Transcriptomic characterization of the human segmental endotoxin challenge model.

Segmental instillation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by bronchoscopy safely induces transient airway inflammation in human lungs. This model enables investigation of pulmonary inflammatory mechanisms as well as pharmacodynamic analysis of investigational drugs. The aim of this work was to describe the transcriptomic profile of human segmental LPS challenge with contextualization to major respiratory diseases. Pre-challenge bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and biopsies were sampled from 28 smoking, healthy participants, followed by segmental instillation of LPS and saline as control. Twenty-four hours post instillation, BAL and biopsies were collected from challenged lung segments. Total RNA of cells from BAL and biopsy samples were sequenced and analysed for differentially expressed genes (DEGs). After challenge with LPS compared with saline, 6316 DEGs were upregulated and 241 were downregulated in BAL, but only one DEG was downregulated in biopsy samples. Upregulated DEGs in BAL were related to molecular functions such as "Inflammatory response" or "chemokine receptor activity", and upregulated pro-inflammatory pathways such as "Wnt-"/"Ras-"/"JAK-STAT" "-signaling pathway". Furthermore, the segmental LPS challenge model resembled aspects of the five most prevalent respiratory diseases chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, pneumonia, tuberculosis and lung cancer and featured similarities with acute exacerbations in COPD (AECOPD) and community-acquired pneumonia. Overall, our study provides extensive information about the transcriptomic profile from BAL cells and mucosal biopsies following LPS challenge in healthy smokers. It expands the knowledge about the LPS challenge model providing potential overlap with respiratory diseases in general and infection-triggered respiratory insults such as AECOPD in particular.

Chimpanzee, orangutan, mouse, and human cell cycle promoters exempt CCAAT boxes and CHR elements from interspecies differences.

Mechanisms regulating the cell division cycle are well conserved among all eukaryotes. Consistently many proteins regulating the cell cycle are functionally interchangeable between many organisms. Cell division control is regulated on different levels of which the transcriptional level appears to be particularly important for controlling synthesis of many cell cycle proteins. We had earlier described transcription factor-binding sites essential for regulating genes important for the transition from the G(2) phase to mitosis. A tandem repressor site named cell cycle-dependent element (CDE) and cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) are responsible for the correct expression during the cell cycle. Another feature of these G(2)/M-specific promoters is the activation through 2 or 3 CCAAT boxes binding the transcription factor nuclear factor-Y (NF-Y). These major activating sites have to be spaced 32 or 33 bp apart to be fully functional. We were interested in looking at the evolutionary changes in regulatory elements and overall promoter structure of 3 well-characterized cell cycle genes. Here, we compare the DNA sequences and functional features of the cdc25C, cyclin B1, and cyclin B2 promoters from humans, mouse, chimpanzee, and orangutan. We find numerous differences in the nucleotide sequence between mouse and primate promoters. However, CHR and CCAAT boxes stand out in that they are perfectly conserved in all promoters tested. The CDE site contains nucleotide exchanges between mouse and primate promoters. Comparing sequences and functions of chimpanzee, orangutan, and human promoters, we observe a complete conservation in nucleotide sequence of the regulatory elements. Functional assays of the cyclin B1, cyclin B2, and cdc25C promoters yield moderate variations in activity and thereby a good conservation of function. Although we find nucleotide differences in cell cycle promoters between orangutan and humans of about 5%, there are never changes in any of the CCAAT boxes or CDE/CHR sites in the cyclin B1, cyclin B2, and cdc25C promoters. Furthermore, we describe the influence of the tumor suppressor p53 and the transcriptional activator NF-Y on regulation of the newly cloned primate promoters.

Functional analysis of human and chimpanzee promoters.

BACKGROUND: It has long been argued that changes in gene expression may provide an additional and crucial perspective on the evolutionary differences between humans and chimpanzees. To investigate how often expression differences seen in tissues are caused by sequence differences in the proximal promoters, we tested the expression activity in cultured cells of human and chimpanzee promoters from genes that differ in mRNA expression between human and chimpanzee tissues. RESULTS: Twelve promoters for which the corresponding gene had been shown to be differentially expressed between humans and chimpanzees in liver or brain were tested. Seven showed a significant difference in activity between the human promoter and the orthologous chimpanzee promoter in at least one of the two cell lines used. However, only three of them showed a difference in the same direction as in the tissues. CONCLUSION: Differences in proximal promoter activity are likely to be common between humans and chimpanzees, but are not linked in a simple fashion to gene-expression levels in tissues. This suggests that several genetic differences between humans and chimpanzees might be responsible for a single expression difference and thus that relevant expression differences between humans and chimpanzees will be difficult to predict from cell culture experiments or DNA sequences.

Regional patterns of gene expression in human and chimpanzee brains.

We have analyzed gene expression in various brain regions of humans and chimpanzees. Within both human and chimpanzee individuals, the transcriptomes of the cerebral cortex are very similar to each other and differ more between individuals than among regions within an individual. In contrast, the transcriptomes of the cerebral cortex, the caudate nucleus, and the cerebellum differ substantially from each other. Between humans and chimpanzees, 10% of genes differ in their expression in at least one region of the brain. The majority of these expression differences are shared among all brain regions. Whereas genes encoding proteins involved in signal transduction and cell differentiation differ significantly between brain regions within individuals, no such pattern is seen between the species. However, a subset of genes that show expression differences between humans and chimpanzees are distributed nonrandomly across the genome. Furthermore, genes that show an elevated expression level in humans are statistically significantly enriched in regions that are recently duplicated in humans.

Intra- and interspecific variation in primate gene expression patterns.

Although humans and their closest evolutionary relatives, the chimpanzees, are 98.7% identical in their genomic DNA sequences, they differ in many morphological, behavioral, and cognitive aspects. The underlying genetic basis of many of these differences may be altered gene expression. We have compared the transcriptome in blood leukocytes, liver, and brain of humans, chimpanzees, orangutans, and macaques using microarrays, as well as protein expression patterns of humans and chimpanzees using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. We also studied three mouse species that are approximately as related to each other as are humans, chimpanzees, and orangutans. We identified species-specific gene expression patterns indicating that changes in protein and gene expression have been particularly pronounced in the human brain.