Gastrectomía por cáncer gástrico: abordaje mínimamente invasivo / Gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Minimally invasive approach

Introducción. El cáncer gástrico en nuestro país es una de las neoplasias más comunes y su diagnóstico generalmente se realiza en estadios avanzados. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir las características sociodemográficas y clínicas, la experiencia quirúrgica, y las complicaciones en los pacientes con cáncer gástrico.Métodos. Se presenta una serie de casos en la que se revisaron las historias clínicas de pacientes con diagnóstico histológico de adenocarcinoma gástrico, a quienes se les practicó gastrectomía mínimamente invasiva en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Bogotá D.C., Colombia, entre enero de 2012 y diciembre de 2018.Resultados. Se realizó gastrectomía por laparoscopia convencional en 31 pacientes (75,6 %) y por laparoscopia asistida por robot en 10 pacientes (24,4 %). Los estadios clínicos fueron IA en 20 pacientes (48,7 %), IB en tres (7,3 %), IIA en nueve (21,9%), IIB en cinco (12,2 %) y IIIA en cuatro pacientes (9,7 %). Se realizaron 24 gastrectomías totales (58,5 %) y 17 distales (41,4 %). No hubo muertes intraoperatorias ni posoperatorias a 30 días. La disección ganglionar predominante fue D2 en el 92,6 % (n=38) de los casos. Se presentaron complicaciones posoperatorias en el 17,1 % (n=7).Discusión. La gastrectomía por cáncer gástrico realizada por vía laparoscópica convencional y la asistida por robot, parecen ser procedimientos seguros y factibles. La determinación de supervivencia libre de enfermedad y mortalidad asociada a cáncer será necesaria para establecer la seguridad oncológica de este tipo de procedimientos en nuestro medio

Introduction. In our country, gastric cancer is one of the most common neoplasms and its diagnosis is generally made in advanced stages. The objective of this study was to describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, surgical experience, and complications in patients with gastric cancer. In our country, gastric cancer is one of the most common neoplasms and its diagnosis is generally made in advanced stages. The objective of this study was to describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, surgical experience, and complications in patients with gastric cancer.Methods. A series of cases is presented in which the medical records of patients with a histological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma, who underwent minimally invasive gastrectomy at the National Cancer Institute of Bogotá, Colombia, between January 2012 and December 2018. Results. Conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy was performed in 31 patients (75.6%) and by robot-assisted laparoscopy in 10 patients (24.4%). The clinical stages were IA in 20 patients (48.7%), IB in three (7.3%), IIA in nine (21.9%), IIB in five (12.2%), and IIIA in four patients (9.7%). Twenty-four total gastrectomies (58.5%) and 17 distal gastrectomies (41.4%) were performed. There were no intraoperative or postoperative deaths at 30 days. The predominant lymph node dissection was D2 in 92.6% (n = 38) of the cases. Postoperative complications occurred in 17.1% (n=7). Discussion. Gastrectomy due to gastric cancer, performed by conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches, appear to be safe and feasible procedures. The determination of disease-free survival and cancer-associated mortality will be necessary to establish the oncological safety of this type of procedure in our environment

Patients With Unexplained Dilated Pancreatic Duct Have High Risk of Biliopancreatic Malignancy Detected by EUS.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with unexplained dilated common bile duct (CBD) and/or dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) on noninvasive abdominal imaging tests are often referred for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in order to rule out biliopancreatic cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of EUS in this patient group. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted. Patients with unexplained dilated CBD and/or MPD on abdominal imaging, who underwent EUS, were enrolled. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients underwent EUS (CBD dilation n=38, MPD dilation n=5 or both n=11). In 31/54 patients (57.4%), EUS revealed pathologic findings. Sixteen patients (29.6%) had EUS evidence of biliopancreatic cancer and 15 patients (27.7%) had benign pathology. Ten (62.5%) of the patients with biliopancreatic cancer had MPD dilation. MPD dilation was significantly associated with malignancy (P=0.017). CONCLUSION: Patients with unexplained dilated MPD on noninvasive image have a high risk of biliopancreatic malignancy detected by EUS.

Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pediatric Patients With Pancreatobiliary Disease.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is one of the greatest advances of the last few decades for the diagnostic and therapeutic approach of gastrointestinal diseases in adults. However, there are limitations to the application of the procedure in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to describe the diagnostic yield and therapeutic role of EUS in pediatric patients with pancreatobiliary disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on a prospective database of pediatric patients who underwent diagnostic and therapeutic endosonographic procedures. All patients seen in a 12-year period were included. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included, including 32 (59.3%) female individuals, with an average age of 16 (9 to 17) years. EUS was abnormal in 46 (85%) patients. Of the abnormal procedures, 4 (7.4%) corresponded to therapeutic ones. The main indication of the study was recurrent acute pancreatitis in 29 (54%). The main endosonographic findings were microlithiasis in 14 (25.9%), chronic pancreatitis in 9 (16.7%), and pancreatic tumors in 6 (11.1%) patients. Follow-up was performed in 31 (57.4%) patients, 19/31 patients underwent surgery, and 4/31 patients had endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The median follow-up was 910 (2 to 3916) days. In 100% of the patients with follow-up, the initial diagnosis of EUS was confirmed. CONCLUSION: EUS is a useful and safe tool in the pediatric population with pancreatobiliary diseases.

Biliary Drainage in Patients With Failed ERCP: Percutaneous Versus EUS-guided Drainage.

AIM: The goal of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of bile duct drains guided by endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EGBD) versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective comparative study. Patients with obstruction of the bile duct who underwent the EGBD or PTBD procedure and had at least 1 previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography that failed or was inaccessible to the second duodenal portion were included. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were initially evaluated and 28 were excluded. There were 39 (62.9%) women, with a median age of 55.6 years (range, 22 to 88 y). The etiology of biliary obstruction was malignancy in 35 (56.4%) patients. Differences between EGBD versus PTBD groups were in technical success (90% vs. 78%; P=0.3), clinical success (96% vs. 63%; P=0.04), complications (6.6% vs. 28%; P=0.04), length of stay [6.5 d (range, 0 to 11 d) vs. 12.5 d (range, 6.2 to 25 d)] (P=0.009), and costs 1440.15±240.94 versus 2165.87±241.10 USD (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: EGBD is associated with a higher clinical success rate and safety, shorter hospital stays, and lower cost compared with PTBD.