Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring: an updated position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring.

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are used to assess the functional status of somatosensory pathways during surgical procedures and can help protect patients' neurological integrity intraoperatively. This is a position statement on intraoperative SEP monitoring from the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM) and updates prior ASNM position statements on SEPs from the years 2005 and 2010. This position statement is endorsed by ASNM and serves as an educational service to the neurophysiological community on the recommended use of SEPs as a neurophysiological monitoring tool. It presents the rationale for SEP utilization and its clinical applications. It also covers the relevant anatomy, technical methodology for setup and signal acquisition, signal interpretation, anesthesia and physiological considerations, and documentation and credentialing requirements to optimize SEP monitoring to aid in protecting the nervous system during surgery.

Multimodal Analgesia and Intraoperative Neuromonitoring.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring has been a valuable tool for ensuring the functional integrity of vital neural structures by providing real-time feedback to the operative team during procedures where neurological structures are at risk. Commonly used intravenous and inhaled anesthetic drugs are known to affect waveform parameters measured with various intraoperative neuromonitoring modalities. While the concept of opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia has gained popularity in recent years, the impact of such a strategy on intraoperative neuromonitoring remains poorly characterized, in contrast to the more well-established concepts and literature regarding the effects of other hypnotic agents on neuromonitoring quality. The purpose of this focused review is to provide an overview of the clinical evidence pertaining to the pharmacological interaction of certain multimodal analgesics with routine intraoperative neuromonitoring modalities.

Cautionary findings for motor evoked potential monitoring in intracranial aneurysm surgery after a single administration of rocuronium to facilitate tracheal intubation.

Administration of rocuronium to facilitate intubation has traditionally been regarded as acceptable for intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring because of sufficiently rapid spontaneous neuromuscular blockade recovery. We hypothesized that residual neuromuscular blockade, in an amount that could hinder optimal neuromonitoring in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm clipping, was still present at dural opening. We sought to identify how often this was occurring and to identify factors which may contribute to prolonged blockade. Records of 97 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Rocuronium was administered to facilitate intubation with no additional neuromuscular blockade given. Prolonged spontaneous recovery time to a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0.75 after rocuronium administration was defined as 120 min, which was approximately when dural opening and the setting of baseline MEPs were occurring. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors related to prolonged spontaneous recovery time. Prolonged spontaneous recovery time to a TOF ratio of 0.75 was observed in 44.3% of patients. Multivariable analysis showed that only the dosage of rocuronium based on ideal body weight had a positive correlation with prolonged spontaneous recovery time (P = 0.01). There was no significant association between dosage of rocuronium based on total body weight, age, sex, or body temperature and prolonged recovery time. This study demonstrates that the duration of relaxation for MEP monitoring purposes is well-beyond the routinely recognized clinical duration of rocuronium. Residual neuromuscular blockade could result in lower amplitude MEP signals and/or lead to higher required MEP stimulus intensities which can both compromise monitoring sensitivity.

Practice guidelines for the supervising professional: intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

The American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM) was founded in 1989 as the American Society of Evoked Potential Monitoring. From the beginning, the Society has been made up of physicians, doctoral degree holders, Technologists, and all those interested in furthering the profession. The Society changed its name to the ASNM and held its first Annual Meeting in 1990. It remains the largest worldwide organization dedicated solely to the scientifically-based advancement of intraoperative neurophysiology. The primary goal of the ASNM is to assure the quality of patient care during procedures monitoring the nervous system. This goal is accomplished primarily through programs in education, advocacy of basic and clinical research, and publication of guidelines, among other endeavors. The ASNM is committed to the development of medically sound and clinically relevant guidelines for the performance of intraoperative neurophysiology. Guidelines are formulated based on exhaustive literature review, recruitment of expert opinion, and broad consensus among ASNM membership. Input is likewise sought from sister societies and related constituencies. Adherence to a literature-based, formalized process characterizes the construction of all ASNM guidelines. The guidelines covering the Professional Practice of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring were initially published January 24th, 2013, and subsequently that document has undergone review and revision to accommodate broad inter- and intra-societal feedback. This current version of the ASNM Professional Practice Guideline was fully approved for publication according to ASNM bylaws on February 22nd, 2018, and thus overwrites and supersedes the initial guideline.

A Case Report of Onyx Pulmonary Arterial Embolism Contributing to Hypoxemia During Awake Craniotomy for Arteriovenous Malformation Resection.

A healthy 26-year-old man with cerebral arteriovenous malformation underwent staged endovascular embolization with Onyx followed by awake craniotomy for resection. The perioperative course was complicated by tachycardia and severe intraoperative hypoxemia requiring significant oxygen supplementation. Postoperative chest computed tomography (CT) revealed hyperattenuating Onyx embolization material within the pulmonary vasculature, and an electrocardiogram indicated possible right heart strain, supporting clinically significant embolism. With awake arteriovenous malformation resection following adjunctive Onyx embolization becoming increasingly employed for lesions involving the eloquent cortex, anesthesiologists need to be aware of pulmonary migration of Onyx material as a potential contributor to significant perioperative hypoxemia.

Nicardipine is superior to esmolol for the management of postcraniotomy emergence hypertension: a randomized open-label study.

BACKGROUND: Emergence hypertension after craniotomy is a well-documented phenomenon for which natural history is poorly understood. Most clinicians attribute this phenomenon to an acute and transient increase in catecholamine release, but other mechanisms such as neurogenic hypertension or activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system have also been proposed. In this open-label study, we compared the monotherapeutic antihypertensive efficacy of the 2 most titratable drugs used to treat postcraniotomy emergence hypertension: nicardipine and esmolol. We also investigated the effect of preoperative hypertension on postcraniotomy hypertension and the natural history of postcraniotomy hypertension in the early postoperative period. METHODS: Fifty-two subjects were prospectively randomized to receive either nicardipine or esmolol as the sole drug for treatment of emergence hypertension at the conclusion of brain tumor resection (40 subjects finally analyzed). After a uniform anesthetic, standardized protocols of these antihypertensive medications were administered for the treatment of systolic blood pressure (SBP) >130, with the goal of maintaining SBP <140 throughout the first postoperative day. In the event of study medication "failure," a "rescue" antihypertensive (labetalol or hydralazine) was used. The O'Brien-Fleming Spending Function was used to calculate the appropriate α value for each interim analysis of the primary outcome; univariate analysis was performed otherwise, with a 2-sided P<0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The incidence of nicardipine failure (5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1%-24.9%) was significantly less than that of esmolol (55%, 95% CI 31.5%-76.9%) as a sole drug in controlling SBP after brain tumor resection (difference 99% CI 13.8%-75.7%, P = 0.0012). The presence of preoperative hypertension or the approach to surgery (open craniotomy versus endonasal transsphenoidal) had no significant effect on the incidence of failure of the antihypertensive regimen used. We did not observe a difference in the need for opioid therapy for postcraniotomy pain between drug groups (99% CI difference -39.2%-30.2%). Failure of the study drug predicted the need for rescue drug therapy in the initial 12 hours after discharge from the recovery room (difference success versus failure = -41.7%, 99% CI difference -72.3% to -1.8%, P = 0.0336) but not during the period 12 to 24 hours after discharge from the recovery room (difference success versus failure = -27.4%, 99% CI difference -63.8%-9.2%, P = 0.143). However, in those patients carrying a preoperative diagnosis of hypertension, the need for rescue medication was only different during the period 12 to 24 hours after discharge from the recovery room (difference normotensive versus hypertensive = -35.4%, 99% CI difference -66.9% to -0.3%, P = 0.0254). CONCLUSIONS: Nicardipine is superior to esmolol for the treatment of postcraniotomy emergence hypertension. This type of hypertension is thought to be a transient phenomenon not solely related to sympathetic activation and catecholamine surge but also possibly encompassing other physiologic factors. For treating postcraniotomy emergence hypertension, nicardipine is a relatively effective sole drug, whereas if esmolol is used, rescue antihypertensive medications should be readily available.

West Nile virus infection and postoperative neurological symptoms: a case report and review of the literature.

