A Claims-Based Method for Identification and Characterization of Practicing Interventional Radiologists.

PURPOSE: To propose a research method for identifying "practicing interventional radiologists" using 2 national claims data sets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2015-2019 100% Medicare Part B data and 2015-2019 private insurance claims from Optum's Clinformatics Data Mart (CDM) database were used to rank-order radiologists' interventional radiology (IR)-related work as a percentage of total billed work relative value units (RVUs). Characteristics were analyzed at various threshold percentages. External validation used Medicare self-designated specialty with Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) membership records; Youden index evaluated sensitivity and specificity. Multivariate logistic regression assessed practicing IR characteristics. RESULTS: In the Medicare data, above a 10% IR-related work threshold, only 23.8% of selected practicing interventional radiologists were designated as interventional radiologists; above 50% and 90% thresholds, this percentage increased to 42.0% and 47.5%, respectively. The mean percentage of IR-related work among practicing interventional radiologists was 45%, 84%, and 96% of total work RVUs for the 10%, 50%, and 90% thresholds, respectively. At these thresholds, the CDM practicing interventional radiologists included 21.2%, 35.2%, and 38.4% designated interventional radiologists, and evaluation and management services comprised relatively more total work RVUs. Practicing interventional radiologists were more likely to be males, metropolitan, and earlier in their careers than other radiologists at all thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Most radiologists performing IR-related work are designated in claims data as diagnostic radiologists, indicating insufficiency of specialty designation for IR identification. The proposed method to identify practicing interventional radiologists by percent IR-related work effort could improve generalizability and comparability across claims-based IR studies.

Technical Feasibility and Clinical Efficacy of Iliac Vein Stent Placement in Adolescents and Young Adults with May-Thurner Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To report technical feasibility and clinical efficacy of iliac vein stent placement in adolescent patients with May-Thurner Syndrome (MTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-institution retrospective review of the medical record between 2014 and 2021 found 63 symptomatic patients (F = 40/63; mean age 16.1 years, 12-20 years) who underwent left common iliac vein (LCIV) stent placement for treatment of LCIV compression from an overriding right common iliac artery, or equivalent (n = 1, left IVC). 32/63 (50.7%) patients presented with non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVL). 31/63 (49.2%) patients presented with deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity and required catheter-directed thrombolysis after stent placement (tMTS). Outcomes include technically successful stent placement with resolution of anatomic compression and symptom improvement. Stent patency was monitored with Kaplan-Meier analysis at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet (AC/AP) regimens were reported. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 98.4%. 74 bare-metal self-expanding stents were placed in 63 patients. Primary patency at 12, and 24-months was 93.5%, and 88.9% for the NIVL group and 84.4% and 84.4% for the tMTS group for the same period. Overall patency for the same time intervals was 100%, and 95.4% for the NIVL group and 96.9%, and 96.9% for the tMTS group. Procedural complication rate was 3.2% (2/63) with no thrombolysis-related bleeding complications. Clinical success was achieved in 30/32 (93.8%) and 29/31 (93.5%) patients with tMTS and NIVL groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: CIV stent placement in the setting of tMTS and NIVL is technically feasible and clinically efficacious in young patients with excellent patency rates and a favorable safety profile.

Mid-to-long-term outcomes with image-guided placement of de novo low-profile gastrojejunostomy tubes in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: De novo low-profile gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tubes are advantageous in children that require prolonged supplemental nutrition. However, few institutions place these devices at the time of initial feeding tube placement. We aim to build upon our previously published initial experience with this procedure to study mid-to-long-term outcomes of pediatric patients who have had de novo, image-guided, percutaneous low-profile GJ tube placement. METHODS: All de novo, image-guided, percutaneous, low-profile GJ tube placements at a single children's hospital were retrospectively reviewed between May 2014 and March 2021. Technical parameters, including fluoroscopy time, tube size, technical success, and complications were recorded. Clinical data, including age, indication, weight gain and transition to gastric/oral feeds were analyzed. RESULTS: 64 de novo low-profile GJ tubes were successfully placed in 65 patients (mean age: 4.6 years, median: 1, range: 0.2-19; mean pre-procedural weight: 16.8 kg, median: 8.2, range: 4.4-66.7). Average clinical follow-up 23.4 months (range: 0.1-75, median 10.4). Average weight gain was 6.1 kg. Average increase in weight percentile was 7.3%. 19 (19/64; 29.7%) patients had conversion from GJ to G tube. 11 (11/64; 17.2%) patients had their enteric tube removed completely. There were 7 minor complications (7/65; 10.7%), most common being excessive skin irritation (6/7) and 9 major complications (9/65; 13.8%), most common being tube dislodgment within the first 30 days (6/9). CONCLUSIONS: These results further support that de novo, image-guided, percutaneous, low-profile GJ tube placement is technically feasible and efficacious in children requiring post-pyloric nutritional supplementation with a favorable safety profile.

