Scope of practice of oculofacial plastic and reconstructive surgeons: a public perception survey.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the public's perception of the scope of practice for oculofacial plastic and reconstructive surgeons (OFPRS). METHODS: A 49-question survey was distributed by QualtricsⓇ to a panel similar to the US demographic composition. Responses collected underwent bivariate statistical analysis. RESULT: A total of 530 responses were obtained, with most respondents being white, female, over the age of 35, from the Midwest, and with at least a college education or above. Most respondents did not think ophthalmologists or optometrists were surgeons, and only 158 people (29.8%) knew the primary specialty of OFPRS was ophthalmology. Board certification was preferred by 98.87% of respondents, and 95.28% preferred ASOPRS-trained OFPRS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the gap in knowledge about OFPRS as a field, the qualifications and training required, and the scope of practice. Notably, even for OFPRS-specific procedures, PRS remained the leading subspecialist chosen for interventions such as orbital decompression (58.5% vs. 71.5%), orbital reconstruction (57.9% vs. 74.2%), enucleation/evisceration (48.1% vs. 53.4%), optic nerve-related surgery (39.8% vs. 43.4%), orbital cancer resection (42.8% vs. 46.8%), and tear duct surgery (41.9% vs. 52.5%). Additionally, most respondents did not feel that facial fillers, laser skin resurfacing, eyelid cancer removal, or cataract surgery were within the OFPRS scope of practice.

Outcomes of Strabismus Surgery Following Teprotumumab Therapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the results of patients undergoing surgical treatment for strabismic diplopia in thyroid eye disease (TED) following teprotumumab. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective, case series. METHODS: We report 28 patients who underwent extraocular muscle surgery for strabismic diplopia after treatment with teprotumumab at 7 different academic centers. Elapsed time from last teprotumumab dose to the date of surgery, previous orbital decompression, primary preoperative horizontal and vertical deviation, surgical procedure, and 2-month postoperative results were collected from the patient records. RESULTS: Sixteen (57%) patients were diplopia-free after 1 surgery. Three (11%) chose prism spectacles to correct residual diplopia, 2 (7%) used compensatory head posture to resolve diplopia, and 1 (4%) had intermittent diplopia and was functionally improved (choosing no prisms or further surgery). These were considered treatment successes. Three (11%) patients required reoperation, and all were diplopia-free after their second procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients requiring surgery for strabismic diplopia following teprotumumab achieve good outcomes with success rates comparable to series published before the availability of teprotumumab.