The incidence of West Nile virus, which may cause a range of clinical presentations including subclinical infections, mild febrile illness, meningitis, or encephalitis, has increased over recent years. Rare complications, including optic neuritis, also have been reported. A patient who presented with preoperative asymptomatic West Nile virus developed fever, altered mental status and temporary vision loss after elective multilevel spine fusion surgery.

The implementation and efficacy of the Northwestern High Risk Spine Protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to determine the efficacy and feasibility of implementation of the intraoperative component of a high risk spine (HRS) protocol for improving perioperative patient safety in complex spine fusion surgery. METHODS: In this paired availability study, the total number of red blood cell units transfused was used as a surrogate marker for our management protocol efficacy, and the number of protocol violations was used as a surrogate marker for protocol compliance. RESULTS: The 548 patients (284 traditional vs. 264 HRS protocol) were comparable in all demographics, coexisting diseases, preoperative medications, type of surgery, and number of posterior levels instrumented. However, the surgical duration was 70 minutes shorter in the new group (range, 32-108 minutes shorter; P < 0.0001) and the new protocol patients received a median of 1.1 units less of total red blood cell units (range, 0-2.4 units less; P = 0.006). There were only 7 (2.6%) protocol violations in the new protocol group. CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative component of the HRS protocol, based on two Do-Confirm checklists that focused on 1) organized communication between intraoperative team members and 2) active maintenance of oxygen delivery and hemostasis appears to maintain a safe intraoperative environment and was readily implemented during a 3-year period.

Predicting major adverse cardiac events in spine fusion patients: is the revised cardiac risk index sufficient?

STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) in predicting major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing spine fusion surgery of 3 levels or more. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Preoperative cardiac testing is extensively guided by the RCRI, which was developed and validated in thoracic, abdominal, and orthopedic surgical patients. Because multilevel spine fusion surgery is often associated with major transfusion, we hypothesize that the RCRI may not accurately characterize the risk of cardiovascular morbidity in these patients. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, perioperative data were collected from 547 patients who underwent 3 or more levels of spinal fusion with instrumentation. Postoperative cardiac morbidity was defined as any combination of the following: arrhythmia requiring medical treatment, myocardial infarction (either by electrocardiographic changes or troponin elevation), or the occurrence of demand ischemia. The surgical complexity was categorized as anterior surgery only, posterior cervical and/or thoracic fusion, posterior lumbar fusion, or any surgery that included transpedicular osteotomies. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine RCRI performance. RESULTS: The RCRI performed no better than chance (area under the curve = 0.54) in identifying the 49 patients (9%) who experienced cardiac morbidity. CONCLUSION: The RCRI did not predict cardiac morbidity in our patients undergoing major spine fusion surgery, despite being extensively validated in low-risk noncardiac surgical patients. Preoperative testing and optimization decisions, previously based on the RCRI, may need to be revised to include more frequent functional cardiac imaging and more aggressive implementation of pharmacologic modalities that may mitigate cardiac morbidity, similar to the preoperative evaluation for major vascular surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Development and validation of a generalizable model for predicting major transfusion during spine fusion surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for posterior spine instrumentation often requires major transfusion. The aim of this study was to develop and test the validity of a model for predicting intraoperative major transfusion (>4 U total red blood cells), based on preoperative patient and surgical variables, that was applicable to adult patients undergoing cervical, thoracic, and/or lumbar spine deformity surgery with and without osteotomies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The perioperative data from 548 patients who underwent ≥ 3 levels of posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation between January 1, 2003 and May 30, 2009, were retrospectively collected to create a model for predicting major blood transfusion. The validity of the model was retrospectively tested with a separate data set of 95 patients who underwent surgery from June 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010. RESULTS: There was a 59.5% incidence of major transfusion in the derivation set of patients. Independent predictors of major transfusion were operation duration, number of posterior levels instrumented, surgical complexity score, and preincision hemoglobin. This model was able to predict major transfusion significantly better than a previously published model (ROCAUC=0.89; 99% confidence interval, 0.80-0.90; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our model has an increased accuracy for predicting the probability of major transfusion compared with a previously published model. In addition, our model is applicable to all types of spine fusion surgery and accounts for the complexity of surgical instrumentation, the number of levels instrumented, and the predicted duration of surgery as independent variables.

The incidence of unacceptable movement with motor evoked potentials during craniotomy for aneurysm clipping.

OBJECTIVE: To review the experience at a single institution with motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring during intracranial aneurysm surgery to determine the incidence of unacceptable movement. METHODS: Neurophysiology event logs and anesthetic records from 220 craniotomies for aneurysm clipping were reviewed for unacceptable patient movement or reason for cessation of MEPs. Muscle relaxants were not given after intubation. Transcranial MEPs were recorded from bilateral abductor hallucis and abductor pollicis muscles. MEP stimulus intensity was increased up to 500 V until evoked potential responses were detectable. RESULTS: Out of 220 patients, 7 (3.2%) exhibited unacceptable movement with MEP stimulation-2 had nociception-induced movement and 5 had excessive field movement. In all but one case, MEP monitoring could be resumed, yielding a 99.5% monitoring rate. CONCLUSIONS: With the anesthetic and monitoring regimen, the authors were able to record MEPs of the upper and lower extremities in all patients and found only 3.2% demonstrated unacceptable movement. With a suitable anesthetic technique, MEP monitoring in the upper and lower extremities appears to be feasible in most patients and should not be withheld because of concern for movement during neurovascular surgery.

Adenosine-induced flow arrest to facilitate intracranial aneurysm clip ligation does not worsen neurologic outcome.

BACKGROUND: When temporary arterial occlusion of the parent artery is difficult for anatomical reasons, or when inadvertent aneurysmal rupture occurs during surgical dissection, adenosine administration can be used to produce flow arrest and brief, profound systemic hypotension that can facilitate intracranial aneurysm clip ligation. There is a concern, however, that the flow arrest and profound hypotension produced by adenosine, although brief, may cause cerebral ischemia and therefore worsen neurologic outcome compared with other techniques to facilitate aneurysm clip ligation. Therefore, we performed a retrospective, case-control study to determine whether adenosine-induced flow arrest had negative effects on the neurologic outcome of our patients. METHODS: We reviewed the perioperative records of all patients in our intracranial aneurysm surgery outcomes database between August 1, 2006, and June 15, 2012. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of a poor neurologic outcome 48 hours after surgery, with a modified Rankin scale score >2 being defined as a poor neurologic outcome. The neurologic outcome at the time of hospital discharge was a secondary outcome. Secondary outcomes related to cardiac morbidity included atrial or ventricular arrhythmia requiring treatment and elevated cardiac biomarkers consistent with ischemia (i.e., Troponin-I). RESULTS: During the study period, adenosine-induced flow arrest was used in 72 of the 413 patients (17.4%) who underwent intracranial aneurysm clip ligation. The difference in the incidence of poor neurological outcome, with or without the use of adenosine, was no larger than 15.7% at 48 hours after surgery (P =0.524) or -12.7% at discharge (P = 0.741). In addition, the difference in the incidence of cardiac morbidity was no larger than -16.0% for persistent arrhythmia (P = 0.155) or -9.4% for biomarkers of myocardial ischemia (P = 0.898) in the initial 48 hours after surgery. CONCLUSION: When used to facilitate intracranial aneurysm clip ligation, adenosine-induced flow arrest was associated with no more than a 15.7% increase or a 12.7% decrease in the incidence of a poor neurologic outcome at either 48 hours or at the time of hospital discharge. In addition, adenosine use was not associated with cardiac morbidity in the perioperative period (i.e., persistent arrhythmia or biomarkers of cardiac ischemia).

