Study protocol for The GOAL Trial: comprehensive geriatric assessment for frail older people with chronic kidney disease to increase attainment of patient-identified goals-a cluster randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of older people are living with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Many have complex healthcare needs and are at risk of deteriorating health and functional status, which can adversely affect their quality of life. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an effective intervention to improve survival and independence of older people, but its clinical utility and cost-effectiveness in frail older people living with CKD is unknown. METHODS: The GOAL Trial is a pragmatic, multi-centre, open-label, superiority, cluster randomised controlled trial developed by consumers, clinicians, and researchers. It has a two-arm design, CGA compared with standard care, with 1:1 allocation of a total of 16 clusters. Within each cluster, study participants ≥ 65 years of age (or ≥ 55 years if Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (First Nations Australians)) with CKD stage 3-5/5D who are frail, measured by a Frailty Index (FI) of > 0.25, are recruited. Participants in intervention clusters receive a CGA by a geriatrician to identify medical, social, and functional needs, optimise medication prescribing, and arrange multidisciplinary referral if required. Those in standard care clusters receive usual care. The primary outcome is attainment of self-identified goals assessed by standardised Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include GAS at 6 and 12 months, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), frailty (Frailty Index - Short Form), transfer to residential aged care facilities, cost-effectiveness, and safety (cause-specific hospitalisations, mortality). A process evaluation will be conducted in parallel with the trial including whether the intervention was delivered as intended, any issue or local barriers to intervention delivery, and perceptions of the intervention by participants. The trial has 90% power to detect a clinically meaningful mean difference in GAS of 10 units. DISCUSSION: This trial addresses patient-prioritised outcomes. It will be conducted, disseminated and implemented by clinicians and researchers in partnership with consumers. If CGA is found to have clinical and cost-effectiveness for frail older people with CKD, the intervention framework could be embedded into routine clinical practice. The implementation of the trial's findings will be supported by presentations at conferences and forums with clinicians and consumers at specifically convened workshops, to enable rapid adoption into practice and policy for both nephrology and geriatric disciplines. It has potential to materially advance patient-centred care and improve clinical and patient-reported outcomes (including quality of life) for frail older people living with CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04538157. Registered on 3 September 2020.

Postoperative outcomes after bariatric surgery in patients on chronic dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a barrier to kidney transplantation for patients with kidney failure. Consequently, bariatric surgery is often considered as a bridge to transplantation, even though its risks and benefits are poorly characterised in the dialysis population. METHODS: Systematic searches of observational studies indexed in Embase, MEDLINE and CENTRAL till April 2020 were performed to identify relevant studies. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and quality of evidence was summarised in accordance with GRADE methodology. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to obtain summary odds ratios for postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Four cohort studies involving 4196 chronic dialysis and 732,204 non-dialysis patients undergoing bariatric surgery were included. Sleeve gastrectomy (61%), and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (29%) were the most common procedures performed. Absolute rates of adverse events were low, but the odds of postoperative mortality (0.4-0.5% vs. 0.1%; odds ratio [OR] 4.7, 95%CI 2.2-9.9), and myocardial infarction (0.0-0.5% vs. 0.1%, OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.0-5.9) were higher in dialysis compared to non-dialysis patients. Patients on dialysis also had more than 2-fold increased odds of returning to theatre and having a readmission. Rates of kidney transplant wait-listing among dialysis patients was 59%, with 28% of all patients eventually receiving a kidney transplant. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving chronic dialysis have substantially increased odds of postoperative mortality and myocardial infarction following bariatric surgery compared with patient who do not have kidney failure. It is uncertain whether bariatric surgery improves the likelihood of kidney transplantation, with mid- to long-term outcomes being poorly described.

