Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Optom Vis Sci ; 98(1): 64-72, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33394933

ABSTRACT

SIGNIFICANCE: In intermediate AMD, a simple, clinically feasible vision test of sensitivity to radial deformation is significantly more impaired in eyes with hyperpigmentation than in eyes with large drusen but normal retinal pigmentation, consistent with the former's increased risk of progression to advanced AMD. This ongoing longitudinal study will determine whether this vision measure is predictive of progression to advanced AMD. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether simple, clinically feasible psychophysical measures distinguish between two levels of intermediate AMD that differ in their risk of progression to advanced AMD: eyes with large macular drusen and retinal pigment abnormalities versus eyes with large macular drusen without pigment abnormalities. Abnormal pigmentation in the presence of large drusen is associated with a higher risk of development of advanced AMD. METHODS: Each eye of 39 individuals with the same form of intermediate AMD in both eyes was tested monocularly on a battery of vision tests. The measures (photopic optotype contrast sensitivity, discrimination of desaturated colors, and sensitivity to radial deformation [shape discrimination hyperacuity]) were compared for both dominant and nondominant eyes. ANOVA with eye (dominant or nondominant) as a within-subject factor and retinal status (pigmentary abnormalities present or absent from the macula) as a between-subject factor was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Sensitivity to radial deformation was significantly reduced in eyes with large drusen and pigment changes compared with eyes with large drusen and normal retinal pigmentation (-0.40 ± 0.04 vs. -0.61 ± 0.02, respectively; F = 13.31, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of large macular drusen, performance on a shape discrimination task is related to the presence versus absence of abnormal retinal pigmentation, being poorer in the higher-risk group, supportive of the measure's potential to predict progression to advanced AMD.


Subject(s)
Macular Degeneration/physiopathology , Retinal Drusen/physiopathology , Retinal Pigment Epithelium/pathology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 28(2): 93-104, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32781860

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To present and compare baseline vision findings in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration (E-AMD), intermediate AMD (I-AMD), and age-similar participants with normal aging changes to the retina (No-AMD). METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-seven eyes of 125 individuals (66.4% female, mean age 75.3 years) were tested monocularly using several simple, rapid psychophysical tests: high contrast visual acuity, low contrast visual acuity at reduced luminance, contrast sensitivity, shape discrimination hyperacuity, colour vision, reading rate, and glare recovery. Retinal status was determined using colour fundus photographs that were graded according to the Beckman Initiative for Macular Research Classification Committee scale. Logistic regression analyses with generalized estimating equations were used to assess the association between each vision variable and AMD category, while taking into account the correlation between the two eyes. RESULTS: Three vision measures (contrast sensitivity [CS], shape discrimination hyperacuity [SDH], and colour discrimination [DesatCCS]) were significantly and independently associated with intermediate AMD. Relative Risk Ratios (RRR), 95% Confidence Intervals (in parentheses), beta coefficients, and significance (p) for the I-AMD vs. No-AMD model are: CS: RRR = 6.5 (1.91-22.0), beta = 1.87, p < .01; SDH: RRR = 2.34 (1.24-4.44), beta = 0.85, p < .001; DesatCCS: RRR = 1.43 (1.22-1.68), beta = 0.36, p < .001. Performance on these measures was significantly poorer for participants with I-AMD vs. No-AMD. CONCLUSIONS: Simple screening tests distinguish eyes with intermediate AMD from eyes with less severe AMD or normal aging changes. This suggests that these vision measures may be significant predictors of which participants will go on to develop advanced AMD.


Subject(s)
Macular Degeneration , Aged , Aging , Contrast Sensitivity , Female , Fundus Oculi , Humans , Macular Degeneration/diagnosis , Male , Visual Acuity
3.
Optom Vis Sci ; 91(1): 60-7, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24276578

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Anisometropia shows an exponential increase in prevalence with increasing age based on cross-sectional studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate longitudinal changes in anisometropia in all refractive components in older observers and to assess the influence of early cataract development. METHODS: Refractive error was assessed at two time points separated by approximately 12 years in 118 older observers (aged 67.1 and 79.3 years at the two test times). Anisometropia defined as greater than or equal to 1.00 D was calculated for all refractive components. The subjects had intact ocular lenses in both eyes throughout the study. Lens evaluations were performed at the second test using the Lens Opacities Classification System III. RESULTS: All refractive components approximately doubled in prevalence of anisometropia. Spherical equivalent anisometropia changed from 16.1 to 32.2%. Similar changes were found for spherical error (17 to 38.1%), primary astigmatism (7.6 to 17.8%), and oblique astigmatism (14.4 to 29.7%). Many who did not have anisometropia at the first visit subsequently developed anisometropia (e.g., 26.3% for spherical error and 22.9% for oblique cylinder). The onset of anisometropia occurred at all ages within the studied age range, with no particular preference for any one age. A small number lost anisometropia over time. Individual comparisons of refractive error changes in the two eyes in combination with nuclear lens changes showed that early changes in nuclear sclerosis in the two eyes could account for a large proportion of anisometropia (~40%), but unequal hyperopic shift in the spherical component in the two eyes was the primary cause of the anisometropia. CONCLUSIONS: Anisometropia is at least 10 times more common in the elderly than in children, and anisometropia develops in all refractive components in the oldest observers. Clinicians need to be aware of this common condition that could lead to binocular vision problems and potentially cause falls in the elderly.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Anisometropia/physiopathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anisometropia/etiology , Astigmatism/physiopathology , Cataract/physiopathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Lens, Crystalline , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL