'Fussy eating' and feeding dynamics: School children's perceptions, experiences, and strategies.

'Fussy eating' behaviours are associated with increased mealtime stress, fewer family meals, and are considered a barrier to improving children's diets. A better understanding of these behaviours is critical to enable families to have more nutritious and enjoyable meals. Children's perspectives have not been adequately reported due to parents being seen as sufficient proxies in the past, and ethical challenges associated with carrying out research with children. 'Fussy eating' research has shifted to a bi-directional relational model, calling for deeper insight into how children experience, and contribute to, feeding dynamics. This study aims to explore 1) how 'fussy eating' behaviours are perceived, experienced and managed by children and 2) how children experience feeding dynamics relating to these behaviours. Qualitative interviews were conducted using visual tools and vignettes. Participants included 16 children aged 7-10 years. Children did not have to be considered 'fussy eaters' to participate and represented a wide range of Food Fussiness scores on the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire reported by parents. Thematic analysis generated three themes: 1) Paradoxical Perceptions: 'Normal', yet 'Bad' Behaviour; 2) Grappling with Internal Experience and External Expectations and 3) Navigating Food Refusal and Managing Dislikes. The conceptualisation of 'fussy eating' as 'bad' behaviour likely contributes to mealtimes stress. Children described tension between their internal experiences with food (sensory and emotional) and external expectations on their eating. Children are acutely aware of their parents' goals, emotions and practices at mealtimes. In light of these parental expectations, children develop their own strategies for navigating food refusal, negotiating with parents and overcoming dislikes. This study highlights the need to listen to children and work with them to develop meaningful, relevant and effective eating interventions.

Parental experiences and perceptions of infant complementary feeding: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Interventions to prevent childhood obesity increasingly focus on infant feeding, but demonstrate inconsistent effects. A comprehensive qualitative evidence synthesis is essential to better understand feeding behaviours and inform intervention development. The aim of this study is to synthesize evidence on perceptions and experiences of infant feeding and complementary feeding recommendations. METHODS: Databases CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Academic Search Complete, SocIndex and Maternity and Infant Care were searched from inception to May 2017. Eligible studies examined parents' experiences of complementary feeding of children (<2 years). Data were synthesized using thematic synthesis. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies met inclusion criteria for review. Four key themes emerged. 'Guidelines and advice' highlights variety and inconsistencies between sources of complementary feeding information. 'Stage of weaning' describes infant feeding as a process involving different stages. 'Knowing and trying' outlines parents' engagement in feeding approaches based on instinct, prior experience or trial and error. 'Daily life' highlights problematic cost and time constraints for parents. DISCUSSION: Parents predominantly understand and want to engage in healthy feeding processes. Consideration of infant feeding as a process that changes over time is necessary to support parents. Provision of clear, consistent information and guidance from trusted sources on when, what and how to feed is also essential.

Development of the Children's Attributions about Psychological Problems in their Peers Scale.

BACKGROUND: Research has shown that children's beliefs about the causes of psychological problems are related to their attitudes and reactions towards affected peers. This study describes the development of the Children's Attributions about Psychological Problems in their Peers (CAPPP) Scale, which assesses children's beliefs about the causes of an internalizing and an externalizing condition. METHODS: The 16 items comprising the CAPPP are derived from previous qualitative research findings. Five hundred and ninety-five young people, drawn from five different age groups spanning early childhood to late adolescence, completed a CAPPP Scale for each of two vignettes describing the behaviour of hypothetical peers with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and depression. RESULTS: Modifications following consideration of psychometric properties and conceptual fit resulted in a 12-item scale. For both the ADHD and depression conditions, the components that emerged were 'Volition', 'Recent Life Stress', 'Family Factors' and 'School Factors'. CONCLUSIONS: The present study represents the first field trial of the CAPPP. Results suggest that children's and adolescents' beliefs about the causes of psychological problems are multidimensional and incorporate both individual and environmental factors.

Children's understanding of psychological problems displayed by their peers: a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: There is a widespread consensus in the literature that children who have psychological problems are more likely than other children to be excluded or rejected by their peers. The existence of this phenomenon has been established, primarily with the use of research on their sociometric status within groups of peers. Much less research has been performed on the way in which children develop attitudes and behavioural intentions towards peers with problems. AIMS: The primary aim of this article is to introduce readers to research on children's understanding of the nature of common childhood psychological problems, with a view to exploring the factors that might contribute to the development of negative attitudes and behaviour. METHOD: Relevant publications were identified through searches of electronic databases and articles in print. RESULTS: From the early years of primary school, children are able to identify peers whose behaviour deviates from the norm and to suggest causes for the behaviour of peers with psychological problems. Furthermore, their beliefs about peers' personal responsibility for these problems appear to be a significant determinant of attitudes and behavioural intentions. The article identifies the need for more research on the role of factors such as gender and personal contact in determining children's understanding of, and attitudes towards, peers with psychological problems. In addition, the article calls for more research on mental health education programmes and the extension of these programmes to younger children, given the fact that even young primary school children appear to have beliefs about the causes of psychological problems and negative attitudes to peers who display such problems. CONCLUSIONS: Research on children's understanding of mental health can make an important contribution to our understanding of why children with problems are so much more likely to be excluded from their peer group.