ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is challenging due to its diffuse growth pattern, and the positive margin rate after mastectomy is poorly described. METHODS: We retrospectively determined the positive margin rate in those with stage I-III ILC undergoing mastectomy. We evaluated the relationship between management strategy and recurrence free survival (RFS). RESULTS: In 357 patients, the positive margin rate was 10.6% overall and 18.7% in those with T3 tumors. Having a positive margin was associated with significantly shorter RFS on multivariate analysis (p = 0.01). Undergoing additional local treatment (radiation or re-excision) for a positive margin was significantly associated with improved RFS (p = 0.004). Older women with positive margins were significantly less likely to undergo additional local therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Even mastectomy fails to clear margins in a high proportion of patients with large ILC tumors, a finding which may warrant testing neoadjuvant strategies even prior to planned mastectomy.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast , Carcinoma, Lobular , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/surgery , Female , Humans , Incidence , Margins of Excision , Mastectomy , Mastectomy, Segmental , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The intraoperative placement of an enteral feeding tube (FT) during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is based on the surgeon's perception of need for postoperative nutrition. Published preoperative risk factors predicting postoperative morbidity may be used to predict FT need and associated intraoperative placement. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent PD during 2005-2011 was performed by querying the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database with specific procedure codes. Patients were categorized based on how many of 10 possible preoperative risk factors they demonstrated. Groups of patients with scores of ≤ 1 (low) and ≥ 2 (high), respectively, were compared for FT need, length of stay (LoS) and organ space surgical site infections (SSIs). RESULTS: Of 138 PD patients, 82 did not have an FT placed intraoperatively, and, of those, 16 (19.5%) required delayed FT placement. High-risk patients were more likely to require a delayed FT (29.3%) compared with low-risk patients (9.8%) (P = 0.026). The 16 patients who required a delayed FT had a median LoS of 15.5 days, whereas the 66 patients who did not require an FT had a median LoS of 8 days (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, subjects considered as high-risk patients were more likely to require an FT than low-risk patients. Assessment of preoperative risk factors may improve decision making for selective intraoperative FT placement.