Carriage of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: duration and risk factors.

Identification of risk factors influencing the duration of carriage of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB) may be useful for infection control. The aim of this study is to estimate the impact of several factors collected for routine hospital surveillance on the duration of carriage of selected MDR-GNB. From January 2015 to July 2021, patients with at least two clinical/surveillance samples positive for MDR-GNB different from ESBL-producing E. coli or AmpC - exclusively producing Enterobacterales were assessed. Microorganisms, age, number of admissions, clinical or rectal sample, sex, and admission service were evaluated as risk factors. Multivariate analysis was performed by a Cox proportional hazard model. A total of 1981 episodes of colonization were included. Involved microorganisms were ESBL-Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) in 1057 cases (53.4%), other ESBL-non-E. coli Enterobacterales in 91 (4.6%), OXA-48-KP in 263 (13.3%), KPC-KP in 90 (4.5%), VIM-KP in 29 (1.5%), carbapenemase-producing non-KP Enterobacterales (CP-non-KP) in 124 (6.3%), and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PAER) in 327 (16.5%). No differences in duration of colonization were observed among ESBL-KP (median colonization time 320 days), ESBL-non-E. coli Enterobacterales (226 days), OXA48-KP (305 days), and MDR-PAER (321 days). For each group, duration of colonization was significantly longer than that of KPC-KP (median colonization time 60 days), VIM-KP (138 days), and CP-non-KP (71 days). Male sex (HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.78-0.99), detection in Hepatology-Gastroenterology (HR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.54-0.93), clinical sample (HR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.53-0.69), and > 2 admissions after first detection (HR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.42-0.52) were independent predictors of longer carriage, whereas VIM-KP (HR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.04-2.48), KPC-KP (HR = 1.85; 95% CI 1.49-2.3), and CP-non-KP (HR = 1.92; 95% CI 1.49-2.47) were associated with shorter colonization time. Duration of colonization was significantly longer for ESBL-KP, other ESBL-non-E. coli Enterobacterales, OXA-48-KP, and MDR-PAER. For these microorganisms, prolonging surveillance up to 2.5-3 years should be considered. Male sex, clinical sample, multiple readmissions, admission service, and type of microorganism are independent predictors of the duration of carriage.

Risk scores' performance and their impact on operative decision-making in left-sided endocarditis: a cohort study.

The accuracy of contemporary risk scores in predicting perioperative mortality in infective endocarditis (IE) remains controversial. The aim is to evaluate the performance of existent mortality risk scores for cardiovascular surgery in IE and the impact on operability at high-risk thresholds. A single-center retrospective review of adult patients diagnosed with acute left-sided IE undergoing surgery from May 2014 to August 2019 (n = 142) was done. Individualized risk calculation was obtained according to the available mortality risk scores: EuroScore I and II, PALSUSE, Risk-E, Costa, De Feo-Cotrufo, AEPEI, STS-risk, STS-IE, APORTEI, and ICE-PCS scores. A cross-validation analysis was performed on the score with the best area under the curve (AUC). The 30-day survival was 96.5% (95%CI 91-98%). The score with worse area under the curve (AUC = 0.6) was the STS-IE score, while the higher was for the RISK-E score (AUC = 0.89). The AUC of the majority of risk scores suggested acceptable performance; however, statistically significant differences in expected versus observed mortalities were common. The cross-validation analysis showed that a large number of survivors (> 75%) would not have been operated if arbitrary high-risk threshold estimates had been used to deny surgery. The observed mortality in our cohort is significantly lower than is predicted by contemporary risk scores. Despite the reasonable numeric performance of the analyzed scores, their utility in judging the operability of a given patient remains questionable, as demonstrated in the cross-validation analysis. Future guidelines may advise that denial of surgery should only follow a highly experienced Endocarditis Team evaluation.

Echocardiography and FDG-PET/CT scan in Gram-negative bacteremia and cardiovascular infections.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Current evidence on cardiovascular infections in Gram-negative blood stream infections (GNBSI) with focus on the use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose - positron emission tomography/Computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in the diagnostic workup. RECENT FINDINGS: Most evidence focuses on characteristics of diagnosed cardiovascular infections and the proportion caused by GNBSI. These proportions are low (1-5%) when it comes to native and prosthetic valve endocarditis as well as cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections whereas the proportion of vascular graft infections caused by GNBSI seems substantially higher (30-40%). Information on the prevalence of cardiovascular infection in patients with GNBSI is limited to a few studies finding around 3% endocarditis in patients with GNBSI and a prosthetic heart valve and 4-16% device-related infection in patients with CIED and GNBSI. SUMMARY: Patients with GNBSI and native or prosthetic valves should only undergo work-up for endocarditis (TEE and FDG-PET/CT) if they present GNBSI relapse or signs suggestive of endocarditis. CIED patients with GNBSI with Pseudomonas or Serratia spp. should undergo TEE and PET/CT because of the high prevalence of device-related infection. In other GNBs without IE suggestive signs, normal BSI treatment is reasonable and only cases with relapse need work-up. GNBSI in patients with vascular grafts should lead to consideration of PET/CT.

Experience with the use of siltuximab in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to describe characteristics and clinical outcome of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection that received siltuximab according to a protocol that aimed to early block the activity of IL-6 to avoid the progression of the inflammatory flare. METHODS: Retrospective review of the first 31 patients with SARS-CoV-2 treated with siltuximab, in Hospital Clinic of Barcelona or Hospital Universitario Salamanca, from March to April 2020 with positive polymerase-chain reaction (PCR) from a nasopharyngeal swab. RESULTS: The cohort included 31 cases that received siltuximab with a median (IQR) age of 62 (56-71) and 71% were males. The most frequent comorbidity was hypertension (48%). The median dose of siltuximab was 800 mg ranging between 785 and 900 mg. 7 patients received siltuximab as a salvage therapy after one dose of tocilizumab. At the end of the study, a total of 26 (83.9) patients had been discharged alive and the mortality rate was 16.1% but only 1 out of 24 that received siltuximab as a first line option (4%). CONCLUSIONS: Siltuximab is a well-tolerated alternative to tocilizumab when administered as a first line option in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia within the first 10 days from symptoms onset and high C-reactive protein.

Tocilizumab reduces the risk of ICU admission and mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

OBJECTIVE: In some patients the immune response triggered by SARS-CoV-2 is unbalanced, presenting an acute respiratory distress syndrome which in many cases requires intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The limitation of ICU beds has been one of the major burdens in the management around the world; therefore, clinical strategies to avoid ICU admission are needed. We aimed to describe the influence of tocilizumab on the need of transfer to ICU or death in non-critically ill patients. METHODS: A retrospective study of 171 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection that did not qualify as requiring transfer to ICU during the first 24h after admission to a conventional ward, were included. The criteria to receive tocilizumab was radiological impairment, oxygen demand or an increasing of inflammatory parameters, however, the ultimate decision was left to the attending physician judgement. The primary outcome was the need of ICU admission or death whichever came first. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients received tocilizumab and 94 did not. The tocilizumab group had less ICU admissions (10.3% vs. 27.6%, P=0.005) and need of invasive ventilation (0 vs 13.8%, P=0.001). In the multivariable analysis, tocilizumab remained as a protective variable (OR: 0.03, CI 95%: 0.007-0.1, P=0.0001) of ICU admission or death. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab in early stages of the inflammatory flare could reduce an important number of ICU admissions and mechanical ventilation. The mortality rate of 10.3% among patients receiving tocilizumab appears to be lower than other reports. This is a non-randomized study and the results should be interpreted with caution.

Real-life use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Controversial results on remdesivir efficacy have been reported. We aimed to report our real-life experience with the use of remdesivir from its availability in Spain. METHODS: We performed a descriptive study of all patients admitted for ≥48 hours with confirmed COVID-19 who received remdesivir between the 1st of July and the 30th of September 2020. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients out of 242 admitted with COVID-19 at our hospital (50.8%) received remdesivir. Median age was 58 years, 61% were males and 56.9 % received at least one anti-inflammatory treatment. No adverse events requiring remdesivir discontinuation were reported. The need of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation and 30-days mortality were 19.5%, 7.3% and 4.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our real-life experience, the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was associated with a low mortality rate and good safety profile.

COVID-19: from epidemiology to treatment.

The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted the daily clinical practice of cardiologists and cardiovascular surgeons. Preparedness of health workers and health services is crucial to tackle the enormous challenge posed by SARS-CoV-2 in wards, operating theatres, intensive care units, and interventionist laboratories. This Clinical Review provides an overview of COVID-19 and focuses on relevant aspects on prevention and management for specialists within the cardiovascular field.

