PACAP receptor pharmacology and agonist bias: analysis in primary neurons and glia from the trigeminal ganglia and transfected cells.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A major challenge in the development of new medicines targeting GPCRs is the ability to quantify drug action in physiologically relevant models. Primary cell models that closely resemble the clinically relevant in vivo site of drug action are important translational tools in drug development. However, pharmacological studies in these models are generally very limited due to the methodology used. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We used a neuropeptide system to demonstrate the applicability of using highly sensitive signalling assays in primary cells. We quantified the action of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP)-38, PACAP-27 and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in primary cultures of neurons and glia derived from rat trigeminal ganglia (TG), comparing our observations to transfected cells. KEY RESULTS: PACAP-responsive receptors in rat trigeminal neurons, glia and transfected PAC1n receptors were pharmacologically distinct. PACAP-38, but not PACAP-27, activated ERK in glia, while both forms stimulated cellular cAMP production. PACAP(6-38) also displayed cell-type-dependent, agonist-specific, antagonism. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The complexity of PACAP pharmacology in the TG may help to direct, more effectively, the development of disease treatments targeting the PACAP receptor. We suggest that these methodologies are broadly applicable to other primary cell types of human or animal origin, and that our approach may allow more thorough characterization of ligand properties in physiologically relevant cell types.

Receptor activity-modifying protein-dependent effects of mutations in the calcitonin receptor-like receptor: implications for adrenomedullin and calcitonin gene-related peptide pharmacology.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) define the pharmacology of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR). The interactions of the different RAMPs with this class B GPCR yield high-affinity calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or adrenomedullin (AM) receptors. However, the mechanism for this is unclear. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Guided by receptor models, we mutated residues in the N-terminal helix of CLR, RAMP2 and RAMP3 hypothesized to be involved in peptide interactions. These were assayed for cAMP production with AM, AM2 and CGRP together with their cell surface expression. Binding studies were also conducted for selected mutants. KEY RESULTS: An important domain for peptide interactions on CLR from I32 to I52 was defined. Although I41 was universally important for binding and receptor function, the role of other residues depended on both ligand and RAMP. Peptide binding to CLR/RAMP3 involved a more restricted range of residues than that to CLR/RAMP1 or CLR/RAMP2. E101 of RAMP2 had a major role in AM interactions, and F111/W84 of RAMP2/3 was important with each peptide. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: RAMP-dependent effects of CLR mutations suggest that the different RAMPs control accessibility of peptides to binding residues situated on the CLR N-terminus. RAMP3 appears to alter the role of specific residues at the CLR-RAMP interface compared with RAMP1 and RAMP2.

CGRP in the trigeminovascular system: a role for CGRP, adrenomedullin and amylin receptors?

UNLABELLED: The neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is reported to play an important role in migraine. It is expressed throughout the trigeminovascular system. Antagonists targeting the CGRP receptor have been developed and have shown efficacy in clinical trials for migraine. However, no CGRP antagonist is yet approved for treating this condition. The molecular composition of the CGRP receptor is unusual because it comprises two subunits; one is a GPCR, the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR). This associates with receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) 1 to yield a functional receptor for CGRP. However, RAMP1 also associates with the calcitonin receptor, creating a receptor for the related peptide amylin but this also has high affinity for CGRP. Other combinations of CLR or the calcitonin receptor with RAMPs can also generate receptors that are responsive to CGRP. CGRP potentially modulates an array of signal transduction pathways downstream of activation of these receptors, in a cell type-dependent manner. The physiological significance of these signalling processes remains unclear but may be a potential avenue for refining drug design. This complexity has prompted us to review the signalling and expression of CGRP and related receptors in the trigeminovascular system. This reveals that more than one CGRP responsive receptor may be expressed in key parts of this system and that further work is required to determine their contribution to CGRP physiology and pathophysiology. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Neuropeptides. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2013.170.issue-7.

Identification of key residues involved in adrenomedullin binding to the AM1 receptor.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adrenomedullin (AM) is a peptide hormone whose receptors are members of the class B GPCR family. They comprise a heteromer between the GPCR, the calcitonin receptor-like receptor and one of the receptor activity-modifying proteins 1-3. AM plays a significant role in angiogenesis and its antagonist fragment AM22-52 can inhibit blood vessel and tumour growth. The mechanism by which AM interacts with its receptors is unknown. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We determined the AM22-52 binding epitope for the AM1 receptor extracellular domain using biophysical techniques, heteronuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and alanine scanning. KEY RESULTS: Chemical shift perturbation experiments located the main binding epitope for AM22-52 at the AM1 receptor to the C-terminal 8 amino acids. Isothermal titration calorimetry of AM22-52 alanine-substituted peptides indicated that Y52, G51 and I47 are essential for AM1 receptor binding and that K46 and P49 and R44 have a smaller role to play. Characterization of these peptides at the full-length AM receptors was assessed in Cos7 cells by cAMP assay. This confirmed the essential role of Y52, G51 and I47 in binding to the AM1 receptor, with their substitution resulting in ≥100-fold reduction in antagonist potency compared with AM22-52 . R44A, K46A, S48A and P49A AM22-52 decreased antagonist potency by approximately 10-fold. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study localizes the main binding epitope of AM22-52 to its C-terminal amino acids and distinguishes essential residues involved in this binding. This will inform the development of improved AM receptor antagonists.

Receptor activity-modifying protein-dependent impairment of calcitonin receptor splice variant Δ(1-47)hCT((a)) function.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Alternative splicing expands proteome diversity to GPCRs. Distinct receptor variants have been identified for a secretin family GPCR, the calcitonin receptor (CTR). The possible functional contributions of these receptor variants are further altered by their potential interactions with receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs). One variant of the human CTR lacks the first 47 residues at its N terminus [Δ(1-47)hCT((a)) ]. However, very little is known about the pharmacology of this variant or its ability to interact with RAMPs to form amylin receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Δ(1-47)hCT((a)) was characterized both with and without RAMPs in Cos7 and/or HEK293S cells. The receptor expression (ELISA assays) and function (cAMP and pERK1/2 assays) for up to six agonists and two antagonists were determined. KEY RESULTS: Despite lacking 47 residues at the N terminus, Δ(1-47)hCT((a)) was still able to express at the cell surface, but displayed a generalized reduction in peptide potency. Δ(1-47)hCT((a)) retained its ability to interact with RAMP1 and formed a functional amylin receptor; this also appeared to be the case with RAMP3. On the other hand, its interaction with RAMP2 and resultant amylin receptor was reduced to a greater extent. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Δ(1-47)hCT((a)) acts as a functional receptor at the cell surface. It exhibits altered receptor function, depending on whether it associates with a RAMP and which RAMP it interacts with. Therefore, the presence of this variant in tissues will potentially contribute to altered peptide binding and signalling, depending on the RAMP distribution in tissues.

Pharmacological characterization of rat amylin receptors: implications for the identification of amylin receptor subtypes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Amylin (Amy) is an important glucoregulatory peptide and AMY receptors are clinical targets for diabetes and obesity. Human (h) AMY receptor subtypes are complexes of the calcitonin (CT) receptor with receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs); their rodent counterparts have not been characterized. To allow identification of the most clinically relevant receptor subtype, the elucidation of rat (r) AMY receptor pharmacology is necessary. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Receptors were transiently transfected into COS-7 cells and cAMP responses measured in response to different agonists, with or without antagonists. Competition binding experiments were performed to determine rAmy affinity. KEY RESULTS: rCT was the most potent agonist of rCT((a)) receptors, whereas rAmy was most potent at rAMY(1(a)) and rAMY(3(a)) receptors. rAmy bound to these receptors with high affinity. Rat α-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was equipotent to rAmy at both AMY receptors. Rat adrenomedullin (AM) and rAM2/intermedin activated all three receptors but were most effective at rAMY(3(a)) . AC187, AC413 and sCT(8-32) were potent antagonists at all three receptors. rαCGRP(8-37) displayed selectivity for rAMY receptors over rCT((a)) receptors. rAMY(8-37) was a weak antagonist but was more effective at rAMY(1(a)) than rAMY(3(a)) . CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: AMY receptors were generated by co-expression of rCT((a)) with rRAMP1 or 3, forming rAMY(1(a)) and rAMY(3(a)) receptors, respectively. CGRP was more potent at rAMY than at hAMY receptors. No antagonist tested was able to differentiate the rAMY receptor subtypes. The data emphasize the need for and provide a useful resource for developing new CT or AMY receptor ligands as pharmacological tools or potential clinical candidates.

Mapping the CGRP receptor ligand binding domain: tryptophan-84 of RAMP1 is critical for agonist and antagonist binding.

The calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) associates with the accessory protein RAMP1 to form a receptor for the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Multiple lines of evidence have implicated CGRP in the pathophysiology of migraine headache making the CGRP receptor an attractive target for development of small-molecule antagonists as a novel treatment for this debilitating condition. The CGRP receptor antagonists telcagepant and olcegepant (BIBN4096BS) have demonstrated clinical efficacy in the treatment of migraine and there is now a need to better understand how these molecules interact with the receptor. Previous work has shown the extracellular portion of RAMP1 to be important for binding of these antagonists, with tryptophan-74 being a key interaction site. The crystal structure of the extracellular portion of human RAMP1 placed tryptophan-74 in a hydrophobic patch hypothesized to interact with CGRP receptor ligands and also identified nearby residues that may be important for ligand binding. In this study we explored the role played by these residues of RAMP1 using an alanine replacement strategy. We confirmed a role for tryptophan-74 in antagonist binding and also identified arginine-67 as being important for binding of telcagepant but not compound 3, a close analog of BIBN4096BS. We also identified tryptophan-84 as being critical for both high-affinity binding of the non-peptide antagonists as well as the peptides CGRP and CGRP(8-37). These data for the first time pinpoint a specific RAMP1 residue important for both antagonist and agonist potency and are consistent with the N-terminal domain of RAMP1 forming the binding pocket interface with CLR.

What makes a CGRP2 receptor?

1. Heterogeneity in the receptors for the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been apparent for nearly 20 years. This is most clearly manifested in the observation of CGRP(8-37)-sensitive and -insensitive populations of CGRP-activated receptors. The pA(2) values for CGRP(8-37) in excess of 7 are widely considered to be the result of antagonism of CGRP(1) receptors, whereas those below 7 are believed to be the consequence of antagonism of a second population of receptors, namely CGRP(2) receptors. 2. However, a multitude of pA(2) values exist for CGRP(8-37), spanning several log units, and as such no obvious clusters of values are apparent. Understanding the molecular nature of the receptors that underlie this phenomenon is likely to aid the development of selective pharmacological tools to progress our understanding of the physiology of CGRP and related peptides. Because there is active development of CGRP agonists and antagonists as therapeutics, such information would also further this pursuit. 3. The CGRP(1) receptor is pharmacologically and molecularly well defined as a heterodimer of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL) and receptor activity modifying protein (RAMP) 1. The CL/RAMP1 complex is highly sensitive to CGRP(8-37). Conversely, the constituents of the CGRP(2) receptor have not been identified. In fact, there is little evidence for a distinct molecular entity that represents the CGRP(2) receptor. 4. Recent pharmacological characterization of receptors related to CGRP(1) has revealed that some of these receptors may explain CGRP(2) receptor pharmacology. Specifically, AMY(1(a)) (calcitonin receptor/RAMP1) and AM(2) (CL/RAMP3) receptors can be activated by CGRP but are relatively insensitive to CGRP(8-37). 5. This, along with other supporting data, suggests that the 'CGRP(2) receptor' that has been extensively reported in the literature may, in fact, be an amalgamation of contributions from a variety of CGRP-activated receptors. The use of appropriate combinations of agonists and antagonists, along with receptor expression studies, could allow such receptors to be separated.

Agonist-dependent consequences of proline to alanine substitution in the transmembrane helices of the calcitonin receptor.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transmembrane proline (P) residues in family A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form functionally important kinks in their helices. These residues are little studied in family B GPCRs but experiments with the VPAC1 receptor and calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL) show parallels with family A receptors. We sought to determine the function of these residues in the insert negative form of the human calcitonin receptor, a close relative of CL. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Proline residues within the transmembrane domains of the calcitonin receptor (P246, P249, P280, P326, P336) were individually mutated to alanine (A) using site-directed mutagenesis. Receptors were transiently transfected into Cos-7 cells using polyethylenimine and salmon and human calcitonin-induced cAMP responses measured. Salmon and human calcitonin competition binding experiments were also performed and receptor cell-surface expression assessed by whole cell ELISA. KEY RESULTS: P246A, P249A and P280A were wild-type in terms of human calcitonin-induced cAMP activation. P326A and P336A had reduced function (165 and 12-fold, respectively). In membranes, human calcitonin binding was not detectable for any mutant receptor but in whole cells, binding was detected for all mutants apart from P326A. Salmon calcitonin activated mutant and wild-type receptors equally, although B(max) values were reduced for all mutants apart from P326A. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: P326 and P336 are important for the function of human calcitonin receptors and are likely to be involved in generating receptor conformations appropriate for agonist binding and receptor activation. However, agonist-specific effects were observed , implying distinct conformations of the human calcitonin receptor.

Heterodimers and family-B GPCRs: RAMPs, CGRP and adrenomedullin.

RAMPs (receptor activity-modifying proteins) are single-pass transmembrane proteins that associate with certain family-B GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors). Specifically for the CT (calcitonin) receptor-like receptor and the CT receptor, this results in profound changes in ligand binding and receptor pharmacology, allowing the generation of six distinct receptors with preferences for CGRP (CT gene-related peptide), adrenomedullin, amylin and CT. There are three RAMPs: RAMP1-RAMP3. The N-terminus appears to be the main determinant of receptor pharmacology, whereas the transmembrane domain contributes to association of the RAMP with the GPCR. The N-terminus of all members of the RAMP family probably contains two disulphide bonds; a potential third disulphide is found in RAMP1 and RAMP3. The N-terminus appears to be in close proximity to the ligand and plays a key role in its binding, either directly or indirectly. BIBN4096BS, a CGRP antagonist, targets RAMP1 and this gives the compound very high selectivity for the human CGRP(1) receptor.

Amylin receptors: molecular composition and pharmacology.

Several receptors which bind the hormone AMY (amylin) with high affinity have now been identified. The minimum binding unit is composed of the CT (calcitonin) receptor at its core, plus a RAMP (receptor activity modifying protein). The receptors have been named AMY(1(a)), AMY(2(a)) and AMY(3(a)) in accordance with the association of the CT receptor (CT((a))) with RAMP1, RAMP2 and RAMP3 respectively. The challenge is now to determine the localization and pharmacological nature of each of these receptors. Recent attempts to achieve these aims will be briefly discussed.

The pharmacology of CGRP-responsive receptors in cultured and transfected cells.

Historically, CGRP receptors have been classified as CGRP(1) or CGRP(2) subtypes, chiefly depending on their affinity for the antagonist CGRP(8-37). It has been shown that the complex between calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR or CL) and receptor activity modifying protein (RAMP) 1 provides a molecular correlate for the CGRP(1) receptor; however, this does not explain the range of affinities seen for CGRP(8-37) in isolated tissues. It is suggested that these may largely be explained by a combination of methodological factors and CGRP-responsive receptors generated by CL and RAMP2 or RAMP3 and complexes of RAMPs with the calcitonin receptor.

CL/RAMP2 and CL/RAMP3 produce pharmacologically distinct adrenomedullin receptors: a comparison of effects of adrenomedullin22-52, CGRP8-37 and BIBN4096BS.

