ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to compare length of hospital stay, transfusion rates, and re-intervention rates during hospitalization for transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P), open prostatectomy (OP), and laser therapy (LT) for surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). METHODS: URO-Cert is an organization, in which clinical data of prostatic diseases from 2 university, 19 public, and 3 private hospitals and 270 office-based urologists are collected in order to document treatment quality. Data on diagnostics, therapy, and course of disease are recorded web based. The analysis includes datasets from 2005 to 2017. RESULTS: Of 10,420 patients, 8,389 were treated with TUR-P, 1,334 with OP, and 697 with LT. Median length of hospital stay was 6 days (IQR: 4-7) for TUR-P, 9 days (IQR: 7-11) for OP, and 5 days (IQR: 4-6) for LT (p < 0.001). Risk for a hospital stay ≥7 days was higher for OP versus TUR-P (OR: 7.25; 95% CI = 6.27-8.36; p < 0.001) and LT (OR: 17.89; 95% CI = 14.12-22.65; p < 0.001) and higher for TUR-P versus LT (OR: 2.47; 95% CI = 2.03-3.01; p < 0.001). OP had a significantly higher risk for transfusions than TUR-P (OR: 2.44; 95% CI = 1.74-3.41; p < 0.001) and LT (OR: 3.32; 95% CI = 1.56-7.01; p < 0.001). Transfusion rates were not significantly different between TUR-P and LT (OR: 1.36; 95% CI = 0.66-2.79; p = 0.51). Risk of re-intervention was not different between all 3 approaches. CONCLUSION: OP was associated with higher transfusion rates and longer hospital stay than TUR-P and LT. Risk of transfusion was not different between TUR-P and LT, but TUR-P was inferior to LT concerning length of hospital stay. Re-intervention rates during hospitalization did not differ between the groups.
Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/surgery , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Transurethral Resection of Prostate , Aged , Blood Transfusion , Databases, Factual , Germany , Humans , Laser Therapy/adverse effects , Length of Stay , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/diagnosis , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/physiopathology , Male , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Prostatic Hyperplasia/diagnosis , Prostatic Hyperplasia/physiopathology , Recovery of Function , Retreatment , Time Factors , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , UrodynamicsABSTRACT
Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) represents one of the most significant risk factors for acute pyelonephritis in children. The current indications for the surgical correction of VUR depend on the presence or absence of renal scars. If no scars are present, primary ureteral reimplantation is only indicated in high-grade bilateral VUR, whereas in the presence of renal scars surgical correction is indicated in low/high grade reflux at a young age. Since there are numerous techniques for antireflux surgery available, it is the purpose of this article to critically review these techniques with their specific advantages, typical complications and postoperative management. In general, all surgical technique have a high success rate of 92-98%. The extravesical Lich-Gregoir technique is primarily indicated in unilateral VUR. Children with a high-grade VUR, who are under the age of 3 years and boys are prone to the development of postoperative urinary retention and might be considered for intravesical surgical techniques. The Politano-Leadbetter technique is very helpful in correcting bilateral VUR of any grade in one session to create a neo-ostium in an anatomically correct position which is easily accessible for endourological manipulations. The Psoas hitch ureteroneocystotomy is an excellent technique to correct VUR associated with megaureter, or with duplicated ureters, and VUR failures. Endoscopic subureteral injections are primarily reserved for low grade VUR with a one session success rate of >90%. Endoscopic subureteral injections appear to be an alternative to long-term antibiotics in grade I-III VUR. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery has not gained widespread use due to the very long operating times. Contralateral VUR will occur in about 20% of children undergoing unilateral antireflux surgery; risk factors are severe VUR and VUR into a duplicated system. Postoperative follow-up nowadays consists of urinalysis and ultrasonography; voiding cystourethrography is only indicated in case of febrile urinary tract infection. Despite the excellent success rates following antireflux surgery one has to keep in mind that surgery only corrects the anatomical abnormality. The long-term outcome with regard to renal function, posttherapeutic febrile urinary tract infections and arterial hypertension does not differ significantly from the medication group except for those patients with a demonstrated a genetic background. Therefore, the indication for surgery and the surgical technique applied have to be discussed thoroughly and must be associated with a minimal complication rate.
Subject(s)
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/surgery , Child , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Postoperative Care , Preoperative Care , Time Factors , Ureteroscopy , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Endoscopic lithotripsy is still the method of choice for a number of stones, especially large renal stones. Various disintegration techniques exist. Ultrasound is widely used because it is the only method that allows disintegration and active suction of stone debris at the same time. We evaluated 4 ultrasound lithotriptors in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a newly developed experimental setup and compared 4 ultrasound devices, namely the 27085 K (Karl Storz Endoscopy, Tuttlingen, Germany), 2167.01 (Wolf, Knittlingen, Germany), USL 2000 (Circon Corp., Santa Barbara, California) and an ultrasound prototype lithotriptor (EMS, Nyon, Switzerland). RESULTS All ultrasound lithotriptors achieved stone disintegration, which depended on the pressure used to apply ultrasound. Newer devices with modified technology provided better disintegration. CONCLUSIONS: All ultrasound devices are effective for lithotripsy. Changes in the ultrasound setup and integration of modern technical knowledge into ultrasound devices increase efficacy.
Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi/therapy , Lithotripsy/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Local therapy of the prostate could have a role in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia as well as prostate cancer. Endoscopic jet injection could simplify these treatments. We evaluated the tissue effects of endoscopic jet injection in an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An endoscopic jet injector was developed. In 12 beagle dogs the prostate was injected with single shot and continuous mode jet injection. Macroscopic and histological analysis was performed 0, 2 and 14 days after jet injection. RESULTS: Jet injection allowed complete penetration of the beagle prostate. The single shot technique resulted in only minimal tissue effects. However, the continuous mode led to major tissue damage, even complete aseptic necrosis, in the injected area. CONCLUSIONS: A new method for endoscopic application of fluids is described. Depending on the jet injection technique it could be used to apply pharmaceutical agents or plasmids, and/or induce aseptic necrosis.