Expert Opinion on P2Y12 Inhibitors Use in Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Focus on Ticagrelor.

Ticagrelor is a potent, oral P2Y12 inhibitor used as a part of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). New evidence has emerged for its use in ACS, which may be crucial for the Indian context. This brought together nearly 150 experts in ACS management across the country who reviewed the current evidence and discussed the same through a series of 10 meetings on an online platform. With all experts' agreement, the key expert opinions for the P2Y12 inhibitors use in ACS management were finalized. These include the following. In ACS patients aged <75 years, with diabetes, a history of stroke/transient ischemic attack, and chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor may be preferred over other P2Y12 inhibitors. It may also be preferred in the elderly above 75 years with clopidogrel is a suitable alternative in patients at high-risk of bleeding. Rates of stent thrombosis are lower with ticagrelor than clopidogrel. In patients managed with fibrinolysis, use ticagrelor after 48 hours if streptokinase was the fibrinolytic agent or it can be used after 12 to 24 hours if fibrin-specific fibrinolytic was used. Rates of major bleeding in patients treated with fibrinolysis are similar to clopidogrel. Prehospital administration may be preferred over in-hospital administration with expected bleeding rates similar to clopidogrel. Switching among P2Y12 inhibitors should be done with due consideration of their pharmacodynamics. At present, DAPT should be continued for 12 months with discontinuation after three to six months in patients with high bleeding risk. The use of low dose ticagrelor may be considered in cases with high-bleeding risk. DAPT or ticagrelor continuation beyond one year should be individualized considering ischemic and bleeding risks. Dyspnea is a common, mild, and transient and does not necessitate ticagrelor discontinuation. Severe dyspnea should be investigated thoroughly. In conclusion, ticagrelor (180 mg, 90 mg, and 60 mg doses), a potent antiplatelet is expected to reshape the antiplatelet use in the management of ACS.

Transradial access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: Consensus statement and recommendations for India: Advancing Complex CoronariES Sciences through TransRADIAL intervention in India - ACCESS RADIAL™: Clinical consensus recommendations in collaboration with Cardiological Society of India (CSI).

Radial access for cardiac catheterization and intervention in India has been growing steadily over the last decade with favorable clinical outcomes. However, its usage by interventional cardiologists varies greatly among Indian operators and hospitals due to large geographic disparities in health care delivery systems and practice patterns. It also remains unclear whether the advantages, as well as limitations of transradial (TR) intervention (as reported in the western literature), are applicable to developing countries like India or not. An evidence-based review involving various facets of radial procedure for cardiac catheterization, including practical, patient-related and technical issues was conducted by an expert committee that formed a part of Advancing Complex CoronariES Sciences through TransRADIAL intervention (ACCESS RADIAL™) Advisory Board. Emerging challenges in redefining TR management based on evidence supporting practices were discussed to formulate these final recommendations through consensus.

Management protocols for chronic heart failure in India.

Heart failure is a common clinical syndrome and a global health priority. The burden of heart failure is increasing at an alarming rate worldwide as well as in India. Heart failure not only increases the risk of mortality, morbidity and worsens the patient's quality of life, but also puts a huge burden on the overall healthcare system. The management of heart failure has evolved over the years with the advent of new drugs and devices. This document has been developed with an objective to provide standard management guidance and simple heart failure algorithms to aid Indian clinicians in their daily practice. It would also inform the clinicians on the latest evidence in heart failure and provide guidance to recognize and diagnose chronic heart failure early and optimize management.

Evaluation and efficacy of long length Pronova XR Bioabsorbable Polymer stent in the treatment of long coronary lesions.

AIM: The study aims an observational registry of the long and extra-long length (>33mm) Pronova XR stents in patients with long coronary lesions (>30mm) in a prospective real world study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Current study was conducted at Ruby Hall Clinic Pune, between July 2012 and July 2013 including 30 patients who underwent PTCA using long and extra-long Pronova XR stents. Among the stents used, one stent - 33mm, 2 stents - 38mm, 5 stents - 43mm and 25 stents were of 48mm in length. In particular average stent length for the study was 46.03mm and the average stent diameter was 3.09±0.41mm. For this study coronary angioplasty was performed using femoral approach and standard practice. Lesions were predilated using undersized balloons and study stent was deployed at pressure 7-26atm. (12.8±3.2atm.) The successful delivery of stent at the intended lesion with visual residual stenosis less than 50% was defined as Procedural success. Follow up studies were conducted for all the patients at 30days, 3 months and 6 months intervals. The predefined QCA parameters were calculated using Sanders Data System QCA plus software (Palo Alto, CA, USA). No procedural complication was observed during the whole study. 100% successful stent placement was achieved in all patients. Six months clinical follow-up was available for all patients. No adverse events (Acute closure, angina, REPCI, MI, death, sub acute stent thrombosis) or hospitalization was reported for any of the patients except one. The Quantative Coronary Core Lab analysis post 6 months showed well-flowing stent with average late lumen loss 0.10mm ±0.26. CONCLUSION: In patients with long coronary lesions and very long length stent implantation series, Pronova XR showed excellent in 6 months results. This is for the first time reported that use of long length Pronova XR stents has shown so low restenosis rate and absent of mortality in six month period. These results offer a new opportunity to single long length stenting.

Current practices of Asia-Pacific cardiologists in the utilization of bioresorbable scaffolds.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (A-BVS) are routinely used in the Asia-Pacific, there is little information on patient selection or deployment technique here. This document investigates the experiences of leading interventional cardiologists from the Asia-Pacific region with a focus on patient characteristics, deployment techniques and management. METHODS AND RESULTS: A detailed questionnaire was distributed to 28 highly-experienced interventional cardiologists ('Authors') from 13 Asia-Pacific countries. The results were discussed at a meeting on patient selection, technical consideration, deployment practices and patient management. Potential patient benefits of Absorb compared to metallic DES, the learning curve for patient selection and preparation, device deployment, and subsequent patient management approaches are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Current practices are derived from guidelines optimized for European patients. Differences in approach exist in the Asia-Pacific context, including limited access to imaging and frequency of occurrence of complex lesions. Nevertheless, the use of the Absorb BVS ('Absorb') in certain Asia-Pacific countries has flourished and practices here are continuing to mature.

A multicentre retrospective study to understand anti-platelet treatment patterns and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients in India (TRACE).

BACKGROUND: There is limited available information for treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with respect to outcomes, therapeutic agents and treatment practices. Our retrospective registry study collected and evaluated varying anti-platelet treatment strategies and outcomes of ACS patients who were admitted to 9 different tertiary care hospitals in India. This study was carried out to provide an insight to anti-platelet treatment patterns and analyze outcomes of ACS patients in India. METHODS: All the relevant data, including anti-platelet treatment strategies, outcomes and patient treatment compliance were collected from 500 ACS (defined as STEMI, NSTEMI and unstable angina [UA]) cases from January 2007 to December 2009. These ACS cases were randomly collected from the hospital records and included in the analysis. The patient follow up data was acquired either from the hospital records or via telephonic contact for a period of one year following the event. RESULTS: Out of 500 ACS patients, 59.8% had UA/NSTEMI and 40.2% had STEMI. On hospital admission, aspirin, clopidogrel, statins, beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) were used by 83%, 83%, 68%, 43.2% and 31.6% patients, respectively. On discharge, aspirin, clopidogrel, statins and beta-blockers were used by 90.2%, 88%, 80.6%, and 59% patients, respectively. The average patient compliance to statins, clopidogrel and aspirin was recorded as 74.28%, 69.7% and 68.66%, respectively during discharge and follow-up visits. Greater than 50% of ACS patients after discharge were lost to follow-up and as a result there was significant drop in the number of clinical events reported. CONCLUSION: This pilot study conducted in tertiary care centers in India showed that patients with ACS were more often diagnosed with UA/NSTEMI as compared to STEMI and reported maximum compliance to statins, clopidogrel and aspirin after discharge over 1 year follow-up. More ACS patients were lost to follow up that resulted in low reporting of clinical outcomes, following discharge upto 1 year.

Post-marketing study of clinical experience of atorvastatin 80 mg vs 40 mg in Indian patients with acute coronary syndrome- a randomized, multi-centre study (CURE-ACS).

OBJECTIVE: To generate comparative clinical data in Indian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in terms of safety and efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg vis-à-vis atorvastatin 40 mg MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 236 patients with diagnosed ACS (with TIMI Risk score > or = 3) within preceding 10 days were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 80 mg or atorvastatin 40 mg once daily for 12 weeks. Out of 236 patients, data for 173 was analyzed who had both baseline and post-baseline lipid assessment. The primary end point of the trial was percentage change in LDL-C at the end of treatment from baseline. Other end points were change in high sensitivity C reactive protein, incidence of increase in liver enzymes > or = 3 times upper limit of normal and incidence of myotoxicity (with or without elevation of creatinine phosphokinase) at the end of treatment. RESULTS: A dose-dependent response was observed with greater reduction of LDL -C in atorvastatin 80 mg (27.5% vs 19.04%) than that of atorvastatin 40 mg group. Both the treatment groups had a significant reduction (p < 0.001) in LDL-C at the end of 6 and 12 weeks in comparison to baseline. hs-CRP was also significantly reduced (p < 0.001) in both the treatment groups i.e. atorvastatin 80 mg (76.15%) and atorvastatin 40 mg (84.4%) from baseline at the end of 12 weeks. Both doses of atorvastatin were well tolerated. No patient had elevation of (> or = 3 times of upper limit of normal) liver enzymes or creatinine phosphokinase. One patient on atorvastatin 80 mg complained of myalgia. There were no dose-related differences in incidence of adverse events between two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The CURE-ACS trial indicated that atorvastatin 80 mg was more effective than atorvastatin 40 mg in terms of reduction in LDL cholesterol and was as safe and well tolerated as 40 mg dose in Indian patients with ACS.

Role of omega-3 ethyl ester concentrate in reducing sudden cardiac death following myocardial infarction and in management of hypertriglyceridemia: an Indian consensus statement.

