Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Nucl Med Commun ; 41(9): 888-895, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32796477

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Myocardial SPECT/CT imaging is frequently performed to assess myocardial perfusion and dynamic parameters of heart function, such as ejection fraction (EF). However, potential pitfalls exist in the imaging chain that can unfavorably affect diagnosis and treatment. We performed a national cardiac quality control study to investigate how much SPECT/CT protocols vary between different nuclear medicine units in Finland, and how this may affect the heart perfusion and EF values. METHODS: Altogether, 21 nuclear medicine units participated with 27 traditional SPECT/CT systems and two cardiac-centered IQ-SPECT systems. The reproducibility of EF and the uniformity of perfusion were studied using a commercial dynamic heart phantom. SPECT/CT acquisitions were performed and processed at each participating unit using their own clinical protocol and with a standardized protocol. The effects of acquisition protocols and analysis routines on EF estimates and uniformity of perfusion were studied. RESULTS: Considerable variation in EF estimates and in the uniformity of perfusion were observed between the units. Uniformity of perfusion was improved in some units after applying the higher count-statistic standard acquisition protocol. EF estimates varied more due to differences in analysis routines than as a result of different acquisition protocols. The results obtained with the two IQ-SPECT systems differed substantially from the traditional multipurpose cameras. CONCLUSION: On average, the EF and heart perfusion were accurately estimated by SPECT/CT, but high errors could be produced if the acquisition and analysis routines were poorly optimized. Eight of the 21 participants altered their imaging protocol after this quality control tour.


Subject(s)
Coronary Circulation , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/instrumentation , Phantoms, Imaging , Stroke Volume , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/instrumentation , Estonia , Finland , Humans
2.
Nucl Med Commun ; 35(9): 977-84, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24949915

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The diversity of the dynamic radionuclide renal imaging (renography) study protocols sets challenges for the overall study quality, therefore raising a need for national quality control. The aim of this study was to encourage the standardization of renography in Finland and to evaluate the development after a previous study performed in 1997. METHODS: The new Heikkinen phantom was imaged in each of the 20 participating nuclear medicine laboratories. The results were interpreted in the manner of a regular patient study, and reconstructions and printouts were made according to the clinical routines of each laboratory. Four quantitative parameters were calculated and compared between laboratories. The reports were also assessed in a blind test. RESULTS: The average error in T(max) values ranged from -5 to 7% (-29 to +18% in 1997), in T(1/2) from 0 to 35% (-43 to +66%), in RCA20 from -20 to +28% (-50 to +82%) and in relative uptake from -3 to 5%. The difference from average in relative uptake ranged from -4 to 5% (-21 to +36%). CONCLUSION: The results showed that the errors in T(max) and relative uptake were generally within quite acceptable margins, and the variation in quantitative parameters between laboratories was shown to be smaller than 14 years earlier. The reason might be the use of new software packages as well as increased efforts to improve the quality of the studies.


Subject(s)
Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Radioisotope Renography/instrumentation , Radioisotope Renography/standards , Radionuclide Imaging/instrumentation , Radionuclide Imaging/standards , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Finland , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/standards , Medical Audit , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Nucl Med Commun ; 35(7): 745-54, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24709979

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In this second UK audit of quantitative parameters obtained from renography, phantom simulations were used in cases in which the 'true' values could be estimated, allowing the accuracy of the parameters measured to be assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A renal physical phantom was used to generate a set of three phantom simulations (six kidney functions) acquired on three different gamma camera systems. A total of nine phantom simulations and three real patient studies were distributed to UK hospitals participating in the audit. Centres were asked to provide results for the following parameters: relative function and time-to-peak (whole kidney and cortical region). As with previous audits, a questionnaire collated information on methodology. Errors were assessed as the root mean square deviation from the true value. RESULTS: Sixty-one centres responded to the audit, with some hospitals providing multiple sets of results. Twenty-one centres provided a complete set of parameter measurements. Relative function and time-to-peak showed a reasonable degree of accuracy and precision in most UK centres. The overall average root mean squared deviation of the results for (i) the time-to-peak measurement for the whole kidney and (ii) the relative function measurement from the true value was 7.7 and 4.5%, respectively. These results showed a measure of consistency in the relative function and time-to-peak that was similar to the results reported in a previous renogram audit by our group. CONCLUSION: Analysis of audit data suggests a reasonable degree of accuracy in the quantification of renography function using relative function and time-to-peak measurements. However, it is reasonable to conclude that the objectives of the audit could not be fully realized because of the limitations of the mechanical phantom in providing true values for renal parameters.


Subject(s)
Medical Audit , Phantoms, Imaging , Radioisotope Renography/instrumentation , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Time Factors , United Kingdom
4.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 69(9): 1618-22, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20643765

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The authors examined the validity, interobserver reliability and interscanner variation in detecting bone erosions with ultrasonography using a custom-made phantom. METHODS: 21 bovine bones were used. Artificial erosions were made into 15 bones and six bones were left as controls. In the processed bones the numbers of erosions, their depths and widths varied between 1-7, 1-4 and 1.5-5 mm, respectively. Each bone was coated with polyvinyl alcohol cryogel to mimic overlying soft tissue and to hide the erosions. Four musculoskeletal sonography experts scanned the 21 blind-coded phantoms using one of the three sets of ultrasound equipment. Finally, quality assurance measurements of the ultrasound equipment was carried out using two additional bone samples. RESULTS: The sonographers detected the erosions successfully with ultrasound. The mean correlation coefficient for a correct result in terms of the number of erosions detected was 0.88 (range 0.75-0.975). The overall Cohen's kappa coefficient for interobserver agreement was 0.683 in terms of discrimination between healthy bones and bones with erosions. The different sets of equipment showed that their overall performance was equal. CONCLUSIONS: The sonographers had good correlations with the number of erosions and they were successful in separating healthy bones from bones with erosions. It seems that neither depth nor width is crucial but that in experimental conditions a 1.5 mm erosion width was the limit for the resolution with current ultrasound equipment. Ultrasound is a valid and reliable method of detecting cortical bone erosions in vitro, when the round erosion is at least 1 mm deep and 1.5 mm wide.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Experimental/diagnostic imaging , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnostic imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Animals , Arthritis, Experimental/pathology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/pathology , Cattle , Observer Variation , Polyvinyl Alcohol , Reproducibility of Results , Ultrasonography
5.
J Nucl Med Technol ; 34(1): 34-42, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16517967

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The diagnostic proficiency of nuclear medicine professionals and the accuracy of equipment may be tested with phantoms. All phases of the imaging chain should be included in the external quality assurance of imaging. METHODS: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the quality of nuclear imaging of the lung in Finland. For this purpose, we developed a new anatomically realistic lung phantom. The phantom consisted of plastic containers filled with plastic pellets to imitate the 3-dimensional shape of the lungs. These containers were filled with radioactive liquid and placed inside an anatomically accurate phantom of the chest cavity. The attenuation properties of the phantom were close to those of a real human thorax. Perfusion and ventilation defects were positioned inside the phantom to mimic 2 clinical cases. The phantom was imaged and interpreted as a patient simulation study in 18 Finnish hospitals. Reconstruction, printout, and reporting were according to the clinical routine of each hospital. The quality of the image sets and reports was evaluated and scored from 0 to 10. Additionally, technical performance was evaluated by a nuclear medicine specialist and hospital physicians. RESULTS: The average score (+/-SD) for overall quality was 7.1+/-1.1 (range, 5.2-8.5). Reports received a score of 7.2+/-1.7 (4.7-10.0); image sets, 7.2+/-1.3 (4.8-9.7), technical evaluation by hospital readers, 6.5+/-2.3 (1.6-9.5); and technical evaluation by a specialist, 7.8+/-1.2 (5.7-10.0). CONCLUSION: Lung imaging routines and the results of this survey were diverse. None of the participating hospitals routinely used tomography. In planar imaging, the most valuable projections were oblique (left anterior oblique, right anterior oblique, left posterior oblique, and right posterior oblique) and straight sides (right and left). The phantom mimics variable clinical situations well and is suitable for testing of imaging protocols and for proficiency testing of nuclear medicine professionals and equipment. Clinical phantom studies are an effective way of assessing an imaging program.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Medical Audit , Models, Anatomic , Phantoms, Imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Radiology Department, Hospital , Finland , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Phys Med Biol ; 50(7): N49-54, 2005 Apr 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15798326

ABSTRACT

Gamma camera imaging with Tc-99m marking is a widely used method to locate sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) in breast cancer patients. Prior to SN biopsy, the anterior and lateral location of the SN is marked on the patient's skin using an ink pen. The pen marks guide the surgeon during an operation. However, in many cases the marking is difficult due to limited space under the detectors of a gamma camera. The aim of this study was to improve the pen marking method. Eleven female patients were imaged 3-4 h after injection of Tc-99m labelled Nanocol. Injection was performed to parenchyma surrounding the breast tumour. To facilitate pen marking, two polycarbonate (PC) plates with 40 x 32 holes (spacing=10 mm) were engineered for anterior and lateral side imaging and then installed on the bed of a dual-head gamma camera. Two drops of Tc-99m were placed into the top corners of both the PC plates, in order to trace the corresponding x-y coordinates first from the acquired images and then from the plates. After imaging, the x-y coordinates of the SN(s) were determined from the anterior and lateral side images. Subsequently, the location of each SN was marked with an ink pen on the skin through the small holes in the PC plates. According to the surgeon's evaluation, the distance between the marks and the true location of the SNs was 4.5+/-6.9 mm. Measurements with a custom made phantom revealed that the accuracy of the novel method was significantly (P=0.06) higher as compared with the traditional method (2.7+/-3.0 mm versus 9.2+/-3.0 mm). In addition, we were not able to mark the weakest activity (0.02 MBq) with the traditional method. Taken together, the marking process was considerably easier with the novel method, it had better accuracy and sensitivity than the traditional method and the device is simple enough to be adapted for most gamma cameras.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Image Enhancement/instrumentation , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Preoperative Care/instrumentation , Radionuclide Imaging/instrumentation , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care/methods , Radionuclide Imaging/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Subtraction Technique/instrumentation
7.
J Nucl Med ; 45(3): 495-9, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15001693

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Physical phantoms have been used to test the diagnostic proficiency of nuclear medicine professionals and the accuracy of their equipment in external quality assurance surveys. No dynamic renal phantoms are commercially available. A new renal phantom, presented in this paper, was constructed and patented in the United States. METHODS: The organs to be simulated by the phantom were in the form of containers filled with radioactive solution, and the device further comprised movable steel and lead plates between the containers and the gamma-camera. The detectable radiation was regulated in accordance with automated computer-controlled step motors to move the attenuators to simulate a given patient situation. The reproducibility of the phantom measurements was defined as a coefficient of variation. Four different kidney-function simulations were repeated 3 times, and 6 parameters were compared. RESULTS: The average root mean square deviation of the coefficient of variation was 6.7% for the perfusion integral, 1.3% for time to reach the maximum activity, 19.7% for mean transit time, 3.3% for function (Patlak [%]), 1.0% for outflow index (%), and 6.5% for time to reach the half-activity from maximum. CONCLUSION: With this phantom, the true values of most parameters measured are well known; it closely approaches true extraction, washout, and attenuation properties and curves, and the images produced are similar to those of patient studies. Compared with the first manual version, this new automated phantom is easy to use. Any desired clinical situation can be programmed. It is a promising tool for quality assurance and calibration of renography.


Subject(s)
Equipment Failure Analysis/methods , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Radioisotope Renography/instrumentation , Robotics/instrumentation , Technetium Tc 99m Mertiatide , Calibration/standards , Equipment Failure Analysis/standards , Humans , Radioisotope Renography/methods , Radioisotope Renography/standards , Radiopharmaceuticals , Reproducibility of Results , Robotics/methods , Robotics/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...