Barriers to the Administration of Epinephrine in Schools.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a serious and growing concern in the school setting as the prevalence of food allergies and food-induced severe allergic reactions continues to increase. METHODS: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted regarding anaphylactic events that occurred during the 2014-2015 school year. Eligible schools were enrolled in the EPIPEN4SCHOOLS® program (Mylan Specialty L.P., Canonsburg, PA), which provides free epinephrine auto-injectors to qualifying US schools. Participating schools completed a 29-item survey on anaphylactic event occurrence and treatment, epinephrine stock, school policies regarding anaphylaxis, school staff training, and school nursing coverage. RESULTS: Responses were provided by 12,275 schools. Epinephrine was administered on school property for 63.7% of reported anaphylactic events (1272/1998). In 38.5% (235/610) of events for which epinephrine was not used, antihistamines were cited as the reason. Only 59.4% of schools cited epinephrine as their standard first-line therapy for anaphylaxis. School nurses were most likely to be trained in anaphylaxis recognition and permitted to administer epinephrine; however, just 53.6% of schools had a full-time nurse on staff. CONCLUSIONS: Process-related barriers to the appropriate use of epinephrine go beyond access to medication. Widespread staff training and review of school policies are needed to ensure that anaphylaxis is appropriately managed in schools.

A somatization comorbidity phenotype impacts response to therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: post-hoc results from the certolizumab pegol phase 4 PREDICT trial.

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities may contribute to disease activity and treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. We defined a somatization comorbidity phenotype (SCP) and examined its influence on response to certolizumab pegol (CZP) using data from the PREDICT trial. METHODS: Patients in PREDICT were randomized to the patient-reported Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) or physician-based Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) for treatment response assessment. Post-hoc analyses identified patients with the SCP, which included diagnosis of depression, fibromyalgia/myalgias, and/or use of medications indicated for treatment of depression, anxiety, or neuropathic pain. The effect of the SCP on RAPID3 or CDAI response at week 12 and low disease activity (LDA; Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate ≤ 3.2) at week 52, in week-12 responders, was analyzed using non-parametric analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). RESULTS: At baseline, 43% (313/733) of patients met the SCP classification. Patients with the SCP were 9% more likely to withdraw from the trial. American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70 responses were 5-14% lower among those with the SCP, and 11% more patients reported adverse events (AEs). Patients without SCP in the CDAI arm were twice as likely to achieve LDA at week 52 compared with those with SCP (32% versus 16%). No differentiation by SCP was observed in the RAPID3 arm (pooled result 21.5%). CONCLUSIONS: We operationalized a potentially important somatization comorbidity phenotype in a trial setting that was associated with a substantially lower likelihood of treatment response and a higher frequency of AEs. Including large numbers of patients with this phenotype in RA trials may reduce the measured clinical effectiveness of a new molecule. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01255761 . Registered on 6 December 2010.

Prevalence and triggers of anaphylactic events in schools.

BACKGROUND: Prevention and management of anaphylaxis in schools is an area of active interest as allergy and asthma rates in children continue to increase. A greater understanding of the prevalence and characteristics of anaphylaxis can help guide preventive and management strategies both within and outside of the school setting, with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to elucidate the epidemiology of and management strategies for anaphylaxis in the school setting. METHODS: A cross-sectional, Web-based survey was administered to schools that participated in an initiative that provides stock epinephrine autoinjectors (EAIs) to qualifying U.S. schools. Representatives from participating schools completed a questionnaire regarding anaphylactic reactions that occurred during the 2014-2015 school year. Weighted analyses were performed to account for differential responses between schools that completed the survey and those that did not. RESULTS: A total of 12,275 of the 45,819 invited schools responded to the survey. The occurrence of one or more anaphylactic events was reported by 1358 schools. Most events (89.8% [1803/2008]) occurred in students. High school students accounted for the largest proportion of anaphylactic reactions among students (40.1% [723/1802]). Food was the most commonly identified anaphylaxis trigger across grade levels, seasons, and geographic regions. The trigger was unknown to the individual who experienced anaphylaxis in 21.8% of the events (436/1998). No known history of allergy or asthma was present in 24.5% (491/2001) and 51.3% (1026/2000) of affected individuals, respectively. Transportation to the hospital or clinic for further treatment and/or management was reported for 72.6% of the individuals with anaphylactic events (1450/1997). Results from the weighted analyses were similar to those of the unweighted analyses. CONCLUSION: Anaphylaxis occurred across grade levels and in individuals with or without known risk factors, which reinforced the need for school preparedness in both management of anaphylaxis and stocking of EAIs.

Anaphylaxis in Schools: Results of the EPIPEN4SCHOOLS Survey Combined Analysis.

A pilot survey described the characteristics of anaphylactic events occurring in an initial set of participating U.S. schools during the 2013-2014 school year. This survey was subsequently readministered to large school districts, which were underrepresented in initial results. A cross-sectional survey was administered to the U.S. schools that were participating in the EPIPEN4SCHOOLS® program (Mylan Specialty L.P., Canonsburg, PA) to assess characteristics of anaphylactic events. Data from large school districts were added to initial findings in this comprehensive combined analysis. A total of 1,140 anaphylactic events were reported among 6,574 responding schools. Of 1,063 anaphylactic events with data on who experienced the event, it was observed that it occurred mostly in students (89.5%, 951/1,063). For students, anaphylactic events were reported across all grades, with 44.9% (400/891) occurring in high school students, 18.9% (168/891) in middle school students, and 32.5% (290/891) in elementary school students. Food was identified as the most common trigger (60.1%, 622/1,035). A majority of schools (55.0%, 3,332/6,053) permitted only the school nurse and select staff to administer epinephrine to treat anaphylaxis. The unpredictability of anaphylaxis is emphasized by its high occurrence in individuals with no known allergies (25.0%). A majority of schools permitted only the school nurse and select staff to treat anaphylaxis. Thus, individuals experiencing an anaphylactic event may frequently encounter staff members not being permitted to administer potentially life-saving epinephrine. Epinephrine auto-injectors provided by the EPIPEN4SCHOOLS program were used to treat 38.0% of events. Anaphylaxis can occur in children with no previously known allergies, illustrating the importance of public access to epinephrine.

Enhancement in specific CD8+ T cell recognition of EphA2+ tumors in vitro and in vivo after treatment with ligand agonists.

The EphA2 receptor tyrosine kinase is an attractive therapeutic target that is commonly overexpressed on solid tumors, with the degree of overexpression associated with disease progression, metastatic potential, and poor prognosis. Agonistic mAbs or ligand (ephrinA1)-Fc fusion protein are capable of inducing EphA2 internalization and degradation, thereby (at least transiently) eliminating the influence of this oncoprotein. We and others have also shown that EphA2 contains multiple peptide epitopes that can be recognized by effector CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells isolated from tumor-bearing patients. Herein, we show that "agonist" reagents that trigger the proteasome-dependent degradation of tumor cell EphA2 result in the improved presentation of peptides derived from (both the extracellular and intracellular domains of) EphA2 in MHC class I complexes expressed on the tumor cell membrane for at least 48 h, as manifested by increased recognition by EphA2-specific CD8(+) T cells in vitro. We also observed that while delivery of ephrinA1-Fc fusion protein or agonist mAb into EphA2(+) tumor lesions promotes EphA2 degradation in situ, this single administration of agent does not dramatically alter tumor progression in a humanized SCID model. However, when combined with the adoptive transfer of normally nontherapeutic (human) anti-EphA2 CD8(+) CTL, this dual-agent regimen results in complete tumor eradication. These results suggest that strategies targeting the conditional proteasome-mediated destruction of tumor cell EphA2 may enable EphA2-specific CD8(+) T cells (of modest functional avidity) to realize improved therapeutic potential.

Improving immunotherapy by conditionally enhancing MHC class I presentation of tumor antigen-derived Peptide epitopes.

Tumors represent an altered self cell type that can be recognized by both the host humoral (B cells, antibodies) and cellular (T cells) adaptive immune systems. Because most known tumor-associated antigens (TAA) recognized by T cells represent overexpressed or aberrantly expressed proteins, which are not mutated and to which tolerance has been developed, the anti-TAA T-cell repertoire available to the cancer patient is of moderate-to-low avidity. Specific vaccinations typically amplify the absolute number of such T cells, but may have little consequence on improving their functional avidity, which may fall below a critical threshold required for effective recognition of tumor cells in situ. This review will discuss methods to improve low-avidity T-cell recognition of cancer cells by manipulating the tumor cells themselves to conditionally express higher levels of TAA-derived peptide epitopes presented in major histocompatibility (MHC) complexes. This may facilitate the design and performance of novel combinational therapies for the effective treatment of a broad range of cancer types.

Expression of EphA2 is prognostic of disease-free interval and overall survival in surgically treated patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Whereas normally expressed at sites of cell-to-cell contact in adult epithelial tissues, recent studies have shown that the receptor tyrosine kinase EphA2 is overexpressed in numerous epithelial-type carcinomas, with the greatest level of EphA2 expression observed in metastatic lesions. In the current study, we have assessed EphA2 expression in archived renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tissues as it relates to patient disease course. Using specific anti-EphA2 monoclonal antibody 208 and immunohistochemistry, we evaluated EphA2 protein expression levels in RCC specimens surgically resected from 34 patients (including 30 conventional clear-cell RCC, 3 papillary, and 1 chromophobic RCC cases) resulting in clinical cures. Regardless of histopathologic subtype, RCC lesions expressing higher levels of EphA2 tended to be of a higher grade (P < 0.05) and larger (P = 0.093), more-highly-vascularized tumors (P = 0.005). Perhaps most notable, the degree of EphA2 overexpression (versus normal matched autologous kidney tissue) seemed predictive of short-term (<1 year) versus longer-term (> or =1 year) disease-free interval (P < 0.001) and of overall survival (P < 0.001) among the RCC patients evaluated. These data suggest that EphA2 expression level may serve as a useful prognostic tool in the clinical management of patients who have been successfully treated with surgery, but who are at greater risk for accelerated disease recurrence and who have a poorer prognosis.

Disease stage variation in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell reactivity to the receptor tyrosine kinase EphA2 in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

We have evaluated CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell responses against a new tumor-associated antigen, the receptor tyrosine kinase EphA2, which is broadly expressed in diverse cancer histologies and is frequently overexpressed in advanced stage/metastatic disease. We report herein that EphA2 is overexpressed in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines and clinical specimens of RCC, and find that the highest levels of EphA2 are consistently found in the most advanced stages of the disease. We identified and synthesized five putative HLA class I-binding and three class II-binding peptides derived from EphA2 that might serve as targets for immune reactivity. Each peptide induced specific, tumor-reactive CD8+ or CD4+T-cell responses as measured using IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assays. The EphA2 peptides elicited relatively weak responses from CD8+ T cells derived from normal healthy volunteers or from RCC patients with active disease. In marked contrast, immune reactivity to EphA2-derived epitopes was greatly enhanced in CD8+ T cells that had been isolated from patients who were rendered disease-free, after surgery. Furthermore, enzyme-linked immunospot analyses demonstrated prominent EphA2-restricted T-helper 1-type CD4+ T cell activity in patients with early stage disease, whereas T-helper 2-type and T regulatory-type responses predominated in patients with more advanced forms of RCC. These data suggest that the immune system of cancer patients actively monitors EphA2-derived epitopes, and that the magnitude and character of T-cell responses to EphA2 epitopes may convey much-needed predictive information about disease stage and outcome.