[Epiretinal membrane: diagnostics, indications and surgical treatment]. / Epiretinale Gliose: Diagnostik, Indikationsstellung und chirurgische Therapie.

An epiretinal membrane (ERM) is a frequently occurring disease affecting the macula, which can be associated with visual impairment and metamorphopsia, depending on the severity and location. A distinction is made between an idiopathic form caused by age-related changes of the vitreous body and a secondary form associated with diseases of the posterior segment. The development of fibrocellular epiretinal membranes formed by dedifferentiation of intraretinal and extraretinal cells at the level of the vitreomacular interface plays a major role in the pathogenesis. The diagnostics and indications for surgical treatment of ERM are based on the visual acuity, evidence of metamorphopsia, ophthalmoscopic findings and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macula. In addition to the possibility of observation of the course where benign spontaneous courses are not uncommon, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with peeling of the ERM and internal limiting membrane (ILM) to prevent recurrences is the treatment of choice in symptomatic patients. The prognosis after surgical treatment is very good. In approximately two thirds of the cases, an improvement in visual acuity and/or a reduction of metamorphopsia can be achieved, with a number of predictive, primarily OCT-based factors enabling a prediction of the functional prognosis. Comprehensive patient education regarding the generally long duration of postoperative rehabilitation and the possibility of persistent symptoms or visual deterioration despite successful membrane removal is essential.

[Lamellar macular holes-In the center of vitreomacular interface diseases : Pathophysiology, spontaneous courses and treatment concepts]. / Makulaschichtforamen ­ im Zentrum der vitreomakulären Grenzflächenerkrankungen : Pathophysiologie, Spontanverläufe und Therapiekonzepte.

BACKGROUND: A lamellar macular hole (LMH) is characterized by a distinct morphologic configuration and can be distinguished from related entities such as macular pseudohole (MPH) and epiretinal membrane with foveoschisis (ERM-FS) by clear morphologic features. PURPOSE: Based on current knowledge, the pathophysiologic function of LMH in the spectrum of vitreomacular interface diseases will be described and therapeutic concepts will be presented. METHODS: Current studies are supplemented by case reports to provide a schematic overview of the natural history and therapeutic concepts at the vitreomacular interface. RESULTS: The LMH is as a retrospective marker for pathologic posterior vitreous detachment in adult patients and may be interpreted as the pathophysiologic center of tractional maculopathies. Various vitreomacular pathologies can result in LMH: a detached vitreomacular traction, a spontaneously closed penetrating macular hole, or an epiretinal membrane with foveoschisis. Pathophysiologically, a degenerative, progressive loss of the architecture of the foveal muller cell cone may be the underlaying mechanism, resulting in the typical undermining of the hole edges and occasionally in a full thickness macular hole. The optimal timing and the appropriate surgical method are the focus of current clinical studies. CONCLUSION: The pathophysiology of LMH indicates a smooth transition of tractive maculopathies. These should be prospectively evaluated in order to develop evidence-based treatment strategies for LMH.

[Macular hole: Differential diagnosis, treatment options and new guideline recommendations]. / Makulaforamen: Differenzialdiagnose, Behandlungsoptionen und neue Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) usually result in a pronounced reduction of visual acuity and represent one of the most frequent indications for retinal surgery. If diagnosed and treatment is initiated at an early stage, surgery has a high success rate with respect to both hole closure and improvement of visual acuity. Optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based staging and sizing enables an estimation of the surgical outcome. The differential diagnostic distinction from clinically similar disorders, such as lamellar macular holes, macular pseudoholes, and foveoschisis is clinically relevant as the pathogenesis, prognosis and treatment are significantly different. While vitrectomy with peeling of the inner limiting membrane (ILM) and gas tamponade is established as the standard treatment for FTMH, some aspects of treatment are handled differently between surgeons, such as the timing of surgery, the choice of endotamponade and the type and duration of postoperative positioning. For FTMH associated with vitreomacular traction, alternative treatment options in addition to vitrectomy include intravitreal ocriplasmin injection and pneumatic vitreolysis. The current clinical guidelines of the German ophthalmological societies summarize the evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of FTMH.

[Vitreomacular traction: diagnostics, natural course, treatment decision and guideline recommendations]. / Vitreomakuläre Traktion: Diagnostik, natürlicher Verlauf, Therapieentscheidung und Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Vitreomacular traction is a tractive foveolar adhesion of the posterior vitreous limiting membrane, resulting in pathological structural alterations of the vitreomacular interface. This must be differentiated from physiological vitreomacular adhesion, which exhibits a completely preserved foveolar depression. Symptoms depend on the severity of the macular changes and typically include reduced visual acuity, reading problems and metamorphopsia. High-resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) imaging enables classification of the sometimes only subtle morphological changes. If pronounced vitreomacular traction is accompanied by epiretinal gliosis and alterations to the outer retina, it is referred to as a vitreomacular traction syndrome. Vitreomacular traction has a high probability of spontaneous resolution within 12 months. Therefore, treatment should only be carried out in cases of undue suffering of the patient and with symptoms during bilateral vision and a lack of spontaneous resolution. In addition to pars plana vitrectomy, alternative treatment options, such as intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin and pneumatic vitreolysis are discussed for vitreomacular traction with an associated macular hole; however, ocriplasmin is no longer available in Germany. The best anatomical results in comparative investigations were achieved by vitrectomy. Pneumatic vitreolysis is controversially discussed due to the increased risk of retinal tears. In one of the current S1 guidelines of the German ophthalmological societies evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostics and treatment of vitreomacular traction are summarized.

Early REperfusion therapy with intravenous alteplase for recovery of VISION in acute central retinal artery occlusion (REVISION): Study protocol of a phase III trial.

RATIONALE: Meta-analyses of case series of non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) indicate beneficial effects of intravenous thrombolysis when initiated early after symptom onset. Randomized data are lacking to address this question. AIMS: The REperfusion therapy with intravenous alteplase for recovery of VISION in acute central retinal artery occlusion (REVISION) investigates intravenous alteplase within 4.5 h of monocular vision loss due to acute CRAO. METHODS: This study is the randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter adaptive phase III trial. STUDY OUTCOMES: Primary outcome is functional recovery to normal or mildly impaired vision in the affected eye defined as best-corrected visual acuity of the Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution of 0.5 or less at 30 days (intention-to-treat analysis). Secondary efficacy outcomes include modified Rankin Score at 90 days and quality of life. Safety outcomes include symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, major bleeding (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition) and mortality. Exploratory analyses of optical coherence tomography/angiography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers will be conducted. SAMPLE SIZE: Using an adaptive design with interim analysis at 120 patients, up to 422 participants (211 per arm) would be needed for 80% power (one-sided alpha = 0.025) to detect a difference of 15%, assuming functional recovery rates of 10% in the placebo arm and 25% in the alteplase arm. DISCUSSION: By enrolling patients within 4.5 h of CRAO onset, REVISION uses insights from meta-analyses of CRAO case series and randomized thrombolysis trials in acute ischemic stroke. Increased rates of early reperfusion and good neurological outcomes in stroke may translate to CRAO with its similar pathophysiology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04965038; EU Trial Number: 2023-507388-21-00.

Brolucizumab for recalcitrant macular neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with pigment epithelial detachment.

PURPOSE: To analyze anatomic and functional response to intravitreal brolucizumab in age-related macular degeneration recalcitrant to previous intravitreal anti-VEGF therapies. METHODS: In this monocentric, one arm, retrospective study, eyes affected by neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) resistant to other intravitreally injected anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors were switched to intravitreal brolucizumab. All patients underwent ophthalmological examinations at baseline and in regular follow-up intervals. Best registered visual acuity (BRVA), Goldmann tonometry, intraocular pressure (IOP), central retinal thickness (CRT) and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) characteristics were analyzed at initiation of anti-VEGF treatment, at treatment switch, and at the end of brolucizumab loading phase. RESULTS: The study included 20 eyes of 18 consecutively treated patients (age: 77 ± 6 years). All eyes had macular neovascularization with PED. Previous treatments included intravitreal aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab and had not resulted in a significant improvement in BRVA (0.5 ± 0.5 logMAR vs 0.5 ± 0.6 logMAR) or mean CRT (320 ± 60 µm vs 313 ± 83 µm) up to treatment switch to brolucizumab. At the end of the brolucizumab loading phase, there was significant improvement for both BRVA (0.3 ± 0.2 logMAR, P < 0.05) and CRT (264 ± 55 µm, P < 0.05). Under previous anti-VEGF therapy, there was a significant increase/deterioration in both PED area (2.68 mm2 to 5.18 mm2, P < 0.05) and PED volume (0.39 mm3 to 1.07 mm3, P < 0.05); however, both parameters improved after switching to brolucizumab (3.81 mm2 and 0.37 mm3, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a favourable anatomical and visual response after treatment switch to brolucizumab in patients with nAMD refractory to previous anti-VEGF agents.

BALATON and COMINO: Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials of Faricimab for Retinal Vein Occlusion: Study Design and Rationale.

Purpose: Dual inhibition of angiopoietin-2 and VEGF-A with faricimab (Vabysmo) offers excellent visual acuity gains with strong durability in patients with diabetic macular edema (ME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The phase III BALATON/COMINO (NCT04740905/NCT04740931) trials will investigate the efficacy, safety, and durability of faricimab in patients with ME due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Design: Two identically designed global, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled studies. Participants: Anti-VEGF treatment-naive patients with branch, central, or hemiretinal RVO. Methods: Patients were randomized to 6 monthly injections of faricimab 6.0 mg or aflibercept 2.0 mg. From weeks 24 to 72, all patients received faricimab 6.0 mg administered in up to 16-week intervals using an automated treatment algorithm to generate a treat-and-extend-based personalized treatment interval dosing regimen. Personalized treatment interval adjustments were based on changes in central subfield thickness (CST) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Main Outcome Measures: Primary end point was noninferiority of faricimab versus aflibercept in mean change from baseline in BCVA (week 24; noninferiority margin: 4 letters). Secondary end points (weeks 0-24) were mean change from baseline in BCVA, CST, and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 composite score; proportion of patients gaining or avoiding loss of ≥ 15/≥ 10/≥ 5/> 0 letters. Secondary end points (weeks 24-72) were treatment durability (week 68); continuation of weeks 0 to 24 end points. Ocular/nonocular adverse events will be assessed. Results: In total, 1282 patients across 22 countries were enrolled (BALATON, 553 patients, 149 centers; COMINO, 729 patients, 193 centers). Conclusions: Using a novel automated interval algorithm, BALATON/COMINO will evaluate the efficacy and safety of faricimab for ME secondary to RVO and provide key insights into how to personalize treatment. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Acute central retinal artery occlusion with emboli.

CRAO is an ophthalmic and medical emergency. This case is a reminder that diagnosis and management of CRAO begins with ophthalmologists but immediately thereafter care involves emergency cardiovascular and neurological similar to cerebral stroke.

Isolated Internal Ophthalmoplegia from Posterior Cerebral Artery Neurovascular Conflict.

We report a rare case of recurrent isolated internal ophthalmoplegia attributed to oculomotor nerve (CN III) compression by the posterior cerebral artery (PCA). A 30-year-old female patient presented with recurrent right-sided headaches, right periorbital pain, and slight anisocoria. Slit-lamp examination revealed normal anterior and posterior segments except for vermiform movements of the right pupil with a temporal hyporeactive flat area. Tonic pupils were ruled out with pilocarpine 0.1% testing. Suspecting an internal ophthalmoplegia, magnetic resonance imaging was ordered which demonstrated the right CN III indented by the PCA, fulfilling the criteria of a neurovascular conflict. The evaluation of unilateral mydriasis from internal ophthalmoplegia should prompt neuroimaging with exclusion of aneurysmal or compressive lesions. CN III palsy can rarely be caused by vascular anatomical variants because of the proximity of the posterior intracranial circulation and CN III. Newer, more precise imaging techniques will better help characterize neurovascular conflicts presenting as cranial nerve palsies.

Frosted branch angiitis as an immune recovery response in newly diagnosed acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and systemic cytomegalovirus infection.

Frosted branch angiitis (FBA) is an uncommon form of severe retinal perivasculitis associated with systemic inflammatory/infectious diseases. In this report, we describe a case of FBA and macular edema as a result of immune recovery response in a patient newly diagnosed with HIV infection and cytomegalovirus viremia.

[Cardiovascular risk factors, haemostasis and antithrombotic treatment in retinal vessel occlusion]. / Kardiovaskuläre Risikofaktoren, Gerinnung und gerinnungswirksame Therapien bei retinalen Gefäßverschlusserkrankungen.

Venous and arterial retinal vascular occlusions are age-related disorders, generally associated with classical cardiovascular risk factors, rather than an isolated ocular disease. As affected patients often also have an increased general risk for other vascular diseases, such as ischemic stroke, an interdisciplinary clarification of cardiovascular risk factors and systemic comorbidities is essential for all patients. Extended hemostaseological investigations may be recommended in those patients who do not match the typical risk profile. Patients at a young age by the time of manifestation, without conventional risk factors as well as patients with an increased risk of developing antiphospholipid syndrome may require a selective clinical investigation including testing for thrombophilic risk factors. Recent studies have clearly demonstrated an association between coagulation and lipid metabolism disorders and the development of both retinal vein and artery occlusions in specific subgroups of patients. Therapeutic approaches to treat retinal vascular occlusions or reduce the long-term risk of recurrences with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs have not gained widespread acceptance. However, intravenous thrombolysis may be a valuable treatment option for central retinal artery occlusions within a short time to treatment therapeutic window. For defined disorders of the coagulation system, the administration of antithrombotic drugs to reduce the general vascular risk can be a reasonable approach. This article provides an overview of cardiovascular risk factors, the general vascular risk and the current state of knowledge on ophthalmologically relevant disorders of coagulation and lipid metabolism in patients with venous and arterial retinal vascular occlusions.

[Ischemia and laser photocoagulation in retinal vein occlusion]. / Ischämie und Lasertherapie bei retinalen venösen Verschlüssen.

BACKGROUND: Retinal vein occlusions (RVO) are associated with retinal ischemia to a highly variable extent. An ischemic retina may lead to the development of neovascularization and further to secondary complications such as neovascular glaucoma, vitreous hemorrhage or tractional retinal detachment. Numerous factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and other cytokines are produced in the ischemic area, which cause macular edema. Before the introduction of intravitreal drug injections (IVI), retinal laser photocoagulation was the leading form of treatment. Macular laser photocoagulation was applied in the form of focal laser or grid laser in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) to treat macular edema. In patients with ischemic RVO, panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) was recommended for treatment of secondary neovascular complications. The value of laser treatment in the management of patients with RVO changed after the introduction of IVI treatment. AIM: This article presents a review of the current study results and the recommendations for performing laser photocoagulation of the central and peripheral retina in patients with RVO. CONCLUSION: Conventional focal or grid laser photocoagulation has been replaced by IVI treatment in the management of macular edema secondary to BRVO; however, macular laser treatment can still be considered in patients with BRVO if the macular edema persists despite the use of available IVI drugs. The use of central laser photocoagulation in these cases is based on the findings of fluorescein angiography. Disseminated panretinal laser photocoagulation is still indicated in RVO patients who have large areas of nonperfusion, have developed neovascularization and/or late complications. Targeted laser photocoagulation of the peripheral areas of nonperfusion has recently been recommended by several authors and is expected to improve not only the visual outcome of IVI treatment, but more importantly to also reduce the duration of treatment and the number of re-injections needed. Clear evidence for targeted laser treatment is not yet available and is a focus of currently ongoing prospective randomized studies.

[Retinal vein occlusion : Intravitreal pharmacotherapies and treatment strategies for the management of macular edema]. / Venöse retinale Gefäßverschlüsse : Intravitreale Therapien und Strategien zur Behandlung des Makulaödems.

Intravitreal injection treatment for the management of macular edema as an expression of increased capillary permeability and leakage constitute the mainstay of treatment in retinal vein occlusion. In contrast to diabetic retinopathy or neovascular age-related macular degeneration, permanent and complete functional and morphological restoration can be achieved, as retinal vein occlusions are usually associated with risk factors, but do not represent the manifestation form of an underlying systemic or degenerative chronic disorder; however, successful long-term management of retinal vein occlusion -associated macular edema usually requires intensive and also long-term continued treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors or with a less favorable side effect profile, dexamethasone. A functional treatment success can be maintained over the long term by both pro re nata (PRN) or treat and extend (T&E) regimens. In contrast, according to the currently available data, the combination of anti-VEGF administration and grid laser treatment has no additional benefit compared to monotherapy. In patients with recalcitrant macular edema, switching to another intravitreal agent may be considered during the course of treatment, although a true therapeutic benefit with respect to the development of visual acuity has not yet been proven. The current review summarizes the relevant aspects in the management of RVO-associated macular edema and provides the foundations for the application of successful treatment strategies.

[Biomarkers in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion]. / Biomarker in der Therapie venöser retinaler Gefäßverschlüsse.

BACKGROUND: Retinal vein occlusion, subdivided into central retinal and branch retinal vein occlusion, is one of the most frequent vascular diseases of the retina. Biomarkers of optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT-angiography and (ultra-widefield) fluorescein angiography are of exceptional importance in the initial diagnosis and also in the treatment of complications associated with retinal vascular occlusion, particularly macular edema. METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried out in PubMed with the keywords central retinal vein occlusion, branch retinal vein occlusion, biomarker, OCT, OCT angiography, ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography with prioritization of the most important aspects. RESULTS: Relevant biomarkers in OCT include central retinal thickness (CRT), macular fluid, the integrity of the photoreceptor bands (external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone), disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), hyperreflective foci, choroidal thickness and signs of ischemia, such as a prominent middle limiting membrane (p-MLM), paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) as well as hyperreflectivity of inner retinal layers (HIRL). The importance of OCT-angiography lies particularly in the assessment of microvascular alterations, especially vessel density in the deep retinal vascular plexus, the foveal avascular zone and of areas with no capillary perfusion. Biomarkers of ultra-widefield angiography, such as peripheral ischemia (ischemic index) and neovascularízation are essential with respect to treatment decisions for retinal laser. CONCLUSION: A multitude of simple and complex biomarkers currently enable an effective individualized evaluation of treatment and prognosis in retinal vein occlusion. A shift from invasive to noninvasive biomarkers can be observed.

Real-Time (iOCT) Guided Epiretinal Membrane Surgery Using a Novel Forceps with Laser-Ablated Microstructure Tip Surface.

PURPOSE: We investigated intraoperative OCT (iOCT)-guided epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal using a novel forceps with a laser-ablated tip surface; it was designed to help prevent indentation force, shear stress, or tractional trauma when grasping very fine membranes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent 23- and 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for vitreoretinal interface disorders. ERM and ILM peeling was performed under guidance with microscope-integrated iOCT using novel ILM forceps with laser-ablated tip surfaces. These forceps were engineered to enhance friction when grasping tissue. Evaluation of ERM/ILM manipulation included postoperative slow-motion video analysis of the number of grasping attempts, initial ILM mobilization, and observed damage to retinal tissue. RESULTS: ERM/ILM removal was successfully performed in all patients, with an average of four grasp actions to initial membrane mobilization (91%). Additional use of a diamond-dusted membrane scraper was used in two cases (9%). Mean best-recorded visual acuity (BRVA) logMAR improved from 0.5 ± 0.34 to 0.33 ± 0.36 (p = 0.05) and mean central retinal thickness (CRT) improved from 462 ± 146 µm to 359 ± 78 µm (p = 0.002). Postoperative iOCT video analysis demonstrated hyper-reflectivity of the inner retinal layers associated with retinal hemorrhage in five eyes (22%), but no grasping-related retinal breaks. CONCLUSIONS: The texturized surface on the tips of the ILM forceps were found to be helpful for mobilizing ILM edges from the retinal surface. iOCT-guided ERM surgery also allowed for improved intraoperative tissue visualization. We believe that these two technologies helped reduce both unnecessary surgical maneuvers and retinal damage.

Retinal Vascular Occlusion after COVID-19 Vaccination: More Coincidence than Causal Relationship? Data from a Retrospective Multicentre Study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is associated with the onset of retinal vascular occlusive disease (RVOD). METHODS: In this multicentre study, data from patients with central and branch retinal vein occlusion (CRVO and BRVO), central and branch retinal artery occlusion (CRAO and BRAO), and anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (AION) were retrospectively collected during a 2-month index period (1 June-31 July 2021) according to a defined protocol. The relation to any previous vaccination was documented for the consecutive case series. Numbers of RVOD and COVID-19 vaccination were investigated in a case-by-case analysis. A case-control study using age- and sex-matched controls from the general population (study participants from the Gutenberg Health Study) and an adjusted conditional logistic regression analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-one subjects presenting during the index period (61 days) were enrolled: one hundred and twenty-one patients with CRVO, seventy-five with BRVO, fifty-six with CRAO, sixty-five with BRAO, and one hundred and four with AION. Three hundred and thirty-two (78.9%) patients had been vaccinated before the onset of RVOD. The vaccines given were BNT162b2/BioNTech/Pfizer (n = 221), followed by ChadOx1/AstraZeneca (n = 57), mRNA-1273/Moderna (n = 21), and Ad26.COV2.S/Johnson & Johnson (n = 11; unknown n = 22). Our case-control analysis integrating population-based data from the GHS yielded no evidence of an increased risk after COVID-19 vaccination (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.60-1.45, p = 0.75) in connection with a vaccination within a 4-week window. CONCLUSIONS: To date, there has been no evidence of any association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and a higher RVOD risk.