Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Elife ; 52016 11 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27892853

ABSTRACT

The germline genome of the binucleated ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila undergoes programmed chromosome breakage and massive DNA elimination to generate the somatic genome. Here, we present a complete sequence assembly of the germline genome and analyze multiple features of its structure and its relationship to the somatic genome, shedding light on the mechanisms of genome rearrangement as well as the evolutionary history of this remarkable germline/soma differentiation. Our results strengthen the notion that a complex, dynamic, and ongoing interplay between mobile DNA elements and the host genome have shaped Tetrahymena chromosome structure, locally and globally. Non-standard outcomes of rearrangement events, including the generation of short-lived somatic chromosomes and excision of DNA interrupting protein-coding regions, may represent novel forms of developmental gene regulation. We also compare Tetrahymena's germline/soma differentiation to that of other characterized ciliates, illustrating the wide diversity of adaptations that have occurred within this phylum.


Subject(s)
Gene Rearrangement , Genome, Protozoan , Tetrahymena thermophila/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA
2.
Nat Genet ; 46(12): 1350-5, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25326702

ABSTRACT

Complete knowledge of the genetic variation in individual human genomes is a crucial foundation for understanding the etiology of disease. Genetic variation is typically characterized by sequencing individual genomes and comparing reads to a reference. Existing methods do an excellent job of detecting variants in approximately 90% of the human genome; however, calling variants in the remaining 10% of the genome (largely low-complexity sequence and segmental duplications) is challenging. To improve variant calling, we developed a new algorithm, DISCOVAR, and examined its performance on improved, low-cost sequence data. Using a newly created reference set of variants from the finished sequence of 103 randomly chosen fosmids, we find that some standard variant call sets miss up to 25% of variants. We show that the combination of new methods and improved data increases sensitivity by several fold, with the greatest impact in challenging regions of the human genome.


Subject(s)
Genetic Variation , Genome, Human , Algorithms , Base Sequence , Chromosome Mapping , Gene Frequency , Genome , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Software
3.
Genome Biol ; 14(5): R51, 2013 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23718773

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: DNA sequencing technologies deviate from the ideal uniform distribution of reads. These biases impair scientific and medical applications. Accordingly, we have developed computational methods for discovering, describing and measuring bias. RESULTS: We applied these methods to the Illumina, Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Complete Genomics sequencing platforms, using data from human and from a set of microbes with diverse base compositions. As in previous work, library construction conditions significantly influence sequencing bias. Pacific Biosciences coverage levels are the least biased, followed by Illumina, although all technologies exhibit error-rate biases in high- and low-GC regions and at long homopolymer runs. The GC-rich regions prone to low coverage include a number of human promoters, so we therefore catalog 1,000 that were exceptionally resistant to sequencing. Our results indicate that combining data from two technologies can reduce coverage bias if the biases in the component technologies are complementary and of similar magnitude. Analysis of Illumina data representing 120-fold coverage of a well-studied human sample reveals that 0.20% of the autosomal genome was covered at less than 10% of the genome-wide average. Excluding locations that were similar to known bias motifs or likely due to sample-reference variations left only 0.045% of the autosomal genome with unexplained poor coverage. CONCLUSIONS: The assays presented in this paper provide a comprehensive view of sequencing bias, which can be used to drive laboratory improvements and to monitor production processes. Development guided by these assays should result in improved genome assemblies and better coverage of biologically important loci.


Subject(s)
Base Composition , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Algorithms , Genome, Bacterial , Genome, Human , Genome, Protozoan , Genomics/methods , Humans , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Sequence Analysis, DNA/instrumentation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...