Radiation Exposure and Safety Considerations in Interventional Radiology: Comparison of a Twin Robotic X-ray System to a Conventional Angiography System.

Background/Objectives: To evaluate radiation exposure in standard interventional radiology procedures using a twin robotic X-ray system compared to a state-of-the-art conventional angiography system. Methods: Standard interventional radiology procedures (port implantation, SIRT, and pelvic angiography) were simulated using an anthropomorphic Alderson RANDO phantom (Alderson Research Laboratories Inc. Stamford, CT, USA) on an above-the-table twin robotic X-ray scanner (Multitom Rax, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) and a conventional below-the-table angiography system (Artis Zeego, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). The phantom's radiation exposure (representing the potential patient on the procedure table) was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters. Height-dependent dose curves were generated for examiners and radiation technologists in representative positions using a RaySafe X2 system (RaySafe, Billdal, Sweden). Results: For all scenarios, the device-specific dose distribution differs depending on the imaging chain, with specific advantages and disadvantages. Radiation exposure for the patient is significantly increased when using the Multitom Rax for pelvic angiography compared to the Artis Zeego, which is evident in the dose progression through the phantom's body as well as in the organ-related radiation exposure. In line with these findings, there is an increased radiation exposure for the performing proceduralist, especially at eye level, which can be significantly minimized by using protective equipment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this study, the state-of-the-art conventional below-the-table angiography system is associated with lower radiation dose exposures for both the patient and the interventional radiology physician compared to an above-the-table twin robotic X-ray system for pelvic angiographies. However, in other clinical scenarios (port implantation or SIRT), both devices are suitable options with acceptable radiation exposure.

Imaging of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Complications: Comparison of Whole Body Low-Dose Computed Tomography and Radiographic Shunt Series.

OBJECTIVE: To determine diagnostic value and radiation exposure of low-dose computed tomography (LD-CT) compared to radiographic shunt series (SS) for the detection of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt complications. METHODS: Fourteen VP shunts were implanted in 7 swine cadavers. Mechanical complications were induced in 50% of VP shunts. Low-dose CT (80 kVp, 10 mAs, Pitch = 1.5) and SS were acquired. Dose area product (DAP) and effective doses for SS and LD-CT were collected. Scoring of diagnostic confidence and blinded readings of SS and CT data were performed. RESULTS: The sensitivity of LD-CT was high (0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.00) with excellent interobserver agreement (κ = 0.88). Similarly, the sensitivity of SS was high (0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.95) with good interobserver agreement (κ = 0.68). In contrast, LD-CT was associated with significantly higher diagnostic confidence (4.64 ± 0.41 vs 2.71 ± 0.73; P < 0.01) and significantly lower radiation exposure (effective dose: 0.26 mSv vs 1.06 mSv; DAP: 265.4 µGym vs 724.8 µGym; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For the assessment of suspected VP shunt complications, LD-CT provides excellent sensitivity and higher diagnostic confidence with lower radiation exposure compared with SS.

Ultra low-dose VCUG in children using a modern flat detectorunit.

OBJECTIVES: To assess dose area products (DAP) and effective doses (ED) of voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) in children using optimized protocols on a modern flat detector unit. METHODS: DAP and ED were evaluated in 651 VCUG (316 girls, median age: 2.25 years) between 2009 and 2012. DAP was analyzed in relation to patient characteristics (gender, age, presence of pathological findings) and experience of performing physician using analysis of variance. ED values were estimated using adapted conversion factors from the literature. Diagnostic image quality was validated by two experienced physicians using a 3-point scale. RESULTS: Median DAP/ED was 0.5 cGycm(2)/4.56 µSv (boys: 0.6 cGycm(2)/6.16 µSv; girls: 0.4 cGycm(2)/3.54 µSv). In 300 studies without pathologic findings DAP was 0.35 cGycm(2), whereas 351 studies with pathologic findings had a median DAP of 0.7 cGycm(2). No significant relationship between DAP and experience of radiologist was observed. Image validation resulted in an overall good to excellent rating. CONCLUSIONS: DAP and ED can be markedly reduced in paediatric VCUG performed with optimized protocols on modern equipment without a noticeable decrease in diagnostic image quality. KEY POINTS: • Voiding cystourethrography is a comprehensive examination in diagnosing vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). • Radiation reduction is achieved in VCUG through modern equipment and optimized protocols. • Low-dose VCUG is possible without noticeable decrease in diagnostic image quality.

Therapeutic angiographic procedures: differences in dose area product between analog image intensifier and digital flat panel detector.

BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure remains an unceasing concern in angiographic procedures. Modern angiography machines such as analog image intensifiers (AII) or the new flat panel detectors (FPD) aim at a further dose reduction. PURPOSE: To present dose area products (DAP) in a broad spectrum of therapeutic angiographic procedures, comparing an AII to an FPD angiography system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 999 peripheral therapeutic angiography procedures performed with an FPD (n = 562) and an AII system (n = 437) were evaluated. DAP, fluoroscopy time, and patients' body mass index (BMI) were recorded. Interventions were classified into five main groups: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA); PTA and stent placement; intra-arterial thrombolysis; embolization procedures; and specialized interventions. RESULTS: DAP values in therapeutic angiographic procedures were significantly higher when performed with the FPD compared to the AII system. The increase of the FPD versus AII system was 100.1% for PTA, 39.9% for PTA and stent placement, 187% for intra-arterial thrombolysis, 31.3% for embolization procedures, and 361% for specialized interventions. These differences persisted after standardizing DAP values to the geometric mean fluoroscopy duration of each procedure. Fluoroscopy times were shorter in all interventions performed at the FPD as compared to the AII system. DAPs increased with higher BMI, but the DAP increase of both systems with elevated BMI was variable, depending on the individual intervention. CONCLUSION: In therapeutic angiographic procedures, the FPD system required higher DAPs despite shorter fluoroscopy times as compared to an AII system. Better ergonomics and speediness of the FPD system may be advantageous in the emergency setting.

Endovascular aneurysm management of a gastroduodenal artery aneurysm in a multipara pregnant woman.

The authors describe a case of an intrapancreatic gastroduodenal artery aneurysm in a pregnant woman. Successful endovascular therapy was performed for the first time in a visceral artery aneurysm during pregnancy as a bailout solution. The attributive risk to the fetus from scattered radiation during endovascular treatment did not exceed a critical level.