Geoepidemiology of Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Lessons from Switzerland.

No data on primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are available in Switzerland. We established a national patient cohort to obtain information on PBC phenotypes and disease course in Switzerland. Local databases in all university hospitals and in two large secondary centers were searched for case finding. In addition, all primary care physicians, gastroenterologists, rheumatologists, and dermatologists were invited to contribute patients from their own medical records. PBC diagnosis was centrally reviewed. Five hundred one PBC patients were identified, 474 were included in data analysis, and 449 of them were enrolled by tertiary centers. The catchment area accounts for approximately one third of the Swiss population or approximately 2.8 million inhabitants. The median age at diagnosis was 53 years, 84% were women, and 86% were anti-mitochondrial antibody positive. The median follow-up was 5.4 years, 12.6% experienced a liver-related endpoint. Splenomegaly was present at diagnosis in one quarter of patients and in half of male patients. Approximately one third were non-responders to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). The median transplant-free survival at 10 years was 85%. The following variables were independently associated with poor outcome: low platelet count at baseline (HR = 0.99, p < 0.0001), elevated alkaline phosphatase at baseline (HR = 1.36, p < 0.0001), elevated bilirubin at baseline (HR = 1.11, p = 0.001), and elevated alanine aminotransaminase (HR = 1.35, p = 0.04) after 12 months of UDCA therapy. The AUROC for the UK-PBC risk score at 5, 10, and 15 years was 0.82. The AUROC for the Globe score at 5, 10, and 15 years was 0.77. Patients included in this study are currently being enrolled in a prospective nationwide registry with biobank, taking advantage of the collaboration network generated by this study. Our study provides the first snapshot of PBC in Switzerland, describing a diagnostic delay with one quarter of patients diagnosed when already in the cirrhotic stage. We were also able to externally validate the UK-PBC risk score and the Globe score. The ongoing nationwide prospective registry will be fundamental to improve disease awareness and interdisciplinary collaborations and will serve as a platform for clinical and translational research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov : NCT02846896; SNCTP000001870.

Chronic Hepatitis C virus infection in Swiss primary care practices: low case loads-high barriers to treatment?

BACKGROUND: The primary care physician (PCP) diagnoses chronic Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in most patients. He serves as gatekeeper and plays a key role in counselling and treatment guidance. OBJECTIVES: To calculate the approximate HCV caseload per practice and characterize PCPs management of the disease; in particular, to determine antiviral treatment rates and reasons for PCPs for withholding treatment. The ultimate objective was to identify potentially modifiable barriers to treatment. METHODS: A confidential self-administered questionnaire centred on the above-mentioned questions was distributed to 2371 Swiss primary care physicians. All respondents of the main questionnaire received an additional small questionnaire focussed on the initial disease workup. Descriptive statistics were used to describe questionnaire responses and PCP demographics. RESULTS: The response rate was 53.1%. Of all participating PCPs (n = 1084), 86.2% reported having patients with chronic HCV, with an average number of 4 patients per practice; 18.6% (n = 142) of PCPs did not monitor their chronic HCV patients. Two-thirds (66.8%) of the sample chronic HCV patient population (n = 4626) never received antiviral therapy. The main reasons given by PCPs for withholding treatment were HCV-specialist advice, patient preference, normal liver enzymes and patient related factors like substance abuse or psychiatric co morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Most PCPs follow patients with chronic hepatitis C, but practice caseloads are low, which may account for insecurity in managing this complex disease.

Continuous administration of sorafenib in combination with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a phase I study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It is unknown whether sorafenib can be combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. This study assesses the safety and tolerability of a continuous regimen of sorafenib combined with TACE. METHODS: This was an open-label phase I study testing a continuous administration of sorafenib (dose escalation from 200 mg twice daily [bid] to 400 mg bid) starting 7 days prior to TACE with doxorubicin (50 mg). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were screened and 14 received sorafenib combined with TACE. Because there were no dose-limiting toxicities in the first three patients who received sorafenib at a dose of 200 mg bid, subsequent patients received 400 mg bid. Twenty-seven procedures were performed (median, two per patient) and two local therapy-related severe adverse events occurred. The median duration of sorafenib therapy was 246 days (range, 14-547 days). Sorafenib-related adverse events of grade ≥3 were hand-foot skin reaction (n = 3), weight loss (n = 2), diarrhea (n = 1), abdominal pain (n = 1), and thrombocytopenia (n = 3). After treatment with sorafenib and TACE, there was a significant decrease in the concentration of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from 93 ng/l to 67 ng/l. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous administration of sorafenib at a dose of 400 mg bid combined with TACE was tolerable. The adverse event profile of this regimen was comparable with that of sorafenib monotherapy with the exception of thrombocytopenia, which may be more frequent. There were no increases in the circulating VEGF levels after TACE with this combined regimen. (Swiss Association for the Study of the Liver study number 25; ClinicalTrials.gov trial identifier, NCT00478374).

Connective tissue growth factor, steatosis and fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Both steatosis and insulin resistance have been linked to accelerated fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) plays a major role in extracellular matrix production in fibrotic disorders including cirrhosis, and its expression is stimulated in vitro by insulin and glucose. We hypothesized that CTGF may link steatosis, insulin resistance and fibrosis. METHODS: We included 153 chronic hepatitis C patients enrolled in the Swiss Hepatitis C Cohort Study and for whom a liver biopsy and plasma samples were available. CTGF expression was assessed quantitatively by immunohistochemistry. In 94 patients (57 with genotypes non-3), plasma levels of glucose, insulin and leptin were also measured. CTGF synthesis was investigated by immunoblotting on LX-2 stellate cells. RESULTS: Connective tissue growth factor expression was higher in patients with steatosis (P=0.039) and in patients with fibrosis (P=0.008) than those without these features. CTGF levels were neither associated with insulinaemia or with glycaemia, nor with inflammation. By multiple regression analysis, CTGF levels were independently associated with steatosis, a past history of alcohol abuse, plasma leptin and HCV RNA levels; when only patients with genotypes non-3 were considered, CTGF levels were independently associated with a past history of alcohol abuse, plasma leptin levels and steatosis. Leptin stimulated CTGF synthesis in LX-2 cells. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic hepatitis C and steatosis, CTGF may promote fibrosis independently of inflammation. CTGF may link steatosis and fibrosis via increased leptin levels.

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid with vitamin e in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a frequent liver disease that can progress to cirrhosis and for which there is no recognized therapy. UDCA and vitamin E have been considered separately as therapeutic options and have not been shown to be effective. This study tested their combination. METHODS: Patients with elevated aminotransferase levels and drinking less than 40 g alcohol/week with biopsy-proven NASH were randomly assigned to receive UDCA 12-15 mg.kg-1.day-1 with vitamin E 400 IU twice a day (UDCA/Vit E), UDCA with placebo (UDCA/P), or placebo/placebo (P/P). After 2 years, they underwent a second liver biopsy. Biopsy specimens were collected, blinded, and scored by a single liver pathologist. RESULTS: Forty eight patients were included, 15 in the UDCA/Vit E group, 18 in the UDCA/P group, and 15 in the P/P group; 8 patients dropped out, none because of side effects. Baseline parameters were not significantly different between the 3 groups. Body mass index remained unchanged during the study. Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels diminished significantly in the UDCA/Vit E group. Neither the AST nor the ALT levels improved in the P/P group and only the ALT levels in the UDCA/P group. Histologically, the activity index was unchanged at the end of the study in the P/P and UDCA/P groups, but it was significantly better in the UDCA/Vit E group, mostly as a result of regression of steatosis. CONCLUSIONS: Two years of treatment with UDCA in combination with vitamin E improved laboratory values and hepatic steatosis of patients with NASH. Larger trials are warranted.

HCV-related advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis: randomized controlled trial of pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin.

In patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, 30% of sustained HCV clearance has been reported with pegylated interferon alpha-2a (PEG-IFN) alone, but the efficacy and tolerability of the PEG-IFN/ribavirin (RBV) combination remain poorly defined. A total of 124 treatment-naïve patients with biopsy proved HCV-related advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis (Ishak score F4-F6, Child-Pugh score < or =7) were randomized to 48 weeks of PEG-IFN (180 microg sc weekly) and standard dose of RBV (1000/1200 mg po daily, STD) or PEG-IFN (180 microg sc weekly) and low-dose of RBV (600/800 mg po daily, LOW). Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates with PEG-IFN/STD RBV (52%) were higher--albeit not significantly--than that with PEG-IFN/LOW RBV (38%, P = 0.153). In multivariate analysis, genotype 2/3 and a baseline platelet count > or =150 x 10(9)/L were independently associated with SVR. The likelihood of SVR was < 7% if viraemia had not declined by > or =2 log or to undetectable levels after 12 weeks. Nine adverse events in the STD RBV and 15 in the LOW RBV group were classified as severe (including two deaths); dose reductions for intolerance were required in 78% and 57% (P = 0.013), and treatment was terminated early in 23% and 27% of patients (P = n.s.). The benefit/risk ratio of treating compensated HCV-cirrhotics with STD PEG-IFN/RBV is favourable.

Barriers to interferon-alpha therapy are higher in intravenous drug users than in other patients with acute hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Treatment with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) may eradicate HCV in most acute hepatitis C patients, thus preventing chronic hepatitis and avoiding less efficacious combination therapy. METHODS: In a prospective study, we evaluated the impact of barriers to successful start and completion of treatment of acute and subacute (<12 months from infection) hepatitis C with pegylated IFN-alpha2b, 1.5 microg/kg, QW, for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Out of 27 patients (22 were active intravenous drug users [IVDU]), 5 cleared HCV spontaneously. Antiviral treatment was indicated in 22 patients: six refused therapy for fear of side effects, whereas two others were lost to observation. Eight patients completed the treatment or received >80% of the scheduled drug: seven (88%) were sustained virological responders 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Six patients (all IVDU) stopped prematurely due to side effects: only one had a sustained virological response. Based on an intent-to-treat analysis, and considering all 14 patients in whom at least one dose of drug was administered, only 8 (57%) became sustained virological responders. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of acute hepatitis C with pegylated IFN-alpha is highly beneficial, but its effectiveness is affected by a poor rate of acceptance and/or adherence to currently available regimens, especially in IVDU and women.

Insulin resistance is associated with liver fibrosis in non-diabetic chronic hepatitis C patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Liver steatosis is a frequent finding in chronic hepatitis C. An association has been suggested between steatosis and fibrosis progression rate, but the pathogenetic mechanisms linking fatty infiltration and collagen deposition are unknown. METHODS: We measured the levels of insulin resistance (as HOMA score) and leptin in 221 non-diabetic chronic hepatitis C patients, to assess their impact on liver steatosis and fibrosis, relative to other factors, using a multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: When all 221 patients were considered, steatosis was associated with excessive alcohol intake, genotype 3, and serum HCV RNA level, whereas fibrosis was associated with HOMA score and age. In 152 patients infected with genotype non-3, steatosis was associated with alcohol abuse and HCV RNA level, and fibrosis with HOMA score and age. In the 69 patients with genotype 3, steatosis and fibrosis were associated with each other. The association between fibrosis and HOMA score held also when 22 obese patients were excluded from the analysis. Levels of insulin resistance were not correlated with the presence of steatosis. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, insulin resistance (but not leptin) may play a role in fibrogenesis in chronic hepatitis C patients infected with genotype non-3.

Combination therapy with amantadine and interferon in naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C: meta-analysis of individual patient data from six clinical trials.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In chronic hepatitis C, clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of amantadine (AMA) and interferon (INF) compared to INF monotherapy, have produced conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis of the individual patient's data from previous studies. METHODS: Nine hundred and seventy-two patients from six European centres were evaluated by means of individual patient meta-analysis, using mixed models with centres and the centre-treatment interaction fitted as random variables. RESULTS: At the end of therapy, virological responses were 38.5% (95% CI 34.1-42.8) after INF and AMA, and 29.5% (95% CI 25.5-33.6) after INF alone (P = 0.003). Sustained response occurred in 111 (23.1%; 95% CI 19.3-20.2) and 85 patients (17.3%; 95% CI 14.0-20.7), respectively (P = 0.03). Even accounting for the centre effect, therapy with AMA and INF was more effective than IFN alone (P = 0.029). When genotypes and viraemia levels were combined, the response rate after combination therapy doubled that observed with IFN alone in all subgroups, except those with low viraemia and genotypes 2 or 3. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic hepatitis C, therapy with AMA and INF is effective and may be an alternative to INF and ribavirin in patients who cannot tolerate ribavirin.

Interferon and amantadine in naive chronic hepatitis C: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Recent controlled trials on the efficacy of an amantadine/interferon combination in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C yielded contradictory results. We therefore conducted a large, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C: 246 patients were randomized to receive interferon alfa-2a (6 MIU sc thrice weekly for 20 weeks, then 3 MIU sc thrice weekly) and either amantadine sulphate (2 x 100 mg p.o. QD) or placebo. Treatment continued for a total of 52 weeks, if HCV-RNA in serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) had fallen below detection limit (1,000 copies/mL) at treatment week 10, and stopped otherwise. All patients were followed for 24 weeks off therapy. After 10 weeks of treatment, 66/121 patients treated with amantadine (55%) and 78/125 treated with placebo (62%) had lost HCV-RNA (n.s.). After 24 weeks of follow-up, 25 patients in the amantadine (21%) and 17 (14%) in the placebo group remained HCV-RNA negative (n.s.). During therapy, virologic breakthroughs occurred less often in the amantadine than in the placebo group [14 (12%) vs. 27 (22%) patients; P =.04]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed genotype, viremia level, age, and amantadine therapy [risk ratio 0.4 (95%CI 0.2-1.0), P =.05] as predictors of sustained virologic response. Adverse events and impact of therapy on quality of life were similar in amantadine and placebo treated patients. Compared with current standard treatment (interferon/ribavirin), the interferon/amantadine combination was not cost-effective. In conclusion, amantadine does not add to a clinically relevant extent to the treatment of naive patients with chronic hepatitis C.