Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Neurología (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 37(6): 434-440, Jul.-Aug. 2022. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-205998

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Alrededor de 15 millones de personas sufren un ictus cada año, de los que un 10-15% ocurre en menores de 50 años (ictus en el adulto joven). La prevalencia de los distintos factores de riesgo vascular y las estrategias sanitarias para el manejo del ictus varían a nivel mundial, siendo interesante conocer la epidemiología y las características específicas de cada región. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la prevalencia de los diferentes factores de riesgo vascular, la etiología y las características de los ictus isquémicos en el adulto joven en la comunidad autónoma de Aragón. Métodos: Estudio multicéntrico, de corte transversal, realizado por los Servicios de Neurología de todos los hospitales del Servicio Aragonés de Salud (SALUD). Se identificó a todos los pacientes entre 18 y 50 años que ingresaron en cualquiera de estos hospitales con el diagnóstico de ictus isquémico o AIT entre enero del 2005 y diciembre del 2015. Se recogieron variables demográficas, factores de riesgo vascular y tipo de ictus isquémico entre otras. Resultados: En el periodo de estudio, 786 pacientes entre 18 y 50 años ingresaron con el diagnóstico de ictus isquémico o AIT en algún hospital del SALUD, con una tasa anual promedio de 12,3 por 100.000 habitantes. La mediana de su edad fue de 45 años (RIQ: 40-48 años). El factor de riesgo vascular más prevalente fue el tabaquismo, 404 (51,4%). La mayoría fue de causa indeterminada (36,2%), seguida por «otras causas» (26,5%). La mediana de puntuación en la escala NIHSS fue de 3,5 (RIQ: 2,07,0). En total, 211 (26,8%) de los ingresos fueron por AIT. De los pacientes que ingresaron con el diagnóstico de ictus isquémico, 59 (10,3%) se fibrinolizaron. Conclusiones: El ictus isquémico en el adulto joven no es infrecuente en Aragón y en un importante número de casos es de etiología indeterminada, por lo que es necesario implementar medidas que nos permitan mejorar su estudio, disminuir su incidencia y prevenir su recurrencia. (AU)


Introduction: Stroke affects around 15 million people per year, with 10%-15% occurring in individuals under 50 years old (stroke in young adults). The prevalence of different vascular risk factors and healthcare strategies for stroke management vary worldwide, making the epidemiology and specific characteristics of stroke in each region an important area of research. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of different vascular risk factors and the aetiology and characteristics of ischaemic stroke in young adults in the autonomous community of Aragon, Spain. Methods: A cross-sectional, multi-centre study was conducted by the neurology departments of all hospitals in the Aragonese Health Service. We identified all patients aged between 18 and 50 years who were admitted to any of these hospitals with a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke or TIA between January 2005 and December 2015. Data were collected on demographic variables, vascular risk factors, and type of stroke, among other variables. Results: During the study period, 786 patients between 18 and 50 years old were admitted with a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke or TIA to any hospital of Aragon, at a mean annual rate of 12.3 per 100 000 population. The median age was 45 years (IQR: 40-48 years). The most prevalent vascular risk factor was tobacco use, in 404 patients (51.4%). The majority of strokes were of undetermined cause (36.2%), followed by other causes (26.5%). The median NIHSS score was 3.5 (IQR: 2.0-7.0). In total, 211 patients (26.8%) presented TIA. Fifty-nine per cent of the patients admitted with a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke (10.3%) were treated with fibrinolysis. Conclusions: Ischaemic stroke in young adults is not uncommon in Aragon, and is of undetermined aetiology in a considerable number of cases; it is therefore necessary to implement measures to improve study of the condition, to reduce its incidence, and to prevent its recurrence. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Stroke/epidemiology , Young Adult , Brain Ischemia/complications , Brain Ischemia/epidemiology , Ischemic Attack, Transient/complications , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/therapy , Spain , Cross-Sectional Studies
2.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 37(6): 434-440, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34092536

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Stroke affects around 15 million people per year, with 10%-15% occurring in individuals under 50 years old (stroke in young adults). The prevalence of different vascular risk factors and healthcare strategies for stroke management vary worldwide, making the epidemiology and specific characteristics of stroke in each region an important area of research. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of different vascular risk factors and the aetiology and characteristics of ischaemic stroke in young adults in the autonomous community of Aragon, Spain. METHODS: A cross-sectional, multi-centre study was conducted by the neurology departments of all hospitals in the Aragonese Health Service. We identified all patients aged between 18 and 50 years who were admitted to any of these hospitals with a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke or TIA between January 2005 and December 2015. Data were collected on demographic variables, vascular risk factors, and type of stroke, among other variables. RESULTS: During the study period, 786 patients between 18 and 50 years old were admitted with a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke or TIA to any hospital of Aragon, at a mean annual rate of 12.3 per 100 000 population. The median age was 45 years (IQR: 40-48 years). The most prevalent vascular risk factor was tobacco use, in 404 patients (51.4%). The majority of strokes were of undetermined cause (36.2%), followed by other causes (26.5%). The median NIHSS score was 3.5 (IQR: 2.0-7.0). In total, 211 patients (26.8%) presented TIA. Fifty-nine per cent of the patients admitted with a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke (10.3%) were treated with fibrinolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Ischaemic stroke in young adults is not uncommon in Aragon, and is of undetermined aetiology in a considerable number of cases; it is therefore necessary to implement measures to improve study of the condition, to reduce its incidence, and to prevent its recurrence.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Ischemic Attack, Transient , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Adolescent , Adult , Brain Ischemia/complications , Brain Ischemia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/complications , Middle Aged , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/therapy , Young Adult
3.
Neurología (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 36(7): 531-536, septiembre 2021. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-220089

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La pandemia por COVID-19 ha tenido un impacto en el manejo del ictus isquémico; se ha descrito una disminución de los ingresos hospitalarios e incluso una interrupción en la cadena de atención y un aumento de la mortalidad intrahospitalaria. Sin embargo, falta evidencia sobre su impacto en el pronóstico funcional. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar el efecto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en el pronóstico funcional a 3 meses de los pacientes con ictus isquémico agudo hospitalizados en Aragón.Material y métodosRevisamos los datos de todos los pacientes ingresados por ictus isquémico en todos los hospitales de nuestro sistema sanitario entre el 30 de diciembre del 2019 y el 3 de mayo del 2020. Comparamos su mRS y la mortalidad a 3 meses de los hospitalizados antes y después de haberse establecido el estado de emergencia secundario a la pandemia por COVID-19.ResultadosEn total, 318 pacientes con ictus isquémico agudo cumplieron nuestros criterios de inclusión. No hubo diferencias en las características globales y específicas de cada periodo, excepto por una mayor proporción de pacientes mayores de 80 años de edad durante el periodo pre-CoV (42,2% vs. 29,0%, p = 0,028). En el análisis comparativo, no encontramos una diferencia significativa en la mortalidad (12,3 vs. 7,9, p = 0,465) o la proporción de pacientes con mRS ≤ 2 (57,7% vs. 57,1%, p = 0,425) a los 3 meses.ConclusiónHasta donde sabemos, este es el primer estudio que analiza el impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en el pronóstico funcional a 3 meses de pacientes con ictus isquémico. En nuestra comunidad autónoma, no ha habido un incremento en la mortalidad o discapacidad a 3 meses de pacientes hospitalizados por ictus isquémico durante el periodo de COVID-19. (AU)


Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on ischaemic stroke management, with a reported decrease in hospital admissions, and even disruptions in healthcare and increased in-hospital mortality. However, there is a lack of evidence on the impact of the pandemic on functional prognosis. The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the 3-month functional outcomes of patients hospitalised due to acute ischaemic stroke in Aragon (Spain).Materil and methodsWe reviewed the data of all patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke to any hospital in our regional healthcare system between 30 December 2019 and 3 May 2020. We compared modified Rankin Scale scores and mortality at 3 months in patients hospitalised before and after the declaration of a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic.ResultsIn total, 318 patients with acute ischaemic stroke met our inclusion criteria. No differences were observed between periods in global or specific characteristics, with the exception of a higher proportion of patients older than 80 years during the first period (42.2% vs. 29.0%, P=.028). In the comparative analysis, we found no significant differences in mortality (12.3 vs. 7.9, P=.465) or in the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale scores ≤ 2 (57.7% vs. 57.1%, P=.425) at 3 months.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to analyse the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the 3-month functional outcomes of patients with ischaemic stroke. In our region, there has been no increase in rates of mortality or disability at 3 months in patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke during the pandemic. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Brain Ischemia/epidemiology , Pandemics , Prognosis , Stroke/epidemiology , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus , Treatment Outcome
4.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 36(7): 531-536, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34099423

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on ischaemic stroke management, with a reported decrease in hospital admissions, and even disruptions in healthcare and increased in-hospital mortality. However, there is a lack of evidence on the impact of the pandemic on functional prognosis. The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the 3-month functional outcomes of patients hospitalised due to acute ischaemic stroke in Aragon (Spain). METHODS: We reviewed the data of all patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke to any hospital in our regional healthcare system between 30 December 2019 and 3 May 2020. We compared modified Rankin Scale scores and mortality at 3 months in patients hospitalised before and after the declaration of a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: In total, 318 patients with acute ischaemic stroke met our inclusion criteria. No differences were observed between periods in global or specific characteristics, with the exception of a higher proportion of patients older than 80 years during the first period (42.2% vs 29.0%, P = .028). In the comparative analysis, we found no significant differences in mortality (12.3 vs 7.9, P = .465) or in the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale scores ≤ 2 (57.7% vs 57.1%, P = .425) at 3 months. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyse the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the 3-month functional outcomes of patients with ischaemic stroke. In our region, there has been no increase in rates of mortality or disability at 3 months in patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , COVID-19 , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Brain Ischemia/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Stroke/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
5.
Rev. neurol. (Ed. impr.) ; 72(11): 377-383, Jun 1, 2021. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-227881

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La adhesión al tratamiento preventivo oral (TPO) en la migraña se ve frecuentemente comprometida. El objetivo fue conocer el grado de adhesión al TPO en pacientes con migraña a los tres meses. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio multicéntrico observacional de pacientes diagnosticados de migraña episódica o crónica (criterios de la Clasificación Internacional de Cefaleas, tercera edición) en los que se iniciaba TPO. Se recogieron datos demográficos (edad, género, nivel estudios, estado civil) y de enfermedad (número de ataques, puntuación en las escalas Headache Impact Test-6 y Migraine Disability Assessment Scale). A los tres meses se pasó la escala de Morisky Green, que diferencia niveles de adhesión: excelente (0), moderada (1-2) y baja (3-4). Resultados: Participaron 100 pacientes, un 87% mujeres de 42 ± 13 años, el 14% con migraña crónica. El 53,2% comenzaba su primer TPO. Se iniciaron betabloqueantes en el 23,2%, antidepresivos tricíclicos en el 35,4%, flunaricina en el 21,2%, neuromoduladores en el 19,2% y antihipertensivos en el 1%. El 56% presentaba discapacidad grave y el 79,5%, impacto muy grave. La adhesión a los tres meses fue excelente en el 41,8%, moderada en el 28,6% y baja en el 29,6%. El motivo más frecuente de discontinuación fueron los efectos adversos (44%). Se encontró una relación significativa entre adhesión excelente y estado civil soltero (p = 0,046), y entre adhesión baja y efectos adversos (p = 0,009). No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los TPO empleados y el grado de adhesión ni con el resto de variables estudiadas. Conclusiones: Aunque nuestros resultados son mejores que los publicados en la bibliografía, consideramos que la adhesión terapéutica en nuestro medio es baja y es prioritario educar a nuestros pacientes en este sentido.(AU)


Introduction: Adherence to oral preventive treatment (OPT) in migraine is often compromised. The aim was to determine the degree of adherence to OPT in migraine patients at three months. Patients and methods: We conducted a multicentre observational study of patients diagnosed with episodic or chronic migraine (criteria of the International Headache Classification, third edition) in whom OPT was initiated. Demographic data (age, gender, educational level, marital status) and disease data (number of attacks, Headache Impact Test-6 and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale scores) were collected. At three months, the Morisky-Green scale was administered, which differentiates levels of adherence: excellent (0), moderate (1-2) and low (3-4). Results: Altogether 100 patients participated in the study: 87% women aged 42 ± 13 years, 14% with chronic migraine; 53.2% of them were beginning their first OPT. Beta-blockers were initiated in 23.2%, tricyclic antidepressants in 35.4%, flunarizine in 21.2%, neuromodulators in 19.2% and antihypertensives in 1%. Severe disability was observed in 56%, and the impact was very severe in 79.5%. Adhesion at three months was excellent in 41.8%, moderate in 28.6% and low in 29.6%. The most frequent reason for discontinuing was the occurrence of adverse effects (44%). A significant relationship was found between excellent adherence and being single (p = 0.046), and between low adherence and adverse effects (p = 0.009). No significant differences were found between the OPT used and the degree of adherence or the other variables studied. Conclusions: Although our results are better than those published in the literature, we consider that therapeutic adherence in our setting is low and educating our patients in this regard is a priority.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Patient Compliance , Treatment Adherence and Compliance , Headache , Neurology , Nervous System Diseases , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology
6.
Rev Neurol ; 72(11): 377-383, 2021 Jun 01.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34042166

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to oral preventive treatment (OPT) in migraine is often compromised. The aim was to determine the degree of adherence to OPT in migraine patients at three months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicentre observational study of patients diagnosed with episodic or chronic migraine (criteria of the International Headache Classification, third edition) in whom OPT was initiated. Demographic data (age, gender, educational level, marital status) and disease data (number of attacks, Headache Impact Test-6 and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale scores) were collected. At three months, the Morisky-Green scale was administered, which differentiates levels of adherence: excellent (0), moderate (1-2) and low (3-4). RESULTS: Altogether 100 patients participated in the study: 87% women aged 42 ± 13 years, 14% with chronic migraine; 53.2% of them were beginning their first OPT. Beta-blockers were initiated in 23.2%, tricyclic antidepressants in 35.4%, flunarizine in 21.2%, neuromodulators in 19.2% and antihypertensives in 1%. Severe disability was observed in 56%, and the impact was very severe in 79.5%. Adhesion at three months was excellent in 41.8%, moderate in 28.6% and low in 29.6%. The most frequent reason for discontinuing was the occurrence of adverse effects (44%). A significant relationship was found between excellent adherence and being single (p = 0.046), and between low adherence and adverse effects (p = 0.009). No significant differences were found between the OPT used and the degree of adherence or the other variables studied. CONCLUSIONS: Although our results are better than those published in the literature, we consider that therapeutic adherence in our setting is low and educating our patients in this regard is a priority.


TITLE: Grado de cumplimiento terapéutico a los tres meses en pacientes con migraña.Introducción. La adhesión al tratamiento preventivo oral (TPO) en la migraña se ve frecuentemente comprometida. El objetivo fue conocer el grado de adhesión al TPO en pacientes con migraña a los tres meses. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio multicéntrico observacional de pacientes diagnosticados de migraña episódica o crónica (criterios de la Clasificación Internacional de Cefaleas, tercera edición) en los que se iniciaba TPO. Se recogieron datos demográficos (edad, género, nivel estudios, estado civil) y de enfermedad (número de ataques, puntuación en las escalas Headache Impact Test-6 y Migraine Disability Assessment Scale). A los tres meses se pasó la escala de Morisky Green, que diferencia niveles de adhesión: excelente (0), moderada (1-2) y baja (3-4). Resultados. Participaron 100 pacientes, un 87% mujeres de 42 ± 13 años, el 14% con migraña crónica. El 53,2% comenzaba su primer TPO. Se iniciaron betabloqueantes en el 23,2%, antidepresivos tricíclicos en el 35,4%, flunaricina en el 21,2%, neuromoduladores en el 19,2% y antihipertensivos en el 1%. El 56% presentaba discapacidad grave y el 79,5%, impacto muy grave. La adhesión a los tres meses fue excelente en el 41,8%, moderada en el 28,6% y baja en el 29,6%. El motivo más frecuente de discontinuación fueron los efectos adversos (44%). Se encontró una relación significativa entre adhesión excelente y estado civil soltero (p = 0,046), y entre adhesión baja y efectos adversos (p = 0,009). No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los TPO empleados y el grado de adhesión ni con el resto de variables estudiadas. Conclusiones. Aunque nuestros resultados son mejores que los publicados en la bibliografía, consideramos que la adhesión terapéutica en nuestro medio es baja y es prioritario educar a nuestros pacientes en este sentido.


