Connecting Actors With the Introduction of Mobile Technology in Health Care Practice Placements (4D Project): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: The learning process in clinical placements for health care students is a multifaceted endeavor that engages numerous actors and stakeholders, including students, clinical tutors, link teachers, and academic assessors. Successfully navigating this complex process requires the implementation of tasks and mentorships that are synchronized with educational and clinical processes, seamlessly embedded within their respective contexts. Given the escalating number of students and the rising demand for health care services from the general population, it becomes imperative to develop additional tools that support the learning process. These tools aim to simplify day-to-day clinical practice, allowing a concentrated focus on value-based activities. This paper introduces a project funded by the European Commission that involves 5 European countries. The project's objective is to comprehensively outline the entire process of development and ultimately implement mobile technology in practice placements. The project tackles the existing gap by constructing tailored mobile apps designed for students, teachers, tutors, and supervisors within each participating organization. This approach leverages practice-based learning, mobile technology, and technology adoption to enhance the overall educational experience. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to introduce mobile technology in clinical practice placements with the goal of facilitating and enhancing practice-based learning. The objective is to improve the overall effectiveness of the process for all stakeholders involved. METHODS: The "4D in the Digitalization of Learning in Practice Placement" (4D Project) will use a mixed methods research design, encompassing 3 distinct study phases: phase 1 (preliminary research), which incorporates focus groups and a scoping review, to define the problem, identify necessities, and analyze contextual factors; phase 2 (collaborative app development), which involves researchers and prospective users working together to cocreate and co-design tailored apps; and phase 3, which involves feasibility testing of these mobile apps within practice settings. RESULTS: The study's potential impact will primarily focus on improving communication and interaction processes, fostering connections among stakeholders in practice placements, and enhancing the assessment of training needs. The literature review and focus groups will play a crucial role in identifying barriers, facilitators, and factors supporting the integration of mobile technology in clinical education. The cocreation process of mobile learning apps will reveal the core values and needs of various stakeholders, including students, teachers, and health care professionals. This process also involves adapting and using mobile apps to meet the specific requirements of practice placements. A pilot study aimed at validating the app will test and assess mobile technology in practice placements. The study will determine results related to usability and design, learning outcomes, student engagement, communication among stakeholders, user behavior, potential issues, and compliance with regulations. CONCLUSIONS: Health care education, encompassing disciplines such as medicine, nursing, midwifery, and others, confronts evolving challenges in clinical training. Essential to addressing these challenges is bridging the gap between health care institutions and academic settings. The introduction of a new digital tool holds promise for empowering health students and mentors in effectively navigating the intricacies of the learning process. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/53284.

Medical studies in times of a pandemic - concepts of digital teaching for Orthopaedics and Trauma at german universities.

BACKGROUND: Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, on-site classroom teaching became limited at most German medical universities. This caused a sudden demand for digital teaching concepts. How the transfer from classroom to digital teaching or digitally assisted teaching was conducted was decided by each university and/or department individually. As a surgical discipline, Orthopaedics and Trauma have a particular focus on hands-on teaching as well as direct contact to patients. Therefore, specific challenges in designing digital teaching concepts were expected to arise. Aim of this study was to evaluate medical teaching at German universities one year into the pandemic as well as to identify potentials and pitfalls in order to develop possible optimization approaches. METHODS: A questionnaire with 17 items was designed and sent to the professors in charge of organising the teaching in Orthopaedics and Trauma at each medical university. A differentiation between Orthopaedics and Trauma was not made to allow a general overview. We collected the answers and conducted a qualitative analysis. RESULTS: We received 24 replies. Each university reported a substantial reduction of their classroom teaching and efforts to transfer their teaching to digital formats. Three sites were able to switch to digital teaching concepts completely, whereas others tried to enable classroom and bedside teaching at least for students of higher edcuational levels. The online platforms used varied depending on the university as well as the format it was supposed to support. CONCLUSION: One year into the pandemic significant differences concerning the proportions of classroom and digital teaching for Orthopaedics and Trauma can be observed. Simultaneously huge differences in concepts used to create digital teaching are present. Since a complete suspense of classroom teaching was never mandatory, several universities developed hygiene concepts to enable hands-on and bedside teaching. Despite these differences, some similarities were observed: the lack of time and personnel to generate adequate teaching material was reported as the leading challenge by all participants of this study.

Experience with an OSCE anamnesis station via Zoom: Feasibility, acceptance and challenges from the perspective of students, simulated patients and examiners during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aim: Assessments of practical clinical competencies pose a challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reports about OSCE stations administered online show that, despite technical feasibility and acceptance, there is a lingering desire for in-person assessments. Barriers and challenges must therefore also be identified in regard to the future integration of digital competencies into the curriculum. Based on a study investigating the feasibility and acceptance of an online OSCE anamnesis station and the descriptions given by students, simulated patients and examiners of the challenges and limitations, we make recommendations for necessary future adaptations to anamnesis training and testing in the context of telemedicine. Method: We surveyed students after completion of an OSCE anamnesis station, adapted to the telemedical setting, that was administered as an alternative assessment to 149 students via Zoom®. Using semi-structured interviews, we analyzed the resulting challenges and limitations as seen by all of the participants. Results: We confirm the existence of good technical and organizational feasibility, positive learning experiences through feedback, the acquisition of clinical competencies, and a high acceptance of this format as an alternative assessment during the pandemic. Using the semi-structured interviews, it was also possible to analyze additional categories that identify necessary adaptations of this type of format. Conclusion: Adaptation of the content-based training for all of the participants and a targeted revision of the checklists, e.g., regarding communication techniques in a telemedicine setting, is required due to the effects of the online format on communication and interactions between students and simulated patients.

Can positive expectations help to improve the learning of risk literacy? A cluster-randomized study in undergraduate medical students.

BACKGROUND: Risk literacy, i.e., the ability to calculate and apply risk parameters, represents a key competence for risk communication and medical decision making. However, risk literacy is reportedly low in medical students. The successful acquisition of statistical competencies is often difficult, and can be hampered by emotional learning obstacles, calling for interventions to support learning. In this cluster-randomized study, we aimed to translate findings from placebo research to medical education. Specifically, we tested if the acquisition of risk literacy during a seminar unit can be facilitated by positive expectations, induced by a positive and non-threatening framing of the content and learning goals. METHODS: The study took place during a mandatory 2.5-h seminar on "risk literacy" for 2nd year medical students. The seminar teaches both statistical knowledge and its application in patient communication. To test the effects of expectations on risk literacy acquisition, the (otherwise identical) seminar was framed either as "communication training" (positive framing condition) or "statistics seminar" (negative framing condition). All N = 200 students of the semester were invited to participate, and cluster-randomized to the positive or negative framing condition (4 seminar groups each condition). Risk literacy was assessed with the "Quick Risk Test" (QRT) at the beginning and end of the seminar, along with statistics anxiety and subjective learning success using questionnaires. RESULTS: Data from N = 192 students were included. At the end of the seminar, risk literacy was increased in both framing conditions, with a significantly greater increase in QRT scores in the positive framing condition. Statistics anxiety was significantly decreased in both framing conditions, with no evidence of group differences. Subjective learning success was overall high and comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Supporting our hypothesis, positive framing led to a significantly greater increase in risk literacy (i.e., in QRT scores). Our data offer first support that positive framing of learning goals may help to facilitate the acquisition of statistical knowledge. Expectation-orientated interventions may thus offer a feasible tool to optimize learning settings and framing of learning objectives in medical statistics courses.

Are medical students equipped for digital studies?Have their hopes and fears been confirmed during Covid-19? What should we consider in the future?

Digitisation in the education of future doctors was still in its infancy before the Covid pandemic. For the successful implementation of digital teaching, students need the technical equipment and the necessary skills to use it in a meaningful way. Furthermore, it requires a willingness to adapt the learning environment and to take responsibility for self-directed learning. At the beginning of 2020, faculties were forced to convert all teaching to digital formats. Initial research shows that students prefer face-to-face teaching. To determine whether medical students were prepared for digital studies and what should be considered for the future, we analysed surveys at the beginning of online studies and after two Corona semesters at a medical faculty. We were able to show that although our students had good technology equipment, they had a rather negative attitude towards online teaching for various reasons and developed negative emotions. Deficits in design of educational material, and personal learning habits raised concern. A lack of guidance and a lack of interaction with fellow students contributed to this. Adjustments in these areas will be necessary in the future to provide students with positive access to digital studies and thus increase learning success.

Internship Experience in Orthopaedics and Traumatology and its Impact on Becoming a Specialist. / Praktisches Jahr in Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie ­ die kollegiale Staffelstabübergabe in die Weiterbildung?

INTRODUCTION: The German practical year is the last clinical placement period during Medical School. However, it remains unclear how medical students evaluate the practical year in orthopaedics and traumatology (Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie; O & U) and whether it has an impact on becoming an O & U specialist. METHOD: We analysed data of 146 medical students (46,7% female) who completed the placement in O & U. From the evaluation, 37 items were included in the analyses. Participants who could imagine becoming an O & U specialist (O & U-Ja) following graduation were statistically compared to those who could not (O & U-Nein). RESULTS: Overall 123 (83.7%) trainees indicated that they would like to become an O & U specialist (O & U-Ja), 18 (12.8%) negated (O & U-Nein) and 6 (4.1%) were undecided. Groups did not differ for sex and age (sex: Chi² = 2.50, p = 0.114; age: F [1.93] < 1, p = 0.764). Group differences were found for practical orientation, independency, acquisition of anamnesis and diagnostics skills and problem-solving expertise with students who could imagine becoming an O & U specialist (O & U-Ja) giving the highest ratings. DISCUSSION: Evaluations of the last medical year are essential in order to continuously improve the internship experience and to attract students towards a certain medical field and, moreover, to post-graduate specialist training. Clinics and institutions who already emphasize on the factors derived from this evaluation, or are continuously working on improvement, might be more able to attract young professionals, since personnel acquisition is starting early in the medical field.

Learning by doing: To explore the influence of Simulation on Clinical Decision-Making Approaches on Final Year Medical Students at the University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Background: Final year medical students at the University Duisburg-Essen, Germany, are unsatisfied with their clinical judgement skills in common elective and emergency clinical situations. A competency based medical curriculum determines that clinical judgement is an essential tool in effective patient care, patient safety and limiting clinical error. Approaches to clinical judgement include either analytical, intuitive or a combination of both approaches. Novices show specific factors, which are typical in inexperienced clinicians. Simulation provides opportunities in a competency-based medical education curriculum. There is limited evidence showing that simulation can provide an effective environment for teaching and learning clinical decision-making skills. This project explores how final year medical students at the University of Duisburg-Essen approach the clinical decision-making process as well as how simulation influences this process. Methods: Ethics approval was obtained from the local ethics committee. After completing a 10-week simulation course,thirty-five students completed a clinical decision-making instrument to categorise their clinical decision-making approaches. The Novice Decision Making Model and the Cognitive Continuum Model were combined with learning theories in Simulation (Social Cognitive Theory) and used to explore and interpret data collected through questionnaires, interviews and observation. Results: The majority (60%) of students employed a predominantly analytic approach, some students showed intuitive tendencies in clinical situations. During interviews students displayed typical novice approaches to decision-making and expressed positive comments relating to simulation. Conclusions: Simulation presents an opportunity for teaching and learning clinical decision-making. Results show the need for further inquiry into learning clinical decision-making through simulation. This research provides initial evidence that simulation can be incorporated into curricular teaching of clinical decision-making.

[Potential of digitalization in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education and training in orthopedics and trauma surgery]. / Potenzial der Digitalisierung in Aus­, Fort- und Weiterbildung in Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie.

INTRODUCTION: In its digital agenda the German Federal Government pursues the ambitious objective to facilitate digital competence and perform research into digital learning and teaching processes. Considerable investments are to be concentrated into the future viability of education, academic research and digitalization. As far as academic teaching and further education are concerned, not only in the field of orthopedics and trauma surgery, three aspects can be identified: digital organization, digital competence and digital tools. DIGITAL APPLICATIONS: New formats, such as the elective subject digital health of the Charité in Berlin, enable digital competences to be mediated in a multimodal and interdisciplinary way. With the help of a newly developed app the University of Essen provides teachers and students with mobile and flexible access to information on lectures in terms of content and organization. Especially because of transparency, high legal compliance and predictability, the digital logbook for the resident training program promises a real innovation for trainees in the further training reformation. Augmented and virtual reality play a crucial role in the imparting of practical skills and interconnect high-tech with classical craftsmanship. Digital training course formats have significantly gained in importance and are meanwhile well-established tools for efficient advanced medical training. OUTLOOK: If orthopedic and trauma surgeons take an active role in the process of digitalization of teaching, they can take part in decisions, adequately prepare the colleagues of tomorrow, optimize patient care, encourage innovations and altogether improve the discipline even more.

[Where did all the men in child and adolescent psychiatry and psychotherapy go? The influence of gender on the choice of specialization]. / Wo sind die Männer im Fachgebiet Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie?

Where did all the men in child and adolescent psychiatry and psychotherapy go? The influence of gender on the choice of specialization Abstract. Objective: To examine the factors influencing graduates to choose child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) or orthopaedic surgery (OR) as a career specialty. Method: We distributed a web-based survey to residents in child and adolescent psychiatry and orthopedic surgery in Germany. The survey included questions related to the factors contributing to their career choice, particularly sociodemographic, workplace, and education-related matters. Results: 101 participants completed the questionnaires (CAP: 49 women, 10 men; OR 21 women and 21 men). CAP residents were significantly older and more often married with children. Exposure to the subject during medical school was significantly more common among OR residents. CAP residents rated the factors "time for breaks," "regular work hours," "structured workday," "reconciliation of work and family life," "overall work load," and "sufficient time for each individual patient" as significantly more important than did OR residents. OR residents in turn considered "spectacular cases," "fast decision-making," "high technical requirements," and "positive experiences during medical school" as significantly more important. A family-friendly workplace was especially more important to woman in CAP. Conclusions: There is a need to rebrand the perception of psychiatry and to expose medical students early on to the subject if we are to attract more (male) psychiatrists in the future.

Willingness of medical students to be examined in a physical examination course.

BACKGROUND: Physical examination courses are an essential part of the education of medical students. The aim of this study was to ascertain the factors influencing students' motivation and willingness to participate in a physical examination course. METHODS: Students were asked to complete a questionnaire subdivided into five domains: anthropometric data, religiousness, motivation to take part in physical examination courses, willingness to be physically examined at 11 different body regions by peers or a professional tutor and a field for free text. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 142 medical students. The importance of the examination course was rated 8.7 / 10 points, the score for students' motivation was 7.8 / 10 points. Willingness to be physically examined ranged from 6 to 100% depending on body part and examiner. Female students were significantly less willing to be examined at sensitive body parts (breast, upper body, groin and the hip joint; p = .003 to < .001), depending on group composition and / or examiner. Strictly religious students showed significantly less willingness to undergo examination of any part of the body except the hand (p = .02 to < .001). Considering BMI, willingness to be examined showed comparable rates for normal weight and under- / overweight students in general (80% vs. 77%). Concerning the composition of the group for physical examination skills courses, students preferred self-assembled over mixed gender and same gender groups. CONCLUSIONS: Peer physical examination is a method to improve students' skills. While motivation to participate in and acceptance of the physical examination course appears to be high, willingness to be examined is low for certain parts of the body, e.g. breast and groin, depending on religiousness, gender and examiner. Examination by a professional medical tutor did not lead to higher acceptance. Most students would prefer to choose their team for physical examination courses themselves rather than be assigned to a group.