Calculation of breast volumes from mammogram: Comparison of four separate equations relative to mastectomy specimen volumes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Accurately assessing breast volume (BV) relative to the volume of breast tissue to be removed could help objectively determine the optimal surgical candidates for breast conserving surgery. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal mammography-based method of BV estimation. METHODS: Mammography data was obtained for patients who underwent mastectomy for breast cancer from 2005 to 2015. This data was used to calculate BV using four previously published equations. Results were compared to mastectomy specimen volumes calculated from specimen weights and breast density. Five practitioners then independently assessed reproducibility and ease of use. RESULTS: Complete mammographic measurements were available for 65 breasts from 45 patients. Median age was 58 years (range 19-82). Mammographic breast density scores were available for 62 breasts. Of the 65 mastectomies performed, 16 (36%) were simple mastectomies. The equation BV = 1/3πRcc Rmlo Hmlo most closely approximated actual breast specimen volumes (R = 0.89, P < 0.0001). Internal correlation of calculated BV was excellent among all practitioners (lowest Pearson R = 0.963). CONCLUSIONS: Breast volumes can be reliably estimated utilizing measurements from a preoperative mammogram. This low-cost method of volumetric analysis can be employed to guide surgical decision making in treatment of patients with invasive breast cancer.

Evaluating the Effect of Margin Consensus Guideline Publication on Operative Patterns and Financial Impact of Breast Cancer Operation.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to evaluate re-excision rates, patient satisfaction with their breasts, and healthcare costs before and after publication of 2014 Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society of Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast conserving operation with whole-breast irradiation for stage I and II breast cancer at an academic institution. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with stage I and II invasive carcinomas who underwent partial mastectomy were divided into 2 groups based on whether they were treated before (PRE) or after (POST) guideline publication in March 2014. Groups were compared with respect to re-excision rates, conversion to mastectomy, specimen volumes, mean cost per patient of surgical care, and prospectively collected patient post-procedure quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 237 patients who underwent partial mastectomy were examined (n = 126 in the PRE group and n = 111 in the POST group). Patients in the POST group were less likely to require re-excision (9% POST vs 37% PRE; p < 0.001) and were less likely to undergo conversion to mastectomy (5% POST vs 14% PRE; p = 0.02). After consensus guideline publication, mean operative cost per patient decreased ($4,874 POST vs $5,772 PRE; p < 0.001), and patients had improved breast quality of life scores (77 out of 100 POST vs 61 out of 100 PRE; p = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, publication of the consensus statement was an independent predictor of decreased re-excision rates (odds ratio 0.17; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.38; p < 0.001) and operative cost per patient (odds ratio 0.14; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.30; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Widespread implementation of the consensus guideline on margins for breast conserving operation will likely lead to the intended improvements in operative and financial outcomes, as well as patient satisfaction with breast conserving operation.