Subject(s)
Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Migraine Disorders/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Time Factors
7.
Neurologia ; 36(7): 531-536, 2021 Sep.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38620471

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on ischaemic stroke management, with a reported decrease in hospital admissions, and even disruptions in healthcare and increased in-hospital mortality. However, there is a lack of evidence on the impact of the pandemic on functional prognosis. The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the 3-month functional outcomes of patients hospitalised due to acute ischaemic stroke in Aragon (Spain). Materil and methods: We reviewed the data of all patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke to any hospital in our regional healthcare system between 30 December 2019 and 3 May 2020. We compared modified Rankin Scale scores and mortality at 3 months in patients hospitalised before and after the declaration of a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: In total, 318 patients with acute ischaemic stroke met our inclusion criteria. No differences were observed between periods in global or specific characteristics, with the exception of a higher proportion of patients older than 80 years during the first period (42.2% vs. 29.0%, P=.028). In the comparative analysis, we found no significant differences in mortality (12.3 vs. 7.9, P=.465) or in the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale scores ≤ 2 (57.7% vs. 57.1%, P=.425) at 3 months. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyse the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the 3-month functional outcomes of patients with ischaemic stroke. In our region, there has been no increase in rates of mortality or disability at 3 months in patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke during the pandemic.

8.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 2019 Jul 21.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31340903

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Stroke affects around 15 million people per year, with 10%-15% occurring in individuals under 50 years old (stroke in young adults). The prevalence of different vascular risk factors and healthcare strategies for stroke management vary worldwide, making the epidemiology and specific characteristics of stroke in each region an important area of research. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of different vascular risk factors and the aetiology and characteristics of ischaemic stroke in young adults in the autonomous community of Aragon, Spain. METHODS: A cross-sectional, multi-centre study was conducted by the neurology departments of all hospitals in the Aragonese Health Service. We identified all patients aged between 18 and 50 years who were admitted to any of these hospitals with a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke or TIA between January 2005 and December 2015. Data were collected on demographic variables, vascular risk factors, and type of stroke, among other variables. RESULTS: During the study period, 786 patients between 18 and 50 years old were admitted with a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke or TIA to any hospital of Aragon, at a mean annual rate of 12.3 per 100 000 population. The median age was 45 years (IQR: 40-48 years). The most prevalent vascular risk factor was tobacco use, in 404 patients (51.4%). The majority of strokes were of undetermined cause (36.2%), followed by other causes (26.5%). The median NIHSS score was 3.5 (IQR: 2.0-7.0). In total, 211 patients (26.8%) presented TIA. Fifty-nine per cent of the patients admitted with a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke (10.3%) were treated with fibrinolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Ischaemic stroke in young adults is not uncommon in Aragon, and is of undetermined aetiology in a considerable number of cases; it is therefore necessary to implement measures to improve study of the condition, to reduce its incidence, and to prevent its recurrence.

9.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 128(3): 418-423, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28160747

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study retrospectively the impact of electrode modality (subdural or depth electrodes) during presurgical assessment on surgical outcome after temporal lobectomy. METHODS: The study included 17 patients assessed with depth electrodes and 57 with bitemporal subdural strips. RESULTS: MRI showed a larger proportion of bilateral pathology in patients undergoing depth recordings (29.41% versus 3.5%, p=0.00069). Among the operated patients, those undergoing depth electrode recordings showed better outcome at one year after surgery (11/12 versus 22/33; p=0.046). This difference disappears at longest follow up (10/12 versus 22/33; p=0.138). Moreover, the probability of undergoing surgery and having good outcome after assessment with intracranial recordings is higher for the depth electrode group at one-year follow up (11/17 versus 22/57; p=0.029) but statistical differences decrease to a trend for the longest follow up (10/17 versus 22/57; p=0.069). No other statistical differences were noted between subdural and depth electrodes. Depth electrodes showed lower complication rates than subdural electrodes. CONCLUSION: Both depth and subdural electrodes are effective for presurgical assessment of temporal lobe epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: Assessment with depth electrodes is associated with slightly increased likelihood of surgery and marginally better surgical outcome at one year follow up which disappears for longer follow up periods. Initial assessment with depth electrodes would have avoided a second implantation in 15% of patients.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy/surgery , Electrodes, Implanted/adverse effects , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications
12.
Rev Neurol ; 59(9): 385-91, 2014 Nov 01.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25342051

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic migraine (CM) and medication abuse are difficult to treat, and have a greater tendency towards chronification and a poorer quality of life than those with other types of headache. AIM: To evaluate whether the presence of medication abuse lowers the effectiveness of topiramate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of patients with CM were grouped according to whether they met abuse criteria or not. They were advised to stop taking the drug that they were abusing. Treatment was adjusted to match their crises and preventive treatment with topiramate was established from the beginning. The number of days with headache and intense migraine in the previous month and at four months of treatment was evaluated. RESULTS: In all, 262 patients with CM criteria were selected and 167 (63.7%) of them fulfilled abuse criteria. In both groups there was a significant reduction in the number of days with headache/month and number of migraine attacks/month at the fourth month of treatment with topiramate. The percentage of reduction in the number of days with headache/month in CM without abuse was 59.3 ± 36.1%, and with abuse, 48.7 ± 41.7% (p = 0.0574). The percentage of reduction in the number of days with intense migraine/month in CM without abuse was 61.2%, and with abuse, 50% (p = 0.0224). Response rate according to the number of days with headache/month in CM without abuse was 69%, and with abuse, 57%. Response rate according to the number of intense migraines/month in CM without abuse was 76.8%, and in CM with abuse, 61% (p = 0.0097). CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate was effective in patients with CM with and without medication abuse, although effectiveness is lower in the latter case.


TITLE: El abuso de farmacos en pacientes con migraña cronica influye en la efectividad del tratamiento preventivo con topiramato?Introduccion. Los pacientes con migraña cronica (MC) y abuso de medicacion son dificiles de tratar y tienen peor calidad de vida que otros pacientes con migrañas. Objetivo. Valorar si la presencia de abuso de farmacos disminuye la efectividad del topiramato. Pacientes y metodos. Una serie de pacientes con MC fueron agrupados segun presentasen criterios de abuso o no abuso de farmacos. Se les aconsejo la supresion del farmaco del cual abusaban. Se ajusto el tratamiento de sus crisis y se inicio tratamiento preventivo desde el principio con topiramato. Se valoro el numero dias con cefalea y migrañas intensas en el mes previo y al cuarto mes de tratamiento. Resultados. Fueron seleccionados 262 pacientes con criterios de MC, y de ellos 167 (63,7%) cumplieron criterios de abuso. En ambos grupos hubo una reduccion significativa del numero de dias con cefalea/mes y numero de crisis de migraña/mes al cuarto mes de tratamiento con topiramato. Porcentaje de reduccion de dias con cefalea/mes en MC sin abuso, 59,3 ± 36,1%; y con abuso, 48,7 ± 41,7% (p = 0,0574). Porcentaje de reduccion de migrañas intensas/mes en MC sin abuso, 61,2%; y con abuso, 50% (p = 0,0224). Tasa de respondedores segun numero de dias con cefalea/mes en MC sin abuso, 69%; y con abuso, 57%. Tasa de respondedores segun numero de migrañas intensas/mes en MC sin abuso, 76,8%; y en MC con abuso, 61% (p = 0,0097). Conclusiones. El topiramato fue efectivo en pacientes con MC sin y con abuso de farmacos, aunque con menor efectividad en estos ultimos.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Drug Overdose/complications , Fructose/analogs & derivatives , Headache Disorders, Secondary/complications , Migraine Disorders/prevention & control , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Tryptamines/adverse effects , Adult , Analgesics/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacokinetics , Drug Interactions , Female , Fructose/pharmacokinetics , Fructose/therapeutic use , Headache Disorders/drug therapy , Headache Disorders/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/complications , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Patient Satisfaction , Topiramate , Treatment Outcome , Tryptamines/pharmacokinetics , Young Adult
13.
Rev Neurol ; 59(6): 264-8, 2014 Sep 16.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25190339

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION. There are many forms of neuro-ophthalmological involvement secondary to syphilis, and not all of them are well known. Our aim is to determine the clinical and therapeutic differences in these patients. CASE REPORTS. Our sample included eight patients diagnosed with an ocular and neuro-ophthalmological disorder due to syphilis over the years 2012 and 2013. Five of them presented uveitis, pan-eveitis being the most frequent, with three cases. Two cases presented papilloedema and another displayed retrobulbar optic neuropathy. A total of 62.5% were diagnosed with neurosyphilis, the presence of which was related with compromise of the optic nerve (p = 0.035). None of them gave positive for VDRL in cerebrospinal fluid and they were diagnosed by the presence of FTA antibodies together with high protein levels in cerebrospinal fluid, lymphocytic pleocytosis or intrathecal synthesis of antibodies. In the absence of uveitis, diagnosis was delayed by a mean time of 2.6 months (p = 0.047). All the patients, except one who required a vitrectomy, progressed favourably with intravenous antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS. In cases of neuro-ophthalmological compromise, whether inflammatory or non-inflammatory, the physician must bear syphilis in mind as a potential causation in order to avoid delays in the diagnosis, since early well-tailored treatment can prevent permanent loss of sight.


TITLE: Diferencias clinicas y terapeuticas de la afectacion neurooftalmologica secundaria a sifilis.Introduccion. Existen multiples formas de afectacion neurooftalmologica secundaria a sifilis, no siempre bien conocidas. Nuestro objetivo es conocer las diferencias clinicas y de tratamiento en estos pacientes. Casos clinicos. Se incluyeron ocho pacientes diagnosticados de afectacion ocular y neurooftalmologica por sifilis durante los años 2012 y 2013. Cinco presentaron uveitis, siendo la panuveitis la forma mas frecuente, con tres casos. Dos casos presentaron papiledema, y otro, neuropatia optica retrobulbar. Un 62,5% fue diagnosticado de neurosifilis, cuya presencia se relaciono con la afectacion del nervio optico (p = 0,035). Ninguno de ellos presento positividad para VDRL en el liquido cefalorraquideo, y se diagnosticaron por la presencia de anticuerpos FTA junto con hiperproteinorraquia, pleocitosis linfocitaria o sintesis intratecal de anticuerpos. En ausencia de uveitis, se produjo un retraso diagnostico medio de 2,6 meses (p = 0,047). Todos los pacientes, salvo uno que preciso vitrectomia, evolucionaron favorablemente con antibioterapia intravenosa. Conclusiones. En casos de afectacion neurooftalmologica, inflamatoria y no inflamatoria, el clinico debe tener en cuenta la sifilis como potencial etiologia para evitar un retraso diagnostico, puesto que un adecuado tratamiento precoz puede evitar una perdida de vision permanente.


Subject(s)
Optic Neuritis/etiology , Panuveitis/etiology , Papilledema/etiology , Syphilis/complications , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological , Female , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neurosyphilis/cerebrospinal fluid , Neurosyphilis/complications , Neurosyphilis/drug therapy , Penicillin G/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Puncture , Symptom Assessment , Syphilis/diagnosis , Syphilis/drug therapy , Syphilis Serodiagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...