Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 90
Filter
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(4): 101297, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38461094

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although aspirin therapy is being increasingly advocated with the intention of risk modification for a wide range of pregnancy complications, women with prepregnancy diabetes mellitus are commonly excluded from clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to examine the effect of aspirin therapy on a composite measure of adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial was conducted at 6 university-affiliated perinatology centers. Women with type 1 diabetes mellitus or type 2 diabetes mellitus of at least 6 months' duration were randomly allocated to 150-mg daily aspirin or placebo from 11 to 14 weeks' gestation until 36 weeks. Established vascular complications of diabetes mellitus, including chronic hypertension or nephropathy, led to exclusion from the trial. The primary outcome was a composite measure of placental dysfunction (preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth <34 weeks' gestation, or perinatal mortality). The planned sample size was 566 participants to achieve a 35% reduction in the primary outcome, assuming 80% statistical power. Secondary end points included maternal and neonatal outcomes and determination of insulin requirements across gestation. Data were centrally managed using ClinInfo and analyzed using SAS 9.4. The 2 treatment groups were compared using t tests or chi-square tests, as required, and longitudinal data were compared using a repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS: From February 2020 to September 2022, 191 patients were deemed eligible, 134 of whom were enrolled (67 randomized to aspirin and 67 to placebo) with a retrospective power of 64%. A total of 101 (80%) women had type 1 diabetes mellitus and 25 (20%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus. Reaching the target sample size was limited by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Baseline characteristics were similar between the aspirin and placebo groups. Treatment compliance was very high and similar between groups (97% for aspirin, 94% for placebo). The risk of the composite measure of placental dysfunction did not differ between groups (25% aspirin vs 21% placebo; P=.796). Women in the aspirin group had significantly lower insulin requirements throughout pregnancy compared with the placebo group. Insulin requirements in the aspirin group increased on average from 0.7 units/kg at baseline to 1.1 units/kg by 36 weeks' gestation (an average 83% within-patient increase), and increased from 0.7 units/kg to 1.3 units/kg (a 181% within-patient increase) in the placebo group, over the same gestational period (P=.002). Serial hemoglobin A1c levels were lower in the aspirin group than in the placebo group, although this trend did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial, aspirin did not reduce the risk of adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by prepregnancy diabetes mellitus. Compared with the placebo group, aspirin-treated patients required significantly less insulin throughout pregnancy, indicating a beneficial effect of aspirin on glycemic control. Aspirin may exert a plausible placenta-mediated effect on pregestational diabetes mellitus that is not limited to its antithrombotic properties.


Subject(s)
Aspirin , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Pre-Eclampsia , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Humans , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Pregnancy , Female , Double-Blind Method , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Adult , Pregnancy in Diabetics/epidemiology , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/prevention & control , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Ireland/epidemiology , Premature Birth/prevention & control , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Fetal Growth Retardation/epidemiology , Fetal Growth Retardation/prevention & control , Insulin/administration & dosage
2.
Neuropsychol Rehabil ; 34(2): 244-267, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36927243

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Treatment-related outcomes after Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery (GKSRS) for benign brain tumour are well-established; yet patient reported outcomes have been largely overlooked. This study explored individuals' perspectives of their health and well-being prior to and following GKSRS. METHOD: Twenty adults (65% female) aged 24-71 years with benign brain tumour were recruited from a major metropolitan hospital and assessed approximately one week prior to, two weeks after, and at three months following GKSRS. They completed telephone-based interviews focusing on general health, symptoms, and well-being. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three major themes characterized individuals' perceptions of their health and well-being. "Understanding my Illness and Treatment" reflected individuals' efforts to make sense of their illness and symptoms to reduce ambiguity and increase sense of control. "Experiencing Gamma Knife" related to expectations of the procedure, outcomes, daily impacts, and emotional reactions. "Adjusting one's Mindset and Coping" characterised how peoples' approaches to coping with their illness were altered over time. CONCLUSIONS: Coping and adjustment is highly individualistic in the context of GKSRS. Over time, most individuals were able to make sense of their illness, adjust their mindset and utilize behavioural strategies and support systems to cope with the long-term effects.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Adult , Humans , Female , Male , Radiosurgery/methods , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Coping Skills
3.
medRxiv ; 2024 Jan 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37904943

