Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil ; 13(1): 25, 2021 Mar 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33731190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a major health concern in western countries. In Norway, patients with obesity can attend weight-loss programmes, which focus on changes in dietary and physical activity habits. Use of self-monitoring is advocated when changing dietary and physical activity habits for adults with obesity. This study aimed to explore the experiences of patients with obesity who used activity monitors while attending a weight-loss programme. METHODS: Patients with body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2 with weight related comorbidities or a BMI > 40 kg/m2 referred to an intermittent weight-loss programme were recruited into this study. They were introduced to one of three different activity monitors, Fitbit Zip™, Mio Fuse™, or Mio Slice™. Semi-structured interviews were performed with patients six months into the weight-loss programme. Thematic analysis was applied when analysing the data. RESULTS: Of the 29 informants (aged 21 to 66 years) interviewed, 59% were female. Their experience with activity monitors was related to their adherence to the weight-loss programme. Two main themes emerged from the informants stories: 1. "Activity monitors visualize proof of effort or failure to change health habits". 2. "Activity monitors act as a positive or negative enforcer when incorporating change". CONCLUSIONS: Using activity monitors either strengthens or undermines patients' attempts to change health habits when attending a weight-loss program. Our findings suggest a need for more individualized weight-loss programmes for patients with obesity.

2.
Disabil Rehabil ; 38(24): 2406-12, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26800715

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of the present paper was to study preferences for web based self-administered questionnaires (web SAQs) vs. paper-based self-administered questionnaires (paper SAQs) and to evaluate the feasibility of using web SAQs in patients referred to cardiac, lung, occupational and cancer rehabilitation programs. METHODS: The patients were approached by mail and given the choice to answer the compulsory SAQs either on paper or on a web-based platform. RESULTS: Hundred and twenty seven out of 183 eligible patients (69.3%) were willing to participate and 126 completed the study. Web SAQs were preferred by 77.7%, and these patients were significantly younger, more often cohabiting and tended to have higher level of education than paper SAQ users. Mean number of data missing per patient was less among the web SAQ users than the paper SAQ users (0.55 vs. 2.15, p < 0.001). Costs related to human resources were estimated to be 60% lower with web SAQs compared to paper SAQs. CONCLUSIONS: Web SAQs were well accepted among the patients scheduled for rehabilitation, led to less missing data and considerable cost savings related to human resources. Patients referred to rehabilitation should be offered the choice to complete self-administered questionnaires on internet platforms when internet access is common and available. Implications for Rehabilitation The high acceptability of web-based self-administered questionnaires among rehabilitation patients suggests that internet platforms are suitable tools to collect patient information for rehabilitation units. Web-based modes of patient data collection demonstrate low number of missing data and can therefore improve the quality of data collection from rehabilitation patients. Use of web-based questionnaires considerably reduces administrative costs of data collection in rehabilitation settings compared to traditional pen and paper methods.


Subject(s)
Health Status Indicators , Rehabilitation/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Diagnostic Self Evaluation , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Internet , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Preference , Rehabilitation/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL