Trends in the incidence, mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with ventricular septal rupture following an ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in outcomes of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), ventricular septal rupture (VSR) remains a known complication, carrying high mortality. The contemporary incidence, mortality, and management of post-STEMI VSR remains unclear. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database (2009-2020) was used to study trends in admissions and outcomes of post-STEMI VSR over time. Survey estimation commands were used to determine weighted national estimates. RESULTS: There were 2 315 186 ±â€…22 888 visits for STEMI with 0.194 ±â€…0.01% experiencing VSR during 2009-2020 in the USA. Patients with VSR were more often older, white, female, and presented with an anterior STEMI; there was no difference in the rates of fibrinolysis. In-hospital mortality was 73.6 ±â€…1.8%, but only 29.2 ±â€…1.9 and 10 ±â€…1.2% received surgical repair and transcatheter repair (TCR), respectively. TCR was associated with higher and surgical repair with lower mortality. Days to surgery were longer for those who survived (5.9 ±â€…2.75) compared with those who died (2.44 ±â€…1). In a multivariable analysis, surgical repair at greater than or equal to day 4 was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.88). CONCLUSION: Mortality in post-STEMI VSR remains high with no improvement over time. Most patients are managed conservatively, and the frequency of surgical repair has decreased, while TCR has increased over the study period. Despite design limitations and survival bias, surgical repair at greater than or equal to 4 days was associated with a lower mortality.

Acute Device-Related Thrombus Elimination During Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Via Vacuum Catheter Aspiration.

We describe a rare complication of intraprocedural spontaneous thrombus formation on a transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (MitraClip; Abbott Laboratories) device in a hypercoagulable yet adequately anticoagulated patient. We also outline the novel use of a vacuum (Penumbra) aspiration system, which resulted in rapid and effective thrombus elimination.

Validity of International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 Diagnosis Codes for Identification of Acute Heart Failure Hospitalization and Heart Failure with Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction in a National Medicare Sample.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalization in older adults. Medicare data have been used to assess HF outcomes. However, the validity of ICD-10 diagnosis codes (used since 2015) to identify acute HF hospitalization or distinguish reduced (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction) versus preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unknown in Medicare data. METHODS: Using Medicare data (2015-2017), we randomly sampled 200 HF hospitalizations with ICD-10 diagnosis codes for HF in the first/second claim position in a 1:1:2 ratio for systolic HF (I50.2), diastolic HF (I50.3), and other HF (I50.X). The primary gold standards included recorded HF diagnosis by a treating physician for HF hospitalization, ejection fraction (EF)≤50 for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and EF>50 for HFpEF. If the quantitative EF was not present, then qualitative descriptions of EF were used for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction/HFpEF gold standards. Multiple secondary gold standards were also tested. Gold standard data were extracted from medical records using standardized forms and adjudicated by cardiology fellows/staff. We calculated positive predictive values with 95% CIs. RESULTS: The 200-chart validation sample included 50 systolic, 50 diastolic, 47 combined dysfunction, and 53 unspecified HF patients. The positive predictive values of acute HF hospitalization was 98% [95% CI, 95-100] for first-position ICD-10 HF diagnosis and 66% [95% CI, 58-74] for first/second-position diagnosis. Quantitative EF was available for ≥80% of patients with systolic, diastolic, or combined dysfunction ICD-10 codes. The positive predictive value of systolic HF codes was 90% [95% CI, 82-98] for EFs≤50% and 72% [95% CI, 60-85] for EFs≤40%. The positive predictive value was 92% [95% CI, 85-100] for HFpEF for EFs>50%. The ICD-10 codes for combined or unspecified HF poorly predicted heart failure with reduced ejection fraction or HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS: ICD-10 principal diagnosis identified acute HF hospitalization with a high positive predictive value. Systolic and diastolic ICD-10 diagnoses reliably identified heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and HFpEF when EF 50% was used as the cutoff.

A Survey of Antibiotic Use During Insertion of Cardiovascular Implantable Devices Among United States Implanters.

Antibiotic use for cardiovascular implantable devices (CIED) prophylaxis is well-accepted despite a paucity of data. Pre-procedural prophylaxis lowers the rate of CIED infections; however, data is lacking for intra- or post-procedural antibiotic use. Antibiotic-eluting envelopes (ENVELOPE) [TYRX®TM] have been shown to reduce post-procedural infections. Understanding implanter practices may provide insight as to the need for antibiotic stewardship. The purpose of this survey was to assess the practices of implanters nationally. A survey was completed by 150 implanters across the US. Participants were board certificated, implanters of CIEDs, with varying experience (1-25 years), in various hospital settings. Of the respondents, 97% reported routine use of systemic antibiotics pre-operatively. About two-thirds of implanters continue systemic antibiotics post-operatively, with half continuing antibiotics for >24 h; 83% of implanters add antibiotic to saline for the purpose of irrigating the wound; 55% routinely use ENVELOPE on approximately 38% of patients. Common reasons cited for ENVELOPE use were infection concerns, significant risk factors, prior device infection, and immunosuppressed status. Two-thirds of respondents use systemic antibiotics during generator changes, with >50% continuing antibiotics for >24 h. This study suggests wide variations in practice among implanters. Additional attention to existing guidelines and evidence regarding appropriate use of ENVELOPE is still needed.

Disparities in Drug-Eluting Stent Utilization in Patients With Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

The superiority of drug-eluting stents (DES) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) is well-established, but data regarding DES use in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as a function of race is limited. Our goal was to examine stent utilization patterns and disparities based on race, sex, and insurance status in patients with STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The National Inpatient Sample database was used to retrospectively compare DES vs BMS use in patients admitted with STEMI from 2009 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the independent predictors of DES use. DES utilization increased significantly from 62.8% in 2009 to 94.0% in 2018. However, African Americans were less likely to receive a DES (odds ratio [OR] .82, 95% confidence interval [CI] .77-.87) compared with Caucasians. Women were more likely to undergo DES implantation (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.10). Patients insured by Medicaid (OR .84, 95% CI .80-.89) and those classified as Self-pay (OR .63, 95% CI .61-.66) were less likely to undergo DES implantation compared to those with private insurance (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.29-1.38). Disparities based on race and insurance status continue to persist despite a significant increase in DES utilization in STEMI patients across the identified subgroups.

Radiofrequency Ablation for Prevention of Outflow Tract Obstruction in Percutaneous Mitral Valve-in-Valve Replacement.

Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) can complicate percutaneous mitral valve replacement and may preclude patients considered high surgical risk from transcatheter therapies. We report a case of mitral valve-in-valve procedure in a patient at high risk for LVOTO. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Sex Disparities in the Treatment of Aortic Stenosis and Related Outcomes: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on sex disparities has not been well established. This study sought to examine the impact of sex on outcomes following aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) in the era of routine TAVR. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2009-18) to study AS visits for all AVR and in-hospital outcomes as a function of sex. Survey estimation commands were used to provide national estimates. RESULTS: There were an estimated 431,344 surgical AVR (SAVR) and 189,137 TAVR inpatient visits. Mortality was higher in women after SAVR (3.8% ± 0.1 vs. 2.7% ± 0.07, p < 0.001) and TAVR (2.4% ± 0.1 vs. 1.7% ± 0.1, p < 0.001) compared to men. Female patients undergoing SAVR had higher rates of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, stroke, and bleeding (5.9% ± 0.1 vs. 5% ± 0.1, 2.8% ± 0.1 vs. 2.3% ± 0.07, and 37.8% ± 0.8 vs. 29.8% ± 0.6; p < 0.001, respectively) but lower rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) (16.4% ± 0.3 vs. 20.3% ± 0.3, p < 0.001). Women undergoing TAVR had higher rates of stroke and bleeding (2.4% ± 0.1 vs. 1.6% ± 0.09 and 28.7% ± 0.6 vs. 22% ± 0.5; p < 0.001, respectively) but lower rates of PPM and AKI (9.5% ± 0.3 vs. 10.7% ± 0.2 and 11.3% ± 0.3 vs. 13.4% ± 0.3; p < 0.001, respectively). Compared with isolated SAVR, isolated TAVR was associated with lower mortality in women during 2016-18, both after multivariable adjustment (OR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27-0.60) and propensity matching (mean difference 0.66% ± 0.2); however, there was no difference in men. CONCLUSION: Although women continue to have higher in-hospital mortality following both TAVR and SAVR as compared to men, TAVR is associated with a lower in-hospital mortality in women compared to SAVR. Thus, TAVR may represent a potential intervention to narrow the sex-based disparities in the management of AS.

In-Hospital Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement at Transcatheter Valve Implantation Centers.

The availability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has led to the development of a multidisciplinary team, the "heart team," at institutions offering both TAVI and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Whether this approach has improved in-hospital outcomes in patients who underwent SAVR at institutions offering TAVI versus those not offering TAVI is largely unknown. The National Inpatient Sample (2011 to 2018) was used to study trends in visits for SAVR and in-hospital outcomes at TAVI and non-TAVI centers. Survey estimation commands were used to determine weighted national estimates. There were 559,365 inpatient visits during 2011 to 2018 for aortic valve replacement, with 65.9 ± 0.8% and 34.0 ± 0.8% at TAVI and non-TAVI centers, respectively. Patients who underwent SAVR at TAVI hospitals had more co-morbidities and were less likely to receive mechanical prosthesis (24.7 ± 0.5% vs 35.5 ± 0.6%). Adjusted in-hospital mortality was lower among any SAVR (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.94) and isolated SAVR (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.98) recipients at TAVI centers. There was no difference in the incidence of stroke, permanent pacemaker placement, and acute kidney injury after SAVR in TAVI and non-TAVI centers. Although patients who underwent SAVR at TAVI centers had more co-morbidities, in-hospital mortality was lower at TAVI centers than non-TAVI centers. This may be attributable to several factors, including but not limited to experience, resource availability, and operative volumes and the use of the heart team.

Contemporary trends and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: The choice between a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve in aortic valve replacement (AVR) is based on life expectancy, bleeding risk and comorbidities, since bioprosthetic AVR (bAVR) are associated with a more rapid structural deterioration compared to mechanical AVR (mAVR). The impact of widespread transcatheter valve replacements, on the decision to use bAVR versus mAVR, in the contemporary era and subsequent outcomes remain to be determined. METHODS: The National Inpatient database (2009-2018) was used to study trends in admissions for bAVR and mAVR and in-hospital mortality and outcomes over time. Survey estimation commands were used to determine weighted national estimates. RESULTS: There were 700,896 ± 18,285 inpatient visits for AVR with 70.1% (95% CI 69.2%-71.1%) and 29.9% (95% CI 28.9%-30.8%) visits for bAVR and mAVR, respectively. Those undergoing bAVR were significantly older (bAVR [69.8 years] vs. mAVR [62.7 years] p < .001]. The rates of mAVR decreased across all age groups during the study period (ptrend < .001), including patients ≤50 years (ptrend < .001). In-hospital mortality for mAVR recipients was higher, both after multivariable adjustment (OR 1.35 95% CI 1.26-1.45 p < .001) and propensity matching (mean difference 0.846% ± 0.19%). CONCLUSION: In the contemporary era, the utilization of mAVR has decreased across all age groups, including those younger than 50 years old. Although mAVR recipients were healthier with less comorbidities, inpatient mortality was higher after mAVR compared to bAVR. In addition to understanding causes for higher in-hospital mortality after mAVR, future research should focus on developing transcatheter valve replacement friendly bAVR.

A Twenty-Year Analysis of Demographics, Surgical Management, and Outcomes of Aortic Stenosis in New Jersey.

We investigated the incidence and characteristics of 14,996 patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who were hospitalized in New Jersey between the years 1995 to 2015. The average age was 72, the majority were Caucasian males and common co-morbidities were hypertension, coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolemia. Hospital admission for AS declined between 1995 to 2007, to 10/100,000 patients, and increased to 15/100,000 patients in 2015 (p for trend <0.001). During the study period, the percentage of patients who received aortic valve replacement (AVR) increased (p <0.001). All-cause and cardiovascular mortality were higher among patients who did not undergo AVR at 1-year (HR 1.98 CI 1.75 to 2.23, p <0.001 and HR 1.82 CI 1.57 to 2.11, p <0.001, respectively) and 3-years (HR 2.16 CI 1.96 to 2.38, p <0.001 and HR 2.16 CI 1.90 to 2.45, p <0.001, respectively). The probability for readmission for AS was higher in patients who did not receive AVR compared to patients who had AVR at 1 year (HR 92.95 CI 57.85 to 149.35, p <0.001) and 3 years (HR 70.36 CI 47.18 to 104.95, p <0.001). These data imply that earlier diagnosis of AS and AVR when indicated will improve outcomes.

Is isolated ST segment elevation in Lead aVR associated with high grade coronary artery disease?

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy of lead aVR ST-segment elevation for left main or triple vessel disease (LM/3VD) has not been universally accepted. In the present analysis we sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of STEaVR in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios were calculated using a random effects model (DerSimonian-Laird Method) for computing summary estimates and receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis for evaluating overall diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 14 studies. The pooled sensitivity of STEaVR for LM/3VD was 0.40 (95% CI; 0.38 0.43, p < 0.001), specificity 0.82 (95% CI; 0.81-0.83, p < 0.001). Pooled positive likelihood ratio 2.49 (95% CI; 1.62-3.81, p < 0.001) and negative likelihood 0.54 (95% CI; 0.39-0.76, p < 0.001). The pooled sensitivity of STEaVR for LM was 0.39 (95% CI; 0.34-0.45, p < 0.001) specificity was 0.86 (95% CI; 0.85-0.87, p < 0.001) with an AUC of 0.79. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) for LM was 2.78 (95% CI, 2.28-3.39, p < 0.001) negative likelihood ratio 0.51 (95% CI, 0.33-0.78, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that in patients presenting with an ACS, presence of STEaVR may indicate the presence of LM or 3VD. STEaVR has a high specificity for both LM and 3VD, with a high pooled LR.

A conservative isoleucine to leucine mutation causes major rearrangements and cold sensitivity in KlenTaq1 DNA polymerase.

Assembly of polymerase chain reactions at room temperature can sometimes lead to low yields or unintentional products due to mispriming. Mutation of isoleucine 707 to leucine in DNA polymerase I from Thermus aquaticus substantially decreases its activity at room temperature without compromising its ability to amplify DNA. To understand why a conservative change to the enzyme over 20 Å from the active site can have a large impact on its activity at low temperature, we solved the X-ray crystal structure of the large (5'-to-3' exonuclease-deleted) fragment of Taq DNA polymerase containing the cold-sensitive mutation in the ternary (E-DNA-ddNTP) and binary (E-DNA) complexes. The I707L KlenTaq1 ternary complex was identical to the wild-type in the closed conformation except for the mutation and a rotamer change in nearby phenylalanine 749, suggesting that the enzyme should remain active. However, soaking out of the nucleotide substrate at low temperature results in an altered binary complex made possible by the rotamer change at F749 near the tip of the polymerase O-helix. Surprisingly, two adenosines in the 5'-template overhang fill the vacated active site by stacking with the primer strand, thereby blocking the active site at low temperature. Replacement of the two overhanging adenosines with pyrimidines substantially increased activity at room temperature by keeping the template overhang out of the active site, confirming the importance of base stacking. These results explain the cold-sensitive phenotype of the I707L mutation in KlenTaq1 and serve as an example of a large conformational change affected by a conservative mutation.