offspring (OR 1.8, 95 % CI 1.7-2.0). CONCLUSIONS: Among our study population, the maternal use of opioids was associated with the repeated use of prescription opioids among the respective offspring. The same association was seen with NSAIDs, but to a lesser extent.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Mothers/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway , Registries
15.
Scand J Public Health ; 40(8): 704-11, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23108475

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To (a) describe the prevalence, trend, and amount of hypnotic drug use, (b) determine the prevalence of chronic diseases among hypnotic drug users, and (c) determine levels of recurrent hypnotic drug use (2007-2011), among 0-17 year old Norwegians. METHODS: Data were obtained from the nationwide Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) in the period 2004-2011. RESULTS: Hypnotic drug use in 0-17 year olds increased during the period, from 8.9 to 12.3 per 1000, mainly owing to doubling of melatonin use. Hypnotic drug use peaked at 15 per 1000 among those aged 1-2 years. Melatonin use increased steadily from 6 to 12 years of age, most pronounced in males. Among females, hypnotic drug use increased threefold from 13 to17 years of age. Melatonin was dispensed in the highest annual amount of all hypnotic drugs; accounting up to a median of 360 defined daily doses in 9-13 year old boys. A total of 62% and 52% of all male and female hypnotic drug users were co-medicated with reimbursable drugs for chronic diseases. Levels of recurrent use (2007-2011) were 12% in boys and 8% in girls, of whom 76-77% were co-medicated with drugs reimbursed for chronic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend of increasing use of hypnotic drugs among 0-17 year olds, mainly owing to increasing use of melatonin, used in high amounts. Still, melatonin is not recommended in Norway for use in this age group because of insufficient data on safety and efficacy. A threefold increase in hypnotic drugs among females from 13 to 17 years of age warrants attention.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization/trends , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Norway/epidemiology , Prevalence
16.
Clin Epidemiol ; 4: 225-31, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22936858

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were to investigate the prevalence of psychotropic (hypnotic, antidepressant, and anxiolytic) drug use among adolescents aged 15-16 years during the period 2006-2010 according to gender and subcategories of psychotropics, and to study psychotropic drug use over the period 2007-2010 among incident users in 2007. METHODS: This was a one-year prevalence and follow-up study based on information retrieved from the nationwide Norwegian prescription database for the period 2006-2010. The study population consisted of adolescents aged 15-16 years who had filled at least one prescription for a psychotropic drug in the study period. The main outcome measures were filling of hypnotic, antidepressant, and/or anxiolytic drug prescriptions. RESULTS: Overall use of psychotropic drugs increased from 13.9 to 21.5 per 1000 among boys and from 19.7 to 24.7 per 1000 among girls during the 2006- 2010 period. Hypnotic drugs, and melatonin in particular, accounted for most of the increase. For melatonin, the annual median amount dispensed was 180 defined daily doses through the period until 2010, at which time it decreased to 90 defined daily doses. In total, 16.4% of all incident psychotropic drug users in 2007 were still having prescriptions dispensed in 2010. CONCLUSION: This study shows an increase in hypnotic drugs dispensed for adolescents in Norway, mainly attributable to the increasing use of melatonin. The amount of melatonin dispensed indicates more than sporadic use over longer periods, despite melatonin only being licensed in Norway for use in insomnia for individuals aged 55 years or older.

17.
J Adolesc Health ; 50(6): 578-87, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22626484

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between mental distress, other factors, and subsequent use of psychotropic drugs in adolescents aged 15-16 years. METHODS: This study is based on information retrieved from the Norwegian Youth Health Surveys (2000-2003) and linked to prescription data from the Norwegian Prescription Database (2004-2009). The study population included 11,620 adolescents aged 15-16 (87% response rate) years. Self-reported mental distress (Hopkins Symptom Checklist-10 score 1.85) was recorded along with health and lifestyle habits, education plans, and family economics. Incident psychotropic drug use (outcome measure) was defined ≥1 prescriptions of one of the following psychotropic drugs: anxiolytics, hypnotics, antidepressants, or phenothiazines registered in the Norwegian Prescription Database. RESULTS: Overall, 15.5% of the adolescents reported mental distress, 75% of them were girls. For both genders, incident psychotropic use was significantly higher among those reporting mental distresses at baseline, compared with the rest of the participants. The highest psychotropic drug use was observed among mentally distressed girls (27.7%). Mental distress was significantly associated with incident use of psychotropic drugs (odds ratio: 2.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.97-2.55). After adjustment for confounding factors and inclusion of potential mediating factors, the odds ratio attenuated to 1.59 (95% confidence interval: 1.35-1.86). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of mental distress among adolescents may have consequences for health promotion. Public health nurses in Norway, working in health centers and schools, have a responsibility to promote health and prevent health problems. They have the opportunity and a responsibility to identify vulnerable young people.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Registries , Stress, Psychological/complications , Adolescent , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Aspirations, Psychological , Attitude to Health , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Life Style , Male , Medical Record Linkage , Norway , Pain/epidemiology , Pain/psychology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , Statistics as Topic , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 20(1): 90-8, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21182157

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of prescribed opioids for chronic non-cancer pain is increasing in many countries. It is, therefore, important to investigate predictors for repeated use of opioids in young non-cancer patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate adolescent smoking and its association with repeated use of prescription opioids in adolescents/young adults without cancer. METHODS: The study population consisted of 11,809 15-16 year old participants (86% participation rate) in the Norwegian Youth Health Surveys carried out in 2000-2003. The exposure variable, self reported smoking status, was registered in the youth surveys along with potential confounders. Repeated use of opioids, defined as 4+ prescriptions recorded in the nationwide Norwegian Prescription Database during 2004-2008, was used as outcome measure. RESULTS: Among the participants included in our study, 161 had redeemed 4+ prescriptions for opioids. Daily adolescent smoking was associated with repeated use of opioids with an adjusted OR of 2.2 (95% CI 1.3-3.5). CONCLUSIONS: Daily smoking at 15-16 years of age was associated with increased risk of incident repeated use of prescribed opioids later in life. Our study suggests that smoking dependence in adolescents may predict longer lasting and/or higher levels of opioid use.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Smoking/metabolism , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Adolescent , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Population , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Scand J Pain ; 2(1): 36-44, 2011 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29914000

ABSTRACT

Purpose To examine and compare dispensing of prescribed analgesics between young people with parents from countries with a Muslim majority and those with parents born in Norway. Methods Our study-population constituted 11,542 adolescents from the Norwegian Youth Health Surveys conducted in 2000-2003. Users and non-users of prescribed analgesics at baseline were analysed separately. Self-reported information on their parents' birth country was used to classify them into one of the three predefined groups: Norway, countries with a Muslim majority or others. To study and compare dispensing of prescribed analgesics, data from the youth surveys were linked to the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) 2004-2007. Dispensed analgesics studied were antiinflammatory and antirheumatic products (non-steroid), opioids and other analgesics and antipyretics. Results Among non-users of prescribed analgesics at baseline, 34% of all males with parents born in Norway received prescribed analgesics at least once during 2004-2007, compared to 36% in the group with parents from countries with a Muslim majority. The proportions of females receiving prescribed analgesics were about 44% in both of the two previously mentioned groups. Among users of prescribed analgesics at baseline, the proportion of individuals who were dispensed prescribed analgesics in 2004-2007 was generally higher than for those that were non-users at baseline. Both males and females with parents from countries with a Muslim majority reported more pain compared to those with parents born in Norway. No statistical differences were detected between participants with parents from countries with a Muslim majority compared to those with parents born in Norway in terms of prescribed analgesics dispensed or total amount of analgesics dispensed in 2004-2007. For the dispensing of all analgesics in 2004-2007 the adjusted OR for having parents from countries with a Muslim majority compared to parents born in Norway was 1.02 (0.87-1.21) among non-users of prescribed analgesics at baseline and 0.82 (0.57-1.16) among users. Conclusions There were no differences in the dispensing of prescribed analgesics between young people with parents born in countries with a Muslim majority and those with parents born in Norway. Nor did the amount of prescribed analgesics differ between these groups.

20.
Soc Sci Med ; 70(6): 921-5, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20071064

ABSTRACT

The proportion of Norwegians on disability pensions has doubled since the 1980s. The Norwegian Government wants action to stimulate the working capacity in those disability pensioners who have the potential to work. Information on factors that may impair rehabilitation efforts, including the unfavourable use of benzodiazepines, may be useful in this context. A longitudinal design, including data on 40-42 year old participants in Norwegian health surveys (year 1985-1989) linked to a prescription database (year 2004-2006), was used to describe risk of long-term use of benzodiazepines among disability pension recipients. The study population constituted benzodiazepine users at baseline. More than half of those on disability pensions, 57% of all men and 65% of all women, retrieved benzodiazepine prescriptions 20 years later, a span covering a large part of the potential active workforce period. Further, the observed amount of benzodiazepines dispensed over a three-year period indicated more than sporadic use e.g. half of the female disability pensioners were dispensed an amount of benzodiazepines corresponding to the use of a daily dose every second day over a three year period (median 450 daily doses). The majority of those who were dispensed benzodiazepines, were dispensed opioids as well: half of all men and 3 out of four women. And last, being on a disability pension was a predictor of benzodiazepine use 20 years later. Our study suggests that benzodiazepines are extensively and unfavourably used among disability pensioners, and that disability pension may have an independent effect on long-term use. Improved management of benzodiazepine use may be one alternative to get disability pensioners with the potential to work back into employment.


Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines/administration & dosage , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Pensions , Adult , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Disability Evaluation , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Norway , Rehabilitation, Vocational , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...