Early Real-World Data to Assess Benefits and Risks of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review of Methods.

Since the authorization of the first COVID-19 vaccines in December 2020, multiple studies using real-world data (RWD) have been published to assess their effectiveness/safety profile. This systematic review aimed to characterize the methods and outcomes of studies using RWD for assessment of COVID-19 vaccines, four months after vaccine approval. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify published studies until 6 May 2021. Two independent researchers selected relevant publications and extracted data from included studies. The risk of bias was assessed using New-Castle Ottawa tools. After screening 1086 studies, 15 were included. Out of the 15 studies, 12 (80%) followed a cohort design, 8 (53%) were based on USA data, 7 (47%) assessed health care professionals, and 14 articles (93%) assessed the BNT162b2 vaccine. Data sources included institutional databases, electronic health records, and patient-generated data. The primary endpoint mainly described was SARS-CoV-2-infection. Hospitalization and mortality were assessed in 2 studies. For the comparability domain, six studies (40%) had a high risk of bias. A few months after the beginning of COVID-19 vaccination, Real-world Evidence (RWE) provided timely safety surveillance and comparative effectiveness with findings that showed similar findings to Randomized control trial (RCT). Most of the initiatives assessed BNT162b2 and were conducted in the USA and used healthcare workers' data.

Appropriateness of Acetaminophen Dosing by Caregivers of Pediatric Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department at the University Pediatric Hospital in Puerto Rico.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the appropriateness of acetaminophen dosing by caregivers seeking care for their children/wards at the emergency department of a pediatric hospital. METHODS: Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Setting: The emergency department of the University Pediatric Hospital in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Participants: Eighty-eight caregivers who had, in the past 24 hours, administered a known quantity of acetaminophen to a pediatric patient under their care and were visiting the emergency room with that patient. Intervention: The caregivers were interviewed by the investigators, using a standardized questionnaire. Main outcome measures: The appropriateness of the acetaminophen doses administered by caregivers. The product's dosage form and strength, measurement device used (if any), and demographic data (of the caregiver and child) were also collected. Doses of 10 to 15 mg/kg of acetaminophen were considered appropriate. RESULTS: Overall, 45% of the caregivers had administered an inappropriate dose. Of these, 70% were subtherapeutic and 30% were supratherapeutic. Although 74% of the caregivers knew their child's/ward's weight, only 50% had used it to determine the dose. Caregivers with previous experience (as caregivers) were most likely to have administered an inappropriate dose (P = 0.03). Physicians were the source most consulted (40%) by caregivers, followed by the product's label (35%). Only 9% of the caregivers consulted a pharmacist for dosing recommendations. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of all the caregivers administered an incorrect acetaminophen dose, suggesting that there is a need for better caregiver education. Due to their accessibility at the point of sale of OTC medications and pharmacotherapy knowledge, pharmacists could have an active role in promoting the safe and effective use of acetaminophen.

Prevalence of statin utilization and adherence among privately insured subjects in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

BACKGROUND: Puerto Ricans are the Hispanic subgroup with the highest adjusted prevalence of statin-eligible patients. However, no study has described statin utilization and adherence among subjects living on the island of Puerto Rico. OBJECTIVES: To (a) estimate the prevalence of beneficiaries with diabetes aged between 40 and 75 years; (b) estimate the prevalence of statin utilization among beneficiaries with diabetes; and (c) estimate secondary adherence to statins among beneficiaries with diabetes. METHODS: With pharmacy claims data from a commercial pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, this study used a retrospective longitudinal design to analyze all pharmacy claims generated by 115,674 beneficiaries aged between 40 and 75 years with continuous enrollment during 2018. Beneficiaries with diabetes were defined by having ≥ 2 pharmacy claims for antidiabetic agents during 2018. Statin utilization was defined by having ≥ 1 pharmacy claim for statins among beneficiaries with diabetes. The proportion of days covered (PDC) was used to measure secondary adherence to statins. Parametric and nonparametric statistics were used to describe statin utilization and adherence. RESULTS: The prevalence of beneficiaries with diabetes was 7.8%. Of the 8,975 beneficiaries with diabetes, 5,129 (57.1%) received ≥ 1 prescription for a statin. Older males with diabetes were more likely to receive prescriptions for statins. The median PDC for the 4,553 beneficiaries with ≥ 2 prescriptions for statins was 63.4%; 3,306 (72.6%) beneficiaries filled their statin prescriptions for a 30-day supply only; and 1,252 (27.5%) beneficiaries had a PDC ≥ 80%. The highest PDC (92.3%) was observed for beneficiaries who received statins for a 90-day supply only. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that has measured statin utilization and adherence among patients with diabetes living in Puerto Rico. The utilization and adherence to statins among privately insured beneficiaries with diabetes in Puerto Rico are suboptimal. Future studies should focus on understanding the reasons for the suboptimal use of statins and on potential interventions at the beneficiary and provider level to increase statin utilization. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures to disclose related to this study.

Prevalence of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Drug Dispensing Patterns Among Medicaid and Medicaid-Medicare Dually Eligible Beneficiaries in Puerto Rico.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Puerto Rico, to describe disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) dispensing patterns by prescriber specialty, and to illustrate the impact of RA case definition on the estimated prevalence. METHODS: This study estimated the prevalence of RA in Puerto Rico during 2016 among Medicaid and Medicaid-Medicare dually eligible beneficiaries of the Mi Salud health care plan, a federally funded health insurance program. DMARD dispensing and cost patterns were described and stratified by provider specialty. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of RA case definition on estimated prevalence. RESULTS: The prevalence of RA in 2016 was estimated to be 2 cases per 1,000 beneficiaries, with 3 per 1,000 beneficiaries among females, 4.5 times that of males. In total, 44% of beneficiaries received conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) only, 32% received biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) only, and 24% received a combination of csDMARDs and b/tsDMARDs. Rheumatologists and a combination of specialties accounted for the highest median number of dispensed DMARDs, with 14 each. A sensitivity analysis revealed that when RA cases with ≥3 medical claims were restricted to having ≥1 DMARD claim, the estimated prevalence changed from 6 to 3 cases per 1,000 beneficiaries. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RA in Puerto Rico in this study is lower than reported in the mainland US, possibly due to more stringent criteria to define RA. DMARD dispensing and cost patterns are similar to those found in other studies. Claims algorithms that identify RA have higher validity when pharmacy data is included.

Travel to Mexico and uropathogen-antibiotic susceptibility mismatch in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: International travel results in an increased risk of colonization and infection with multidrug-resistant organisms. This study aimed to determine if recent travel to Mexico affects the rate of uropathogen-antibiotic susceptibility mismatch (UASM) in outpatients treated for urinary tract infection (UTI) in a South Texas emergency department (ED). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of adult patients presenting to the ED and treated outpatient for UTI from October 1, 2014, to February 25, 2020, was conducted at a community hospital located within approximately 15 miles of the United States-Mexico border. Rates of UASM were compared between patients with a history of recent travel to Mexico and those who have not recently traveled. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were included, with 64 in the travel to Mexico group and 128 in the no travel group. UASM was significantly higher in the recent travel to Mexico group when compared to the no travel group (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.03-2.13). Antibiotics most commonly associated with UASM included fluoroquinolones, cephalexin, and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. There was no significant difference between the rates of resistance to first-line agents for the treatment of UTI among the two groups. CONCLUSION: In addition to known antibiotic resistance risk factors, recent travel to Mexico may increase the risk of UASM for ED patients with UTI. Considering the potential consequences of UTI treatment failure, antimicrobial stewardship services in the ED should include screening for antibiotic resistance risk factors and urine culture follow-up to ensure appropriate outpatient antibiotic therapy, especially among patients with recent international travel.

Knowledge and Perceptions of E-cigarettes and the Motivations for their Use: Talking to Smokers (E-cigarettes and/or Conventional Cigarettes) and Non-smokers in Puerto Rico.

OBJECTIVE: The awareness and use of e-cigarettes have been increasing in recent years. The World Health Organization recently reported that regulations are needed to impede the promotion of e-cigarettes to young people, prohibit unproven health claims about them (including those regarding smoking-cessation efficacy), minimize potential health risks to e-cigarette users and non-users, and protect existing tobacco controls. The study described herein explored e-cigarette knowledge, perceptions, and usage motivations among a group of adults in Puerto Rico. METHODS: This research study used a validated questionnaire with closed-ended questions to gather data. Non-inferential and inferential statistics were used to characterize smokers (of e-cigarettes, of conventional cigarettes, and of both) and non-smokers. RESULTS: A total of 415 respondents took part; they were evenly distributed by gender, age, and socioeconomic status; all were residents of Puerto Rico at the time of the survey. The overall awareness of e-cigarettes was high, but knowledge of nicotine content and regulations was limited. Asked whether e-cigarettes contain nicotine (they do not), approximately two thirds stated either that they do or that they didn't know; asked whether e-cigarettes are regulated as a tobacco product (they are in Puerto Rico), 84% stated either that they are not or that they didn't know. Common perceptions of e-cigarettes are that they are harmful to health and that they are no less harmful than cigarettes are. However, a significant portion of the respondents perceived e-cigarettes to be less addictive than conventional cigarettes are. Overall, the respondents were divided on the efficacy of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. Nonetheless, the most common motivation for their use, according to both current users and potential future users, is to aid in smoking cessation or reduction. CONCLUSION: The majority of individuals surveyed were aware of e-cigarettes but had limited knowledge of their contents or regulation. As an aid in smoking cessation was the most commonly mentioned motivation for e-cigarette use.

Cost-Utility Study of Warfarin Genotyping in the VACHS Affiliated Anticoagulation Clinic of Puerto Rico.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-utility of the pharmacogenetic-guided dosing of warfarin (PGx), when compared to the current dosing strategy. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to assess the impact of the genotypingguided warfarin dosing in a hypothetical cohort of patients. The model was based on the percentage of time patients spent within the therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) range (PTTR). PTTR estimates and genotype distribution were derived from a cohort of patients (n = 206) treated in the Veteran Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System (VACHS) and from results of other research study. Costs, utilities and event probability data were obtained from the literature. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the range of plausible results. Willingness to pay was established at $50,000 per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: According to our model, the PGx strategy showed a QALY increase of 0.0021, with an increase in total cost of $272. This corresponds to an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of $127,501, ranging from $95,690 to $148,611. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the ICURs were more sensitive to the cost of genotyping and the effect of genotyping on the PTTR. CONCLUSION: Our model suggests that the warfarin PGx was not superior to the standard of care dosing strategy in terms of cost-utility.

Prevalence of Concurrent Prescribing of ACE-Is and ARBs among Beneficiaries of Puerto Rico's Government-Sponsored Health Care Plan During 2012 and 2013.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular conditions are the second cause of death in Puerto Rico. The individual use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) is considered the first-line therapy for the treatment of several cardiovascular-related medical conditions. However, the concurrent use of these 2 therapeutic classes of drugs is not supported by treatment guidelines. Studies have shown that their concurrent use represents a potential health risk. The research described in this paper aimed to determine the prevalence of the concurrent prescription of ACE-Is and ARBs, either separately or as a combination product, in a group of beneficiaries of the Puerto Rico Health Services Administration (ASES, by its initials in Spanish). METHODS: A 2-year cross sectional study was conducted. All pharmacy claims from the years 2012 and 2013 were provided by ASES and subsequently evaluated by the investigators to identify those involving the prescription of an ACE-I, an ARB, or a combination of drugs belonging to both therapeutic classes. Each pharmacy claim was complemented with sociodemographic and clinical data. The final dataset was analyzed at the person-month level using frequency, cumulative frequency, percentage, and cumulative percentage. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 361,841 beneficiaries. A total of 23,598 beneficiaries were excluded because of incomplete diagnostic information. Of the beneficiaries with complete information, 36,202 out of 338,243 (10.7%) had concurrent prescriptions for ACE-Is and ARBs during the study period. We excluded 1,124 beneficiaries who had a primary diagnosis of HF, resulting in a final pool of 35,078 beneficiaries (10.4%) who had prescriptions for combination products. CONCLUSION: An unacceptable pattern of ACE-I and ARB co-prescribing during the years 2012 and 2013 was observed in patients with diagnoses for which the combination is not clinically indicated.