INTRODUCTION: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most lethal manifestation of heart disease. In an Indian study the SCDs contribute about 10% of the total mortality and SCD post ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI) constitutes for about half of total deaths. OBJECTIVE: Given the limitations of existing therapy there is a need for an effective, easy to use, broadly applicable and affordable intervention to prevent SCD post MI. Leading cardiologists from all over India came together to discuss the potential role of n-3 acid ethyl esters (90%) of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 460 mg & docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 380 mg in the management of post MI patients and those with hypertriglyceridemia. RECOMMENDATIONS: Highly purified & concentrated omega-3 ethyl esters (90%) of EPA (460 mg) & DHA (380 mg) has clinically proven benefits in improving post MI outcomes (significant 15% risk reduction for all-cause mortality, 20% risk reduction for CVD and 45% risk reduction in SCD in GISSI-Prevenzione trial) and in reducing hypertriglyceridemia, and hence, represent an interesting option adding to the treatment armamentarium in the secondary prevention after MI based on its anti-arrhythmogenic effects and also in reducing hypertriglyceridemia.

Safety and efficacy of indigenously developed and manufactured bivalirudin in moderate/high-risk Indian patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the Bivaflo Registry.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment strategies for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include concomitant use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) and antithrombotic therapy such as aspirin, clopidogrel, and unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin. The "direct thrombin inhibitor" bivalirudin has been associated with better efficacy and safety than heparin. OBJECTIVE: The present study is performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an indigenously developed and manufactured bivalirudin (Bivaflo; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Mumbai) as the primary anticoagulation strategy during PCI in moderate-high risk patients with only provisional use of GPI. METHODS: This prospective multicentered registry enrolled 439 patients in 11 tertiary care centers across India. Patients who had ACS or other clinical/angiographic characteristics, which increase risk during PCI, were enrolled in the registry. Bivaflo was administered as a bolus dose of 0.75 mg/kg, followed by infusion at a rate of 1.75 mg/kg/h during the procedure and optionally 0.25 mg/kg/h for 4 hours after the procedure at investigator's discretion. GPI use was discouraged except as bailout. The primary endpoints were composite and individual incidences of death, myocardial infarction (MI), urgent revascularization, subacute stent thrombosis (SAT), or bleeding at day 7/hospital discharge, whichever was earlier. The secondary endpoints were 30-day composite and individual incidences of death, MI, urgent revascularization, and SAT. RESULTS: The mean age of the group was 58 +/- 10 years and 83% were males. Bivaflo was administered for a mean duration of 102 +/- 79 minutes, and 65% patients received Bivaflo infusion post-PCI. ACT values measured at 10 minutes after bolus and at the end of the PCI were found to be 339 +/- 110 and 336 +/- 104 seconds, respectively. GPI was provisionally used in only 4% (16) patients mostly due to new or suspected thrombus and obstructive dissection with decreased flow. At day 7/hospital discharge, there were no incidences of major adverse cardiac events or major bleeding. Minor bleeding occurred in only 4 patients (0.9%). The 30-day composite major adverse cardiac event rate was 0.68%. One death and two subacute thrombosis occurred during the 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSION: Bivaflo is safe and effective sole anticoagulation strategy during PCI of moderate-high risk patients. Bivaflo administration was associated with no major bleeding events and extremely low in hospital and 30-day MACE rate. These rates were lower than expected MACE rates for such a subgroup of patients based on historical controls.

Optimal platelet inhibition in patients undergoing PCI: data from the Multicenter Registry of High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Adequate Platelet Inhibition (MR PCI) study.

BACKGROUND: Optimal inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) may afford greater protection against ischemic events during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The objective of this study was to test several antiplatelet regimens in elective high-risk PCI patients by comparing different combinations of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and clopidogrel. METHODS: The study was a randomized open-label study at 3 heart centers in India. One hundred twenty patients were enrolled between July 2006 and September 2006. Patients were randomized to 1 of the 4 groups: group A--tirofiban, group B--eptifibatide, group C--tirofiban + clopidogrel 600-mg loading dose, and group D--eptifibatide + clopidogrel 600-mg loading dose. All patients received a clopidogrel maintenance dose after PCI. The primary outcome measure was the IPA assessed at 10 minutes, at 6 to 8 hours, and at 24 hours. RESULTS: The IPA was higher with high-dose tirofiban compared with eptifibatide at 10 minutes (95.88 +/- 5.85% vs 91.22 +/- 7.52%, P = .003) and at 6 to 8 hours (93.11 +/- 7.6% vs 85.45 +/- 11.03, P < .001). Significantly more patients achieved >95% IPA with the high-dose tirofiban regimen. CONCLUSIONS: This head-to-head study comparing high-dose tirofiban with double-bolus eptifibatide demonstrated higher degree of platelet inhibition with high-dose tirofiban at 10 minutes and at 6 to 8 hours in patients undergoing elective high-risk PCI. The addition of clopidogrel did not acutely extend the IPA from intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, but did so at 24 hours.