Clofarabine Has a Superior Therapeutic Window as compared to Gemcitabine in Preclinical Bladder Cancer Models.

Current standard-of-care systemic therapy options for locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer (BC), which are predominantly based on cisplatin-gemcitabine combinations, are limited by significant treatment failure rates and frailty-based patient ineligibility. We previously addressed the urgent clinical need for better-tolerated BC therapeutic strategies using a drug screening approach, which identified outstanding antineoplastic activity of clofarabine in preclinical models of BC. To further assess clofarabine as a potential BC therapy component, we conducted head-to-head comparisons of responses to clofarabine versus gemcitabine in preclinical in vitro and in vivo models of BC, complemented by in silico analyses. In vitro data suggest a distinct correlation between the two antimetabolites, with higher cytotoxicity of gemcitabine, especially against several nonmalignant cell types, including keratinocytes and endothelial cells. Accordingly, tolerance of clofarabine (oral or intraperitoneal application) was distinctly better than for gemcitabine (intraperitoneal) in patient-derived xenograft models of BC. Clofarabine also exhibited distinctly superior anticancer efficacy, even at dosing regimens optimized for gemcitabine. Neither complete remission nor cure, both of which were observed with clofarabine, were achieved with any tolerable gemcitabine regimen. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that clofarabine has a better therapeutic window than gemcitabine, further emphasizing its potential as a candidate for drug repurposing in BC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared the anticancer activity of clofarabine, a drug used for treatment of leukemia but not bladder cancer, and gemcitabine, a drug currently used for chemotherapy against bladder cancer. Using cell cultures and mouse models, we found that clofarabine was better tolerated and more efficacious than gemcitabine, and even cured implanted tumors in mouse models. Our results suggest that clofarabine, alone or in combination schemes, might be superior to gemcitabine for the treatment of bladder cancer.

Advances in preclinical assessment of therapeutic targets for bladder cancer precision medicine.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bladder cancer incidence is on the rise, and until recently, there has been little to no change in treatment regimens over the last 40 years. Hence, it is imperative to work on strategies and approaches to untangle the complexity of intra- and inter-tumour heterogeneity of bladder cancer with the aim of improving patient-specific care and treatment outcomes. The focus of this review is therefore to highlight novel targets, advances, and therapy approaches for bladder cancer patients. RECENT FINDINGS: The success of combining an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) with immunotherapy has been recently hailed as a game changer in treating bladder cancer patients. Hence, interest in other ADCs as a treatment option is also rife. Furthermore, strategies to overcome chemoresistance to standard therapy have been described recently. In addition, other studies showed that targeting genomic alterations (e.g. mutations in FGFR3 , DNA damage repair genes and loss of the Y chromosome) could also be helpful as prognostic and treatment stratification biomarkers. The use of single-cell RNA sequencing approaches has allowed better characterisation of the tumour microenvironment and subsequent identification of novel targets. Functional precision medicine could be another avenue to improve and guide personalized treatment options. SUMMARY: Several novel preclinical targets and treatment options have been described recently. The validation of these advances will lead to the development and implementation of robust personalized treatment regimens for bladder cancer patients.

Recent contributions of single-cell and spatial profiling to the understanding of bladder cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Current risk stratification and treatment decision-making for bladder cancer informed by histopathology as well as molecular diagnostics face limitations. This review summarizes recent advancements in single-cell and spatial omics methodologies for understanding bladder cancer biology and their potential impact on development of novel therapeutic strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: Single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial omics techniques offer unprecedented insights into various aspects of tumor microenvironment (TME), bladder cancer heterogeneity, cancer stemness, and cellular plasticity. Studies have identified multiple malignant cell subpopulations within tumors, revealing diverse transcriptional states and clonal evolution. Additionally, intratumor heterogeneity has been linked to tumor progression and therapeutic response. Immune cell composition analysis has revealed immunosuppressive features in the TME, impacting treatment response. Furthermore, studies have elucidated the role of cancer-associated fibroblasts and endothelial cells in shaping the tumor immune landscape and response to therapy. SUMMARY: Single-cell and spatial omics technologies have revolutionized our understanding of bladder cancer biology, uncovering previously unseen complexities. These methodologies provide valuable insights into tumor heterogeneity and microenvironmental interactions, with implications for therapeutic development. However, challenges remain in translating research findings into clinical practice and implementing personalized treatment strategies. Continued interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation are essential for overcoming these challenges and leveraging the full potential of single-cell and spatial omics in improving bladder cancer diagnosis and treatment.