Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 28(10): 3548-3555, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38856130

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) targeting beta-lactam antibiotics pose a major healthcare challenge. Carbapenems are known to be less impacted. However, the emergence of carbapenem-resistant strains can add further complexity to this existing challenge. With slow drug discovery and rapid resistance, repurposing existing drugs is crucial. This research study aims to provide insight into the antimicrobial effectiveness of 3-hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-thiol against diverse clinical ESBL-producing isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The broth microdilution assay was conducted on a total of sixty-nine clinical ESBL-producing isolates to assess the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 3-hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-thiol. The assay was conducted in triplicate, and the average MIC values were calculated. RESULTS: The most repeatedly observed MIC was 64 µg/ml (37.7%), followed by 256 µg/ml (23.2%) and 128 µg/ml (17.4%). Other MICs: 32 µg/ml (11.6%), 16 µg/ml (7.2%), 4-8 µg/ml (1.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated an effect of 3-hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-thiol on various ESBL-producing strains in vitro, indicating its promising therapeutic potential. To comprehensively understand the drug, rigorous testing, including pharmacokinetics, resistance assays, safety assessments, and exploration of potential synergies with other antibiotics against ESBL-producing organisms, is crucial.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Quinoxalines , beta-Lactamases , Quinoxalines/pharmacology , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Humans
2.
Infect Prev Pract ; 2(3): 100061, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34316558

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on 11th March 2020. The treatment guidelines for COVID-19 vary between countries, yet there is no approved treatment to date. AIM: To report any evidence of therapeutics used for the management of patients with COVID-19 in clinical practice since emergence of the virus. METHODS: A systematic review protocol was developed based on the PRISMA statement. Articles for review were selected from Embase, Medline and Google Scholar. Readily accessible peer-reviewed, full articles in English published from 1st December 2019 to 26th March 2020 were included. The search terms included combinations of: COVID, SARS-COV-2, glucocorticoids, convalescent plasma, antiviral and antibacterial. There were no restrictions on the types of study eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty-nine articles were identified in the literature search; of these, 41 studies were included in this review. These were clinical trials (N=3), case reports (N=7), case series (N=10), and retrospective (N=11) and prospective (N=10) observational studies. Thirty-six studies were conducted in China (88%). Corticosteroid treatment was reported most frequently (N=25), followed by lopinavir (N=21) and oseltamivir (N=16). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review to date related to medication used to treat patients with COVID-19. Only 41 studies were eligible for inclusion, most of which were conducted in China. Corticosteroid treatment was reported most frequently in the literature.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL