Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in North Carolina: Incidence and Characteristics among Infants and Mothers.

BACKGROUND Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a complex disorder characterized by withdrawal symptoms secondary to in utero exposure to drugs capable of producing physical dependence. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of NAS, as well as infant and maternal characteristics associated with NAS in North Carolina (NC).METHODS This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study used the State Inpatient Database (SID) to compare the incidence rates of NAS for NC for the year 2016 to historical data (years 2000 to 2013). A multivariable logistic regression model including available covariates of interest was constructed.RESULTS Overall NAS incidence rate (IR) for NC was found to be 9.7 per 1,000 live births, a 32.3-fold increase since 2000 (IR=0.3 in 2000). The multivariable logistic regression model suggested race group (both black [OR 0.11; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.16] and 'other' [OR 0.43; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.61] vs white), ethnicity [OR 0.43; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.61], insurance group (both 'other/self-pay' [OR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.52] and 'private insurance' [OR 0.07; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.10] vs Medicaid/Medicare), region (Piedmont [OR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.79] vs Mountain), income quartile (both 4th [OR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.26, 0.79] and 3rd [OR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.96] vs 1st), county population size (50k-249k [OR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.86] vs ≥1 million), birth weight [OR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.98], and length of stay [OR 1.23; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.26] as potentially important predictors of NAS.LIMITATIONS Only hospitals providing data to the SID for 2016 were included and ICD-9 codes, in use at the time of data collection, were used.CONCLUSIONS The incidence of NAS has increased in NC in 2016 compared to prior years spanning back to 2000. Specific infant and maternal characteristics including race, ethnicity, payer type, geographic region, county population, parental income status, birth weight, and length appear to be associated with an infant bearing the diagnosis of NAS.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Moxifloxacin in Children.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Moxifloxacin is a fluoroquinolone that is commonly used in adults, but not children. Certain clinical situations compel pediatric clinicians to use moxifloxacin, despite its potential for toxicity and limited pharmacokinetics (PK) data. Our objective was to further characterize the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in children. METHODS: We performed an opportunistic, open-label population PK study of moxifloxacin in children < 18 years of age who received moxifloxacin as part of standard care. A set of structural PK models and residual error models were explored using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Covariates with known biological relationships were investigated for their influence on PK parameters. RESULTS: We obtained 43 moxifloxacin concentrations from 14 participants who received moxifloxacin intravenously (n = 8) or orally (n = 6). The dose of moxifloxacin was 10 mg/kg daily in participants ≤ 40 kg and 400 mg daily in participants > 40 kg. The population mean clearance and mean volume of distribution were 18.2 L/h and 167 L, respectively. The oral absorption was described by a first-order process. The estimated extent of oral bioavailability was highly variable (range 20-91%). Total body weight was identified as a covariate on clearance and volume of distribution, and substantially reduced the random unexplained inter-individual variability for both parameters. No participants experienced suspected serious adverse reactions related to moxifloxacin. CONCLUSION: These data add to the existing literature to support use of moxifloxacin in children in certain situations; however, further prospective studies on the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin are needed.

Association between preoperative respiratory support and outcomes in paediatric cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative mechanical ventilation is associated with morbidity and mortality following CHD surgery, but prior studies lack a comprehensive analysis of how preoperative respiratory support mode and timing affects outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on children <18 years of age undergoing cardiac surgery at an academic tertiary care medical centre. Using multivariable regression, we examined the association between modes of preoperative respiratory support (nasal cannula, high-flow nasal cannula/noninvasive ventilation, or invasive mechanical ventilation), escalation of preoperative respiratory support, and invasive mechanical ventilation on the day of surgery for three outcomes: operative mortality, postoperative length of stay, and postoperative complications. We repeated our analysis in a subcohort of neonates. RESULTS: A total of 701 children underwent 800 surgical procedures, and 40% received preoperative respiratory support. Among neonates, 243 patients underwent 253 surgical procedures, and 79% received preoperative respiratory support. In multivariable analysis, all modes of preoperative respiratory support, escalation in preoperative respiratory support, and invasive mechanical ventilation on the day of surgery were associated with increased odds of prolonged length of stay in children and neonates. Children (odds ratio = 3.69, 95% CI 1.2-11.4) and neonates (odds ratio = 8.97, 95% CI 1.31-61.14) on high-flow nasal cannula/noninvasive ventilation had increased odds of operative mortality compared to those on room air. CONCLUSION: Preoperative respiratory support is associated with prolonged length of stay and mortality following CHD surgery. Knowing how preoperative respiratory support affects outcomes may help guide surgical timing, inform prognostic conversations, and improve risk stratification models.