ABSTRACT

Background: Phenotypes identified during dysmorphology physical examinations are critical to genetic diagnosis and nearly universally documented as free-text in the electronic health record (EHR). Variation in how phenotypes are recorded in free-text makes large-scale computational analysis extremely challenging. Existing natural language processing (NLP) approaches to address phenotype extraction are trained largely on the biomedical literature or on case vignettes rather than actual EHR data. Methods: We implemented a tailored system at the Children's Hospital of Philadelpia that allows clinicians to document dysmorphology physical exam findings. From the underlying data, we manually annotated a corpus of 3136 organ system observations using the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO). We provide this corpus publicly. We trained a transformer based NLP system to identify HPO terms from exam observations. The pipeline includes an extractor, which identifies tokens in the sentence expected to contain an HPO term, and a normalizer, which uses those tokens together with the original observation to determine the specific term mentioned. Findings: We find that our labeler and normalizer NLP pipeline, which we call PhenoID, achieves state-of-the-art performance for the dysmorphology physical exam phenotype extraction task. PhenoID's performance on the test set was 0.717, compared to the nearest baseline system (Pheno-Tagger) performance of 0.633. An analysis of our system's normalization errors shows possible imperfections in the HPO terminology itself but also reveals a lack of semantic understanding by our transformer models. Interpretation: Transformers-based NLP models are a promising approach to genetic phenotype extraction and, with recent development of larger pre-trained causal language models, may improve semantic understanding in the future. We believe our results also have direct applicability to more general extraction of medical signs and symptoms. Funding: US National Institutes of Health.

5.
Ir J Med Sci ; 2023 Nov 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37917306

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bedside teaching (BST) is a method of structured clinical teaching where the patient is central in education. We had previously explored the patients' perceptions of BST using both a qualitative research study and validation of a questionnaire, both showing strong support by patients for BST once basic rules of respect and confidentiality are followed. With the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical education transitioned to online/virtual learning. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore patients' attitudes towards reintroduction of BST as the pandemic restrictions have lifted. METHODS: Patients were invited to complete a validated questionnaire exploring their attitudes towards BST. A descriptive analysis was performed. Results were compared to a previous study performed before the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Four hundred patients consented to complete the questionnaires. Participants included women attending for antenatal (40%), postnatal (33%) and gynaecology issues (28%). Most patients (> 94%) reported that they were happy to be involved in BST. Patients believed that they should not be asked to participate in BST should they feel stressed or unwell (69%). These findings were the same as our previous study, performed prior to the pandemic. CONCLUSION: This study shows extensive and persisting patient support for BST. BST is unique in that it allows students to gain a deeper understanding of the disease which are hard to elicit through online/virtual methods.

6.
Sex Reprod Health Matters ; 31(1): 2216526, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37335387

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to explore service providers' lived experiences with abortion care in the Republic of Ireland following liberalisation in 2018 via public referendum. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews conducted between February 2020 and March 2021. Thirteen interviews were completed with providers who were directly involved in caring for patients accessing liberalised abortion care in the Republic of Ireland. The sample includes six general practitioners, three midwives, two obstetricians, and two nurses. Interpretative phenomenological analysis identified five super-ordinate themes in the providers' lived experiences: (1) public reactions to liberalised abortion care; (2) lessons from the service implementation; (3) getting involved in abortion care; (4) moments of moral doubt; and (5) remaining committed to the provision of care. Following liberalisation, providers recalled isolated experiences with anti-abortion sentiments, particularly from those who continue to oppose abortion care. They believed that implementation has been mostly successful in delivering a safe, robust, and accessible service in general practice, though identified ongoing challenges in Irish hospitals. Personally, the providers supported access to care and began providing because they perceived a duty to facilitate access to care. Many, however, reported occasional moral doubts about their work. Despite these, none had considered leaving abortion care and all were proud of their work. They said that patients' stories were a constant reminder about the importance of safe abortion care. Further work is required to ensure that abortion is fully integrated and normalised and that all providers and patients have access to supports.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Midwifery , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Ireland , Attitude of Health Personnel , Qualitative Research
7.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 162(1): 292-299, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36883288

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a virtual reality learning environment (VRLE) enhanced student understanding and knowledge compared with a traditional tutorial. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial involving medical students from University College Dublin, Ireland. Participants were assigned to an intervention (VRLE involving a 15-min learning experience on the stages of fetal development) or control (PowerPoint tutorial on the same topic) group. Multiple choice questionnaires (MCQs) assessed knowledge at three time points: preintervention, immediately postintervention, and 1 week postintervention. Primary outcomes were differences in MCQ knowledge scores postintervention between groups. Secondary outcomes included attitudes on the learning experience assessed using the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS) and the Virtual Reality Design Scale (VRDS). RESULTS: No statistically significant between-group differences were found in the primary outcome assessing postintervention knowledge scores. Within-group differences in knowledge scores were significant among the three time points for both the intervention (P < 0.01 [95% confidence interval, 5.33-6.19]) and control (P = 0.02 [95% confidence interval, 5.74-6.49]) groups. Mean levels of satisfaction and self-confidence in learning were higher in the intervention group compared with the control group: 54.2 (standard deviation, 7.5) and 50.5 (standard deviation, 7.2), respectively (P = 0.21). CONCLUSION: VRLEs are a learning tool that can support knowledge development.


Subject(s)
Students, Medical , Virtual Reality , Humans , Learning , Personal Satisfaction , Fetal Development
8.
Ir J Med Sci ; 192(2): 765-771, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35665474

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With blood products being a limited and expensive resource within the healthcare system, there is an ever-increasing emphasis on judicial and appropriate use. AIMS: To evaluate whether implementing contemporary society recommendations on restrictive transfusion policies would reduce inappropriate use of red blood cell transfusions, by evaluating the effect of a staff educational campaign. METHODS: An audit of peri-partum red cell concentrate (RCC) transfusion practice within a tertiary obstetric unit was undertaken, covering a 1-year period (2015), examining data related to transfusion prescribing practices. Subsequently, an educational programme was held for clinical and laboratory staff which aimed to bring practice in line with society guidelines. A repeat audit covering another 1-year period (2018) was undertaken. RESULTS: The number of RCC units of transfused reduced by 49% between 2015 and 2018 (426 to 218). The number of patients receiving transfusion dropped from 166 in 2018 (1.8% of births) to 119 in 2015 (1.5% of births). Among stable patients who were transfused, the proportion receiving a single unit increased from 6.9 to 53.9%. (p < 0.001). Haematological reassessment between units rose from 13.8 to 80.4% (p < 0.001). Written consent documentation improved (68% in 2018 vs. 38% in 2015) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of guidelines has resulted in substantial reduction in RCC transfusions between 2015 and 2018. Fewer women received a blood transfusion, and those who did received fewer units. There is a higher proportion of patients being reassessed between units and receiving single unit transfusions. Recording of consent has improved.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Obstetrics , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Blood Transfusion , Erythrocyte Transfusion , Medical Audit/methods
10.
Nurse Educ Today ; 119: 105573, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36206631

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality learning environments (VRLEs) are a potentially valuable learning tool that have recently increased in popularity due to widespread availability and decreased cost. VRLEs can provide an immersive learning environment that increases the understanding of three-dimensional relationships between anatomical structures. However, there is a paucity of evidence in the literature supporting its use within Midwifery education. OBJECTIVES: To explore the effectiveness of a VRLE as an educational tool in midwifery education. SETTING: A large University in Ireland, with institutional ethical approval. PARTICIPANTS: Undergraduate and graduate degree midwifery students. DESIGN: A descriptive qualitative and quantitative study was carried out. Data collection was carried out between September 2020 and March 2021. METHODS: Participants underwent a VRLE lesson based on the topic of fetal lie, position, and presentation in pregnancy. A multiple-choice questionnaire was used to quantitatively evaluate knowledge before and immediately after the intervention, and knowledge retention after one week. Qualitative data was collected using open-ended questions in the questionnaire. The primary outcome was a difference in pre- and post-intervention knowledge scores. Data was analysed using repeated measures one-way ANOVA. Qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis and simple content analysis. All students participated in the quantitative and qualitative components of the study. Secondary outcomes included participant satisfaction and self-confidence in learning which were analysed using thematic analysis. The side effect profile of the virtual reality device was also explored using open-ended questions in the questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-one midwifery students participated in the study, with a 100 % participation and response rate. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA revealed no statistically significant differences in knowledge scores pre- and post-intervention. Participants rated high satisfaction and self-confidence scores with regard to the VRLE as a learning modality. Side effects most commonly experienced by participants included dizziness (49 %), disorientation (30 %) and symptoms similar to motion sickness (32 %). The following themes were identified: "Learning in 3D", "The Power of Visual Learning", "The value of Educational Technology", "Learning can be fun and enjoyable". CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the VRLE had no impact on knowledge gain, though high levels of satisfaction and self-confidence indicate a positive response to the VRLE. VRLEs are a potentially valuable learning tool to help enhance the student learning experience, promoting increased engagement, satisfaction, and self-confidence with the learning material.


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Midwifery , Students, Nursing , Virtual Reality , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Midwifery/education , Clinical Competence , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/methods , Learning
11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36078508

ABSTRACT

Exercise is often recommended in addition to diet and medication in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Our aim was to determine if strength training compared with aerobic exercise had an impact on glycaemic control, maternal and neonatal outcomes. The Cochrane library, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, Google Scholar, and OpenGrey were searched. Over 758 pregnant women (mother-baby pairs) from 14 studies are included in this systematic review. Interventions ranged from cycling, aerobic exercises, walking, yoga, or combined aerobic and resistance exercises. Of the studies identified, none directly compared aerobic exercise with strength training. Half of the studies showed benefit in glycaemic control with additional exercise compared with usual physical activity. There was largely no impact on obstetric or neonatal outcomes. Studies on exercise in GDM have reiterated the safety of exercise in pregnancy and shown mixed effects on maternal glycaemic control, with no apparent impact on pregnancy outcomes. The heterogenicity of reported studies make it difficult to make specific recommendations on the optimum exercise modality for the management of GDM. The use of a core outcome set for GDM may improve reporting of studies on the role of exercise in its management.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Resistance Training , Diabetes, Gestational/therapy , Exercise , Female , Glycemic Control , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome
12.
BMJ Open ; 12(7): e057788, 2022 07 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35788074

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities are subjected to a specific form of racism fuelled by deep-seated prejudice and stereotypes. These groups have historically been the victims of school segregation, forced assimilation policies, hate speech and hate crimes.Persecution and displacement have resulted in high rates of unemployment, reduced access to education and poorer health in general, which places these groups at significantly increased risk of poverty. In pregnancy, they are at increased risk of adverse obstetric outcomes. There is a gap in the literature surrounding the experiences and outcomes of pregnant women within this group. A scoping review was chosen as the appropriate methodology to identify what is known about the experiences and outcomes of pregnant women in these communities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Levac et al guideline on conducting a scoping review will be followed. This six-step approach includes identification of the research question, identification of relevant studies, selection of studies, charting of data, summary of results and consultation with experiential experts. A comprehensive search of the following electronic databases from 1980 to 2021 will be conducted: CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science. Relevant grey literature and reference lists will also be searched. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) tool will be used. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was not required for this protocol as all literature within this scoping review are publicly available. To facilitate dissemination of findings, the research team will present the findings to key stakeholders working with Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities.


Subject(s)
Roma , Crime , Educational Status , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Review Literature as Topic , Serogroup , Systematic Reviews as Topic
13.
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am ; 34(2): 205-214, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35660234

ABSTRACT

Team-based care has been recommended by numerous cardiovascular organizations involving the treatment of valvular heart disease. Utilization of the cardiovascular team (CVT) in valvular programs has been discussed but there is a paucity of data involving team roles, backgrounds, or expectations. This article will describe a single health system and the roles of the CVT involved in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) program.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Humans , Patient Care , Patient Care Team , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
Diabetes Ther ; 13(3): 481-487, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35190969

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes mellitus (CFRDM) is becoming a more common issue in pregnancy care as the life expectancy of females living with cystic fibrosis has improved, with an increasing number of pregnancies in this population. Despite the Republic of Ireland having the highest incidence of cystic fibrosis globally, there is limited Irish data on pregnancy outcomes for those with CFRDM. This study aimed to retrospectively review maternal and foetal outcomes of pregnancies affected by maternal CFRDM. METHODS: The patient records of all women with CFRDM who attended the National Maternity Hospital Dublin for obstetric care between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A search of patient records identified 15 pregnancies in 12 women with CFRDM during the study period. CFRDM was diagnosed pre-conception in ten of the 15 pregnancies. Median neonatal weight at birth was lower in women with CFRDM diagnosed pre-conception compared to women diagnosed during pregnancy (2.8 vs. 3.02 kg). The median weight gain in women with CFRDM diagnosed pre-conception was 10.9 kg compared to 11.9 kg for those diagnosed during pregnancy. The majority of women (62.5%) with CFRDM diagnosed pre-conception delivered via caesarean section. Admission for CF exacerbations during pregnancy in women with CFRDM diagnosed pre-conception was very common (87.5%) compared with 75% of those diagnosed during their pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Women diagnosed with CFRDM were likely to require caesarean section, to be treated with insulin, and to be frequently admitted to hospital for CF exacerbations. Our review highlights the importance of good glucose control, stable cystic fibrosis before pregnancy and a multidisciplinary team approach.

15.
J Med Internet Res ; 24(2): e30082, 2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35103607

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence in the literature regarding the learning outcomes of immersive technologies as educational tools for teaching university-level health care students. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to assess the learning outcomes of immersive technologies compared with traditional learning modalities with regard to knowledge and the participants' learning experience in medical, midwifery, and nursing preclinical university education. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Randomized controlled trials comparing traditional learning methods with virtual, augmented, or mixed reality for the education of medicine, nursing, or midwifery students were evaluated. The identified studies were screened by 2 authors independently. Disagreements were discussed with a third reviewer. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) in April 2020. RESULTS: Of 15,627 studies, 29 (0.19%) randomized controlled trials (N=2722 students) were included and evaluated using the MERSQI tool. Knowledge gain was found to be equal when immersive technologies were compared with traditional learning modalities; however, the learning experience increased with immersive technologies. The mean MERSQI score was 12.64 (SD 1.6), the median was 12.50, and the mode was 13.50. Immersive technology was predominantly used to teach clinical skills (15/29, 52%), and virtual reality (22/29, 76%) was the most commonly used form of immersive technology. Knowledge was the primary outcome in 97% (28/29) of studies. Approximately 66% (19/29) of studies used validated instruments and scales to assess secondary learning outcomes, including satisfaction, self-efficacy, engagement, and perceptions of the learning experience. Of the 29 studies, 19 (66%) included medical students (1706/2722, 62.67%), 8 (28%) included nursing students (727/2722, 26.71%), and 2 (7%) included both medical and nursing students (289/2722, 10.62%). There were no studies involving midwifery students. The studies were based on the following disciplines: anatomy, basic clinical skills and history-taking skills, neurology, respiratory medicine, acute medicine, dermatology, communication skills, internal medicine, and emergency medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality play an important role in the education of preclinical medical and nursing university students. When compared with traditional educational modalities, the learning gain is equal with immersive technologies. Learning outcomes such as student satisfaction, self-efficacy, and engagement all increase with the use of immersive technology, suggesting that it is an optimal tool for education.


Subject(s)
Learning , Students, Nursing , Humans , Delivery of Health Care , Technology
16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35162907

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Due to COVID-19, many centres adopted a change to the diagnosis of GDM. METHODS: A case-control study of antenatal patients between 1 April and 30 June in 2019 and 2020 looking at detection rates of GDM, use of medication, obstetric, and fetal outcomes. RESULTS: During COVID-19, the rate of positive GDM tests approximately halved (20% (42/210) in 2020 vs. 42.2% (92/218) in 2019, (p < 0.01)) with higher rates of requirement for insulin at diagnosis (21.4% (2020) vs. 2.2% (2019); p < 0.01), and at term (31% (2020) vs. 5.4% (2019); p < 0.01). and metformin at diagnosis (4.8% (2020) vs. 1.1% (2019); p < 0.01), and at term (14.3% (2020) vs. 7.6% (2019) p < 0.01), with no differences in birth outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There was likely an underdiagnosis of GDM while women at a higher risk of hyperglycaemia were correctly identified. The GTT should be maintained as the gold-standard test where possible, with provisions made for social distancing during testing if required.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes, Gestational , Case-Control Studies , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Female , Glucose Tolerance Test , Humans , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 270: 201-205, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35093828

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Simulation has been shown to be beneficial and effective in the intimate educational setting of trans-vaginal ultrasound (TVUS). In addition, quantitative work has shown dyad learning (learning in pairs) to be non-inferior to independent learning simulation in this setting. This study aims to explore trainees' perceptions of learning in TVUS using qualitative research methods. A second aim was to study trainees' perceptions of the method of training, (learning in pairs (dyads) or as individuals). STUDY DESIGN: A three-hour training session using the transvaginal simulator and teaching programme was offered to participants, who either trained individually or as a dyad. Participants were then interviewed using a semi-structured interview technique. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, entered a qualitative research database (NVivo) to allow coding, structured analysis of data and development of themes using Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen doctors with no previous experience in TVUS were assigned simulation training either as individuals (n = 7) or dyads (n = 4 pairs, eight people in total). All participants reported the beneficial nature of simulation training and felt they had sufficient time to meet their learning needs. Some frustration was reported with feedback and the repetitive nature of the simulation. For dyad learning, participants perceived the value of the use of a second person to act as a "sound board", to problem solve and to encourage each other. Independent learners reported frustration and difficulty in understanding if and how something went wrong. However, individual learners had the advantage of being able to go at their own pace. CONCLUSION: Previous studies have shown that simulation is effective for training in transvaginal ultrasound. This qualitative research study supports findings of previous quantitative studies by showing that participants appreciated the value of simulation and provided feedback for improvement in educational content. Clinicians and educators providing transvaginal simulation training could consider dyad training as an efficient and educational option, with individual training reserved for those who may need more time.


Subject(s)
Learning , Simulation Training , Clinical Competence , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Perception , Qualitative Research
18.
Ir J Med Sci ; 191(2): 785-791, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33988805

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early onset group B streptococcal (GBS) disease can cause significant neonatal morbidity and mortality. There is currently no Irish national guideline for GBS screening, and protocols vary across maternity units. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing at induction or labour onset informs triage for antibiotic prophylaxis; however, there are human and infrastructural resource requirements to enable widespread implementation. AIM: Our aim was to identify current standard practices for GBS prevention in Irish obstetric and neonatal services and to utilise this data to inform the need for, and potential impact of implementation of, a national guideline. METHODS: A questionnaire on GBS screening, management and existing resources was completed by an informed staff member from each of the 19 Irish maternity units, including questions regarding timing and method of screening, antibiotic usage, and neonatal management. RESULTS: One unit (5.2%) performs routine GBS screening at 35-37 weeks of gestation. Twelve units (63%) screen for GBS following spontaneous rupture of membranes (SROM) after 37 weeks, of which two (17%) perform PCR and ten (83%) culture testing. Seventeen units (89.3%) have access to a GeneXpert PCR machine, and of these, two (11.7%) use the machine for rapid GBS testing. Two units screen patients for GBS at either the start of labour or induction of labour. Four units (21%) use the neonatal early onset sepsis (EOS) calculator. Sixteen units (84%) do not treat asymptomatic infants born to GBS-positive mothers.  CONCLUSION: There is a lack of consistency in the methods for GBS screening and disease prevention across the country, highlighting the need for a national guideline accompanied by an implementation plan and budget to standardise care.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Streptococcal Infections , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Ireland , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Streptococcal Infections/diagnosis , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control , Streptococcus agalactiae
19.
Ir J Med Sci ; 191(1): 469-473, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33660113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Screening programmes decrease the incidence of colorectal, breast and cervical cancer. As such, it is imperative that medical health professionals are educated on the screening programmes available and are aware of the research basis justifying them. AIMS: To establish the attitudes of final-year medical students to a gynaecological cancer screening teaching session, provided as part of their core Obstetrics and Gynaecology module. METHODS: A 3-h workshop, aimed to critically appraise research papers, reviewed cervical and ovarian cancer screening methods. The workshop was facilitated by a Consultant in Gynae-oncology Surgery. Anonymous evaluation was requested from two hundred nine students attending during the 2018/2019 academic year. Qualitative research with thematic analysis of content was performed. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-six students gave evaluation on the workshop itself (74.6%). Three main themes were identified-support for the importance of teaching screening methods, appreciation of the importance of understanding cervical screening and a wish for further teaching in Critical Appraisal. Students identified that there was a need to understand screening, that it was "..important for us to consider the value of screening programmes". The teaching on Cervical screening was "..helpful, especially with cervical screening". CONCLUSIONS: Medical students expressed a wish to understand the research basis of a common clinical screening programme (for cervical cancer) as well as the research basis for not providing screening to low risk populations (for ovarian cancer). Further research in this area may include exploring how this is taught in other medical schools.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Ovarian Neoplasms , Students, Medical , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Attitude of Health Personnel , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Ireland , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Teaching , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis
20.
Ir J Med Sci ; 191(5): 2177-2184, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34855128

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has changed how maternity care services are provided worldwide. To contain the virus, many providers reduced the number of face-to-face visits for women. In addition, partner attendance was prohibited in many circumstances to protect staff, and other service users, from potential infection. AIMS: To explore women's experience of pregnancy and birth in the Republic of Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A qualitative study with 14 women was conducted using a grounded theory approach. Data were collected between April and July 2020, and in-depth interviews were conducted either in pregnancy or in the first 12 weeks after the birth. RESULTS: Six categories emerged: loss of normality, navigating "new" maternity care systems, partners as bystanders, balancing information, uncertainty, and unexpected benefits of pregnancy during the pandemic. While benefits were reported (working from home and additional time spent with partners during the "fourth trimester"), in general, the themes were of increased anxiety and uncertainty. CONCLUSION: The pandemic caused additional anxiety for pregnant women. This was exacerbated by uncertainty about the effects of COVID-19 on pregnancy and unclear messaging about restrictions. More interactive and personalized communication is required to support women to cope with uncertainty during a pandemic. The birth partner plays an important role as an advocate for women and excluding them from pregnancy care caused additional anxiety for pregnant women. Containment strategies for a pandemic should be developed with this in mind, to view the family as a unit rather than the woman in isolation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Maternal Health Services , Female , Humans , Pandemics , Parturition , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Qualitative Research
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...