Performance of differential time to positivity as a routine diagnostic test for catheter-related bloodstream infections: a single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of differential time to positivity (DTP) for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI). METHODS: From all episodes of bloodstream infections (BSI) diagnosed during a 15-year period (2003-17) those in which a paired set of blood cultures drawn from a catheter and a peripheral vein were positive for the same microorganism and had a clinically and/or microbiologically defined source were selected. To assess diagnostic discrimination ability and accuracy of DTP for CRBSI, area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and performance characteristics of a DTP ≥2 h were computed. RESULTS: A total of 512 BSI were included, of which 302 (59%) were CRBSI. Discrimination ability of DTP was low for Staphylococcus aureus (AUC 0.656 ± 0.06), coagulase-negative staphylococci (AUC 0.618 ± 0.081), enterococci (AUC 0.554 ± 0.117) and non-AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae (AUC 0.653 ± 0.053); moderate for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (AUC 0.841 ± 0.073), and high for AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae (AUC 0.944 ± 0.039). For the entire sample, DTP had a low-to-moderate discrimination ability (AUC 0.698 ± 0.024). A DTP ≥2 h has a low sensitivity for coagulase-negative staphylococci (60%) and very low for S. aureus (34%), enterococci (40%) and non-AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae (42%). A DTP cut-off of 1 h improved sensitivity (90%) for AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae. CONCLUSIONS: Differential time to positivity performs well for diagnosing CRBSI only when AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa are involved. Performance is low for common Gram-positive organisms and non-AmpC-producing enteric bacilli; a negative test should not be used to rule out CRBSI due to these microorganisms. A DTP ≥1 h may improve accuracy for AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae, particularly Enterobacter spp.

The Changing Epidemiology of Infective Endocarditis in the Twenty-First Century.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a relatively infrequent infectious disease. It does, however, causes serious morbidity, and its mortality rate has remained unchanged at approximately 25%. Changes in IE risk factors have deeply impacted its epidemiology during recent decades but literature from low-income countries is very scarce. Moreover, prophylaxis guidelines have recently changed and the impact on IE incidence is still unknown. RECENT FINDINGS: In high-income countries, the proportion of IE related to prior rheumatic disease has decreased significantly and has been replaced proportionally by cases related to degenerative valvulopathies, prosthetic valves, and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Nosocomial and non-nosocomial-acquired cases have risen, as has the proportion caused by staphylococci, and the median age of patients. In low-income countries, in contrast, rheumatic disease remains the main risk factor, and streptococci the most frequent causative agents. Studies performed to evaluate impact of guidelines changes' have shown contradictory results. The increased complexity of cases in high-income countries has led to the creation of IE teams, involving several specialties. New imaging and microbiological techniques may increase sensitivity for diagnosis and detection of IE cases. In low-income countries, IE remained related to classic risk factors. The consequences of prophylaxis guidelines changes are still undetermined.

Prevalencia y significado pronóstico de la comorbilidad en la insuficiencia cardiaca / Prevalence and prognostic meaning of comorbidity in heart failure

La insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) afecta predominantemente a personas de edad avanzada con una importante repercusión en los sistemas de salud de los países desarrollados. Las comorbilidades están presentes en la mayoría de los pacientes con IC por actuar como causa, ser consecuencia o mera coincidencia. Además de su elevada prevalencia, tienen una gran relevancia porque pueden enmascarar los síntomas, dificultar el diagnóstico y tratamiento, contribuir a la progresión y repercutir negativamente en el pronóstico de la IC. La mayoría de las comorbilidades asociadas condicionan más ingresos, peor calidad de vida y contribuyen a aumentar la mortalidad. Dado que muchas de ellas están infradiagnosticadas, su detección puede mejorar la evolución y la calidad de vida del paciente con IC. En este artículo se revisa la prevalencia y significado pronóstico de las comorbilidades más prevalentes asociadas a la IC (AU)

Heart failure (HF) predominantly affects elderly individuals and has a significant impact on the health systems of developed countries. Comorbidities are present in most patients with HF by acting as the cause, the consequence or a mere coincidence. In addition to their high prevalence, they have considerable relevance because they can mask symptoms, impede the diagnosis and treatment, contribute to progression and negatively influence the prognosis of HF. Most of the associated comorbidities result in a greater number of hospitalisations, poorer quality of life and increased mortality. Given that many of these comorbidities are underdiagnosed, their detection could improve the outcome and quality of life of patients with HF. This article reviews the prevalence and prognostic meaning of the most prevalent comorbidities associated with HF (AU)

[Prevalence and prognostic meaning of comorbidity in heart failure]. / Prevalencia y significado pronóstico de la comorbilidad en la insuficiencia cardiaca.

Heart failure (HF) predominantly affects elderly individuals and has a significant impact on the health systems of developed countries. Comorbidities are present in most patients with HF by acting as the cause, the consequence or a mere coincidence. In addition to their high prevalence, they have considerable relevance because they can mask symptoms, impede the diagnosis and treatment, contribute to progression and negatively influence the prognosis of HF. Most of the associated comorbidities result in a greater number of hospitalisations, poorer quality of life and increased mortality. Given that many of these comorbidities are underdiagnosed, their detection could improve the outcome and quality of life of patients with HF. This article reviews the prevalence and prognostic meaning of the most prevalent comorbidities associated with HF.