Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Public Health ; 31(3): 576-582, 2021 07 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33411922

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The implementation by diagnostic laboratories in England of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to screen faecal specimens for Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) has resulted in a significant increase in notifications mainly due to non-O157 strains. The purpose of this study was to develop an approach to public health risk assessment that prioritizes follow-up to cases caused by haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) associated E. coli (HUSEC) strains and minimizes unnecessary actions. METHODS: Epidemiological and microbiological data were prospectively collected from 1 November 2013 to 31 March 2017 and used to compare three risk assessment approaches. RESULTS: A history of HUS/bloody diarrhoea/age under 6 years and faecal specimens positive for stx-predicted HUSEC with a diagnostic accuracy of 84% (95% CI; 81-88%). STEC isolated by Gastrointestinal Bacteria Reference Unit (GBRU) and stx2 and eae positive predicted HUSEC with a diagnostic accuracy of 99% (95% CI; 98-100%). Risk assessment combining these two tests predicts the most efficient use of resources, predicting that 18% (97/552) of cases would be eligible for follow-up at some stage, 16% (86/552) following local stx PCR results, 1% (7/552) following GBRU results of stx2 and eae status and 0.7% (4/552) following whole-genome sequencing. Follow-up could be stopped in 78% (76/97) of these cases, 97% (74/76) following second stage risk assessment. CONCLUSIONS: This three-stage risk assessment approach prioritizes follow-up to HUSEC and minimizes unnecessary public health actions. We developed it into the algorithm for public health actions included in the updated PHE Guidance for management of STEC published in August 2018.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli Infections , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli , Child , Escherichia coli Infections/diagnosis , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/diagnosis , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/epidemiology , Humans , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Public Health , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/genetics
2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 144(3): 582-90, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26165194

ABSTRACT

On 30 May 2012, Surrey and Sussex Health Protection Unit was called by five nurseries reporting children and staff with sudden onset vomiting approximately an hour after finishing their lunch that day. Over the following 24 h 50 further nurseries supplied by the same company reported cases of vomiting (182 children, 18 staff affected). Epidemiological investigations were undertaken in order to identify the cause of the outbreak and prevent further cases. Investigations demonstrated a nursery-level attack rate of 55 out of 87 nurseries (63·2%, 95% confidence interval 52·2-73·3). Microbiological tests confirmed the presence of Bacillus cereus in food and environmental samples from the catering company and one nursery. This was considered microbiologically and epidemiologically consistent with toxin from this bacterium causing the outbreak. Laboratory investigations showed that the conditions used by the caterer for soaking of pearl haricot beans (known as navy bean in the USA) used in one of the foods supplied to the nurseries prior to cooking, was likely to have provided sufficient growth and toxin production of B. cereus to cause illness. This large outbreak demonstrates the need for careful temperature control in food preparation.


Subject(s)
Bacillus cereus/isolation & purification , Bacterial Toxins/poisoning , Disease Outbreaks , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Phaseolus/microbiology , Vomiting/microbiology , Adult , Child, Preschool , England/epidemiology , Food Microbiology , Food Services/standards , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Humans , Infant , Nurseries, Hospital
3.
J Food Prot ; 77(1): 94-9, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24406004

ABSTRACT

Nonparatyphoidal and nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) infections are major causes of food poisoning in England. Diagnostic laboratories and clinicians have a statutory responsibility to report NTS infection cases to the Health Protection Agency via various means, with electronic reporting encouraged as the universal method. The Health Protection Agency (Public Health England since 1 April 2013) refers cases to environmental health departments for follow-up. Timeliness of reporting and adequacy of NTS infection case follow-up are key factors in the implementation of public health actions. Laboratories, health protection units, and environmental health departments in London and South East (SE) regions of England completed three surveys between December 2010 and April 2011, collecting data about the NTS infection case reporting methods and the time elapsed between symptom onset and public health actions. The median period between symptom onset and public health investigation was 25 days in London and 23 days in SE when electronic reporting was used and 12 days in London and 11 days in SE when other means of reporting were used. The most common follow-up method was a telephone questionnaire in London (53%) and a postal questionnaire in SE (52%). The telephone questionnaire had the highest response rate (98% in London; 96% in SE). Timeliness and efficiency of electronic NTS infection case reports can be improved by decreasing the electronic laboratory report period and using telephone-administered questionnaires to maximize the public health benefit when following up single cases of NTS infection.


Subject(s)
Medical Records Systems, Computerized/statistics & numerical data , Public Health/statistics & numerical data , Salmonella Food Poisoning/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections/epidemiology , Sentinel Surveillance , Disease Notification , Electronic Data Processing , England/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Laboratories , London/epidemiology , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data
4.
Epidemiol Infect ; 140(8): 1400-13, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22093751

ABSTRACT

In the summer of 2009, an outbreak of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli O157 (VTEC O157) was identified in visitors to a large petting farm in South East England. The peak attack rate was 6/1000 visitors, and highest in those aged <2 years (16/1000). We conducted a case-control study with associated microbiological investigations, on human, animal and environmental samples. We identified 93 cases; 65 primary, 13 secondary and 15 asymptomatic. Cases were more likely to have visited a specific barn, stayed for prolonged periods and be infrequent farm visitors. The causative organism was identified as VTEC O157 PT21/28 with the same VNTR profile as that isolated in faecal specimens from farm animals and the physical environment, mostly in the same barn. Contact with farm livestock, especially ruminants, should be urgently reviewed at the earliest suspicion of a farm-related VTEC O157 outbreak and appropriate risk management procedures implemented without delay.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Escherichia coli O157/metabolism , Shiga Toxins/metabolism , Animals , Case-Control Studies , Child, Preschool , Data Collection , England/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/transmission , Female , Humans , Infant , Logistic Models , Male , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Zoonoses
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL