Long-term directional deep brain stimulation: Monopolar review vs. local field potential guided programming.

BACKGROUND: Directional subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease can increase stimulation threshold for adverse effects and widen the therapeutic window. However, selection of programming settings is time consuming, requiring a thorough monopolar clinical review. To overcome this, programming may be guided by intraoperatively recording local field potential beta oscillations (13-35 Hz). OBJECTIVES: 1) Evaluate whether the power of beta oscillations recorded intraoperatively can predict the clinically most effective directional contacts; and 2) assess long-term directional stimulation outcomes between patients programmed based on clinical monopolar review and patients programmed based on beta activity. METHODS: We conducted a non-randomized, prospective study with 24 Parkinson's disease patients divided into two groups. In group A (14 patients, 2016-2018), we investigated whether beta activity in the directional contacts correlated with clinical efficacy. Stimulating parameters were selected according to clinical monopolar review and mean follow-up was 27 months. In group B (10 patients, 2018-2019), stimulating parameters were selected according to beta activity and mean follow-up was 13 months. RESULTS: Neurophysiological results showed a strong correlation between clinical efficacy and the low-beta sub-band. Contacts with highest beta peaks increased the therapeutic window by 25%. Selecting the two contacts with highest beta peaks provided an 82% probability of selecting the best clinical contact. Clinical results showed similar improvements in group A (motor score, 72% reduction; levodopa-equivalent daily dose, 65% reduction) and B (72% and 63% reduction, respectively), maintained at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our results validate the long-term efficacy of directional stimulation guided by intraoperative local field potential beta oscillations.

Role of radiotherapy in the chemotherapy-containing multidisciplinary management of patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To analyze prognostic factors associated with long-term outcomes in patients with resected pancreatic cancer treated with chemotherapy (CT) and surgery with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1995 to December 2012, 95 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and locoregional disease [clinical stage IB-IIA (n = 45; 47%), IIB-IIIC (n = 50; 53%)] were treated with curative resection [R0 (n = 52; 55%), R1 (n = 43, 45%)] and CT with (n = 60; 63%) or without (n = 35; 37%) EBRT (45-50.4 Gy). Additionally, 29 patients (48%) also received a pre-anastomosis IOERT boost (applicator diameter size, 7-10 cm; dose, 10-15 Gy; beam energy, 9-18 MeV). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 17.2 months (range, 1-182), 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional control were 28, 20, and 53%, respectively. Univariate analyses showed that IIB-IIIC stage (HR, 2.23; p = 0.04), R1 margin resection status (HR, 2.09; p = 0.04), no vascular resection (HR, 0.42; p = 0.02), and not receiving external beam radiotherapy (HR, 2.70; p = 0.004) were associated with locoregional recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, only R1 margin resection status (HR, 2.63; p = 0.009) and not receiving EBRT (HR, 2.91; p = 0.002) retained significance with regard to locoregional recurrence. We observed no difference in toxicity between patients treated with or without EBRT (p = 0.44). Overall treatment mortality was 3%. No long-term treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Although adjuvant CT is still the standard of care for resected pancreatic tumors, OS remains modest owing to the high risk of distant metastases. Locoregional treatment needs to be tested in the context of more efficient systemic therapy.

Intraoperative radiation therapy opportunities for clinical practice normalization: Data recording and innovative development.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) refers to the delivery of a high dose of radiation at the time of surgery. AIM: To analyze clinical and research-oriented innovative activities developed in a 17-year period using intraoperative electron-radiation therapy (IOeRT) as a component of treatment in a multidisciplinary approach for cancer management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 01/1995 to 03/2012 IOeRT procedures were registered in a specific Hospital-based database. Research and developments in imaging and recording for treatment planning implementation are active since 2006. RESULTS: 1004 patients were treated and 1036 IORT procedures completed. Median age of patients was 61 (range 5 months to 94 years). Gender distribution was male in 54% of cases and female in 46%. Disease status at the time of IORT was 796 (77%) primary and 240 (23%) recurrent. Cancer type distribution included: 62% gastrointestinal, 18% sarcoma, 5% pancreas, 2% paediatric, 3% breast, 77 7% oligotopic recurrences, 2% other. IORT technical characteristics were: Applicator size 5 cm 22%, 6 cm 21%, 7 cm 21%, 8 cm 15%, 9 cm 6%, 10 cm 7% 12 cm 5% 15 cm 3%. Electron energies: 6 MeV 19%, 8 MeV 15%, 10 MeV 15%, 12 MeV 23%, 15 MeV 19%, 18 MeV 6%, other 3%. Multiple fields: 108 (11%). Dose: 7.5 Gy 3%, 10 Gy 35%, 12 Gy 3%, 12.5 Gy 49%, 15 Gy 5%, other 5%. CONCLUSION: An IORT programme developed in an Academic Hospital based on practice-oriented medical decisions is an attractive interdisciplinary oncology initiative proven to be able to generate an intensive clinical activity for cancer patient quality care and a competitive source of scientific patient-oriented research, development and innovation.

Intraoperative radiation therapy, opportunities for clinical practice normalization: MEDTING, a scientific platform.

AIM: To use a platform to analyze a subgroup specialized in evaluation of patients candidates to IOERT. BACKGROUND: Medting is a project that was initiated to support daily clinical activity, knowledge management and medical education by sharing information with other physicians. The project began at the "Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón", which has a dedicated oncology physician's multi-specialist committee. There are many scientific social networks all over the world. Medting is the only platform that specializes in healthcare and has been developed for hospital purposes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medting brings all together the relevant clinical information from electronic medical records and picture archiving about the patient to study. Subplatform Medting-IORT was created on February 2, 2012 at the Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon. It has 23 members, have been registered 18 cases with 238 multimedia images. RESULTS: Medting started with 28 physicians and five departments. After 6 months, proof of concept period, there are 225 physicians, more than 120 medical students and 39 departments in 3 hospitals using the scientific social network. Furthermore, the project is being extended on three more hospitals in Madrid. CONCLUSION: Medting gives the opportunity to oncology physicians to access all relevant clinical information with the ability to discuss case notes and view images at any time. The impact of the Medting platform in a subgroup working team to evaluate IOERT patients candidates is included in the analysis. The use of a constantly updated repository based on real cases and the documentation of the internal activity of the tumor committee beyond the medical record, has become an extraordinary tool for teaching, training and learning.

Multidisciplinary therapy for patients with locally oligo-recurrent pelvic malignancies.

PURPOSE: To analyze prognostic factors and long-term outcomes in patients with locally recurrent pelvic cancer (LRPC) treated with a multidisciplinary approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From January 1995 to December 2011, 81 patients [rectal (47 %); gynecologic (39 %); retroperitoneal sarcoma (14 %)] underwent extended surgery [multiorgan (58 %), bone (35 %), vascular (9 %), soft tissue (63 %)] and intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) to treat recurrent tumors in the pelvic region. Thirty-five patients (43 %) received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 39 months (6-189 months); the 1- 3- and 5-year rates of locoregional control (LRC) were 83, 53, and 41 %, respectively. Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed worse LRC in patients who did not receive integrated EBRT as rescue treatment of pelvic recurrence (p = 0.003) or underwent non-radical resection (p = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis EBRT, non-radical resection, and tumor fragmentation retained significance (p = 0.002, p = 0.004, and p = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Radical resection, absence of tumor fragmentation and addition of EBRT for rescue are associated with improved LRC in patients with LRPC. Our results suggest that this group can benefit from EBRT combined with extended surgical resection and IOERT.

Chemoradiation for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma with or without intraoperative radiation therapy boost: Long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To analyze prognostic factors associated with long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and surgery with or without intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1995 to December 2012, 60 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and locoregional disease (clinical stage IB [n = 13; 22%], IIA [n = 16; 27%], IIB [n = 22; 36%], IIIC [n = 9; 15%]) were treated with CRT (45-50.4 Gy before surgery [n = 19; 32%] and after surgery [n = 41; 68%]) and curative resection (R0 [n = 34; 57%], R1 [n = 26, 43%]). Twenty-nine patients (48%) also received a pre-anastomosis IOERT boost (applicator diameter size, 7-10 cm; dose, 10-15 Gy; beam energy, 9-18 MeV). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 15.9 months (range, 1-182), 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional control were 20%, 13%, and 58%, respectively. Univariate analyses showed that R1 margin resection status (HR, 3.17; p = 0.04), not receiving IOERT (HR, 7.33; p = 0.01), and postoperative CRT (HR, 5.12; p = 0.04) were associated with a higher risk of locoregional recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, only margin resection status (HR, 3.0; p = 0.05) and not receiving IOERT (HR, 6.75; p = 0.01) retained significance with regard to locoregional recurrence. Postoperative mortality and perioperative complications were 3% (n = 2) and 43% (n = 26). CONCLUSIONS: Although local control is good in the radiation-boosted area, OS remains modest owing to high risk of distant metastases. Intensified locoregional treatment needs to be tested in the context of more efficient systemic therapy.

Prognostic impact of external beam radiation therapy in patients treated with and without extended surgery and intraoperative electrons for locally recurrent rectal cancer: 16-year experience in a single institution.

PURPOSE: To analyze prognostic factors associated with survival in patients after intraoperative electrons containing resective surgical rescue of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From January 1995 to December 2011, 60 patients with LRRC underwent extended surgery (n=38: multiorgan [43%], bone [28%], soft tissue [38%]) or nonextended (n=22) surgical resection, including a component of intraoperative electron-beam radiation therapy (IOERT) to the pelvic recurrence tumor bed. Twenty-eight (47%) of these patients also received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (range, 30.6-50.4 Gy). Survival outcomes were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 36 months (range, 2-189 months), and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rates for locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS) were 86%, 52%, and 44%; and 78%, 53%, 43%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, R1 resection, EBRT at the time of pelvic rerecurrence, no tumor fragmentation, and non-lymph node metastasis retained significance with regard to LRR. R1 resection and no tumor fragmentation showed a significant association with OS after adjustment for other covariates. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT treatment integrated for rescue, resection radicality, and not involved fragmented resection specimens are associated with improved LRC in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. Additionally, tumor fragmentation could be compensated by EBRT. Present results suggest that a significant group of patients with LRRC may benefit from EBRT treatment integrated with extended surgery and IOERT.

Clinical significance of VEGFR-2 and ¹8F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax pretreatment score in predicting the long-term outcome of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

PURPOSE: Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), epidermal growth factor receptor-1 (EGFR), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) stimulate key processes involved in tumor progression and are important targets for cancer drugs. (18)F-FDG maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is a marker of tumor metabolic activity. The purpose of this study was to measure SUVmax combined with VEGFR-2, EGFR and COX-2 proteins in pretreatment tumor biopsies from patients with locally advanced rectal cancer receiving intensive neoadjuvant treatment and to correlate the findings with clinical outcome. METHODS: VEGFR-2, EGFR and COX-2 were measured using the immunoreactive score (IRS). SUVmax (median 8.4) was quantified in tumors with molecular overexpression (IRS ≥3 + SUVmax ≥ 8.4 indicating active tumors; SUVmax <8.4 indicating inactive tumors). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to explore associations between tumor markers, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The study group comprised 38 patients with a median follow-up of 69.3 months (range 4.5 - 92 months). Multivariate analysis showed that active tumors (overexpressing VEGFR-2, high SUVmax) were associated with worse DFS (HR 4.73, 95 % CI 1.18 - 22.17; p = 0.04) and OS (HR 4.28, 95 % CI 1.04 - 20.12; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Active tumors overexpressing VEGFR-2 are associated with a worse overall outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with induction chemotherapy followed by pelvic chemoradiation and surgery. The optimal diagnostic cut-off level for this novel biomarker association should be investigated. Evaluation in a clinical trial is required to determine whether selected patients could benefit from a VEGFR-targeting drug.

Preoperative chemoradiation with oral tegafur within a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in patients with T3-4 rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity in terms of downstaging histologic patterns of residual tumor and clinical tolerance of a neoadjuvant chemoradiation program with oral tegafur for rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From May 1998 to May 2001, 62 consecutive patients with cT(3-4) or cN(+) rectal cancer, or both, were treated with 45-50 Gy (1.8 Gy/day; 25 fractions) and oral tegafur 1200 mg/day. Surgery was performed 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation. All patients received a boost with intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT) over the presacral space. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity consisted on Grade 3 anemia in 1 patient. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild. Fifteen patients (23%) had Grade 3 dermatitis, 16 (25%) had Grade 3, and 2 (3%) had Grade 4 proctitis. The median dose of radiotherapy was 50.4 Gy. Surgery consisted on anterior resection in 38 patients (61%) and abdominoperineal amputation in 24 (39%). Five complete pathologic responses were observed (8%), and 29 patients (47%) had a minimal microscopic residual tumor (mic category). The total downstaging rate was 68%. With a median follow-up of 46 months, the pelvic control rate was 95%, disease-free survival 74.1%, and overall survival 76.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with oral tegafur is feasible, well tolerated, and active, with the additional advantage of offering the convenience of oral chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with tegafur in cancer of the pancreas: initial analysis of clinical tolerance and outcome.

The early institutional experience in the neoadjuvant treatment of potentially resectable pancreatic carcinoma using oral Tegafur as radioenhancing agent is analyzed. Fifteen patients (10 male and 5 female, mean age of 61 years) were treated over a 30-month period. Tegafur dose was 1,200 mg/d along the external radiotherapy period (45-55 consecutive days). Preoperative radiotherapy achieved a total dose of 45 to 50 Gy (1.8 Gy/d). Intraoperative electron boost (10-15 Gy) was delivered at the time of surgery. Hematologic tolerance showed a significant decrease of neutrophil and platelet counts from the outset to the end of the neoadjuvant period (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Five grade III vomiting episodes (33%) were also registered. In 9 patients (60%), surgical resection was performed after chemoradiation. Three complete pathologic responses (pT0 specimens) were identified; in seven cases, the resection achieved tumor-free surgical margins of the specimen. With a median follow-up of 21 months, median survival time was 17 months, with actuarial rates of 45% at 1 year and 24% at 3 years. Median survival for the resected patients was 23 months, and for the unresected patients median survival was 8 months (p = 0.02). The overall median survival in completely resected patients was 28 months, with a 71% survival rate at 1 and 3 years. It is concluded that the treatment scheme described is feasible and acceptably tolerated. The use of oral Tegafur seems to induce results similar to those of other therapeutic protocols using intravenous radioenhancing chemotherapy.

Intraoperative presacral electron boost following preoperative chemoradiation in T3-4Nx rectal cancer: initial local effects and clinical outcome analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To analyze early results of a single institution experience using adjuvant intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) presacral boost in locally advanced rectal cancer following preoperative chemoradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 63 month period (March 1995-June 2000), 100 consecutive T(3-4)N(x) rectal cancer patients were treated with preoperative chemoradiation (45-50 Gy plus oral Tegafur or 5-Fluorouracil continuous intravenous infusion), radical surgery and IOERT presacral boost (mean dose, 12.5 Gy; range, 10-15 Gy). Adjuvant chemotherapy (5-FU-leucovorin: 4-6 cycles) was given to 52 patients. The median age was 63 years, and 39 patients were >or=70 years old (65 males). Clinical staging was performed with computed tomography (94%) and/or endorectal ultrasound (71%) categorizing 90 cT(3), 10 cT(4), 20 cN(x), and 36 cN(+). Abdomino-perineal resection was performed in 41 cases. RESULTS: The IOERT cancellation rate was 6%. With a median follow-up of 23 months in IOERT treated patients, three developed pelvic recurrence: one anastomotic and one in the posterior vaginal wall (simultaneously with distant metastatic disease); and one presacral (in-field IOERT) as the only site of initial failure. Distant metastasis has been observed in 14 patients (exceptionally in pT(0-1) downstaged patients: 1/20; 5%). Overall treatment tolerances, including neoadjuvant and surgical segments, were acceptable. The actuarial 4-year estimations of local control, disease-free and overall survival are 94, 75 and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IOERT electron boost to the presacral region is feasible to integrate systematically in the intensive combined treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, including neoadjuvant chemoradiation segment. Topography of pelvic recurrences identified 2/3 relapses located in non-IOERT boosted anatomic intrapelvic sites: posterior vaginal wall and anastomotic suture. Presacral recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer seems to be of low incidence, in a non-subspecialized academic surgical practice coordinated with a multidisciplinary oncology evaluation context, if an IOERT boost is included as a component of treatment together with preoperative chemoradiation.