A Systematic Review of Escape Room Gaming in Pharmacy Education.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this review were to review the current literature on escape rooms in pharmacy education, determine their impact on educational outcomes, and identify areas for future research. FINDINGS: A literature search retrieved 14 reports, of which 10 studies met all of the study criteria. The majority of the studies used the escape room to review previously taught content (90%). More than half the studies (60%) assessed a change in a student's knowledge. One study testing a broad content area found a decrease in the before and after knowledge assessment from 70% to 67%, while other studies found before and after content knowledge increase. On average, 5.8 faculty facilitators and 33 h were needed for each activity. SUMMARY: This review suggests that pharmacy students enjoy escape rooms and perceive that it helps in their clinical knowledge and teamwork skills. Additionally, there is a potential that it can demonstrate an increase in content knowledge, particularly escape rooms that had a singular content focus. Faculty planning on implementing an escape room activity should give strong consideration to the preparation, delivery/logistics, and content.

A Systematic Review of Weight-Based Metoprolol for Acute Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Rate.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia encountered in the emergency department (ED) and when patients present in acute AF with rapid ventricular rate (RVR), it can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Primary treatment modalities are aimed at rate control with the two most common agents being intravenous metoprolol and diltiazem. Some evidence suggests that diltiazem may be more effective at controlling rate in these patients; however, the dosing strategies, pharmacologic differences, and study designs may play a role in the observation of these differences. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence for using weight-based metoprolol in the treatment of AF with RVR. The vast majority of studies comparing metoprolol and diltiazem for the treatment of acute AF with RVR compare a flat dose of metoprolol to a weight-based dose of diltiazem. Following a comprehensive review, only two studies have compared a weight-based dosing strategy of intravenous (IV) metoprolol versus IV diltiazem for this disease state. Overall, the two studies only contained 94 patients and failed to meet power. Beyond differing dosing strategies, differences in pharmacokinetics between the two medications (like the onset of action and metabolism) could have played a role in the differences observed in the studies. Further studies are warranted to provide better guidance on which agent should be used in the treatment of acute AF with RVR.

Comparison of nimodipine formulations and administration techniques via enteral feeding tubes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Nimodipine improves outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and current guidelines suggest that patients with aSAH receive nimodipine for 21 days. Patients with no difficulty swallowing will swallow the whole capsules or tablets; otherwise, nimodipine liquid must be drawn from capsules, tablets need to be crushed, or the commercially available liquid product be used to facilitate administration through an enteral feeding tube (FT). It is not clear whether these techniques are equivalent. The goal of the study was to determine if different nimodipine formulations and administration techniques were associated with the safety and effectiveness of nimodipine in aSAH. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter observational cohort study conducted in 21 hospitals across North America. Patients admitted with aSAH and received nimodipine by FT for ≥3 days were included. Patient demographics, disease severity, nimodipine administration, and study outcomes were collected. Safety end points included the prevalence of diarrhea and nimodipine dose reduction or discontinuation secondary to blood pressure reduction. Predictors of the study outcomes were analyzed using regression modeling. RESULTS: A total of 727 patients were included. Administration of nimodipine liquid product was independently associated with higher prevalence of diarrhea compared to other administration techniques/formulations (Odds ratio [OR] 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-3.67, p-value = 0.001, OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.37-5.55, p-value = 0.005, for old and new commercially available formulations, respectively). Bedside withdrawal of liquid from nimodipine capsules prior to administration was significantly associated with higher prevalence of nimodipine dose reduction or discontinuation secondary to hypotension (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.57-5.06, p-value = 0.001). Tablet crushing and bedside withdrawal of liquid from capsules prior to administration were associated with increased odds of delayed cerebral ischemia (OR 6.66, 95% CI 3.48-12.74, p-value <0.0001 and OR 3.92, 95% CI 2.05-7.52, p-value <0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that enteral nimodipine formulations and administration techniques might not be equivalent. This could be attributed to excipient differences, inconsistency and inaccuracy in medication administration, and altered nimodipine bioavailability. Further studies are needed.

Characterization of early versus late opioid iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in critically ill children transitioning from fentanyl -infusions to methadone.

OBJECTIVE: Methadone is used to prevent opioid iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) in children, but the optimal dose and overlap time with an opioid infusion have not been elucidated. The purpose was to compare clinical manifestations among patients who developed opioid IWS within 24 hours (early) versus ≥24 hours (late) of fentanyl discontinuation when enteral methadone was initiated. DESIGN: A retrospective, descriptive study. SETTING: Pediatric and cardiovascular intensive care units at a tertiary care health system. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-seven children received fentanyl infusions for ≥3 days and initiated on methadone prior to fentanyl discontinuation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary objective was to compare clinical characteristics between those with early versus late opioid IWS. Opioid IWS was defined as a Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 score ≥3 within 5 days of fentanyl discontinuation. Secondary objectives included a comparison of time to IWS, clinical characteristics, and risk factors among patients with and without IWS. RESULTS: Fifty children (74.6 percent) developed opioid IWS within a median time of 3.5 hours. No differences were noted for those with and without IWS. Thirty-seven patients (74.0 percent) with IWS developed early IWS. A higher percentage of males in the late versus early group developed IWS, 100 percent versus 51.4 percent, p = 0.002. The median overlap time with methadone and fentanyl was shorter in the early versus late IWS group without reaching statistical significance, 27.5 versus 64.0 hours, p = 0.127. CONCLUSIONS: The majority developed opioid IWS, with most developing early IWS, despite methadone initiation. Future studies should evaluate the optimal methadone dosing and overlap time to prevent opioid IWS.

Patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 outcomes on remdesivir according to baseline 4C mortality score.

BACKGROUND: Remdesivir was the first antiviral to show clinical benefit in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. Previous trials demonstrated a faster time to recovery in hospitalized patients treated with remdesivir vs placebo. Current guidelines recommend treatment with remdesivir based on hospitalization status, oxygen requirements, and time from symptom onset. However, other factors may be evaluated to determine disease severity and risk for progression. The 4C mortality score is a validated, eight variable score that may be used to categorize patients by mortality risk at the time of hospital admission for COVID pneumonia. The objective of this study was to determine if the 4C mortality score may be used to predict which patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 would benefit the most from remdesivir at the time of hospital admission. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study comparing time to recovery among hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 who were treated with remdesivir compared to those who were treated with standard of care (SOC). The primary outcome was time to recovery, defined as discharge from the hospital or no longer requiring supplemental oxygen, stratified by the 4C mortality score risk group. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, and time to recovery in patients who were started on remdesivir within 7 days from symptom onset vs after 7 days from symptom onset. A survival analysis was used to analyze time to recovery outcomes. RESULTS: Data was collected and analyzed for a total of 300 patients, of which 200 received remdesivir and 100 received SOC. Patients in the remdesivir group had a longer time to recovery compared to patients in the SOC group (6 days vs 4 days). This finding was driven by patients who were categorized to the intermediate risk and high risk mortality groups. Additionally, patients who received remdesivir had a longer length of hospital stay compared to those who received SOC (12 days vs 9 days). Remdesivir was not associated with an increased rate of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This study of patients admitted with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 found that patients who were treated with remdesivir had a longer time to recovery and a longer length of stay compared to those who received SOC. These findings add to the body of evidence questioning the benefit of remdesivir therapy among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Comparison of Amantadine, Modafinil, and Standard of Care in the Acute Treatment of Disorders of Consciousness After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Many patients who experience severe TBI have persistent disorders of consciousness. Amantadine and modafinil are used for some neurological disorders; however, a comparison of the 2 medications in TBI has not been reported. This study compared the effectiveness of amantadine, modafinil, and standard of care (SOC) on disorders of consciousness after TBI. METHODS: All adult TBI patients admitted between January 1, 2017, and September 31, 2020 who received amantadine, modafinil, or SOC treatments were screened. Data collection included: demographics, change in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), location of hemorrhage, medication duration, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, adverse drug reactions, and concomitant sedative medications. Patients in the amantadine and modafinil groups were matched 1:2 with patients who received SOC therapies. The primary outcome was change in GCS ≥ 3 from baseline to discharge. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients met inclusion criteria. Medications were initiated a median of 8 days from admission. Patients in the SOC group experienced a greater improvement in GCS and shorter hospital length of stay compared with amantadine. A change in GCS ≥ 3 from medication initiation to hospital discharge occurred in 46.5% of amantadine patients and 53.8% of modafinil patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, TBI patients did not benefit from amantadine or modafinil compared with SOC therapies, and no differences were found between medication groups. Further studies are warranted to determine whether the addition of amantadine or modafinil in the weeks after TBI provides benefit.

Role of Clinical Pharmacists in Intensive Care Units.

The cost of health care has been rising in the United States and globally and will continue to increase. Intensive care unit (ICU) care carries a significant portion of the cost for the hospitals. The Institute of Medicine and subsequent studies have suggested that medication errors account for significant morbidity, mortality, and cost, frequently encountered in the ICU. Over the past three decades, clinical pharmacists have emerged from dispensing medication to getting involved in direct patient care and have become an integral part of the multidisciplinary critical care team. Clinical pharmacists play a significant role in reducing medication errors and costs, medication reconciliation, antibiotic stewardship, and patient and health care provider education. This review will discuss the health care and ICU cost, the evolving role of clinical pharmacists in managing critically ill patients, and their contributions in the ICU to mitigate the risks, improve patient outcomes, and decrease health care costs.

Treatment of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis with Etanercept in a Pediatric Patient.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis is a rare, life-threatening skin disease with no consensus on adjunctive treatment, particularly in pediatric patients. We present the case of a 13-year-old previously healthy patient with drug-associated toxic epidermal necrolysis who experienced significantly shortened length of hospital stay and duration of symptoms compared with published literature when treated with 2 doses of etanercept 50 mg during 5 days.