Design and methods of the REMOVAL-HD study: a tRial Evaluating Mid cut-Off Value membrane clearance of Albumin and Light chains in HaemoDialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Removal of uraemic toxins is inadequate using current dialysis strategies. A new class of dialysis membranes have been developed that allow clearance of larger middle molecules. The REMOVAL-HD study (a tRial Evaluating Mid cut-Off Value membrane clearance of Albumin and Light chains in HaemoDialysis patients) will address safety, efficacy and the impact on patient-centred outcomes with the use of a mid cut-off (MCO) dialyser in a chronic haemodialysis (HD) population. METHODS: REMOVAL-HD is an open label, prospective, non-randomised, single-arm, multi-centre device study in 85 chronic HD participants. All visits will be conducted during regular HD sessions and participants will undergo a 1 month wash-in period using a standardised high flux dialyser, 6 months of intervention with a MCO dialyser and 1 month of wash-out using a high flux dialyser. The primary endpoint is change in pre-dialysis concentrations of serum albumin, with secondary endpoints including the efficacy of clearance of free light chains and ß-2 microglobulin, and patient-centred outcomes including quality of life, symptom burden, functional status, nutritional status, hospitalisation and death. DISCUSSION: MCO dialysers are a novel form of HD membrane. The REMOVAL-HD study is a pivotal study designed to monitor the immediate and medium-term effects following exposure to this dialyser. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number (ANZCTRN) 12616000804482 . Date of registration - 21/06/2016.

Cutaneous manifestations of cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients: a case series.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important and well-described opportunistic virus in the immunocompromised host, with infection occurring mainly after the first month in the new renal transplant recipient. CMV can present as primary infection, reinfection, or reactivation of latent disease. It is capable of protean manifestations. Cutaneous manifestations are variable, rare, and diagnosis often delayed. We present 3 cases of cutaneous CMV disease in renal transplant recipients. Manifestations in our patients included ulceration of the tongue and perianal areas, facial petechiae, and nodular lesion involving the ear. This case series serves to highlight the importance of early skin biopsy in the diagnosis and management of cutaneous CMV disease.

Automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis have similar outcomes.

We compared survival and death-censored technique survival in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (automated dialysis) or on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. All 4128 patients from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry who started peritoneal dialysis over a 5-year period through March 2004 were included. Times to death and death-censored technique failure were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards models while a conditional risk set model computed technique failure. Compared to patients treated entirely with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, automated peritoneal dialysis patients were more likely to be young, Caucasian, have marginally lower body mass index, and were less likely to have baseline cardiovascular disease or diabetes. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, our study showed there were no significant differences in patient survival and death-censored technique failure between the two types of peritoneal dialysis modalities.

Non-melanoma skin cancer risk in the Queensland renal transplant population.

BACKGROUND: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is an important complication of solid organ transplantation, especially in areas of high ultraviolet light exposure. Registry data may underestimate the scale of the problem. OBJECTIVES: A single-observer study of a Queensland renal transplant population was conducted between July 1999 and April 2000 utilizing both cross-sectional and retrospective data. The aims were to determine accurately the risk of NMSC following renal transplantation and compare this with currently available registry data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A structured interview and full skin examination was completed by 398 renal transplant recipients. Case notes and histology reports were examined for details of previous skin tumours. Independently collected data on 341 subjects from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplantation Registry (ANZDATA) were also examined. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-seven of 361 (51.8%) transplant recipients of Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV had developed 3979 histologically diagnosed NMSCs since first transplantation. The ratio of SCC/BCC was reversed from 1 : 3.7 before transplantation to 2 : 1 after transplantation. NMSC increased with duration of immunosuppression; 29.1%, 52.2%, 72.4% and 82.1% of those immunosuppressed for < 5, 5-10, 10-20 and > 20 years, respectively, had developed at least one tumour. The ANZDATA registry under-recorded the numbers of patients with NMSC by 28.4% and gave no indication of tumour numbers. CONCLUSIONS: NMSC is a greater clinical problem in renal transplant recipients living in subtropical Queensland, Australia, than is shown by currently available registry data. This has implications for the development of prevention and surveillance strategies.

A prospective crossover trial comparing intermittent intravenous and continuous oral iron supplements in peritoneal dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant iron supplementation is required in the great majority of erythropoietin (Epo)-treated patients with end-stage renal failure. Intravenous (i.v.) iron supplementation has been demonstrated to be superior to oral iron therapy in Epo-treated haemodialysis patients, but comparative data in iron-replete peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are lacking. METHODS: A 12-month, prospective, crossover trial comparing oral and i.v. iron supplementation was conducted in all Princess Alexandra Hospital PD patients who were on a stable dose of Epo, had no identifiable cause of impaired haemopoiesis other than uraemia, and had normal iron stores (transferrin saturation >20% and serum ferritin 100-500 mg/l). Patients received daily oral iron supplements (210 mg elemental iron per day) for 4 months followed by intermittent, outpatient i.v. iron infusions (200 mg every 2 months) for 4 months, followed by a further 4 months of oral iron. Haemoglobin levels and body iron stores were measured monthly. RESULTS: Twenty-eight individuals were entered into the study and 16 patients completed 12 months of follow-up. Using repeated-measures analysis of variance, haemoglobin concentrations increased significantly during the i.v. phase (108+/-3 to 114+/-3 g/l) compared with each of the oral phases (109+/-3 to 108+/-3 g/l and 114+/-3 to 107+/-4 g/l, P<0.05). Similar patterns were seen for both percentage transferrin saturation (23.8+/-2.3 to 30.8+/-3.0%, 24.8+/-2.1 to 23.8+/-2.3%, and 30.8+/-3.0 to 26.8+/-2.1%, respectively, P<0.05) and ferritin (385+/-47 to 544+/-103 mg/l, 317+/-46 to 385+/-47 mg/l, 544+/-103 to 463+/-50 mg/l, respectively, P=0.10). No significant changes in Epo dosages were observed throughout the study. I.v. iron supplementation was associated with a much lower incidence of gastrointestinal disturbances (11 vs 46%, P<0.05), but exceeded the cost of oral iron treatment by 6.5-fold. CONCLUSIONS: Two-monthly i.v. iron infusions represent a practical alternative to oral iron and can be safely administered to PD patients in an outpatient setting. Compared with daily oral therapy, 2-monthly i.v. iron supplementation in PD patients was better tolerated and resulted in superior haemoglobin levels and body iron stores.

Oral versus intravenous iron supplementation in peritoneal dialysis patients.

The vast majority of erythropoietin (EPO)-treated peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients require iron supplementation. Most authors and clinical practice guidelines recommend primary oral iron supplementation in PD patients because it is more practical and less expensive. However, numerous studies have clearly demonstrated that oral iron therapy is unable to maintain EPO-treated PD patients in positive iron balance. Once patients become iron-deficient, intravenous iron administration has been found to more effectively augment iron stores and hematologic response than does oral therapy. We recently performed a prospective, cross-over trial in 28 iron-replete PD patients and showed that twice-monthly outpatient iron polymaltose infusions (200 mg) were a practical and safe alternative to oral iron. That treatment produced significant increases in hemoglobin concentration and body iron stores. The additional expense of intravenous iron therapy was completely offset by reductions in EPO dosage. Careful monitoring of iron stores is important in patients receiving intravenous iron supplementation in view of epidemiologic links with infection and cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, a growing body of evidence suggests that, as has been found for hemodialysis patients, intravenous iron therapy is superior to oral iron supplementation in EPO-treated PD patients.

Novel surveillance and cure of a donor-transmitted lymphoma in a renal allograft recipient.

BACKGROUND: In this report we describe a malignant lymphoma of donor origin inadvertently transplanted into two renal allograft recipients, despite standard comprehensive donor screening. The successful clearance of the tumor from both patients and a novel method of surveillance are detailed. METHODS: Initial management consisted of withdrawal of immunosuppression to promote rejection of the allograft and the transplanted tumor in both patients, followed by graft removal. Peripheral blood microchimerism was assessed in both recipients using nested polymerase chain reaction to detect the DYZ3 gene on the Y chromosome (donor male, recipients female). RESULTS: Although microchimerism was detected on day 6 after transplantation and day 1 after explantation, repeat peripheral blood examination at 1, 3, and 6 months after explantation demonstrated no microchimerism. Both patients remain well at 12 months and have been relisted for transplantation. CONCLUSION: Despite inadvertent transplantation of a previously undiagnosed malignancy of donor origin, the recipients' immune response was able to eliminate donor tumor cells after the withdrawal of immunosuppression. Repeated surveillance of peripheral blood from both recipients, using a novel application of the technique of nested polymerase chain reaction to amplify donor DNA, demonstrated no persistence of donor cells, supporting effective eradication of the donor malignancy.

Is obesity a favorable prognostic factor in peritoneal dialysis patients?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of an elevated body mass index (BMI) on cardiovascular outcomes and survival in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study of a prevalent PD cohort at a single center. SETTING: Tertiary care institutional dialysis center. PATIENTS: The study included all patients with a BMI of at least 20 who had been receiving PD for at least 1 month as of 31 January 1996 (n = 43). Patients were classified as overweight [BMI > 27.5; mean +/- standard error of mean (SEM): 32.1 +/- 1.1; n = 14] or normal weight (BMI 20-27.5; mean +/- SEM: 23.8 +/- 0.4; n = 29). OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient survival and adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, congestive cardiac failure, cerebrovascular accident, and symptomatic peripheral vascular disease) were recorded over a 3-year period. RESULTS: At baseline, no significant differences were seen between the groups in clinical, biochemical, nutritional, or echocardiographic parameters, except for a lower dietary protein intake (0.97 +/- 0.10 g/kg/day vs 1.44 +/- 0.10 g/kg/day, p = 0.004) and a higher proportion of well-nourished patients by subjective global assessment (100% vs 72%, p < 0.05) in the overweight group. After 3 years of follow-up, 29% of overweight patients and 69% of normal-weight patients had died (p < 0.05). Using a Cox proportional hazards model, a BMI greater than 27.5 was shown to be an independent positive predictor of patient survival, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.09 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01-0.85; p < 0.05]. However, being overweight did not significantly influence myocardial infarction-free survival (adjusted HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.07-1.48; p = 0.15) or combined adverse cardiovascular event-free survival (adjusted HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.23-1.93; p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity conferred a significant survival advantage in our PD population. Obese patients should therefore not be discouraged from receiving PD purely on the basis of BMI. Moreover, maintaining a higher-than-average BMI to preserve "nutritional reserve" may help to reduce the mortality and morbidity rates associated with PD.

Peritoneal homocysteine clearance is inefficient in peritoneal dialysis patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the degree and the determinants of peritoneal homocysteine (Hcy) clearance and to compare measured Hcy clearance with the Hcy clearance predicted based on molecular weight (MW). DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational analysis. SETTING: Tertiary care institutional dialysis center. PATIENTS: Sixty-five stable peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Fasting blood and 24-hour pooled dialysate effluents were collected for determination of peritoneal clearances of Hcy (CpHcy), urea (CpUr), and creatinine (CpCr). The dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio at 4 hours (D/P Cr 4 h) and levels of red cell folate, B12, ferritin, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured concurrently. Observed CpHcy was compared with predicted clearance, based on Hcy plasma protein binding and the relative molecular weights of Hcy, urea, and creatinine. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of Hcy averaged 24.6 +/- 1.1 micromol/L and were elevated above the upper limit of normal in 59 (91%) patients. The mean dialysate concentration of Hcy was 2.9 +/- 0.3 micromol/L, equating to a daily peritoneal elimination of 34.6 +/- 3.6 micromol. Observed CpHcy was closely approximated by predicted CpHcy (8.7 +/- 0.6 L/week/1.73 m2 vs 9.0 +/- 0.3 L/week/1.73 m2 respectively, p = 0.55). Patients maintained on automated PD (n = 5) had a CpHcy similar to that of patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (8.9 +/- 1.0 L/week/1.73 m2 vs 8.7 +/- 0.6 L/week/1.73 m2, p = 0.92). The CpHcy was significantly correlated with C-reactive protein (CRP), D/P creatinine, CpUr, CpCr, and peritoneal protein loss, but not with plasma Hcy, albumin, B12, ferritin, age, dialysis duration, peritonitis episodes, or daily dialysate effluent volume. By multivariate analysis, the only variables that remained significant independent predictors of CpHcy were CRP and D/P Cr 4 h. High and high-average transporters had a higher CpHcy than low and low-average transporters (9.7 +/- 0.8 L/week/1.73 m2 vs 7.0 +/- 0.7 L/week/1.73 m2, p < 0.05), despite comparably elevated plasma Hcy concentrations [25.2 +/- 1.5 micromol/L vs 23.4 +/- 1.6 micromol/L, p = nonsignificant (NS)]. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated plasma concentrations of Hcy are not efficiently reduced by PD. The relatively low peritoneal clearance of Hcy is largely accounted for by a high degree of plasma protein binding and is significantly influenced by peritoneal membrane permeability.