The effect of furosemide on intravascular volume status and electrolytes in patients receiving mannitol: an intraoperative safety analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mannitol is often used during intracranial surgery to improve surgical exposure. Furosemide is often added to mannitol to augment this effect. The concern exists, however, that the augmented diuresis caused by the addition of furosemide to mannitol may cause hypovolemia and hypoperfusion, hypokalemia, and hyponatremia. We examined the intraoperative safety of low-dose furosemide (0.3 mg/kg) combined with mannitol (1 g/kg). METHODS: We observed 23 patients in a double-blind, block randomized, placebo-controlled study to examine the effects of furosemide (0.3 mg/kg) when combined with mannitol (1 g/kg) on surgical brain relaxation for tumor surgery. Mannitol and the study drug (furosemide or placebo) were administered, and arterial blood gases with electrolytes (sodium, potassium, and lactic acid) and urine output volume were recorded every 30 minutes for 3 hours. Plasma sodium, potassium, and lactic acid concentrations, and interval urine outputs, were compared across time and between furosemide-placebo assignment groupings, with a P<0.01 considered significant. RESULTS: Although mannitol produced a large volume of diuresis (1533±335 mL), the addition of a low dose of furosemide substantially increased both the rate of production of urine for the first 90 minutes after administration and the total volume of urine produced (2561±611 mL, P<0.001, compared with placebo group). The addition of furosemide did not produce a serum potassium level below 3.8±0.7 mEq/L, a serum sodium level below 128.3±3.4 mEq/L, or a serum lactic acid level above 2.4±0.9 mmol/L. There were no differences in the plasma potassium concentration, sodium concentration, or lactic acid concentration between the drug groups at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in urine output by as much as 67%, adding low-dose furosemide to mannitol does not seem to produce significant electrolyte derangements or hypovolemia compared with the administration of mannitol alone.

Anesthesia implications of waterpipe use.

The waterpipe is an ancient Middle Eastern tobacco delivery system, which is also known as hookah, shisha, or narghile, and it is gaining widespread use. Waterpipes are often perceived as less dangerous than cigarettes. The amount of smoke inhaled in a waterpipe session may equal that produced by more than 100 cigarettes with high nicotine, carbon monoxide, and carcinogen intake. A case of significantly elevated intraoperative carboxyhemoglobin level and decreased oxyhemoglobin saturation in a patient with recent waterpipe use is presented.

Trigeminocardiac reflex in the Postanesthesia care unit.

Bradycardia caused by the oculocardiac reflex is an anticipated occurrence during certain surgeries. The afferent pathway involves the trigeminal nerve's ophthalmic division. Reflex bradycardia from the trigeminocardiac reflex, via stimulation of maxillary or mandibular divisions of cranial nerve V, although less well known, has also been reported intraoperatively. Unstable bradycardia associated with stimulation of the mandibular division of cranial nerve V during trigeminal neuralgia pain episodes in the Postanesthesia Care Unit is presented.

Adenosine-induced flow arrest to facilitate intracranial aneurysm clip ligation: dose-response data and safety profile.

BACKGROUND: Adenosine-induced transient flow arrest has been used to facilitate clip ligation of intracranial aneurysms. However, the starting dose that is most likely to produce an adequate duration of profound hypotension remains unclear. We reviewed our experience to determine the dose-response relationship and apparent perioperative safety profile of adenosine in intracranial aneurysm patients. METHODS: This case series describes 24 aneurysm clip ligation procedures performed under an anesthetic consisting of remifentanil, low-dose volatile anesthetic, and propofol in which adenosine was used. The report focuses on the doses administered; duration of systolic blood pressure <60 mm Hg (SBP(<60 mm Hg)); and any cardiovascular, neurologic, or pulmonary complications observed in the perioperative period. RESULTS: A median dose of 0.34 mg/kg ideal body weight (range: 0.29-0.44 mg/kg) resulted in a SBP(<60 mm Hg) for a median of 57 seconds (range: 26-105 seconds). There was a linear relationship between the log-transformed dose of adenosine and the duration of a SBP(<60 mm Hg) (R(2) = 0.38). Two patients developed transient, hemodynamically stable atrial fibrillation, 2 had postoperative troponin levels >0.03 ng/mL without any evidence of cardiac dysfunction, and 3 had postoperative neurologic changes. CONCLUSIONS: For intracranial aneurysms in which temporary occlusion is impractical or difficult, adenosine is capable of providing brief periods of profound systemic hypotension with low perioperative morbidity. On the basis of these data, a dose of 0.3 to 0.4 mg/kg ideal body weight may be the recommended starting dose to achieve approximately 45 seconds of profound systemic hypotension during a remifentanil/low-dose volatile anesthetic with propofol induced burst suppression.