Changes in the prognostic values of modern cardiovascular biomarkers in relation to duration of diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Based on the complex pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis we hypothesized a dynamic change in prognostic value of cardiovascular biomarkers over time. METHODS: In this prospective study 746 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, being followed up for 60 months were analysed. The primary endpoint was defined as unplanned hospitalization for cardiovascular disease or death. Beside others, especially the prognostic performance of the biomarkers of interest (GDF-15, NT-proBNP, hs-TnT) was evaluated in relation to quartiles of diabetes duration. RESULTS: In patients having a diabetes duration below 7 years lnGDF-15 (HR 2.84; p < 0.01) and lnhs-TnT (HR 2.96; p < 0.01) were significant predictors of the primary endpoint. LnAge (HR 40.01; p < 0.01) and lnNT-proBNP (HR 1.56; p = 0.03) were significant predictors in patients with a diabetes duration between 7 and 12 years. In the third quartile (diabetes duration 12-22 years) lnurinary albumin to creatinine ratio (HR 1.25; p = 0.005) and lnNT-proBNP (HR 2.13, p < 0.001) predicted the endpoint. In patients with a diabetes duration above 22 years, lnAge (HR 75.35; p = 0.001) and lnNT-proBNP (HR 2.0; p < 0.01) were the only significant predictors of the endpoint. CONCLUSION: Prognostic power of cardiovascular biomarkers changes dynamically in relation to duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In patients with shorter duration of the disease markers of subclinical cardiovascular dysfunction and inflammation perform better than markers of systemic advanced organ dysfunction and cardiovascular disease.

Detection of granulocyte-reactive antibodies: a comparison of different methods.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Granulocyte-reactive antibodies can cause autoimmune and neonatal immune neutropenias as well as transfusion-related acute lung injury. The classical antibody-detection methods granulocyte aggregation test (GAT), granulocyte immunofluorescence test (GIFT) and monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of granulocyte antigens (MAIGA) are time-consuming and technically challenging. In recent years, flow cytometric white blood cell immunofluorescence test (Flow-WIFT) and the microbeads assay LabScreen® Multi have emerged and are still subject of evaluation. These serological tests were compared on a screening and specification level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For screening, the combination of GAT/GIFT was compared to Flow-WIFT testing 333 samples. Positive samples were further analysed with MAIGA and LabScreen® Multi. RESULTS: Granulocyte aggregation test/GIFT detected 77 positive samples, Flow-WIFT found 108 granulocyte-reactive samples. Six Samples were only positive in GAT/GIFT, and 37 samples were only positive in Flow-WIFT (κ = 0.682). Antibody specification with MAIGA and the microbeads assay confirmed granulocyte-reactivity in 83 cases with 70 matching results (κ = 0.742). However, out of six detected human neutrophil antigen (HNA) reactivities only two specificities matched in both assays. CONCLUSION: Flow-WIFT may be a valuable addition to GIFT for granulocyte-reactive antibody screening. MAIGA remains the most reliable laboratory method for antibody specification.

Granulocyte-reactive antibodies are associated with red blood cell alloimmunization.

Granulocyte-reactive antibodies may cause transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and immune neutropenias. Risk factors for their acquisition other than previous alloexposition are largely unknown. In addition to the known association between human leucocyte antigen alloantibodies and red blood cell alloimmunization in selected cohorts of transfused patients, this study investigated a possible extension of this association to granulocyte-reactive antibodies in women with a history of pregnancy. The overall prevalence of granulocyte-reactive antibodies in 333 samples from women with a history of pregnancy (143 samples containing red cell alloantibodies) was 23·1%. The prevalence in the red cell-alloimmunized group (32·9%) was significantly higher than in controls (15·8%, P < 0·001). This could suggest that some individuals may be strong immunological responders, forming alloantibodies more readily than others.