Colorectal Cancer Initial Diagnosis: Screening Colonoscopy, Diagnostic Colonoscopy, or Emergent Surgery, and Tumor Stage and Size at Initial Presentation.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Rates of colorectal cancer screening are improving but remain suboptimal. Limited information is available regarding how patients are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (for example, asymptomatic screened patients or diagnostic workup because of the presence of symptoms). The purpose of this investigation was to determine how patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (screening colonoscopy, diagnostic colonoscopy, or emergent surgery) and tumor stage and size at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults evaluated between 2011 and 2014 with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer were identified. Clinical notes, endoscopy reports, surgical reports, radiology reports, and pathology reports were reviewed. Sex, race, ethnicity, age at the time of initial diagnosis, method of diagnosis, presenting symptom(s), and primary tumor size and stage at diagnosis were recorded. Colorectal cancer screening history was also recorded. RESULTS: The study population was 54% male (265 of 492) with a mean age of 58.9 years (range, 25-93 years). Initial tissue diagnosis was established at the time of screening colonoscopy in 10.7%, diagnostic colonoscopy in 79.2%, and during emergent surgery in 7.1%. Cancers diagnosed at the time of screening colonoscopy were more likely to be stage 1 than cancers diagnosed at the time of diagnostic colonoscopy or emergent surgery (38.5%, 7.2%, and 0%, respectively). Median tumor size was 3.0 cm for the screening colonoscopy group, 4.6 cm for the diagnostic colonoscopy group, and 5.0 cm for the emergent surgery group. At least 31% of patients diagnosed at the time of screening colonoscopy, 19% of patients diagnosed at the time of diagnostic colonoscopy, and 26% of patients diagnosed at the time of emergent surgery had never undergone a screening colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: Nearly 90% of colorectal cancer patients were diagnosed after development of symptoms and had more advanced disease than asymptomatic screening patients. Colorectal cancer outcomes will be improved by improving rates of colorectal cancer screening.

Clinicopathologic Features and Outcome of Young Adults With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer has a distinct clinicopathologic presentation in younger patients. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the outcome of younger (age below 50 y) and older patients with stage IV (advanced) colorectal cancer in the modern era of combination chemotherapy. METHODS: Cases of metastatic colorectal cancer reported in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (1973 to 2008) were reviewed. Demographics, tumor characteristics, and overall and cancer-specific survivals in patients below 50 and above 50 years of age were compared by Cox proportional hazard analyses. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to evaluate secular trends in 2-year survival. RESULTS: Younger patients had a greater proportion of negative clinicopathologic features (male sex, African American ethnicity, and signet ring or mucinous histology). In multivariate analysis, older age, male sex, African American ethnicity, right-sided tumors, and signet ring histology were associated with higher mortality risk. Younger patients had improved survival (hazard ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.75) compared with older patients, whereas all patients experienced increased 2-year survival by joinpoint analysis beginning in 1999-2000. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm decreased mortality from advanced colorectal cancer in the era of modern combination chemotherapy in younger and older patients. Younger age, non-right-sided tumors, and absence of signet ring histology significantly associate with better survival.

Small cell carcinoma of the anus in the setting of prior squamous dysplasia and carcinoma in situ.

Small cell carcinoma of the anus is a rare tumor that has been infrequently described in the literature. In contrast to squamous cell carcinoma, which is known to be associated with high-risk subtypes of human papillomavirus (HPV), the etiology of small cell carcinoma of the anal canal is not established. We present a case of a patient with small cell carcinoma of the anal canal in the setting of prior squamous dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. In conjunction with recently published data demonstrating the presence of HPV in tumor specimens from patients with small cell carcinoma of the anal canal, our patient's clinical course suggests a possible link between HPV and this rare malignancy.