Impact of lung transplantation on diastolic dysfunction in recipients with pretransplant pulmonary hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary hypertension can cause left ventricular diastolic dysfunction through ventricular interdependence. Moreover, diastolic dysfunction has been linked to adverse outcomes after lung transplant. The impact of lung transplant on diastolic dysfunction in recipients with pretransplant pulmonary hypertension is not defined. In this cohort, we aimed to assess the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction, the change in diastolic dysfunction after lung transplant, and the impact of diastolic dysfunction on lung transplant outcomes. METHODS: In a large, single-center database from January 2011 to September 2021, single or bilateral lung transplant recipients with pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure > 20 mm Hg) were retrospectively identified. Those without a pre- or post-transplant echocardiogram within 1 year were excluded. Diastolic dysfunction was diagnosed and graded according to the American Society of Echocardiography 2016 guideline on assessment of diastolic dysfunction (present, absent, indeterminate). McNemar's test was used to examine association between diastolic dysfunction pre- and post-transplant. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were used to assess associations between pre-lung transplant diastolic dysfunction and post-lung transplant 1-year outcomes, including mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome grade 1 or higher-free survival. RESULTS: Of 476 primary lung transplant recipients, 205 with pulmonary hypertension formed the study cohort (mean age, 56.6 ± 11.9 years, men 61.5%, mean pulmonary artery pressure 30.5 ± 9.8 mm Hg, left ventricular ejection fraction < 55% 9 [4.3%]). Pretransplant, diastolic dysfunction was present in 93 patients (45.4%) (grade I = 8, II = 84, III = 1), absent in 16 patients (7.8%), and indeterminate in 89 patients (43.4%), and 7 patients (3.4%) had missing data. Post-transplant, diastolic dysfunction was present in 7 patients (3.4%) (grade I = 2, II = 5, III = 0), absent in 164 patients (80.0%), and indeterminate in 15 patients (7.3%), and 19 patients (9.3%) had missing data. For those with diastolic dysfunction grades in both time periods (n = 180), there was a significant decrease in diastolic dysfunction post-transplant (148/169 patients with resolved diastolic dysfunction; McNemar's test P < .001). Pretransplant diastolic dysfunction was not associated with major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08, 95% CI, 0.72-1.62; P = .71), bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome-free survival (HR, 0.67, 95% CI, 0.39-1.56; P = .15), or mortality (HR, 0.70, 95% CI, 0.33-1.46; P = .34) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Diastolic dysfunction is highly prevalent in lung transplant candidates with normal left ventricular systolic function and pulmonary hypertension, and resolves in most patients after lung transplant regardless of patient characteristics. Pre-lung transplant diastolic dysfunction was not associated with adverse lung or cardiac outcomes after lung transplant. Collectively, these findings suggest that the presence of diastolic dysfunction in lung transplant recipients with pulmonary hypertension has no prognostic significance, and as such diastolic dysfunction and the associated clinical syndrome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction should not be considered a relative contraindication to lung transplant in such patients.

Time since primary transplant and poor functional status predict survival after redo lung transplant.

Background: In previous studies, lower functional status measured by Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) correlated with worse survival after redo lung transplant. We hypothesize that combining reduced functional status and time from primary lung transplant will correlate with the etiology of lung allograft failure after primary lung transplant and more accurately predict survival after redo lung transplant. Methods: This retrospective study was approved by University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board. From the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database, 739 patients underwent redo lung transplant (01/01/2005-8/30/2019). Pre-lung transplant characteristics, KPS, time between primary and redo lung transplant, outcomes, overall survival were evaluated. Paired comparisons were used to compare pre-transplant variables. A Cox regression model was fit to examine re-transplant survival. Due to non-proportional hazards, time between transplants was split into <1-year vs. 1+ years and analyzed with time-dependent coefficients, with follow-up time considered in three segments (0-6, 6-24, 24+ months). Results: After KPS grouping (10-40%, 50-70%, 80-100%), KPS 10-40% were less likely to be discharged after primary transplant and more likely required mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) bridging (P<0.001). Redo lung transplant survival was worse in the KPS 10-40% group who more likely underwent lung transplant <1 year after primary lung transplant. Mortality was significantly higher for patients who underwent redo lung transplant within one year of primary transplant when KPS was 10-40% (P<0.001). These patients were more likely to require redo lung transplant due to primary graft failure or acute cellular rejection. Conclusions: Functional status and time from primary lung transplant are strong predictors of outcome after redo lung transplant. We categorized redo lung transplant recipients in two distinct groups. One group has early allograft failure and poor functional status with a very poor prognosis after redo lung transplant. The other group has chronic allograft failure and overall better functional status with relatively better survival after redo lung transplant. Salvage redo lung transplant for primary allograft failure or acute rejection is associated with low one year survival.

Lung Transplant Recipients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Are at Increased Risk of Death and Early Perioperative Hemorrhage.

Prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been considered a relative contraindication to lung transplantation due to the atherosclerotic disease burden and technical challenges. We hypothesized that lung transplant recipients with prior CABG have increased mortality compared to recipients without prior CABG. Further, the causes of death are different for lung transplant recipients with prior CABG vs without CABG. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database was queried to define the survival and causes of death of lung transplant recipients with or without CABG during the Lung Allocation Score era from May 5, 2005 to December 31, 2015. The primary end-points were all-cause mortality at 1 year and 5 years, as well as mortality due to major causes of death. This retrospective study cohort included a total of 13,064 lung transplant recipients, of whom 319 patients had previously undergone CABG, representing 2.4% of all transplants. Patients without prior CABG were more likely to have undergone bilateral lung transplantation compared to those with prior CABG (61.2 % vs 15.7%, P < 0.001). Among patients with prior CABG, single right lung transplant was most common. Overall patient survival at 1 year was 76.8% for lung transplant recipients with prior CABG and 85.4% for patients without prior CABG. Freedom from death due to graft failure at 1 and 5 years in patients with a prior CABG was 93.1% and 76.2% respectively, cardiac and/or cerebrovascular disease 96.2% and 88.5% respectively, and hemorrhage 97.9% and 97.5% respectively. In a multivariate Cox regression model utilizing time-dependent coefficients for recipient age, prior CABG, among several other risk factors, was associated with increased mortality within 1 year. Prior CABG is associated with short- and long-term mortality in lung transplant recipients with history of CABG despite the majority of these patients undergoing single lung transplantation vs bilateral lung transplantation. Graft failure and/or pulmonary causes are the most common cause of death regardless of whether or not the lung transplant recipient had prior CABG, but patients with prior CABG are at increased risk of death due to graft failure, cardiac or cerebrovascular disease, and hemorrhage.

Extracorporeal photopheresis to attenuate decline in lung function due to refractory obstructive allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) to attenuate the rate of decline of FEV1 in lung transplant recipients with refractory bronchiolitis obliterans. Due to an observed higher than expected early mortality, a preliminary analysis was performed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects from 10 lung transplant centres were assigned to ECP treatment or to observation based on spirometric criteria, with potential crossover for those under observation. The primary endpoint of this study was to assess response to ECP (i.e., greater than a 50% decrease in the rate of FEV1 decline) before and 6 months after initiation of ECP. Mortality was also evaluated 6 and 12 months after enrolment as a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Of 44 enrolled subjects, 31 were assigned to ECP treatment while 13 were initially assigned to observation on a non-random basis using specific spirometric inclusion criteria (seven of the observation patients subsequently crossed over to receive ECP). Of evaluable patients, 95% of patients initially assigned to treatment responded to ECP with rates of FEV1 decline that were reduced by 93% in evaluable ECP-treated patients. Mortality rates (percentages) at 6 and 12 months after enrolment was 32% and 41%, respectively. The most common (92%) primary cause of death was respiratory or graft failure. Significantly (p = 0.002) higher rates of FEV1 decline were observed in the non-survivors (-212 ± 177 ml/month) when compared to the survivors (-95 ± 117 ml/month) 12 months after enrolment. In addition, 18 patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) diagnosis within 6 months of enrolment had lost 38% of their baseline lung function at BOS diagnosis and 50% of their lung function at enrolment. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses suggest that earlier detection and treatment of BOS should be considered to appreciate improved outcomes with ECP.

Separate Effect of Perioperative Recombinant Human Factor VIIa Administration and Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusions on Midterm Survival in Lung Transplantation Recipients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between blood product transfusion, with or without recombinant human activated factor VIIa, and survival after lung transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a single center with follow-up out to 6 years post-transplantation. SETTING: Single-center academic lung transplantation program. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 265 adult patients who underwent single or bilateral sequential lung transplantation from March 2011 to June 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Overall survival using Kaplan-Meier curves was compared among the following 3 cohorts: those not transfused with blood products, those transfused with blood products, and those given blood products and recombinant human activated factor VIIa. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), confidence intervals (CIs), and p values. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients received no packed red blood cell transfusions, 149 received packed red blood cell transfusions, and 38 received both packed red blood cell transfusions and recombinant human activated factor VII. Packed red blood cell transfusion was associated with an increased risk of mortality that did not reach statistical significance (HR 2.168, CI 0.978-4.805; p = 0.057). Additional packed red blood cells beyond 15 U were associated with worsened survival (HR 1.363, CI 1.137-1.633; p = 0.001), but recombinant human activated factor VIIa did not increase the risk of mortality. CONCLUSION: Blood product transfusion during and after lung transplantation is associated with decreased survival, especially with large-volume transfusions. Survival is not worse with recombinant human activated factor VIIa administration, but additional studies are needed to determine whether recombinant human activated factor VIIa administration reduces the need for blood product transfusions.

Induction type and outcomes for kidney graft and patient survival in recipients with prior lung transplantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Induction immunosuppression regimens for kidney transplants in lung transplant recipients vary widely. We studied the impact of induction types for kidney after lung transplant recipients. METHODS: Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database between 1994 and 2015, we studied outcomes of patients and kidney grafts for 330 kidney after lung transplant recipients for whom induction before kidney transplant included depletional (n = 115), non-depletional (n = 170), or no induction (steroids only; n = 45). We studied risk factors for recipient and graft survival using Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for kidney and lung induction, kidney donor type, dialysis status, recipient and donor ages, time from lung to kidney transplant, cause of lung disease, bilateral vs single lung transplant, diabetes, and human leukocyte antigen mismatches before kidney transplant, with transplant center as a random effect. RESULTS: There was no difference between groups in patient survival or death-censored kidney allograft survival. The 1-year kidney acute rejection rates were 15.5%, 7.14%, and 0% in depletional, non-depletional, and no induction groups, respectively. In the Cox model for patient survival, living kidney donor recipients and bilateral lung transplant recipients were favorable predictors. For death-censored graft survival, kidney induction type did not predict graft survival. Results did not change when models only included recipients on tacrolimus and mycophenolate based maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: The type of kidney induction did not influence patient or kidney graft survival following kidney transplants for those with previous lung transplants. No induction may be the preferred choice for kidney after lung transplant because of the lack of benefits from biologic induction in this large cohort.

Need for tracheostomy after lung transplant predicts decreased mid- and long-term survival.

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy is an important adjunct for lung transplant patients requiring prolonged ventilation. We explored the effects of post-transplant tracheostomy on survival and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplant. METHODS: A retrospective, single center analysis was performed on all lung transplant recipients during the Lung Allocation Score (LAS) era. Risk factors for post-transplant tracheostomy or death within 30 days were assessed. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between tracheostomy within 30 days after transplant and survival at 1 and 3 years. A total of 403 patients underwent single or bilateral lung transplant between May 2005 and February 2016 with complete data for 352 cases, and 35 patients (9.9%) underwent tracheostomy or died (N = 10, 2.8%) within 30 days. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, primary graft dysfunction grade 3 (PGD3) was associated with a composite end point of tracheostomy or death within 30 days (HR 3.11 (1.69, 5.71), P-value < .001). Tracheostomy within 30 days was associated with decreased survival at 1(HR 4.25 [1.75, 10.35] P-value = .001) and 3 years (HR 2.74 [1.30, 5.76], P-value = .008), as well as decreased bronchiolitis obliterans (BOS)-free survival at 1 (HR 1.87 [1.02, 3.41] P-value = .042) and 3 years (HR 2.15 [1.33, 3.5], P-value = .002). CONCLUSION: Post-transplant tracheostomy is a marker for advanced lung allograft dysfunction with significant reduction in long-term overall and BOS-free survival.

Donation after circulatory death in lung transplantation-five-year follow-up from ISHLT Registry.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine intermediate-term outcomes of lung transplantation (LTx) recipients from donors after circulatory death (DCD). METHODS: We examined the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Thoracic Transplant Registry data for patients transplanted between January 2003 and June 2017 at 22 centers in North America, Europe, and Australia participating in the DCD Registry. The distribution of continuous variables was summarized as median and interquartile range (IQR) values. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare distribution of continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier survival rates after LTx from January 2003 to June 2016 were compared between DCD-III (Maastricht category III withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy [WLST]) only and donors after brain death (DBD) using the log-rank test. Risk factors for 5-year mortality were investigated using Cox multivariate proportional-hazards model. RESULTS: The study cohort included 11,516 lung transplants, of which 1,090 (9.5%) were DCD lung transplants with complete data. DCD-III comprised 94.1% of the DCD cohort. Among the participating centers, the proportion of DCD-LTx performed each year increased from 0.6% in 2003 to 13.5% in 2016. DCD donor management included extubation in 91%, intravenous heparin in 53% and pre-transplant normothermic ex vivo donor lung perfusion in 15%. The median time interval from WLST to cardiac arrest was 15 minutes (IQR: 11-22 minutes) and to cold flush 32 minutes (IQR: 26-41minutes). Compared with DBD, donor age was higher in DCD-III donors (46 years [IQR: 34-55] vs 40 years [IQR: 24-52]), bilateral LTx was performed more often (88.3% vs 76.6%), and more recipients had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema as their transplant indication. Five-year survival rates were comparable (63% vs 61%, p = 0.72). In multivariable analysis, recipient and donor ages, indication diagnosis, procedure type (single vs bilateral and double LTx), and transplant era (2003-2009 vs 2010-2016) were independently associated with survival (p < 0.001), but donor type was not (DCD-III vs DBD; hazard ratio, 1.04 [0.90-1.19], p = 0.61). CONCLUSION: This ISHLT DCD Registry report with 5-year follow-up demonstrated similar favorable long-term survival in DCD-III and DBD lung donor recipients at 22 experienced centers globally. These data indicate that more extensive use of DCD-LTx would increase donor organ availability and may reduce waiting list mortality.

Portable normothermic ex-vivo lung perfusion, ventilation, and functional assessment with the Organ Care System on donor lung use for transplantation from extended-criteria donors (EXPAND): a single-arm, pivotal trial.

BACKGROUND: Donor lung use for transplantation is the lowest among solid organ tranplants because of several complex and multifactorial reasons; one area that could have a substantial role is the limited capabilities of cold ischaemic storage. The aim of the EXPAND trial was to evaluate the efficacy of normothermic portable Organ Care System (OCS) Lung perfusion and ventilation on donor lung use from extended-criteria donors and donors after circulatory death, which are rarely used. METHODS: In this single-arm, pivotal trial done in eight institutions across the USA, Germany, and Belgium, lungs from extended-criteria donors were included if fulfilling one or more of the following criteria: a ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) to fractional concentration of oxygen inspired air (FiO2) in the donor lung of 300 mm Hg or less; expected ischaemic time longer than 6 h; donor age 55 years or older; or lungs from donors after circulatory death that were recruited and assessed using OCS Lung. Lungs were transplanted if they showed stability of OCS Lung variables, PaO2:FiO2 was more than 300 mm Hg, and they were accepted by the transplanting surgeon. Patients were adult bilateral lung transplant recipients. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of patient survival at day 30 post-transplant and absence of The International Society for Heart & Lung Tranplantation primary-graft dysfunction grade 3 (PGD3) within 72 h post-transplantation, with a prespecified objective performance goal of 65%. The primary analysis population was all transplanted recipients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01963780, and is now complete. FINDINGS: Between Jan 23, 2014, and Oct 23, 2016, 93 lung pairs were perfused, ventilated, and assessed on the OCS Lung. 12 lungs did not meet OCS transplantation criteria so 81 lungs were suitable for transplantation. Two lungs were excluded for logistical reasons, hence 79 (87%) of eligible lungs were transplanted. The primary endpoint was achieved in 43 (54%) of 79 patients and did not meet the objective performance goal. 35 (44%) of 79 patients had PGD3 within the initial 72 h. 78 (99%) of 79 patients had survived at 30 days post-transplant. The mean number of lung graft-related serious adverse events (respiratory failure and major pulmonary-related infection) was 0·3 events per patient (SD 0·5). INTERPRETATION: Despite missing the objective primary endpoint, the portable OCS Lung resulted in 87% donor lung use for transplantation with excellent clinical outcomes. Many lungs declined by other transplant centres were successfully transplanted using this new technology, which implies its use has the potential to increase the number of lung transplants performed worldwide. Whether similar outcomes could be obtained if these lungs were preserved on ice is unknown and remains an area for future research. FUNDING: TransMedics Inc.

Greater survival despite increased complication rates following lung transplant for alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency compared to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-1-antitrypsin (A1AT) deficiency (A1ATD) is characterized by accelerated degradation of lung function. We examined our experience with lung transplantation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with and without A1ATD to compare survival and rates of postoperative surgical complications. METHODS: Patients with A1ATD and non-A1ATD COPD undergoing lung transplantation from 1988-2015 at our institution were analyzed. Complications were categorized into non-gastroenteritis gastrointestinal (GI), wound, airway, and reoperation for bleeding. Overall and complication-free survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty-five patients underwent lung transplant for COPD (98 A1ATD). For A1ATD, 56.1% underwent single lung transplantation (80.6% for COPD). Early overall and complication-free survival was worse for A1ATD, but this trend reversed at longer follow up. Unadjusted estimated survival showed advantage for COPD at 90 days and 1 year, which attenuated by 5 years and reversed at 10 years (P<0.001). On adjusted analysis, A1ATD was associated with a trend toward lower complication-free survival at 90 days and 1 year, due partly to increased rates of post-transplant GI pathology, particularly in the era of the lung allocation score (LAS). CONCLUSIONS: A1ATD lung recipients had worse short-term complication-free survival but improved long-term survival compared to COPD patients. A1ATD was associated with greater risk of new GI pathology after transplant. Close monitoring of A1ATD patients with timely evaluation of GI complaints after transplant is warranted.

Influence of lung donor agonal and warm ischemic times on early mortality: Analyses from the ISHLT DCD Lung Transplant Registry.

BACKGROUND: In this study we aimed to assess the impact of agonal time and warm ischemic time on early survival in Category III donation-after-circulatory-death (DCD) donor lung transplants (LTxs) using data reported to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) DCD Lung Transplant Registry. METHODS: In this retrospective study, data were analyzed for 507 DCD LTxs done between January 2005 and June 2015. DCD lung donor agonal time (defined as withdrawal of life support to cessation of cardiac output) and warm ischemic time (WIT; defined as donor systolic blood pressure <50 mm Hg to cold pulmonary artery flush) were divided into 3 clinical timing categories (<30 minutes, 30 to 60 minutes, >60 minutes) and 3 tertiles. Univariate analysis was undertaken for all categorizations, and Day 30/Day 365 Kaplan‒Meier survival rates were calculated and compared. Multivariable analysis included Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazard of 365-day mortality. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-five and 301 DCD LTxs had data to analyze in the agonal and warm ischemic time groups, respectively. Day 30 and Day 365 post-transplant survival overall were 96% and 90%, respectively, and not statistically different according to agonal or WIT category or tertile. CONCLUSIONS: Current experience with DCD Category III LTx does not show a relationship between the duration of donor agonal phase or warm ischemic time up to 60 minutes and early survival. These results suggest the true limits of clinical DCD allograft warm ischemic times may not yet be reached. Global variations in clinical DCD practice are apparent. Continued accurate recording and analyses of DCD processes is warranted.

Single Versus Bilateral Lung Transplantation for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in the Lung Allocation Score Era.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal disease. Lung transplantation is the only therapy associated with prolonged survival. The ideal transplant procedure for IPF is unclear. Outcomes after single transplantation (SLTx) versus bilateral lung transplantation (BLTx) in IPF patients after introduction of the Lung Allocation Score were examined. METHODS: Records of patients undergoing lung transplantation for IPF at our institution between May 2005 and March 2017 were reviewed to examine the effect of transplant laterality. Primary outcomes were overall, rejection-free, and bronchiolitis obliterans (BOS)-free survival at 1 and 5 years post-transplant. RESULTS: Lung transplantation was performed in 151 IPF patients post-Lung Allocation Score. Most recipients were male with average age 59 ± 8 years. SLTx was performed in 94 patients (62%). In the overall cohort, comparative survival between SLTx and BLTx was similar at 1 and 5 years before and after adjusting for age and pulmonary hypertension (PH). SLTx was associated with shorter ventilator time and intensive care unit stay and trended toward improved survival over BLTx in patients without PH. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SLTx versus BLTx in IPF did not correspond to significantly different survival adjusting for age and PH. BLTx was associated with prolonged postoperative ventilation and length of stay compared with SLTx. Patients without PH, all older patients, and patients with PH and advanced disease should be considered for SLTx for IPF.

Secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension: to treat or not to treat?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to review recent literature related to mechanisms and treatment options for 'secondary' (i.e., WHO Groups 3 and 5) pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). RECENT FINDINGS: Published randomized controlled trials, in general, do not support the use of approved therapies for 'primary' (i.e., WHO Group 1) PAH patients in patients with Group 3 PAH because of the small numbers of patients and inconsistent benefit. Therefore, we currently recommend against the use of these medications for Group 3 PAH. Similarly, there is limited evidence supporting the use of Group 1 PAH medications in Group 5 patients. In most patients with Group 5 PAH, treatment should be directed to the underlying disease. SUMMARY: The utility of PAH-specific therapy in WHO Group 3 PAH is unclear because of the small numbers of patients evaluated and inconsistent beneficial effects observed. There is limited evidence supporting the use of PAH medications in Group 5 patients, and they may be harmful in some cases.

Normothermic ex-vivo preservation with the portable Organ Care System Lung device for bilateral lung transplantation (INSPIRE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) of grade 3 (PGD3) is a common serious complication following lung transplantation. We aimed to assess physiological donor lung preservation using the Organ Care System (OCS) Lung device compared with cold static storage. METHODS: In this non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (INSPIRE) recipients were aged 18 years or older and were registered as standard criteria primary double lung transplant candidates. Eligible donors were younger than 65 years old with a ratio of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood to the fraction of inspired oxygen of more than 300 mm Hg. Transplant recipients were randomly assigned (1:1) with permuted blocks, stratified by centre, to receive standard criteria donor lungs preserved in the OCS Lung device (OCS arm) or cold storage at 4°C (control arm). The composite primary effectiveness endpoint was absence of PGD3 within the first 72 h after transplant and 30-day survival in the per-protocol population, with a stringent 4% non-inferiority margin. Superiority was tested upon meeting non-inferiority. The primary safety endpoint was the mean number of lung graft-related serious adverse events within 30 days of transplant. We did analyses in the per-protocol and intention-to-treat populations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01630434. FINDINGS: Between Nov 17, 2011, and Nov 24, 2014, we randomly assigned 370 patients, and 320 (86%) underwent transplantation (n=151 OCS and n=169 control); follow-up was completed in Nov 24, 2016. The primary endpoint was met in 112 (79·4%) of 141 patients (95% CI 71·8 to 85·8) in the OCS group compared with 116 (70·3%) of 165 patients (62·7 to 77·2) in the control group (non-inferiority point estimate -9·1%; 95% CI -∞ to -1·0; p=0·0038; and superiority test p=0·068). Patient survival at day 30 post-transplant was 135 (95·7%) of 141 patients (95% CI 91·0-98·4) in the OCS group and 165 patients (100%; 97·8-100·0) in the control group (p=0·0090) and at 12 months was 126 (89·4%) of 141 patients (83·1-93·9) for the OCS group compared with 146 (88·1%) of 165 patients (81·8-92·8) for the control group. Incidence of PGD3 within 72 h was reported in 25 (17·7%) of 141 patients in the OCS group (95% CI 11·8 to 25·1) and 49 (29·7%) of 165 patients in the control group (22·8 to 37·3; superiority test p=0·015). The primary safety endpoint was met (0·23 lung graft-related serious adverse events in the OCS group compared with 0·28 events in the control group [point estimate -0·045%; 95% CI -∞ to 0·047; non-inferiority test p=0·020]). In the intention-to-treat population, causes of death at 30 days and in hospital were lung graft failure or lung infection (n=2 for OCS vs n=7 for control), cardiac causes (n=4 vs n=1), vascular or stroke (n=3 vs n=0), metabolic coma (n=0 vs n=2), and generalised sepsis (n=0 vs n=1). INTERPRETATION: The INSPIRE trial met its primary effectiveness and safety endpoints. Although no short-term survival benefit was reported, further research is needed to see whether the reduced incidence of PGD3 within 72 h of a transplant might translate into earlier recovery and improved long-term outcomes after lung transplantation. FUNDING: TransMedics Inc.

Clinical implications of donor age: A single-institution analysis spanning 3 decades.

BACKGROUND: We sought to clarify the effect of donor age as a continuous variable on morbidity and mortality in a single-institution experience. METHODS: From 1986 to 2016, 882 adult lung transplants were performed, including 396 in the lung allocation score era. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association of donor age with overall survival and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) score ≥1-free survival. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association with primary graft dysfunction grade 3. Natural cubic splines were used to explore donor age in a continuous fashion to allow for nonlinear relationships. RESULTS: In the lung allocation score era, unadjusted 5-year survival was not significantly different between 3 a priori-defined donor age groups: age <40, 40 to 54, and age ≥55 years (64%, 61%, and 69%, P = .8). Unadjusted 5-year freedom from BOS ≥1 was not significantly different (34%, 20%, and 33%, respectively, P = .1). After we adjusted for comorbidities, cubic spline analysis demonstrated no effect between donor age as a continuous variable and hazard for mortality at 5 years. Similarly, no interaction was seen between donor age and risk of BOS or primary graft dysfunction 3. Adjusted analysis of all 882 transplants pre- and postinception of the lung allocation score also showed no effect of age on 10-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival of lung transplant recipients was not affected by the age of the donor. These findings support the notion that donor age could be relaxed.

Pulmonary Transplant Salvage Using Ultrasound-Assisted Thrombolysis of Subacute Occlusive Main Pulmonary Artery Embolus.

A 53-year-old woman who underwent bilateral lung transplantation 14 months before presented with 2 to 3 weeks of severe exertional dyspnea. Workup revealed a complete embolic occlusion of her left main pulmonary artery related to a femoral deep venous thrombosis. The occlusion did not respond to systemic anticoagulation, and a trial of catheter-directed thrombolysis was pursued. Flow to the left lower lobe was restored after 2 days of thromobolytic therapy. The patient is alive and well at more than 1 year of follow-up.

Gender differences in long-term survival post-transplant: A single-institution analysis in the lung allocation score era.

The purpose of this study was to clarify the significance of recipient gender status on lung transplant outcomes in a large single-institution experience spanning three decades, we analyzed data from all lung transplants performed in our institution since 1986. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the effect of recipient characteristics on survival and BOS score ≥1-free survival. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association of gender with short-term graft function. About 876 lung transplants were performed between 1986 and 2016. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 5 years post-transplant for females vs males in the LAS era were 71% vs 58%. In the LAS era, females showed greater unadjusted BOS≥1-free survival than males (35% vs 25%, P=.02) over 5 years. Female gender was the only factor in the LAS era significantly associated with improved adjusted 5-year survival [HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.33, 0.95) P=.03]. Conversely, in the pre-LAS era female gender was not associated with improved survival. Female recipients showed significantly improved survival over 5 years compared to males in the LAS era. A prospective analysis of biologic and immunologic differences is warranted.

The University of Minnesota Donor Lung Quality Index: A Consensus-Based Scoring Application Improves Donor Lung Use.

BACKGROUND: A simplified and consensus-based donor scoring process could improve donor lung use. METHODS: To develop the University of Minnesota Donor Lung Quality Index (UMN-DLQI), we used expert opinion to create an online survey that ranked 17 lung donor and recipient factors and graded their importance on a scale of 0 to 10. To arrive at consensus-based weights for each of the 17 factors, we used magnitude estimation (ME) methods. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to evaluate predictive value. An application (app) was developed to simplify the scoring process. A second review process was instituted for every donor offer with an UMN-DLQI score greater than 40 as of September 2014 (post-donor score era). RESULTS: Worldwide, 11 transplantation centers (including ours) completed our survey. Results showed strong consensus among transplantation physicians across disparate practices. UMN-DLQI scores greater than 40 provided a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 55%, and a positive predictive value of 52% for donor offer acceptance. Number of transplants (63 versus 48) and donor lung use (15.1% versus 8.9%; p = 0.02) were significantly better in the post-donor score era without a penalty in transplantation outcomes. There was a trend toward a lower incidence of any primary graft dysfunction within 72 hours (40% versus 75%; p = 0.06) with a UMN-DLQI greater than 40 but no difference in 30-day or 1-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: The UMN-DLQI scoring app is a simple tool for describing the attributes of a donor lung offer. More attention to scores greater than 40 safely improved donor lung use at a single institution.