Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Management of Oligometastatic Disease.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) represent non-invasive, efficacious and safe radiation treatments for the ablation of intracranial and extracranial metastases. Although the use of SRS has been established by level 1 evidence for patients presenting with up to three or four brain metastases for at least a decade, the paradigm of ablating a limited number of extracranial metastases (typically up to five, known as oligometastatic disease) has yet to be proven beyond the few reported but highly encouraging phase II randomised trials. In this overview, we summarise the phase III randomised controlled trials evaluating SRS for intact brain metastases and postoperative surgical cavities and introduce the limited literature and future concepts for treating patients with more than five intracranial metastases. Next, we summarise the published phase II randomised controlled trials specific to SBRT and oligometastatic disease, while briefly describing and contrasting the technical principles and biological mechanisms of SBRT versus conventional radiation. Phase III evidence for SBRT is needed, and we summarise ongoing trials in this overview. Ultimately, SRS and SBRT have become cornerstone therapeutic options for patients with oligometastatic disease and the future is bright for these patients, considering that not so long ago they were considered incurable and relegated to palliation alone.

Biological Features of Human Papillomavirus-related Head and Neck Cancers Contributing to Improved Response.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are the sixth most common malignancy globally, and an increasing proportion of oropharyngeal HNSCCs are associated with the human papillomavirus (HPV). Patients with HPV-associated tumours have markedly improved overall and disease-specific survival compared with their HPV-negative counterparts when treated with chemoradiation. Although the difference in outcomes between these two groups is clearly established, the mechanism underlying these differences remains an area of investigation. Data from preclinical, clinical and genomics studies have started to suggest that an increase in radio-sensitivity of HPV-positive HNSCC may be responsible for improved outcomes, the putative mechanisms of which we will review here. The Cancer Genome Atlas and others have recently documented a multitude of molecular differences between HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumours. Preclinical investigations by multiple groups have explored possible mechanisms of increased sensitivity to therapy, including examining differences in DNA repair, hypoxia and the immune response. In addition to differences in the response to therapy, some groups have started to investigate phenotypic differences between the two diseases, such as tumour invasiveness. Finally, we will conclude with a brief review of ongoing clinical trials that are attempting to de-escalate treatment to minimise long-term toxicity while maintaining cure rates. New insights from preclinical and genomic studies may eventually lead to personalised treatment paradigms for HPV-positive patients.