Adrenomedullin (AM) has two known receptors formed by the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL) and receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) 2 or 3: we report the effects of the antagonist fragments of human AM and CGRP (AM22-52 and CGRP8-37) in inhibiting AM at human (h), rat (r) and mixed species CL/RAMP2 and CL/RAMP3 receptors transiently expressed in Cos 7 cells or endogenously expressed as rCL/rRAMP2 complexes by Rat 2 and L6 cells. AM22-52 (10 microM) antagonised AM at all CL/RAMP2 complexes (apparent pA2 values: 7.34+/-0.14 (hCL/hRAMP2), 7.28+/-0.06 (Rat 2), 7.00+/-0.05 (L6), 6.25+/-0.17 (rCL/hRAMP2)). CGRP8-37 (10 microM) resembled AM22-52 except on the rCL/hRAMP2 complex, where it did not antagonise AM (apparent pA2 values: 7.04+/-0.13 (hCL/hRAMP2), 6.72+/-0.06 (Rat2), 7.03+/-0.12 (L6)). On CL/RAMP3 receptors, 10 microM CGRP8-37 was an effective antagonist at all combinations (apparent pA2 values: 6.96+/-0.08 (hCL/hRAMP3), 6.18+/-0.18 (rCL/rRAMP3), 6.48+/-0.20 (rCL/hRAMP3)). However, 10 microM AM22-52 only antagonised AM at the hCL/hRAMP3 receptor (apparent pA2 6.73+/-0.14). BIBN4096BS (10 microM) did not antagonise AM at any of the receptors. Where investigated (all-rat and rat/human combinations), the agonist potency order on the CL/RAMP3 receptor was AM approximately betaCGRP>alphaCGRP. rRAMP3 showed three apparent polymorphisms, none of which altered its coding sequence. This study shows that on CL/RAMP complexes, AM22-52 has significant selectivity for the CL/RAMP2 combination over the CL/RAMP3 combination. On the mixed species receptor, CGRP8-37 showed the opposite selectivity. Thus, depending on the species, it is possible to discriminate pharmacologically between CL/RAMP2 and CL/RAMP3 AM receptors.

Adrenomedullin: receptor and signal transduction.

Adrenomedullin is a vascular tissue peptide and a member of the calcitonin family of peptides, which includes calcitonin, calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) and amylin. Its many biological actions are mediated via CGRP type 1 (CGRP(1)) receptors and by specific adrenomedullin receptors. Although the pharmacology of these receptors is distinct, they are both represented in molecular terms by the type II family G-protein-coupled receptor, calcitonin-receptor-like receptor (CRLR). The specificity here is defined by co-expression of receptor-activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs). CGRP(1) receptors are represented by CRLR and RAMP1, and specific adrenomedullin receptors by CRLR and RAMP2 or 3. Here we discuss how CRLR/RAMP2 relates to adrenomedullin binding, pharmacology and pathophysiology, and how chemical cross-linking of receptor-ligand complexes in tissue relates to that in CRLR/RAMP2-expressing cells. CRLR, like other type II family G-protein-coupled receptors, signals via G(s) and adenylate cyclase activation. We demonstrated that adrenomedullin signalling in cell lines expressing specific adrenomedullin receptors followed this expected pattern.

Interaction of calcitonin-gene-related peptide with its receptors.

The receptor for calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a heterodimer formed by calcitonin-receptor-like receptor (CRLR), a type II (family B) G-protein-coupled receptor, and receptor-activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1), a single-membrane-pass protein. It is likely that the first seven or so amino acids of CGRP (which form a disulphide-bonded loop) interact with the transmembrane domain of CRLR to cause receptor activation. The rest of the CGRP molecule falls into three domains. Residues 28-37 and 8-18 are normally required for high-affinity binding, while residues 19-27 form a hinge region. The 28-37 region is almost certainly in direct contact with the receptor; 8-18 may make additional receptor contacts or may stabilize an appropriate conformation of 28-37. It is likely that these regions of CGRP interact both with CRLR and with the extracellular domain of RAMP1.

Effects of melanocortin receptor ligands on thyrotropin-releasing hormone release: evidence for the differential roles of melanocortin 3 and 4 receptors.

The hypothalamic melanocortin system is important in the central regulation of food intake and body weight. We have previously demonstrated that intracerebroventricular administration of alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH), a nonselective MC3 and MC4 receptor agonist, stimulated plasma thyroid-stimulating hormone, and agouti-related protein (AgRP), an MC3 and MC4 receptor antagonist, suppressed it. In this study, we investigated the effects of MC3 and MC4 receptor (MC3-R and MC4-R) selective agonists and antagonists on the release of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) from hypothalamic explants in vitro. alpha-MSH stimulated TRH release from the rat hypothalamic explants (alpha-MSH 100 nm 230 +/- 22.9% basal, P < 0.005). In contrast, gamma 2-MSH, a selective MC3-R agonist, suppressed TRH release (gamma 2-MSH 10 microns 76.2 +/- 7.4% basal, P < 0.05). AgRP (83-132), a nonselective MC3/4-R antagonist, induced no change in TRH release whilst JKC-363 (cyclic [Mpr11, D-Nal14, Cys18, Asp22-NH2]-beta-MSH 11-22), a selective MC4-R antagonist, suppressed it (JKC-363 10 nm 57.2 +/- 11.5% basal, P < 0.05). Both AgRP (83-132) and JKC-363 blocked alpha-MSH stimulated TRH release but only AgRP (83-132) blocked the inhibitory effect of gamma 2-MSH on TRH release. These data suggest differential roles for the MC3 and MC4 receptors in TRH release; MC3-R agonism inhibiting and MC4-R agonism stimulating TRH release.