A comparison of the effects of dialysis and renal transplantation on the survival of older uremic patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients over age 60 constitute half of all new patients accepted into the renal replacement therapy programs in Australia. However, the optimal treatment of their end-stage renal disease remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to compare survival for dialysis and renal transplantation in older patients who were rigorously screened and considered eligible for transplantation. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 174 consecutive patients over 60 who were accepted on to the Queensland cadaveric renal transplant waiting list between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 1997. Follow-up was terminated on October 1, 1998. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-transplant basis using a Cox regression model with time-varying explanatory variables. An alternative survival analysis was also performed, in which patients no longer considered suitable for transplantation were censored at the time of their removal from the waiting list. RESULTS: There were 67 patients receiving a renal transplant, whereas the other 107 continued to undergo dialysis. These two groups were well matched at baseline with respect to age, gender, body mass index, renal disease etiology, comorbid illnesses, and dialysis duration and modality. The overall mortality rate was 0.096 per patient-year (0.131 for dialysis and 0.029 for transplant, P<0.001). Respective 1-, 3- and 5-year survivals were 92%, 62%, and 27% for the dialysis group and 98%, 95%, and 90% (P<0.01) for the transplant group. Patients in the transplant group had an adjusted hazard ratio 0.16 times that of the dialysis group (95% confidence interval 0.06-0.42). If patients were censored at the time of their withdrawal from the transplant waiting list, the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.24 (95% confidence interval 0.09-0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation seems to confer a substantial survival advantage over dialysis in patients with end-stage renal failure who are rigorously screened and considered suitable for renal transplantation.

Sclerosing peritonitis: the experience in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Sclerosing peritonitis (SP) is a rare but serious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Small-bowel obstruction (SBO) due to encapsulation, dense adhesions, or mural fibrous is characteristic, often associated with peritonitis. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence, clinical features, effect of duration of dialysis, and other possible aetiological factors in severe SP. METHODS: All dialysis units in Australia were surveyed for possible cases up to 1994. Patients were included if there was either surgical or radiological evidence of sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis or SBO with tanned or thickened peritoneum in the absence of other causes of SBO. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were analysed. The duration of continuous PD was mean 52 +/- 30 months, median 48 months and range 8-127 months. Nineteen cases were diagnosed between 1980 and 1989 and 35 between 1990 and 1994, giving mean annual incidences 1.9 and 4.2 per 1000 PD periods respectively. The overall prevalence was 0.7%, which increased progressively with the duration of PD being 1.9, 6.4, 10.8, and 19.4% for patients on dialysis for > 2, 5, 6 and 8 years respectively. Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis was diagnosed in 87% of cases, SBO in 92%, and haemoperitoneum in 8%. Peritoneal calcification was present in seven cases, all of which had been on PD > 7 years. Peritonitis was associated with 38% of cases with fungal infection in 7%. Treatment with immunosuppression in five patients appeared to result in a favourable outcome in three. The mortality rate was 56%. CONCLUSION: Severe sclerosing peritonitis is a serious complication of peritoneal dialysis and there is a time dependent increase on CAPD.

Recovery of gastrointestinal function after renal transplantation in a patient with sclerosing peritonitis secondary to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

We describe the rapid and dramatic improvement in gastrointestinal function that occurred after successful renal transplantation in a women with severe sclerosing peritonitis secondary to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). We postulate that the antiinflammatory effect of the immunosuppressive agents was the most important factor leading to the patient's recovery.