Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J STD AIDS ; 15(12): 815-21, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15601488

ABSTRACT

Few studies have reported on sexually transmitted infections at the US-Mexico border, so the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in this population remains uncertain. This binational project investigated the prevalence of, and risk factors for, C. trachomatis among women along the Arizona, US-Sonora, Mexico border. Women who self-referred for routine gynaecological care were invited to complete an interviewer-administered questionnaire and to undergo a Pap smear, C. trachomatis test, and HPV test. In 2270 women, C. trachomatis prevalence overall was 8.2% as measured by hybrid capture and 2.6% by enzyme immunoassay. Infection was associated with young age, a history of new sexual partner(s) in the previous three months, HPV infection, and proximity of clinic to the international border. Antibiotic use in the previous 30 days was associated with decreased odds of infection. Women in Arizona-Sonora border communities are at increased risk for C. trachomatis infection compared to women attending clinics in non-border locations.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia trachomatis , Internationality , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Bacterial/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Arizona/epidemiology , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Mexico/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Bacterial/diagnosis , United States/epidemiology
2.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 10(11): 1129-36, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11700260

ABSTRACT

The United States-Mexico border is a region comprised of a country with one of the highest rates of invasive cervical cancer (Mexico) and a country with one of the lowest rates (United States). Recent evidence clearly indicates that human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the cause of cervical cancer. The distribution of specific types of HPV is known to vary in different regions of the world, as do the cofactors that may inhibit or promote HPV carcinogenesis. Estimating the prevalence of oncogenic HPV is needed for guiding vaccine development. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of oncogenic and nononcogenic HPV types and risk factors for HPV among women residing along the United States-Mexico border. A cross-sectional study of 2319 women, ages 15-79 years, self-referring for gynecological care was conducted between 1997 and 1998. HPV was detected by PCR using the PYGMY 09/11 L1 consensus primer, and HPV genotyping was conducted using the reverse line blot method. Overall, the HPV prevalence was 14.4% with no significant differences observed by country after adjustment for age. HPV 16 was the most commonly detected HPV type in both the United States and Mexico. Among women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, HPV types 58, 45, 51, 31, 35, 55, and 73 were most common in Mexico, and HPV types 18, 31, 35, 51, 52, and 58 were most common in the United States. In both countries, HPV prevalence declined linearly with age from 25% among women ages 15-19 years to 5.3% among women 56-65 years. Factors significantly independently associated with HPV infection were older age [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.15 for ages 56-65 years compared with those 15-19 years], a marital status other than married (AOR = 1.58-3.29), increased numbers of lifetime male partners (AOR = 3.8 for > or =10 partners compared with 1 partner), concurrent infection with Chlamydia trachomatis (AOR = 1.79), ever use of Norplant (AOR = 2.69), and current use of injectable contraceptives (AOR = 2.29). Risk factors for HPV infection did not differ by country. Results from this study suggest that in addition to HPV 16 and 18, HPV types 31, 45, 51, and 58 should be considered for inclusion in an HPV prevention vaccine for distribution in Mexico.


Subject(s)
Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Tumor Virus Infections/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Genotype , Humans , Mexico/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control
3.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 9(3): 172-81, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11349353

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Mexico has one of the highest mortality rates of invasive cervical cancer in the world. This is particularly true for the states in northern Mexico that border on the United States of America. In addition, Hispanics in the United States have higher rates than do non-Hispanics in the country. Therefore, a binational team was formed to focus on this problem and to determine the risk factors and prevalence of cervical dysplasia and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, the sexually transmitted disease (STD) known to cause cervical cancer. Chlamydia trachomatis infection, a common STD and potential HPV cofactor, was also assessed. METHODS: Research was conducted in 1997 and 1998 in the border region of two states, Arizona in the United States and Sonora in Mexico, applying a cross-sectional study of women attending clinics for routine gynecologic care. Clinical measurements included Pap smears, HPV infection by both polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Hybrid Capture (HC), and C. trachomatis status by HC and enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA). A total of 2,436 women were enrolled (mean age 33.3 years +/- 10.3 years). RESULTS: The overall prevalence of abnormal cytology was 9.3%, with a significant difference in the prevalence in Mexico (11.4%) vs. the United States (6.6%). Of the participants, 14.5% of them tested positive for HPV by PCR, with no significant difference between the two countries, in spite of a lower behavioral risk profile for the Mexican women. Overall prevalence of C. trachomatis was found to be greater by HC than by EIA (8.2% vs. 3.0%), and in Mexico higher by both methods. CONCLUSIONS: An important accomplishment of the project was the implementation of a quality control program for Pap smear collection, which resulted in a significant reduction in inadequate smears in Mexico. Despite numerous potential logistical barriers, the binational team successfully conducted a large-scale study in the border area and developed an infrastructure for future research.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia trachomatis , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Tumor Virus Infections/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Arizona/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Mexico/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Papanicolaou Test , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology , Vaginal Smears
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL