ABSTRACT
Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the demographic and clinical features of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) post-surgery for localized or locally advanced disease in a national Danish cohort, with a specific focus on describing recurrence patterns in a subgroup aligned with the adjuvant KEYNOTE-564 trial classification. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the Danish Renal Cancer (DaRenCa) database. Eligible subjects were individuals with an RCC diagnosis between January 2014 and December 2017 who subsequently underwent radical or partial nephrectomy. Variables of interest were demographic and clinical characteristics, rates and sites of recurrence. Recurrence rates were also assessed in a subpopulation stratified using the risk classifications of the KEYNOTE-564 trial. Results: A total of 2164 RCC patients were identified. Most patients (84.8%) had non-metastatic RCC (stage M0). A recurrence was observed in 250 of the M0 patients (13.6%). Patients with a recurrence were older, male, had a higher tumour stage, had undergone radical nephrectomy and had a higher Leibovich score. The majority (74.8%) of M0 patients had recurrence at distant metastatic sites. A total of 392 patients were stratified by the KEYNOTE-564 risk classification: 335 intermediate-high risk, 17 high risk and 40 M1 NED (metastatic with no evidence of disease). Recurrence was observed in 37.0%, 88.2% and 27.5% of these risk groups, respectively. Conclusions: This study elucidates the rates and determinants of post-surgical RCC recurrence in Denmark, underscoring the potential of adjuvant immunotherapy in refining therapeutic strategies, identifying suitable beneficiaries and minimizing overtreatment risks in RCC care.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In March-April 2020, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic lockdown in Denmark, the Danish Health Authorities recommended that, where possible, face-to-face patient-physician consultations be replaced by telephone consultations. The aim of this study was to obtain patients' evaluation of their telemedicine experience. METHODS: Patients who were candidates for telemedicine consultations were recruited based on their urological ailment, necessity for follow-up and comorbidity. New referrals including patients with suspicion of cancer were not candidates for telemedicine. In total, 548 patients had their appointment altered during the period from 13 March to 30 April 2020. Postal questionnaires were sent to 548 patients and 300 (54.7%) replied. RESULTS: In total, 280 patient answered, 224 (80%) men and 56 (20%) women, mean age 69 years (range 18-91) of whom 180 (64.3%) had a benign and 100 (35.7%) a malignant diagnosis. Twenty (6.7%) respondents did not remember their telephone consultation and were therefore excluded. Telephone consultation satisfaction was reported by 230 (85.0%) patients, but they would not prefer video consultations over telephone consultations, and only 102 (36.4%) would prefer telephone consultations in the future. Patients' age, sex and distance to the hospital did not seem to be associated with telephone consultation satisfaction (age p = 0.17; sex p = 0.99; distance p = 0.27, respectively). In total, 226 (80.7%) were medically assessed as being at risk for COVID, but 74 (26.4%) subjectively evaluated themselves as being at risk. CONCLUSIONS: In general (85.0%), urological patients were satisfied with telephone consultations.