Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
N Engl J Med ; 352(7): 676-85, 2005 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15716561

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many sex partners of persons with gonorrhea or chlamydial infections are not treated, which leads to frequent reinfections and further transmission. METHODS: We randomly assigned women and heterosexual men with gonorrhea or chlamydial infection to have their partners receive expedited treatment or standard referral. Patients in the expedited-treatment group were offered medication to give to their sex partners, or if they preferred, study staff members contacted partners and provided them with medication without a clinical examination. Patients assigned to standard partner referral were advised to refer their partners for treatment and were offered assistance notifying partners. The primary outcome was persistent or recurrent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection in patients 3 to 19 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Persistent or recurrent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection occurred in 121 of 931 patients (13 percent) assigned to standard partner referral and 92 of 929 (10 percent) assigned to expedited treatment of sexual partners (relative risk, 0.76; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.98). Expedited treatment was more effective than standard referral of partners in reducing persistent or recurrent infection among patients with gonorrhea (3 percent vs. 11 percent, P=0.01) than in those with chlamydial infection (11 percent vs. 13 percent, P=0.17) (P=0.05 for the comparison of treatment effects) and remained independently associated with a reduced risk of persistent or recurrent infection after adjustment for other predictors of infection at follow-up (relative risk, 0.75; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.97). Patients assigned to expedited treatment of sexual partners were significantly more likely than those assigned to standard referral of partners to report that all of their partners were treated and significantly less likely to report having sex with an untreated partner. CONCLUSIONS: Expedited treatment of sex partners reduces the rates of persistent or recurrent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Chlamydia Infections/drug therapy , Contact Tracing/methods , Gonorrhea/drug therapy , Sexual Partners , Adult , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Cefixime/therapeutic use , Chlamydia Infections/transmission , Drug Therapy, Combination/therapeutic use , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gonorrhea/transmission , Heterosexuality , Humans , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Compliance , Recurrence , Risk Factors
2.
Sex Transm Dis ; 31(2): 113-6, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14743074

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rescreening patients after treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection has had high yield but low rates of participation. GOAL: The goal of this study was to determine if rescreening for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection in a largely urban sexually transmitted disease population would be more successful if individuals were given the option of submitting a specimen for testing through the mail. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized clinical trial involving 122 patients of whom 62 were assigned to clinic rescreening and 60 were given the option of either mailing a specimen for testing or going to a clinic for rescreening. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (45%) given the option of either rescreening in the clinic or through the mail and 20 (32%) assigned to clinic rescreening were rescreened within 28 days of enrollment in the study (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-3.8). Of the 60 patients randomized to the clinic rescreening or mailing option, 11 of 18 (61%) who opted to mail in a specimen and 16 of 42 (38%) who chose clinic rescreening were rescreened within 28 days of enrollment (P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Although not statistically significant, this study indicates that mailed rescreening could be a successful method to increase rescreening rates.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Correspondence as Topic , Gonorrhea/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Patient Compliance , Adolescent , Adult , Chlamydia Infections/prevention & control , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Female , Gonorrhea/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/isolation & purification , Office Visits , Urban Health , Washington
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...