Sex-differences in COPD: from biological mechanisms to therapeutic considerations.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous respiratory condition characterized by symptoms of dyspnea, cough, and sputum production. We review sex-differences in disease mechanisms, structure-function-symptom relationships, responses to therapies, and clinical outcomes in COPD with a specific focus on dyspnea. Females with COPD experience greater dyspnea and higher morbidity compared to males. Imaging studies using chest computed tomography scans have demonstrated that females with COPD tend to have smaller airways than males as well as a lower burden of emphysema. Sex-differences in lung and airway structure lead to critical respiratory mechanical constraints during exercise at a lower absolute ventilation in females compared to males, which is largely explained by sex differences in maximum ventilatory capacity. Females experience similar benefit with respect to inhaled COPD therapies, pulmonary rehabilitation, and smoking cessation compared to males. Ongoing re-assessment of potential sex-differences in COPD may offer insights into the evolution of patterns of care and clinical outcomes in COPD patients over time.

Physiological Factors Associated with Unsatisfied Inspiration at Peak Exercise in Healthy Adults.

INTRODUCTION: Contrary to common belief, a growing body of evidence suggests that unsatisfied inspiration (UI), an inherently uncomfortable quality of dyspnea, is experienced by ostensibly healthy adults during high-intensity exercise. Based on our understanding of the mechanisms of UI among people with chronic respiratory conditions, this analysis tested the hypothesis that the experience of UI at peak exercise in young, healthy adults reflects the combination of high ventilatory demand and critical inspiratory constraints. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis design, data included 321 healthy individuals (129 females) aged 25 ± 5 yr. Data were collected during one visit to the laboratory, which included anthropometrics, spirometry, and an incremental cardiopulmonary cycling test to exhaustion. Metabolic and cardiorespiratory variables were measured at peak exercise, and qualitative descriptors of dyspnea at peak exercise were assessed using a list of 15 descriptor phrases. RESULTS: Thirty-four percent of participants ( n = 109) reported sensations of UI at peak exercise. Compared with the non-UI group, the UI group achieved a significantly higher peak work rate (243 ± 77 vs 235 ± 69 W, P = 0.016, d = 0.10), rate of O 2 consumption (3.32 ± 1.02 vs 3.27 ± 0.96 L·min -1 , P = 0.018, d = 0.05), minute ventilation (120 ± 38 vs 116 ± 35 L·min -1 , P = 0.047, d = 0.11), and breathing frequency (50 ± 9 vs 47 ± 9 breaths per minute, P = 0.014, d = 0.33), while having a lower exercise-induced change (peak-baseline) in inspiratory capacity (0.07 ± 0.41 vs 0.20 ± 0.49 L, P = 0.023, d = 0.29). The inspiratory reserve volume to minute ventilation ratio at peak exercise was also lower in the UI versus non-UI group. Dyspnea intensity and unpleasantness ratings were significantly higher in the UI versus non-UI group at peak exercise (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Healthy individuals reporting UI at peak exercise have relatively greater inspiratory constraints compared with those who do not select UI.