ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Standard of care for postoperative analgesia after pancreas transplant has been thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). A high incidence of venous graft thrombosis necessitated a change to a more aggressive anticoagulation protocol. To minimize the risk of epidural hemorrhages, we changed from TEA to rectus sheath block (RSB) in 2017. METHODS: From June 2016 to December 2017, a total of 29 consecutive pancreas transplant recipients were included. Sixteen were treated with TEA and 13 were treated with RSB. In the TEA group, the catheter was inserted before induction of general anesthesia, and an epidural infusion was started intraoperatively. An ultrasound-guided RSB was performed bilaterally, and a bolus of local anesthetic was administered before an 18G catheter was inserted. The patients received intermittent local anesthetic boluses every 4 hours in addition to an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with oxycodone. Both groups received oral acetaminophen and additional rescue opioids. RESULTS: The administered amount of intravenous morphine equivalents (MEQ) was not significantly different between the RSB and TEA groups. The median MEQ consumption per day during the stay at the surgical ward was 23 mg MEQ/d (interquartile range [IQR], 14-33 mg MEQ/d) in the TEA group compared with 19 mg MEQ/d (IQR, 14-32 mg MEQ/d) in the RSB group (P = .4). The duration of the pain catheters was significantly longer in the RSB group. We had no complications related to insertion, use, or removal of the RSB or the TEA catheters, and overall patient satisfaction and comfort was good. CONCLUSION: Compared with TEA, RSB was equally effective and safe for postoperative analgesia in heavily anticoagulated pancreas transplant patients.
Subject(s)
Nerve Block/methods , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pancreas Transplantation/methods , Adult , Aged , Analgesia, Epidural , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Rectus Abdominis/drug effects , Rectus Abdominis/innervation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Until recently, pancreas transplantation has mostly been performed with exocrine drainage via duodenojejunostomy (DJ). Since 2012, DJ was substituted with duodenoduodenostomy (DD) in our hospital, allowing endoscopic access for biopsies. This study assessed safety profiles with DD versus DJ procedures and clinical outcomes with the DD technique in pancreas transplantation. DD patients (n = 117; 62 simultaneous pancreas-kidney [SPKDD ] and 55 pancreas transplantation alone [PTADD ] with median follow-up 2.2 years) were compared with DJ patients (n = 179; 167 SPKDJ and 12 PTADJ ) transplanted in the period 1998-2012 (pre-DD era). Postoperative bleeding and pancreas graft vein thrombosis requiring relaparotomy occurred in 17% and 9% of DD patients versus 10% (p = 0.077) and 6% (p = 0.21) in DJ patients, respectively. Pancreas graft rejection rates were still higher in PTADD patients versus SPKDD patients (p = 0.003). Hazard ratio (HR) for graft loss was 2.25 (95% CI 1.00, 5.05; p = 0.049) in PTADD versus SPKDD recipients. In conclusion, compared with the DJ procedure, the DD procedure did not reduce postoperative surgical complications requiring relaparatomy or improve clinical outcomes after pancreas transplantation despite serial pancreatic biopsies for rejection surveillance. It remains to be seen whether better rejection monitoring in DD patients translates into improved long-term pancreas graft survival.
Subject(s)
Duodenostomy/mortality , Graft Rejection/mortality , Jejunostomy/mortality , Pancreas Transplantation/mortality , Pancreatic Diseases/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/mortality , Postoperative Complications , Adult , Anastomosis, Surgical , Case-Control Studies , Drainage , Duodenostomy/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Survival , Humans , Jejunostomy/adverse effects , Male , Pancreas Transplantation/adverse effects , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to increase survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The trials documenting such benefit excluded patients with cardiogenic shock and only a few patients were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention prior to admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). We use therapeutic hypothermia whenever cardiac arrest patients do not wake up immediately after return of spontaneous circulation. METHODS: This paper reports the outcome of 50 OHCA patients with ventricular fibrillation admitted to a tertiary referral hospital for immediate coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention when indicated. Patients were treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) (23 of 50 patients) if indicated. All patients who were still comatose were treated with therapeutic hypothermia at 32-34 degrees C for 24 h before rewarming. The end-points were survival and cerebral performance category (CPC: 1, best; 5, dead) after 6 months. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (82%) survived until 6 months. Thirty-four patients (68%) were in CPC 1 or 2, and seven (14%) were in CPC 3. Of the 23 patients treated with IABP, 14 (61%) survived with CPC 1 or 2. In patients not treated with IABP, 20 patients (74%) survived with CPC 1 or 2. Forty patients (80%) developed myocardial infarction. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 36 patients (72%). CONCLUSION: In OHCA survivors who reached our hospital, the survival rate was high and the neurological outcome acceptable. Our results indicate that the use of therapeutic hypothermia is justified even in haemodynamically unstable patients and those treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.