Oxyntomodulin inhibits food intake in the rat.

Oxyntomodulin is derived from proglucagon processing in the intestine and the central nervous system. To date, no role in the central nervous system has been demonstrated. We report here that oxyntomodulin inhibits refeeding when injected intracerebroventricularly and into the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus of 24-h fasted rats [intracerebroventricularly and into the paraventricular nucleus, 1 h, oxyntomodulin (1 nmol), 3.1 +/- 0.5 g; saline, 6.2 +/- 0.4 g; P < 0.005]. In addition, oxyntomodulin inhibits food intake in nonfasted rats injected at the onset of the dark phase (intracerebroventricularly, 1 h: oxyntomodulin, 3 nmol, 1.1 +/- 0.19 g vs. saline, 2.3 +/- 0.2 g; P < 0.05). This effect of oxyntomodulin on feeding is of a similar time course and magnitude as that of an equimolar dose of glucagon-like peptide-1. Other proglucagon-derived products investigated [glucagon, glicentin (intracerebroventricularly, 3 nmol; into the paraventricular nucleus, 1 nmol), and spacer peptide-1 (intracerebroventricularly and into the paraventricular nucleus, 3 nmol)] had no effect on feeding at any time point examined. The anorectic effect of oxyntomodulin (intracerebroventricularly, 3 nmol; into the paraventricular nucleus, 1 nmol) was blocked when it was coadministered with the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor antagonist, exendin-(9-39) (intracerebroventricularly, 100 nmol; into the paraventricular nucleus, 10 nmol). However, oxyntomodulin has a lower affinity for the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor compared with glucagon-like peptide-1 (IC(50): oxyntomodulin, 8.2 nM; glucagon-like peptide-1, 0.16 nM). One explanation for this is that there might be an oxyntomodulin receptor to which exendin-(9-39) can also bind and act as an antagonist.

Adrenomedullin receptors: molecular identity and function.

Since its discovery in 1993 adrenomedullin (AM) has been the subject over 600 published articles. This multifunctional peptide has powerful vasodilator actions and recent evidence from AM gene-deleted mice suggest that AM plays an essential role in vascular development. However the lack of valid AM receptor clones and non-peptide receptor ligands has considerably slowed research progress on this important peptide. In this review we have focused on the proposition that the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) is a receptor both for AM and the related vasoactive peptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). The receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs) that are essential for defining CRLR pharmacology will also be discussed. We will describe how AM receptors have been reported to signal and be regulated and to consider whether further receptors for AM beyond CRLR/RAMP combinations might exist.

Serial monitoring of human chorionic gonadotropin and free beta subunit secretion in ectopic pregnancy.

The diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy (EP) has relied primarily on serial serum sampling for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and timely pelvic ultrasound examinations. We recently described the applicability of free beta hCG, intact hCG ratio (%) to distinguish EP from spontaneous abortion or intrauterine pregnancy and found that 35% of EP were uniquely characterized by ratios greater than 0.10. In the present study, we sought to determine if this altered pattern of free beta subunit and intact hCG secretion when present persisted as the EP progressed and whether this ratio was influenced by estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) secretion. Twelve patients with histologically-confirmed EP and ratios greater than 0.10 were studied longitudinally from initial presentation to surgical intervention. Ratios (%) ranged from .10 to .52 and persisted at levels greater than 0.10 throughout the period of monitoring in all patients. Intact hCG, free beta hCG and ratios (%) showed no correlation to E2 or P4 concentrations. These data suggest that ratios greater than 0.10 when present persist throughout gestation in EP and may serve as a marker for early diagnosis of EP. Such patterns of hCG secretion in EP may be secondary to altered placental histology with persistence of histologic patterns characteristic of early gestation.