Bridging the Divide: Unintended Consequences of the Shift to Home-Based Telemedicine.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on health care access of the change in telemedicine delivery from a clinic-based model, in which patients connect with their healthcare provider from local telemedicine clinics, to a home-based model, in which patients independently connect from their homes. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective analysis, we compared relative uptake in telemedicine services in Period 1 (01/01/2019 to 03/15/2020, prepandemic, clinic-based model) vs Period 2 (03/16/2020 to 06/30/2022, home-based model) within a tertiary pediatric hospital system. Using multivariable logistic regression, we investigated the influence of telemedicine delivery model on patient sociodemographic characteristics of completed telemedicine visits. RESULTS: We analyzed 400 539 patients with 1 406 961 completed outpatient encounters (52% White, 35% Black), of which 62 920 (4.5%) were telemedicine. In the clinic-based model (Period 1), underserved populations had greater likelihoods of accessing telemedicine: Hispanic ethnicity (OR = 1.41, P = .028) vs reference group non-Hispanic, Medicaid (OR = 2.62, P < .001) vs private insurance, and low-income neighborhood (OR = 3.40, P < .001) vs medium-income. In aggregate, telemedicine utilization rapidly increased from Period 1 (1.5 encounters/day) to Period 2 (107.9 encounters/day). However, underserved populations saw less relative increase (Medicaid [OR = 0.28, P < .001], Hispanic [OR = 0.53, P < .001], low-income [OR = 0.23, P < .001]). CONCLUSIONS: We observe that the clinic-based model offers more equitable access, while the home-based model offers more absolute access, suggesting that a hybrid model that offers both home-based and clinic-based services may result in more absolute and equitable access to telemedicine.

Contemporary management of extracranial vascular malformations.

Vascular malformations are congenital vascular anomalies that originate because of disorganized angiogenesis, most commonly from spontaneous somatic genetic mutations. The modern management of vascular malformations requires a multidisciplinary team that offers patients the gamut of medical, surgical, and percutaneous treatment options with supportive care. This manuscript discusses the standard and contemporary management strategies surrounding extracranial vascular malformations and overgrowth syndromes.

Research Consensus Panel Follow-Up: A Systematic Review and Update on Cost Research in IR.

PURPOSE: To systematically review cost research in interventional radiology (IR) published since the Society of Interventional Radiology Research Consensus Panel on Cost in December 2016. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective assessment of cost research in adult and pediatric IR since December 2016 to July 2022 was conducted. All cost methodologies, service lines, and IR modalities were screened. Analyses were reported in a standardized fashion to include service lines, comparators, cost variables, analytical processes, and databases used. RESULTS: There were 62 studies published, with most from the United States (58%). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, quality-adjusted life-years, and time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) analyses were performed in 50%, 48%, and 10%, respectively. The most frequently reported service line was interventional oncology (21%). No studies on venous thromboembolism, biliary, or IR endocrine therapies were found. Cost reporting was heterogeneous owing to varying cost variables, databases, time horizons, and willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. IR therapies were more cost-effective than their non-IR counterparts for treating hepatocellular carcinoma ($55,925 vs $211,286), renal tumors ($12,435 vs $19,399), benign prostatic hyperplasia ($6,464 vs $9,221), uterine fibroids ($3,772 vs $6,318), subarachnoid hemorrhage ($1,923 vs $4,343), and stroke ($551,159 vs $577,181). TDABC identified disposable costs contributing most to total IR costs: thoracic duct embolization (68%), ablation (42%), chemoembolization (30%), radioembolization (80%), and venous malformations (75%). CONCLUSIONS: Although much of the contemporary cost-based research in IR aligned with the recommendations by the Research Consensus Panel, gaps remained in service lines, standardization of methodology, and addressing high disposable costs. Future steps include tailoring WTP thresholds to nation and health systems, cost-effective pricing for disposables, and standardizing cost sourcing methodology.

Introduction to interventional oncology: A COG Diagnostic Imaging Committee/SPR Oncology Committee White Paper.

Interventional radiology (IR) is a valuable resource when caring for pediatric solid tumor patients. As minimally invasive, image-guided procedures become more relied upon to answer challenging diagnostic questions and provide alternative therapeutic options, IR is poised to become a contributing member of the multidisciplinary oncology team. Improved imaging techniques allow for better visualization during biopsy procedures, transarterial locoregional treatments have the potential to deliver targeted cytotoxic therapy while limiting systemic side effects, and percutaneous thermal ablation can be used to treat chemo-resistant tumors of various solid organs. Additionally, interventional radiologists are able to perform routine, supportive procedures for oncology patients that include central venous access placement, lumbar punctures, and enteric feeding tube placements with high levels of technical success and excellent safety profiles.

Introduction to interventional radiology's role in palliative care for children with cancer: A COG Diagnostic Imaging Committee/SPR Oncology Committee White Paper.

As palliative care continues to be an area of increasing emphasis in pediatric oncology programs, it is important to raise awareness about minimally invasive, image-guided procedures that can supplement more conventional palliative interventions, such as systemic analgesics, external beam radiation, and locoregional anesthesia. These procedures, when performed for appropriately selected patients, can often facilitate discharge from an inpatient facility, and help patients meet their end-of-life goals. This article specifically discusses three palliative procedures performed by interventional radiologists that can assist pediatric palliative care teams in: (a) percutaneous thermal ablation of painful bone metastases, (b) cryoneurolysis, and (c) tunneled drainage catheter placement for malignant pleural effusions and ascites.

Current State of Private Practice and Academic Interventional Radiology: Differences in Practice Structure, Case Mix, and Productivity.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether private practice interventional radiology (IR) groups self-report higher overall productivity given differing case mix and more diagnostic radiology interpretation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 60-question survey was distributed to 3,159 self-identified US IR physicians via the Society of Interventional Radiologists member search engine, with 357 responses (11.3% response rate). Of these responses, there were 258 unique practices from 34 US states. RESULTS: Out of 84 IR group responses, private practice IR (PPIR) physicians reported a minimal trend for higher annual work relative value units (wRVUs) per clinical full-time equivalent compared with academic IR physicians (8,000 versus 7,140, P = .202), but this did not reach statistical significance. PPIR groups reported fewer median weekly hours (50 versus 52), more frequent call (every 6 versus every 5 days), and significantly higher median tenured compensation ($573,000 versus $451,000, P = .000). Out of 179 responses, academic practices reported significantly higher case percentages of interventional oncology and complex hepatobiliary intervention (P <.001), and private practices reported significantly higher percentages of musculoskeletal intervention (P < .001) with a nonsignificant trend for stroke or neurologic intervention (P = .010). Private practices reported more wRVUs from the interpretation of diagnostic imaging, at 26% of total wRVU production compared with 7% of total wRVU production for academic practices (P < .001; n = 131). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported data from private and academic IR groups suggest minimally higher wRVUs per clinical full-time equivalent among PPIRs with lower weekly work hours, more frequent call, differing case mix, and significantly higher tenured compensation among PPIR groups.

How we established a multidisciplinary program for vascular anomalies.

The care of patients with vascular anomalies is quickly becoming a complex field requiring high-quality, coordinated multidisciplinary care. In this article, we review the history of multidisciplinary care in this field, discuss the benefits of this model of care, and outline some of the essential components and structure of a successful vascular anomalies team. We provide an overview of two example programs and a roadmap for other centers to develop their own multidisciplinary vascular anomalies teams.

Intellectual property: A primer for radiologists.

Typically the creative product of the mind, intellectual property often forms the basis of a new product, service line, or company. Intellectual property law is complicated and nuanced, and poorly understood by many physicians, innovators, and entrepreneurs. Successfully navigating the process of intellectual property protection is critical in facilitating the translation of innovation into clinical practice. We define intellectual property and common terms used in intellectual property law and offer justification for the importance of intellectual property protections. We additionally highlight resources to assist radiologists with intellectual property protection and outline basic guidelines to successfully initiate discussions around intellectual property with third party vendors and consultants. SUMMARY: Proactive intellectual property protection is critically important for radiologist innovators seeking to bring new ideas to the marketplace.

Reductions in Reimbursement and Relative Value Units for Interventional Radiology Procedures: Trends from 2011 to 2021 Compared with Those for Other Physician Specialties.

PURPOSE: To compare recent trends in Medicare reimbursement and relative value units (RVUs) for interventional radiology (IR) procedures similar to those performed by non-IR specialties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule for facility reimbursement and RVU component values for 23 commonly performed single Current Procedural Terminology IR procedures were compared with similar procedures or procedures for similar indications performed by non-IR specialties between 2011 and 2021. RESULTS: The work RVU component decreased in 18 of 23 (78.3%) IR procedures compared with 6 of 23 (26.1%) similar procedures performed by non-IR specialties. The largest change in single RVU component was a 19.2% reduction in practice expense RVU for IR compared with a 16.5% reduction for similar procedures performed by non-IR specialties. CONCLUSIONS: As a specialty, IR experienced a disproportionately greater reduction in reimbursement and RVU valuation for a range of comparable procedures performed by non-IR specialties.

Percutaneous image-guided treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts: is there a superior treatment option?

BACKGROUND: Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are often treated with intralesional surgery (curettage) with or without adjuvant treatments. Side effects and conflicting results regarding recurrence rates do not suggest one clearly superior therapy. Percutaneous therapeutic options including sclerotherapy and thermal ablation have gained popularity as potential alternatives. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective review is to report this institution's experience and results of various image-guided minimally invasive treatments in a single institution series of cases referred to interventional radiology by orthopedic surgery after surgical failure or in patients with anatomically challenging ABCs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study identified all patients ≤18 years old who received percutaneous therapy for an ABC, including cryoablation, doxycycline sclerotherapy, microwave ablation or a combination of these modalities. Procedural details, complications, imaging follow-up and clinical follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients received 41 procedures, with major complications seen in 7.7% (3/39) of procedures involving cryoablation or doxycycline sclerotherapy. Patients receiving cryoablation required an average of 1.7 procedures (median: 1 procedure, range: 1-4 procedures) while patients receiving doxycycline sclerotherapy required an average of 3 procedures (median: 2 procedures, range: 1-6 procedures). Patients were followed clinically and with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (average: 23.9 months, range: 3.9-68.3 months). Follow-up imaging demonstrated improvement in 17 (85%) patients. Clinically, 93.8% (15/16) of patients who presented with fracture or pain had markedly reduced or absent pain as well as no fractures. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous image-guided treatment of ABCs demonstrates a favorable efficacy and safety profile. Adding cryoablation may lead to fewer total procedures than using doxycycline sclerotherapy alone.

Coagulopathy and related complications following sclerotherapy of congenital venous malformations.

BACKGROUND: Congenital venous malformations (VMs) are low-flow vascular anomalies that can cause coagulation abnormalities. This phenomenon, referred to as localized intravascular coagulopathy (LIC), is characterized by elevated D-dimer, hypofibrinogenemia, and/or thrombocytopenia. Increased risk for LIC includes patients with an extensive VM, multifocal VM, and Klippel-Trenaunay and CLOVES syndromes. Peri-procedural anticoagulation has been given to prevent complications from LIC in patients undergoing surgical/interventional procedures; however, the rate of clinically relevant complications from sclerotherapy is largely unknown. The purpose of this study is to describe a single-institution's incidence of LIC in patients with VMs and coagulopathy-related complications following sclerotherapy. DESIGN/METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients, 0-21 years of age, with VM who underwent sclerotherapy without peri-procedural anticoagulation and had coagulation profiles evaluated within 1 month prior to sclerotherapy. DATA COLLECTED: diagnosis type (high vs. low risk for LIC), coagulation profile (including PT/PTT, D-dimer, fibrinogen, and platelet count), sclerosant used, and post-procedure outcomes. Coagulopathy-related complications included clinically relevant bleeding, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE). RESULTS: N = 138 patients; 59.4% were female. The most common location of VM was the lower extremity (47.8%; 66/138). Of patients with high-risk VMs (29/138 [21%]), 11/29 (37.9%) had laboratory values consistent with LIC, whereas 5% (5/109) of low-risk VMs had LIC. In sum, 492 sclerotherapy procedures were performed with no complications of bleeding, DVT, or PE. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing sclerotherapy for VM with abnormal coagulation profiles may not require peri-procedural low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Further studies are needed to precisely define which patients would benefit from anticoagulation.

Defining the Value of Interventional Radiology to Healthcare Stakeholders: Proceedings from a Society of Interventional Radiology Research Consensus Panel.

