ABSTRACT
Forty patients with 51 knee arthroplasties after high tibial osteotomy were compared with a matched group of patients with primary knee arthroplasties. Patients were matched according to length of follow-up, age, sex, prosthetic design, and surgeon. At an average of 12.6 years, the patients were reviewed and assessed clinically using the Hospital for Special Surgery scoring system. Radiologic assessment was also performed. Although the overall Hospital for Special Surgery scores showed no significant difference between the 2 groups, there were more patients in the osteotomy group with a poor result (P = .027), significantly reduced flexion (P = .006), and higher reoperation rate. There were more failures after high tibial osteotomy. Failures tend to occur in the medium to long term, emphasizing the importance of long-term follow-up.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Osteotomy/methods , Tibia/surgery , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prosthesis FailureABSTRACT
Fifty patients with 70 previously operated clubfeet were assessed for overcorrection (using Tachdjian's flat foot grade) and generalized joint laxity. Twenty-eight patients (40 feet) had signs of generalized joint laxity using the Biro score and of these 25 feet were overcorrected. Of the 22 patients (30 feet) who did not have signs of joint laxity, only three overcorrected. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). A significant correlation exists between flat foot grade and laxity score (P<0.01). Overcorrection is a complication largely ignored in the published literature but we believe it is a serious complication of open release often resulting in poor long-term function. For those patients requiring surgery, the authors urge caution and recommend a limited surgical release, particularly if joint laxity is suspected, or the Ponseti method of treatment, which will probably avoid this complication.