Interventional radiology (IR) has collectively struggled to articulate and prove its value to several external stakeholders. The goal of this research consensus panel was to provide a summary of the existing knowledge, identify current gaps in knowledge, identify the strengths and weaknesses in existing data, and prioritize research needs related to the value of IR. Panelists were asked to identify the critical relationships/alliances that should be fostered to advance the prioritized research and determine how the Society of Interventional Radiology and the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation can further support these initiatives. Following presentations and discussions, it was determined that proving and quantifying how IR decreases the length of stay and prevents hospital admissions are the most salient, value-related research topics to pursue for the specialty.

Percutaneous cryoablation of chondroblastoma and osteoblastoma in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: To review the safety and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation for the treatment of chondroblastoma and osteoblastoma in the pediatric and adolescent population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review from 2016 to 2020 was performed to evaluate clinical and imaging response to percutaneous cryoablation in 11 symptomatic patients with diagnosis of chondroblastoma and osteoblastoma treated from two pediatric hospitals with at least 12-month follow-up. Technical success (correct needle placement and potential full coverage of the tumor with the planned ablation zone) and clinical success (relief of the symptoms) were evaluated. The primary objective was to alleviate pain related to the lesion(s). Immediate and late complications were recorded. Patients were followed in clinic and with imaging studies such as MRI or CT for a minimum of 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were included (mean 14 years, age range 9-17; male n = 8). Diagnoses were osteoblastoma (n = 4) and chondroblastoma (n = 7). Locations were proximal humerus (n = 1), femur condyle (n = 1), and proximal femur (n = 1) tibia (n = 3), acetabulum (n = 3), thoracic vertebra (n = 1) and lumbar vertebra (n = 1). Cryoablation was technically successful in all patients. Clinical success (cessation of pain) was achieved in all patients. No signs of recurrence were observed on imaging follow-up in any of the patients. One of the patients developed periprocedural right L2-L3 transient radiculopathy as major immediate complication. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation can be considered potentially safe and effective treatment for chondroblastoma and osteoblastoma in children and adolescents.

Vascular anomalies of the head and neck: diagnosis and treatment.

Vascular malformations and vascular tumors comprise the two specific subsets of vascular anomalies that arise as a result of disorganized angiogenesis and neoplasm, respectively. Malformations are separate entities from vascular tumors (e.g., hemangiomas) and are recognized by the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA) as such. Vascular malformations are classified into four main groups: simple, combined, anomalies of major vessels, and those associated with other vascular anomalies. Vascular tumors are neoplastic growths of blood vessels and are morphologically and molecularly distinct from malformations but can arise in the head and neck and have syndromic association. Head and neck vascular anomalies are not uncommon in the pediatric population and require special care in the workup, diagnostic imaging and clinical care. The purpose of this manuscript is to discuss the diagnosis and management of the most common intracranial and extracranial vascular malformations and tumors in the head and neck in children and adolescents.

Endovascular management of nutcracker syndrome in an adolescent patient population.

BACKGROUND: Nutcracker syndrome is defined as left renal vein compression with concomitant clinical symptoms that include flank pain and hematuria. Historically, pediatric and adolescent patients with mild symptoms of nutcracker syndrome were simply observed while those with more severe symptoms underwent left renal vein transposition. Endovascular stenting of the left renal vein is a potentially efficacious and less invasive alternative for managing nutcracker syndrome in adolescents. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the technical feasibility, efficacy and safety of left renal vein stenting in adolescents with nutcracker syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records and imaging archives to identify adolescents undergoing endovascular stenting for nutcracker syndrome. We reviewed patient demographics including age, gender, presenting symptoms and diagnostic imaging findings. We compared pre- and post-stent deployment intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and venography and evaluated patient symptoms in clinic up to 6 months following stent placement. RESULTS: Ten patients (average age 16 years, range 12-20 years) underwent 13 procedures. Initial symptoms included pain (n=10) and gross hematuria (n=5). Diagnostic imaging studies included CT abdomen pelvis (n=8), retroperitoneal US (n=6), MRI abdomen/pelvis (n=4), scrotal US (n=2), pelvic US (n=1) and renal Doppler US (n=2). Venography and IVUS demonstrated venous collaterals, proximal blanching at the left-renal-vein-IVC junction, pre-stenotic dilation and intraluminal compression. Most patients (n=9) experienced symptomatic resolution; however, three patients required reintervention to achieve asymptomatic status. No periprocedural complications occurred. CONCLUSION: In this carefully selected adolescent cohort, left renal vein stenting for nutcracker syndrome was often technically feasible, safe and effective in symptom management.